imported>Nfan No edit summary |
imported>Polcompbot m (Removed templates) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
But those do: [[File:Authcon.png]] [[File:Plcn2.png]] [[File:Tradcon.png]] [[File:Natcon.png]] | But those do: [[File:Authcon.png]] [[File:Plcn2.png]] [[File:Tradcon.png]] [[File:Natcon.png]] | ||
== | == Tell me you're retarded without telling me you're retarded, that's basically social conservatism == | ||
{{ | {{User|Matteel}} - Only thing modern day conservatives conserve are massive debts and the wealth of the rich elite. Not to mention its absolutely terrible cultural policies that only regress society backwards. | ||
==Good idea, but in practice worthless== | ==Good idea, but in practice worthless== | ||
{{KaiserKlausMouse}}: The problem with Conservatism is that unlike progressivism, when they lose, they never get back up again, because once some woke law gets out into place, just wait 10 years and conservatives will be defending it. When progressives fail to put a woke law into place, they just try again. This is why I don't really like calling myself a conservative anymore, because I don't want to conserve the status quo. | {{User|KaiserKlausMouse}}: The problem with Conservatism is that unlike progressivism, when they lose, they never get back up again, because once some woke law gets out into place, just wait 10 years and conservatives will be defending it. When progressives fail to put a woke law into place, they just try again. This is why I don't really like calling myself a conservative anymore, because I don't want to conserve the status quo. | ||
== The problem with modern conservatism== | == The problem with modern conservatism== | ||
They are ok with technological advancement. You cannot advocate for traditional values while liking advanced technology, because the latter will break the former. This is why neocons are not conservative - too technological. | They are ok with technological advancement. You cannot advocate for traditional values while liking advanced technology, because the latter will break the former. This is why neocons are not conservative - too technological. | ||
While I like the prospect of Roe v. Wade being abolished, the issue is how many advocating for such don’t tackle the root issue first, and oppose social programs - | |||
Latest revision as of 20:32, 22 March 2023
These ones don't conserve: 
But those do: 
Tell me you're retarded without telling me you're retarded, that's basically social conservatism
- Only thing modern day conservatives conserve are massive debts and the wealth of the rich elite. Not to mention its absolutely terrible cultural policies that only regress society backwards.
Good idea, but in practice worthless
- The problem with Conservatism is that unlike progressivism, when they lose, they never get back up again, because once some woke law gets out into place, just wait 10 years and conservatives will be defending it. When progressives fail to put a woke law into place, they just try again. This is why I don't really like calling myself a conservative anymore, because I don't want to conserve the status quo.
The problem with modern conservatism
They are ok with technological advancement. You cannot advocate for traditional values while liking advanced technology, because the latter will break the former. This is why neocons are not conservative - too technological.
While I like the prospect of Roe v. Wade being abolished, the issue is how many advocating for such don’t tackle the root issue first, and oppose social programs -