imported>Chirotesla No edit summary |
imported>Polcompbot m (Removed templates) |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Based ngl== | ==Based ngl== | ||
Can help people of a similar culture unite and be more powerful together. And I’m kinda this when it comes to the Slavic world, a Pan-Slav Federation would be nice (provided it’s done through the will of the people) - | Can help people of a similar culture unite and be more powerful together. And I’m kinda this when it comes to the Slavic world, a Pan-Slav Federation would be nice (provided it’s done through the will of the people) - | ||
==ummm== | ==ummm== | ||
It seems interesting… we shouldn’t ally with ethnonats and ultranats. - {{ | It seems interesting… we shouldn’t ally with ethnonats and ultranats. As I’m Asian, a Pan-Asian also would be interesting and good except Japanese Empire style. So I’m kind of this. Nah I’m just civic nationalist. - | ||
==Amazing== | |||
{{User|KaiserKlausMouse}}: Except for pan-Africanism, that would never work, too many cultures. | |||
== I mean... == | |||
{{User|Matteel}} - Maybe if the unification was under a democratic referendum and if the ethno and racial nats were booted out. But still quite the stretch | |||
==CELTICS UNITE== | |||
A unified celtic federal republic would be so based. | |||
More like a radical neoliberal capitalist tax heaven federation. | |||
==nah== | |||
Pan-slavists can piss off - [[User:Chcknwngs|Chcknwngs]] ([[User talk:Chcknwngs|talk]]) 16:27, 1 May 2022 (UTC) | |||
==Bringe== | |||
On one hand I support unity between people of similar cultures, but on the other hand I support national and cultural sovereignty - | |||
Latest revision as of 20:29, 22 March 2023
Based ngl
Can help people of a similar culture unite and be more powerful together. And I’m kinda this when it comes to the Slavic world, a Pan-Slav Federation would be nice (provided it’s done through the will of the people) -
ummm
It seems interesting… we shouldn’t ally with ethnonats and ultranats. As I’m Asian, a Pan-Asian also would be interesting and good except Japanese Empire style. So I’m kind of this. Nah I’m just civic nationalist. -
Amazing
- Except for pan-Africanism, that would never work, too many cultures.
I mean...
- Maybe if the unification was under a democratic referendum and if the ethno and racial nats were booted out. But still quite the stretch
CELTICS UNITE
A unified celtic federal republic would be so based.
More like a radical neoliberal capitalist tax heaven federation.
nah
Pan-slavists can piss off - Chcknwngs (talk) 16:27, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Bringe
On one hand I support unity between people of similar cultures, but on the other hand I support national and cultural sovereignty -