CommentStreams:6beea21e4922cc81c3988f909fd44a1f

1. Our movement is just based on those who shed off their class. We oppose those remaining petit bourgeoisie and other middle classes as dying reactionary segments of society.

2. Yes though we disagree with the post-left on their dismissal of communism and we seek to go beyond them in ways.

3. We support the post-anarchist conception of anarchy as a form

4. We support councils in the sense of the Situationist conception of them in the everyday life which can destroy the division between production, the workplace, and daily life, destroying the subjectivity of the proletariat and therefore the proletariat by allowing it self-management in all aspects of its daily existence while also playing an active role in the smashing of Capital's machinery daily. (Keep in mind even communizers like Dauve ended up admitting this was unique and praised the Situationists for their approach to councils). This is not a glorification or a fixed systemization, the councils Debord and Vaniegem and the rest of the Situationists supported are fluid in nature.

5. Civilization is a rotting corpse based entirely on the discipline and domestication of man. Communism as the barbaric insurrection of the nomad is the negation of civilization. We are not against industry, rather the systems of power based around industry.

6. Technological growth is literally impossible to stop and we are not opposed to technology as a whole but instead governance via technology, disciplinary use of technology.

7. We want to surpass naturalism/ecology.

8. We support organic communal planning though we aren't opposed at all to mutual aid