Talk:Keynesian School: Difference between revisions

Help

Latest revision as of 19:48, 2 April 2023

As capitalistic as you can get while still being tolerable. This is one of the only good forms of capitalism and it certainly has done good, even if it could move a bit to the left. -

- While I am sceptical about the large spending programms, since these could get the state into too much debt and that type of Economics can lead to stagnation like it did in Japan (Capitalism always gets into a crisis when it cannot grow further) It did a pretty well job in building up Europe after WWII and I like how it makes Market worshippers mad.

Better than Chicagoan, Marxian or Austrotard. Still, too fiscally irresponcible.

Great back in it’s time, but antiquated nowadays

Don’t get me wrong, I’d use this as a transition system and it certainly has done good back then, and produced based figures like FDR. But nowadays it’s not really reliable and is way too milquetoast for my likings. We need Distributism or Market Socialism nowadays -

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{Comment|[[File:SomeCrusade.png]] SomeCrusader| Two Keynesians are going for a walk when they happen across a dog turn lying next to the sidewalk. The first says to the second, "I'll pay you $1000 to eat that". The second agrees; he eats the dog turd and accepts the $1000.
-A few minutes later they come across another dog turd. This time it is the second Keynesian who offers $1000 to the first if he eats it. The first agrees, eats the dog turd and gets his $1000 back.
-After the walk the first Keynesian says to the second, "You know, I don't think that was such a good idea. Now we're both sick and neither of us is any richer".
+As capitalistic as you can get while still being tolerable. This is one of the only good forms of capitalism and it certainly has done good, even if it could move a bit to the left. -
-The second replies, "What are you talking about? We created two jobs and increased the GDP by $2000!"}}
+{{User|Pantheon}} - While I am sceptical about the large spending programms, since these could get the state into too much debt and that type of Economics can lead to stagnation like it did in Japan (Capitalism always gets into a crisis when it cannot grow further) It did a pretty well job in building up Europe after WWII and I like how it makes Market worshippers mad.
+Better than Chicagoan, Marxian or Austrotard. Still, too fiscally irresponcible.
+==Great back in it’s time, but antiquated nowadays==
+Don’t get me wrong, I’d use this as a transition system and it certainly has done good back then, and produced based figures like FDR. But nowadays it’s not really reliable and is way too milquetoast for my likings. We need [[Distributism]] or [[Market Socialism]] nowadays -

Latest revision as of 19:48, 2 April 2023

Great back in it’s time, but antiquated nowadays

Recent changes