m (Weedman moved page Marijuanarchy/Self Insert Relations to Post-Marijuanarchy/Self Insert Relations) |
No edit summary |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
COMMENT HERE IF YOU WANT TO BE ADDED | COMMENT HERE IF YOU WANT TO BE ADDED | ||
== | == Relations == | ||
*[[File: | *[[File:HelloThere314Icon.png]] [[HelloThere314ism]] - There is mostly nothing to disagree in your theory, putting aside obvious things like TAZ and approach to technology but we talked about it. Only thing I may dislike here is that your philosophy is overly intellectualized. Don't understand me wrong, knowledge and intellectualism is a very important values to me, but there is lack of creativity, kinda tasteless, you simply derive ideas from actually great philosophers but I prefer to make new things, even if they are seemingly contradictory. | ||
*[[File:Nightshade.png]] [[Venatrixism]] - Okay ish. Still not creative enough. Add some schizo elements to your communization please. | |||
*[[File:Shellshock.png]] [[Shellshocked Communism]] - Based because insane, still democratic confederalism influence is kinda repulsive. Point on capitalist realism is interesting though. | |||
*[[File: | *[[File:Rock icn.png]] [[Rocksism]] - You are like in between of classical and contemporary anarchists, that's not a bad thing. I like autonomous zones, the idea of squatting and community gardens is okay as well. But it all is temporary. Community either becomes disciplinary or collapses. That's a "natural" thing and all anarchists should accept and affirm it. Reliance on so called community is something that must be removed. No community will give me what I deserve, but I can use them, of course with respect toward other individuals. Ideological cooperation will always fail, from my own experience only cooperation that may survive is apolitical one. Where there is an ideology there is war. Finally, social ecology is awful humanist garbage. Good that you are creative and you try to make your own concepts. | ||
*[[File: | *[[File:StockMarketC.png]] [[Romantic Egoism]] - I strongly relate to your connection of traditional romantics, Stirner, Nietzsche and postmodernists or post-structuralists, this is great. Mutualist economy is okay. Anti civ is great. I don't get why De Maistre but the rest is very nice. | ||
*[[File: | |||
*[[File: | |||
Latest revision as of 17:57, 13 March 2024
COMMENT HERE IF YOU WANT TO BE ADDED
Relations
HelloThere314ism - There is mostly nothing to disagree in your theory, putting aside obvious things like TAZ and approach to technology but we talked about it. Only thing I may dislike here is that your philosophy is overly intellectualized. Don't understand me wrong, knowledge and intellectualism is a very important values to me, but there is lack of creativity, kinda tasteless, you simply derive ideas from actually great philosophers but I prefer to make new things, even if they are seemingly contradictory.
Venatrixism - Okay ish. Still not creative enough. Add some schizo elements to your communization please.
Shellshocked Communism - Based because insane, still democratic confederalism influence is kinda repulsive. Point on capitalist realism is interesting though.
Rocksism - You are like in between of classical and contemporary anarchists, that's not a bad thing. I like autonomous zones, the idea of squatting and community gardens is okay as well. But it all is temporary. Community either becomes disciplinary or collapses. That's a "natural" thing and all anarchists should accept and affirm it. Reliance on so called community is something that must be removed. No community will give me what I deserve, but I can use them, of course with respect toward other individuals. Ideological cooperation will always fail, from my own experience only cooperation that may survive is apolitical one. Where there is an ideology there is war. Finally, social ecology is awful humanist garbage. Good that you are creative and you try to make your own concepts.
Romantic Egoism - I strongly relate to your connection of traditional romantics, Stirner, Nietzsche and postmodernists or post-structuralists, this is great. Mutualist economy is okay. Anti civ is great. I don't get why De Maistre but the rest is very nice.
