You desire to create another society, that's the whole point of my criticism. If revolution is about arranging society in some way, and insurrection is letting us to arrange ourselves without any social coercion, how isn't Insurrectionary Communism revolutionary? I understand that you mean the revolution of everyday life, yet the genderless, stateless, moneyless society is only another society.
Absolutely, classical anarchists like Proudhon or Kropotkin are liberals, but post-leftists aren't. Plus Marx was a liberal too.