Yeah so this is my self-insert, I am 
Modular, a mythological deity writing about my own opinions about the world in my free time. I like 
Heraclitus, 
Gorgias, 
Machiavelli, 
Nietzsche, 
Saint-Point, 
Faye, and some other people I probably forgot. Some of my interests are 
philosophy, 
politics, 
theology, 
sociology, 
psychology, 
future studies, and 
science, though I also like learning about other stuff. Oh and I like 
duels, of course I like duels. And brownies. I love brownies. I also want more 
lesbian 
aristocrats.
Don't expect the page to ever be finished.
Beliefs
The National Question 
Analysis
Nationalism, understood as celebrating one's nation, has enormous problems. The age of nations can be described as over or in decline, deeply modernist and opposed to the idea of the medieval feudal state; however, the idea of the nation has certainly not disappeared, though it is in crisis. This can be easily seen from the fact that, similarly to a religious schism, there are different definitions for the "nation," and debates about which of these is the "correct" one are not few. Some argue that the nation is established by membership in a specific ethnic group (ethnic nationalism) or race (racial nationalism), by the language spoken (linguistic nationalism), by citizenship (civic or liberal nationalism), by religion (religious nationalism), by culture (cultural nationalism), and so on. This confusion dictated by modern decadence can be regarded as a popular delusion. However, unlike what many in the West think, nationalism is not to be discarded completely; it can and should be used with clear critiques in mind so that we can learn from our past mistakes. The problem lies in viewing globalization and the exaltation of the nation as antagonists and opposites of a dialectic, with globalization as the only outcome; instead, I believe the two can go hand in hand. What I consider irreconcilable is cosmopolitanism with any nationalistic sentiment. The former is the cause of the nation's collapse and decay, and vice versa. I first want to state that I regard racial and ethnic nationalism as essentialist Platonic diseases and synonymous with pure ignorance; we attack race but not ethnicity, and that causes the delusion of race to either be a more radical synonym for ethnicity or an ethno-delusion. Ethnicity is a huge fraud on which most ordinary people fall; identity will never be found in ethnicity as it would be a pure illusion. The concept of ethnicity, so much studied by science - the hypocritical science - is something that should be attacked relentlessly and made disappear from the minds of ordinary people. Dear Plato, how much better would the world be without your essentialism and idealism? There is no ethnicity, only subtleties added together and artificial groups of all different people bound by anything but this, as we now can trust people different from us. Even the state and citizenship, being artificial concepts, cannot be at the basis of a nation and a common identity. What divides man is the way of doing things. Harmony and stability can exist if one has the same way of doing things. The same customs, the same culture. It is for this reason that I call myself a cultural nationalist; we are divided by our culture. Skin color and somatic features are of no importance.
Solution
WIP
A ruthless criticism of all that I don't like
This is all objectively correct. 
Humanism
Paternalism
Socialism
Utilitarianism
Antinatalism
Efilism
Asceticism
Christianity
Franciscans
Reactionaryism
Traditionalism
Conservatism
Progressivism
Primitivism
Fascism
Aphorisms
- I intend to desecrate the Human. Not enough have I done yet, nor will I ever do, but I don't need to: the future will do it for me.
- The Human is dead, and so is God. Leave Modernity's fallen glory to the coward, for I proclaim the beginning of a new aeon.
- The Orbs do not care about the binary, for conflict makes harmony. Man's obliviousness made him blind, and the true embracer is cast off.
- The quest for the holy grail of man's essence is yet to have a conclusion, though the conclusion is chimeric.
- To have a word with God is to wrangle with man.
- The illusory is real, as reality is the illusory.
- Cowardice is the ethos of the late-modern man.
- What does not overcome itself decays.
- The conservative is purblind, the traditionalist recidivist.
- There is no need for the delirium of race if there is that of ethnicity.
- The one with no enemies is one of no substance.
- "Everyone is blind but me" is the saying of both the enlightened and the fool.
- My essence is waging a relentless war against all essences.
- Beneath the conservative there is only cowardice.
Authors I want to read
Ernst Jünger
Aleksandr Dugin
Carl Schmitt
Julius Evola
Georges Bataille
Guillaume Apollinaire
Fyodor Dostoevsky
Osamu Dazai
Max Weber
Alain de Benoist
Suggestions
Relations
The Masters
People I like and pretty much agree with.
The Warriors
Not bad, worthy of some criticism.
The Blessed
Disagreeable but respectable.
Neo-Anthony Bax Thought - I appreciate your nationalistic sentiments and I think you explain them well, though yours is a profoundly modernist type of nationalism which I don't like. Your philosophy is interesting and respectable, even if I do have some criticism (moral nihilism not being one of those). Your economical views are the worst thing on your page, mainly because I dislike socialism and I consider it to be outdated and not a viable alternative to capitalism anymore, but also because of your definition of it (dirigisme is not socialism what are you talking about). I think your argument against suicide (based on Camus' absurdism) is weak and can be addressed best with a Nietzschean viewpoint. Overall I think your thought is quite sound, especially if we compare it with other people's arguments.
Agricoetism - I mean I respect it, and we both like greco-roman culture, but modernism is outdated, and I don't like agrarianism. At least we both like Jao.
The Sorcerers
Too different from my views.
Necro-Anarchism - You've fallen in the ethnic pit, old friend. We have some similarities, such as wanting duels to make a comeback in society, futurism, and national palingenesis, but you are just incredibly delusional. It's depressing seeing you wanting to revive something that has never existed in the first place.
The Humble
Poor argumentation and viewpoints.
Voidvill Rajandeep - I'm sorry but this is pure larp. You can't agree on both Schopenhauer and Nietzsche on the tragedy, as they have opposing views on the matter. Fumiko never talked about morality. You misunderstand Camus' absurdism so badly it's absurd (you can take this as a joke or not I don't care), philosophical rebellion against the absurd isn't negation. You put a dichotomy between nature and man when that's what biomechanicalism - at least in my view - tries to surpass. You can't like both Camus and Mainländer. You completely misunderstand Floofel's Burn Everything Beautiful in the World section. And there's no way you think Columbine and the Holocaust were necessary that's fucked up.
- - I must apologize for inaccuracy as most philosophers I have not read but have gotten there ideas from youtubers, academic or eh, Mainlander influenced my thought from video sources I watched of his thought, along with Camus, the video explaining absurdism for me was a comedic and very hilarious one, so that could be why I may not understand it properly, I will read Camus after I read the multiple anarchist thought in a tab, I have forgotten most of Schopenhauer's views on the tragedy since I watched a rather long ago, so I may have to change, that, also, my Floofel (R.I.P.) section is not finished and may be removed, most of what I know of Nietzsche is from Jonas Ceika, and Weltgeist. Also, I do remember Fumiko talking about morality and how it was used by civilization, either I misread or you just forgot which is fine. Also it seems you misunderstand my event thing, it was an arbitary tier list of events not an advocacy neccessarily Columbine and Holocaust were at the bottom because I despised it, ironically it seems we both misunderstood something, it wasn't a list of things I thought were neccessary it was just a ranking of world events, B = Bad
Vistulism - You're basically an ultra-utopian with extra steps. I was similar to you, though I was an atheist. I think your ideology is outdated and unworkable in a costantly accelerating postmodern society. But hey, at least we're both cultural nationalists! (even though you don't want to create a new culture)
Brazilian Liberalism - No. You're pro-queer at least.
Hoodism - Outdated views and I don't think you really understand futurism to be honest, but I'd have to talk to you to make sure.
The Outcasts
The worst of the worst.
Rigby Thought - Delusional Brazilian n.23604. Pro-democracy yet plutocratic, coward cuckservative, anti-liberal liberal, anti-capitalist capitalist, unironic corporatocratic without being a NRx (which would be the only way to make corporatocracy actually work), anti-union for braindead reasons, anti-queer (conservatives are masters at projecting when they call gay people pedophiles), gender essentialist (even Dugin, which is a lot more traditionalist than your fake-ass weakness-worship conservatism, is against that and critiques that), anti-choice (you don't care about children in the slightest, don't lie and go learn biology), pedo-worshipper (Catholic, so basically a fake Christian) (Paganism is increasingly becoming more popular here in Europe, cope), thoughtless environmentalism, braindead geopolitical analysis of the world, and braindead philosophy. Democracy is dangerous because people like you could take power.
The Laughing Stock
People like these are why bullying should make a return.
Add List
Add yourself at the bottom if you wish to be added.
Proletariat Builderism
Voidvill Rajandeep (I would like to be readded, I have decided to follow your criticism and try to make it less deemed "LARP-y" probably as an attempt to rejoin Xenosphere, Xenosphere is for radicals I am a radical, altho an armchair one)
D4sh Apoliticism - add me or i will cry.
Gallery
Political Tests
-
Dozen Values
Notes
- ↑ Public use of hard drugs would be highly forbidden, though private consumption would be legalized.
- ↑ Better than pimps and street prostitution.
- ↑ This is also about theology but mainly about cultural differences.
- ↑ Not the Nazi type obviously. Positive eugenics is better.
- ↑ This needs an entire section, I'll write it someday.