×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 2,528 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki

CommentStreams:F510388e7e1f628c0a784c09627de345: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
 
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Not an idealist - I also dislike it. It is an influence. Just like you have influences who were Christian.  
Not an idealist - I also dislike it. It is an influence. Just like you have influences who were Christian.  


I don’t have a hatred for any of those, nor a great love. I am indifferent if you read the small section that I assume you passed over, certainly not my writings.  
I don’t have a hatred for any of those, nor a great love. I am indifferent if you read the small section that I assume you passed over, certainly not my writings.  
Line 5: Line 6:


Because if you did, you would find that my approach is adaptation, or appropriation. Certainly not your alteration of society towards your satanist system, which is not adaptation but mere change from one system to another. Exactly what you critique others for. Pitiful.
Because if you did, you would find that my approach is adaptation, or appropriation. Certainly not your alteration of society towards your satanist system, which is not adaptation but mere change from one system to another. Exactly what you critique others for. Pitiful.
Lastly, blindly following a fictional figure, is certainly not adaptation, but servitude to ideas. Stagnation and fixity to a single conception. It can have no adaptation without deriding its source.

Latest revision as of 00:05, 3 March 2024

Not an idealist - I also dislike it. It is an influence. Just like you have influences who were Christian.


I don’t have a hatred for any of those, nor a great love. I am indifferent if you read the small section that I assume you passed over, certainly not my writings.


Because if you did, you would find that my approach is adaptation, or appropriation. Certainly not your alteration of society towards your satanist system, which is not adaptation but mere change from one system to another. Exactly what you critique others for. Pitiful.


Lastly, blindly following a fictional figure, is certainly not adaptation, but servitude to ideas. Stagnation and fixity to a single conception. It can have no adaptation without deriding its source.