No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
Tag: Rollback |
||
| (47 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|image = Iktaismball.png | |image = Iktaismball.png | ||
|caption = | |caption = | ||
|aliases = | |aliases = Leduism | ||
|alignments = | |alignments = {{Info/Left Unity}} {{Bold|to}} {{Info/AuthLefts}}<br>[[File:Cultcenter.png]] [[:Category:Cultural Center|{{Bold|{{Color| #8BC34A | Culturally}}}} {{Bold|{{Color| #9C27B0 | Syncretic}}}}]] | ||
|greatest_achievement = | |greatest_achievement = | ||
|gangs = | |gangs = | ||
|influences = | |influences = [[File:Reactsoc.png]] [[Reactionary Socialism]]<ref group="note">"Reactionary Socialism" refers to an economic system, not a reaction in the classical sense.</ref><ref group="note">"Reactionary Socialism" is, in some interpretations, the closest to my economic views, but I'm not per se 'influenced' by it in technicality. Please read the body.</ref><br> | ||
[[File:Community.png]] [[Communitarianism]]<br> | |||
[[File:Volknat.png]] [[Volkish Nationalism]]<br> | |||
[[File:Uninat.png]] [[Universal Nationalism]]<br> | |||
[[File:AntiIndust.png]] [[Neoluddism|Criticism of modern conditions]]<br> | |||
[[File:Farm.png]] [[Agrarianism]]<br> | |||
[[File:Local.png]] [[Localism]]<br> | |||
|philosophy = | |philosophy = | ||
|influenced = | |influenced = | ||
| Line 22: | Line 28: | ||
|year = 2023 | |year = 2023 | ||
|country = | |country = | ||
|founder = | |founder = [[User:Ledu]] | ||
|theorists = | |theorists = | ||
|ideas = | |ideas = | ||
| Line 40: | Line 46: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Bold|Iktaism}} is the self-insert ideology of [[User:Ledu]]. This page is supposed to outline my views to the best of my ability. | |||
Nature, and thus the nation and human nature, are at the core of my political beliefs. | |||
== {{Bold|Fundamental Tenets}} == | |||
*Respect and preservation of all nature, including human nature. | |||
*National self-determination and absolute independence. | |||
*Collective ownership over the all the daily economy through national solidarity. | |||
*Abolishment of unnecessary and harmful 'progress', including technologies. | |||
== {{Bold|Views}} == | |||
=== {{Bold|Economics}} === | |||
The economy is to be reconstructed from the ground up into a system of national solidarity, mutual aid, and decentral planning; in which the means of production are held in common through the state, family, collective, and workers. | |||
The solidarity system of mutual aid, with the assistance of the state and locality, is to be developed to a point where money is made obsolete and de facto abolished in ordinary life situations. | |||
=== {{Bold|État}} === | |||
The nation, as the sole natural and legitimate basis for political power, must be congruent with the state. The state is the embodiment of the national will which is in fully reflected by the apparatus through the means of collective consciousness and democracy. | |||
The state is the guard of the nation, the protector of it and its interests; it controls the monopoly on violence, technology, and economy. | |||
The decisions of the state are guided by popular democracy within the framework of a constitution which safeguards the nation. | |||
=== {{Bold|Culture}} === | |||
The traditional homogeneous culture of the land is practiced in the village collective while non-harmful social progress is embraced. | |||
=== {{Bold|Technology}} === | |||
The state is the arbiter and holder of technology, it controls all that is needed for the defense and welfare of the nation but are of no positive use to the people thereof. | |||
=== {{Bold|Diplomacy}} === | |||
The sole diplomatic responsibility of the state is self-preservation and national welfare which does not come at the expense of other nations. | |||
The state is to trade its industrially produced, and excess, consumer goods with the outside world as a means of profit. | |||
The state may promote the ideals of national self-determination on the international stage as long as it is not threatened by repercussions for doing so. | |||
== {{Bold|Specific Issues}} == | |||
<tabber> | |||
Hide = | |||
|-| | |||
On Nationalism = | |||
=== {{Bold|Universal Nationalism}} === | |||
|-| | |||
On Immigration = | |||
|-| | |||
On Technology = | |||
|-| | |||
On Nature = | |||
|-| | |||
On the LGBT = | |||
|-| | |||
Daily Economics = | |||
|-| | |||
State Economics = | |||
|-| | |||
</tabber> | |||
== {{Bold|How to Draw}} == | == {{Bold|How to Draw}} == | ||
[[File:IktaFlag.png|thumb|Flag of Iktaism]] | [[File:IktaFlag.png|thumb|Flag of Iktaism|285px]] | ||
#Draw a ball with a black outline. | #Draw a ball with a black outline. | ||
#Fill with dark red. | #Fill with dark red. | ||
| Line 53: | Line 132: | ||
#Add the eyes. | #Add the eyes. | ||
#Done! | #Done! | ||
== {{Bold|Relations}} == | |||
<tabber> | |||
Very Positive = | |||
Very good ideologies that I can agree with. | |||
=== {{Bold|+1}} === | |||
=== {{Bold|±0}} === | |||
=== {{Bold|-1}} === | |||
|-| | |||
Positive = | |||
Ideologies that are mostly good, but still have a lot of bad. | |||
=== {{Bold|+1}} === | |||
=== {{Bold|±0}} === | |||
=== {{Bold|-1}} === | |||
|-| | |||
Neutral = | |||
Ideologies that have some good and some bad. | |||
=== {{Bold|+1}} === | |||
=== {{Bold|±0}} === | |||
=== {{Bold|-1}} === | |||
*[[File:Bax.png]] [[Baxism]] ([[File:Altru Ego.png]]/[[File:Enlightenment.png]]/[[File:FreeJacobin.png]]/[[File:DirecteddSoc.png]]) — I don't understand many of your views, particularly those philosophical, but I can clearly tell that there should be plenty we could agree on. Especially in regards to universal nationalism, I think, even if I am confused at your nuanced view of nationhood. I also must comment that I love the aesthetics of your page. | |||
*[[File:Cyber_Thought.png]] [[Cyber Thought]] ([[File:Formal.png]]/[[File:Georgist.png]]/[[File:NeoMerc.png]]/[[File:NeoMed.png]]) — While we disagree on economics and especially the structure of the state, I do feel a sense of familiarity and odd comfort in reading the later sections of your page. I believe that we could find common ground in some areas, we just disagree on how to reach and organize it. | |||
|-| | |||
Negative = | |||
Ideologies that are bad, but not the worst on earth. | |||
=== {{Bold|+1}} === | |||
=== {{Bold|±0}} === | |||
*[[File:MeadowBasiliskIcon2.png]] [[Meadowsin's Basilisk]] ([[File:AnCommunization.png]]/[[File:DarkDeleuze.png]]/[[File:PostMarxism.png]]/[[File:Postciv.png]]) — There is too little text on the page for me to accurately judge it, I think; however from what I read now, our biggest agreement would lie in anti-consumerism and technology. I strongly oppose things like your individualism and anti-nationalism however. | |||
=== {{Bold|-1}} === | |||
*[[File:Brazlib.png]] [[Brazilian Liberalism]] ([[File:Neolib.png]]/[[File:3way.png]]/[[File:Civnat.png]]/[[File:Hedonism.png]]) — Awful neoliberal. | |||
*[[File:NCortexball.png]] [[N.Cortexism]] ([[File:Neolib.png]]/[[File:3way.png]]/[[File:Prog.png]]/[[File:Imp.png]]) — Same as above but even worse. | |||
|-| | |||
Very Negative = | |||
Very terrible ideologies that are evil and anti-human. | |||
=== {{Bold|+1}} === | |||
*[[File:StockMarketC.png]] [[Romantic Egoism]] ([[File:Romanticism.png]]/[[File:Post-an.png]]/[[File:Anticiv.png]]/[[File:Existentialist_Anarchism.png]]) — There is not enough text for a accurate evaluation, but from the influences and the little written I do see this seems like evil and anti-human egoism. | |||
=== {{Bold|±0}} === | |||
=== {{Bold|-1}} === | |||
|-| | |||
</tabber> | |||
== {{Bold|Gallery}} == | |||
<gallery> | |||
LeduSapply.png|SapplyValues | |||
</gallery> | |||
== {{Bold|Notes}} == | |||
<references group="note" /> | |||
{{#css: | {{#css: | ||
| Line 61: | Line 212: | ||
#cosmos-pageBody-content {width: -webkit-calc(50% - 160px);width: calc(75% - 0px);} | #cosmos-pageBody-content {width: -webkit-calc(50% - 160px);width: calc(75% - 0px);} | ||
}} | }} | ||
[[Category:Nationalists]] [[Category:Socialists]] [[Category:Left Unity]] | |||
Latest revision as of 08:21, 16 July 2024
 |
Self Insert "People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism This page is meant to represent Ledu's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission. |
Iktaism is the self-insert ideology of User:Ledu. This page is supposed to outline my views to the best of my ability.
Nature, and thus the nation and human nature, are at the core of my political beliefs.
Fundamental Tenets
- Respect and preservation of all nature, including human nature.
- National self-determination and absolute independence.
- Collective ownership over the all the daily economy through national solidarity.
- Abolishment of unnecessary and harmful 'progress', including technologies.
Views
Economics
The economy is to be reconstructed from the ground up into a system of national solidarity, mutual aid, and decentral planning; in which the means of production are held in common through the state, family, collective, and workers.
The solidarity system of mutual aid, with the assistance of the state and locality, is to be developed to a point where money is made obsolete and de facto abolished in ordinary life situations.
État
The nation, as the sole natural and legitimate basis for political power, must be congruent with the state. The state is the embodiment of the national will which is in fully reflected by the apparatus through the means of collective consciousness and democracy.
The state is the guard of the nation, the protector of it and its interests; it controls the monopoly on violence, technology, and economy.
The decisions of the state are guided by popular democracy within the framework of a constitution which safeguards the nation.
Culture
The traditional homogeneous culture of the land is practiced in the village collective while non-harmful social progress is embraced.
Technology
The state is the arbiter and holder of technology, it controls all that is needed for the defense and welfare of the nation but are of no positive use to the people thereof.
Diplomacy
The sole diplomatic responsibility of the state is self-preservation and national welfare which does not come at the expense of other nations.
The state is to trade its industrially produced, and excess, consumer goods with the outside world as a means of profit.
The state may promote the ideals of national self-determination on the international stage as long as it is not threatened by repercussions for doing so.
Specific Issues
Universal Nationalism
How to Draw
- Draw a ball with a black outline.
- Fill with dark red.
- Draw a black circle in the centre.
- Outline the black circle with white from both sides.
- Draw a gold oak leaf in the centre of the circle.
- Add light orange midrib and veins to the leaf.
- Outline the leaf in black and white.
- Add the eyes.
- Done!
Relations
Very good ideologies that I can agree with.
+1
±0
-1
Ideologies that are mostly good, but still have a lot of bad.
+1
±0
-1
Ideologies that have some good and some bad.
+1
±0
-1
Baxism (
/
/
/
) — I don't understand many of your views, particularly those philosophical, but I can clearly tell that there should be plenty we could agree on. Especially in regards to universal nationalism, I think, even if I am confused at your nuanced view of nationhood. I also must comment that I love the aesthetics of your page.
Cyber Thought (
/
/
/
) — While we disagree on economics and especially the structure of the state, I do feel a sense of familiarity and odd comfort in reading the later sections of your page. I believe that we could find common ground in some areas, we just disagree on how to reach and organize it.
Ideologies that are bad, but not the worst on earth.
+1
±0
Meadowsin's Basilisk (
/
/
/
) — There is too little text on the page for me to accurately judge it, I think; however from what I read now, our biggest agreement would lie in anti-consumerism and technology. I strongly oppose things like your individualism and anti-nationalism however.
-1
Brazilian Liberalism (
/
/
/
) — Awful neoliberal.
N.Cortexism (//
/
) — Same as above but even worse.
Very terrible ideologies that are evil and anti-human.
+1
Romantic Egoism (
/
/
/
) — There is not enough text for a accurate evaluation, but from the influences and the little written I do see this seems like evil and anti-human egoism.
±0
-1
Gallery
-
SapplyValues
