 |
Work in Progress "I'll be done any day now!" - Still-Being-Drawnism This page is not done yet and may still contain inaccurate information or miss important details. |
 |
Self Insert "People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism This page is meant to represent MEADOWSIN's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission. |
 |
Infrequently updated "S l o w c h a n g e i s t h e b e s t c h a n g e !" - Decelerationism This page is not frequently updated and the creator doesn't have time to do changes, or might do them later |
"Heffalumps, prophetic ones from long ago
Haunted Mound archaic waste projected soul
Lie awake in shadow's arms
Disembodied voices in the dark
Deer God, it's gon' tear your soul apart
Hundred acres burning down in memoriam"
-
Ghost Mountain, HEFFALUMPS-
Flower Bomb, An Obituary For Identity Politics"The nomads that will dissolve capitalism are not cowboys but barbarians. Not self-attributed but a smear, the term barbarian was invented by Hellenistic Greeks as onomatopoeia for the blabber of those who could not speak their language. Lacking the capacity for reason, barbarian is used to paint certain foreigners as utterly black and without a single virtue. Not all strangers are vilified by the citizens of empire. Rather, barbarians have two defining characteristics: they refuse to be educated in the language of the polis and they act with a savage roughness that exceeds the boundaries of appropriateness."
- 
Andrew Culp, Dark Deleuze
Primary Aspects
- Universal National-Federalism with bounds that are Conceptual/Mythic not Ethnic/Identitarian
- Myths under capital-industrialism manufacture problems 'only capital and industry can solve,' purely so they can be perpetuated.
Unified/Post-Thoreau (see Source Documents/The Woods' Call)
Hyperstitional Mythmaking
Absurd Anarchism
Anti-colonialism
Surrealism
Occultisms 
Xpiritualism
HMH Theory
"The only way to deal with an unfree world is to become so absolutely free that
your very existence is an act of rebellion."
Albert Camus
To build is to be consumed by your tools, to work is to be put to death by your "ownness," and finding yourself to be identified within your absurdity is something everyone considered strange must grapple with. To be put off is to be unheard, to be unheard is to be worse than dead. For this reason, I argue for a antipolitics of art and beauty. This isn't me returning to my roots of situationism, I'm as absurd, but I want to speak in easy-to-read flowery text sometimes, prose, wax poetic, etc. I want to be able to do something unique and yet grounded in a backwards sense. This is the idea I will be building off of from this point, using syncretic and shattered tools, hoping they won't shatter me again.
What I think should be not a direct parallel to 
identity politics/economics as an operator/pseudodistractor in the US, but a stand-in, something to argue about, arguing about nationality or something similarly non-existent, conceptual. We should make myths in order to hold conspiracy over our federations, creating communities with a reason to oppose all other communities: non-corporate patchwork breaching the technical and occult. We should allow for a technonatural playhouse, built into a national-occultist system that is based in the ideas of patchwork and free association. If you find yourself more to be a part of Carcosa than Nihil, move. If you find yourself to be unexpressed by the myth of a grand monarch, move to the land of the patriotic rebel, if you find yourself unexpressed by the land of the rogue, etc.
This is partially the way it is now, but it's always through other factors that the decisions really get made. I think that for totality, a system of barter or simple communitarian agrarianism or whatever the people could possibly want could easily be established for the splinters, with the totality cooperating in the background to perpetuate the realities of waste and excess. We should allow for a myth-making and conspiracy to form, utilizing the nation as a pure, unfiltered distractor and motivator for false-real simulated conflict and economic simulated conflict posed as real conflict. All myth-simulation posed to strike at the future.
Do we live simply to be comfortable, do we live to find peace? Patchwork allows for everyone to find their happy medium, allowing additionally for true flow of desire. Very simply, this is not some dialectical struggle, this would be a struggle of millions of factors, splinter states, and above all, nations. The way forward is to make the citizen a mark of the nation, and to allow those who are disillusioned with that nation to simply and easily leave, with no regard to anything at all. This idea is a soft patchwork nationalism, a system not with a corporate board, but a simulation of our system. Imagine the Democratic and Republican party both advocated for bartering, self-sufficiency, and anti-capitalism, but they both had land where all Democrats/Republicans live. Essentially, to undermine the fundamentally shitty current position, this is similar to what I would want to achieve, a patchwork of "parties," ideas, simulations, and myths. There would be technological advancement, agrarianism, interplays of both, secular reason-based cultism, the occult, christ and buddha and everything- all in fractioned splinter states.
Make everyone feel like a rebel, loyal, a man of the nation, or a man against it. Give them an ideological-simulated unman to throw rocks at while you and they alike travel to find a world of their own liking. Building a future is not simply stratifying, but instead using the lighter simulated stratification of nationalism to fuel a continuing action from a world that would be dead if unified. The world is beautiful, complex, and absurd. Our structures and unstructures should be as well.
The point is to allow those that need a grand narrative and purpose to find that, through conflicts (only if they wish to participate in them), being a good 'community member,' or being simply honor-bound to their home nation's mythos. The point is also to let those that don't sit at home in cabins, avoiding entirely the splinternet and growing shit, or living in a communo-industrial space, or a VR-based society- generally just do whatever. This is the intent and purpose of it all, to utilize elements of the system we have to dissolve the parts we dislike.
Influences
Primary
Derrida- The Caretaker
Deleuze- Bataille
Guattari- Ghost Mountain
Thoreau
4lung 
Rosa Luxemburg
Fisher- CCRU
Hunter S. Thompson
Flower Bomb- Camus
Fumiko Kaneko
Discordianism
Secondary
Marx
Locke
Baudrillard
Land
Meta-Nomad
/
Vonnegut
H.P. Lovecraft
Meadowsin's Basilisk
Relations
biodegrading hyperfags
Hysteria Thought - Your work is beautiful, your art is purely flowing from your mentality and your flesh. I hope to see you in the great beyond, wherever that is.
Marijuanarchy - You're really well read, and a fantastic parallel to me, even if you seem to still have central doctrines. I like your adoption of Post-Anarchy, but even in your chaotic spear-splicings, you find yourself lost in stratifiers, clinging to outside-ideas rather than unique intuition or fully letting yourself dissolve into glee. Do what you wish, and when you read this, have a nice day.
Venatrixism - I like a lot of things about your ideology, and a lot of things you propose are parallel to me, but why do you cling to Zero? Why do you cling to conceptual center, working yourself up over where your center of belief lies? Why do you still adhere to ideology? Why do you adhere yourself to conceptual labels instead of creating-destruction like you're obviously infatuated with? Other than that, fantastic.
Rocksism - I like your absurd anarchy, and your dense care for anarchism not as it stands but as a communization-esque process. Overall pretty good, despite some definite complaints I still have.
fossilite pseudofags
Baxism - I like your post-Rousseau. Maybe avoid Hitlerisms... I don't know, you seem to be a super-stratifier even if you seem to like egoism... I don't understand you. Why are you so ultstructured? Why so much ultracontrolisms? Good otherwise.
Hyperfascism - While I despise fascism to some extent, I find you to generally be only as bad as most of the non-liberals I disagree with on this site. You fuse globalism and interaction between nations in a way that doesn't make globalism the still-death it usually is, although I can't call you particularly a friend to my ideology either, considering you're a fascist. Ultimately, you feel like if Huey Long was how people make him out to be in the midleft that supports him, and I can't really neg you for that. Imperialism is shit though.
shitasses (nonferrous)
Vistulism (
/
/
/
/
) - I physically shuddered while reading your page. I would like everyone to know, when I say communism, this is virtually everything I don't mean. Honest Democracy, Technocracy, blind technophilia, All beaurocracy and misguided FUNCTION OVER EVERYTHING ELSE... It's gross and it leaves a really bad taste in my mouth. How will the worker grow his food if you steamroll his garden for a more "deserving" building etc. Regular progressivism is also meh.. I just really get an abysmal feeling from reading this self-insert. Probably the best possible implementation of the shit you're trying to do, so... whatever I guess.
Schumacherianism
(
/
/
/
/
) - You worship concepts, just like everyone else. Concepts and spiraling, trying to rip whatever it is that is about to latch to your spine off before it gets there. Tell me if you want an actual critique, but I don't wanna dedicate time to something you won't read.
ferrous
brazlib - stratifying starkiller made of hateisms