imported>DarknightYuusha-11 mNo edit summary |
imported>BeryAb No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==this is real conservatism== | ==this is real conservatism== | ||
too economically right and maybe a bit too hardline, and that it's newer adherents are infested with neonazi larpoids, but nonetheless, a positive force for America and actually conserves something other than forever wars and simping for Israel, unlike [[File:Necon.png]] this imperialist | too economically right and maybe a bit too hardline, and that it's newer adherents are infested with neonazi larpoids, but nonetheless, a positive force for America and actually conserves something other than forever wars and simping for Israel, unlike [[File:Necon.png]] this imperialist | ||
==Not good== | |||
{{UserBeryAb}} - Aside from the fact that Neo-Nazis like Fuentes and his followers hijacked this movement, I think it was never that great to begin with. Sure, opposing neo-conservatism is good and all, but really, they oppose interventionism merely for the sake of it meaning that you'll have to get involved with the outside world, not genuine concern for those affected by neo-conservative terrorism. Also, paleoconservatives these days (not counting Fuentes) should embrace fiscal conservatism more; it's listed in the ideological influences, but most of them are too comfortable with an inflated welfare state. | |||
Revision as of 04:15, 31 December 2021
not bad
Too economically right a lot of the time and I hate how a lot of the newer ones are neonazi larpers, but overall good for present day America
this is real conservatism
too economically right and maybe a bit too hardline, and that it's newer adherents are infested with neonazi larpoids, but nonetheless, a positive force for America and actually conserves something other than forever wars and simping for Israel, unlike 
this imperialist
Not good
Template:UserBeryAb - Aside from the fact that Neo-Nazis like Fuentes and his followers hijacked this movement, I think it was never that great to begin with. Sure, opposing neo-conservatism is good and all, but really, they oppose interventionism merely for the sake of it meaning that you'll have to get involved with the outside world, not genuine concern for those affected by neo-conservative terrorism. Also, paleoconservatives these days (not counting Fuentes) should embrace fiscal conservatism more; it's listed in the ideological influences, but most of them are too comfortable with an inflated welfare state.