Economy
Rejection of Capitalism and Socialism
Corporatism for the People, Not The State
This is an Explanation of my form of Corporatism, which has heavy Overlap with Syndicalism and takes elements of Guild Socialism and Neocameralism, though not necessarily Socialist or Capitalist. It's different from Corporate Statism, The Nordic Model, Social Corporatism or others. It argues that the State (Central Authority) isn't a requirement for Class Collaboration, advocating for a Decentraly Planned Economy similar to Libertarian Socialism, but it also incorporates elements of Laiserr Fairre as well by allowing a stronger private sector alongside a more neuanced view of Private and Public Property, stating that an economy based on Heavy Unionisation, Christian Social Teachings, Local Economy, Tribal-like Organisation and essentially Economic Affinity groups is a good and efficient alternative to Capitalism and/or Socialism.
Social Neocameralism?
This is a joke term someone else made that was used to describe my beliefs of Patchwork and Corporations. However, the Corporations I ment are in the Corporatist sense, rather than a Capitalist/Corporatocratic sense unlike actual Neocameralism. I believe in heavy Unionisation alongside Distributism and encouragement to form privately owned corporations that collaborate with Unions.
Goverment
Rejection of Democracy
I personally reject democracy as something that's pretty much a tyranny of the majority and can't represent the people on the national scale. That said, I take influence from National Integralism from the idea of allowing democracy on the local level just not at the national level, as I believe that worker and local democracy should still exist as small communities can manage themselves on direct democratic principles, I would also like to add that polls should exist to voice opinions and inform experts and voice concerns to make the technate function.
A Non-Authoritarian Alternative to Democracy
I'm personally not an Anarchist, but I take heavy influence from National Anarchism and Post-Civ, I believe that Centralisation should only be a way of unification, not government. And Thus, I believe in free association and Tribalism. I don't fully oppose democracy, democracy after all was created as a system for city states and political patches(Ie: Patchwork), but at a national level a Technocracy is a good alternative to a monarchy/autocracy or a democracy at a national scale, as it allows a pragmatic, non-partisan system that doesn't become a cult of personality.
Cyberocracy for the Future
Minimal Government Intervention
Localism
Relationships
Main
Friends
Frenemies
Enemies
Self-Inserts
Friends
Neosyndicalism - Pretty much me but more Economically Left and a fellow Ukrainian Syndie
Frenemies
Gamerism - While a Racist Cringelord, you're clearly Meta-Ironic satire, so I can excuse you for that.
Meadowsin's Basilisk - You have good points, but I have critiques of you.
Neocarlism - A fellow NatSynd and a pretty cool guy, I'm not fully opposed to Reactionaryism but I would still not call myself a fan of it due to having some more modernist views.
Baxism - You have a lot of cool ideas, but why make a strong state amd then remove it?
Enemies
Brazilian Liberalism - Neolibtard №68420. You're Culturally quite decent and i respect your takes on it. But Authoritarian Democracy is literally my opposite, as it's both inefficient and coercive compared to a Technocracy/Cyberocracy that only serves the purpose of Stability.
Theoanarchism 
- I have a sneaking suspicion you were born due to incest.
Also you legit are a Lolcow, you're just asking for harassment.
Other
Favourite Quotes
- "I am an anarch – not because I despise authority, but because I need it. Likewise, I am not a nonbeliever, but a man who demands something worth believing in." -
Ernst Jünger - "Here we should also caution against the opposite idea—that is, of starting with the danger. Aiming simply to become more dangerous than one’s feared opponent leads to no solution—this is the classic relationship between reds and whites, reds and reds, and tomorrow perhaps between whites and non-whites. Terror is a fire that wants to consume the whole world. All the while the fears multiply and diversify. The ruler by calling proves himself such by ending the terror. It is the person who has first conquered his own fear." - Ernst Jünger
- "As I see it, there are two ways you can believe in democracy. One, you can believe in democracy as an end—that is, as a goal which is good in and of itself. Two, you can believe in democracy as a mechanism by which some other goal can be achieved.
- If you believe in democracy as an end in itself, I really cannot help you. You might as well believe in, say, water polo, as an end in itself. It is impossible to reason about ethical axioms.
- I think most sensible people who believe in democracy see it as a mechanism. Or more precisely, as a remedy." -
Curtis Yarvin aka "Mencius Moldbug
