imported>BeryAb mNo edit summary |
imported>Matteel No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Not good== | ==Not good== | ||
{{UserBeryAb}} - Aside from the fact that Neo-Nazis like Fuentes and his followers hijacked this movement, I think it was never that great to begin with. Sure, opposing neo-conservatism is good and all, but really, they oppose interventionism merely for the sake of it meaning that you'll have to get involved with the outside world, not genuine concern for those affected by neo-conservative terrorism. Also, paleoconservatives these days (not counting Fuentes) should embrace fiscal conservatism more; it's listed in the ideological influences, but most of them are very comfortable with an inflated welfare state. | {{UserBeryAb}} - Aside from the fact that Neo-Nazis like Fuentes and his followers hijacked this movement, I think it was never that great to begin with. Sure, opposing neo-conservatism is good and all, but really, they oppose interventionism merely for the sake of it meaning that you'll have to get involved with the outside world, not genuine concern for those affected by neo-conservative terrorism. Also, paleoconservatives these days (not counting Fuentes) should embrace fiscal conservatism more; it's listed in the ideological influences, but most of them are very comfortable with an inflated welfare state. | ||
==Cringe and bluepilled== | |||
{{Comment|{{UserMatteel}}|Most of the modern day followers of this ideology are inbred neo-nazis and white supremacists. Even not in the modern day it was never good to begin with.}} | |||
Revision as of 04:46, 31 December 2021
not bad
Too economically right a lot of the time and I hate how a lot of the newer ones are neonazi larpers, but overall good for present day America
this is real conservatism
too economically right and maybe a bit too hardline, and that it's newer adherents are infested with neonazi larpoids, but nonetheless, a positive force for America and actually conserves something other than forever wars and simping for Israel, unlike 
this imperialist
Not good
Template:UserBeryAb - Aside from the fact that Neo-Nazis like Fuentes and his followers hijacked this movement, I think it was never that great to begin with. Sure, opposing neo-conservatism is good and all, but really, they oppose interventionism merely for the sake of it meaning that you'll have to get involved with the outside world, not genuine concern for those affected by neo-conservative terrorism. Also, paleoconservatives these days (not counting Fuentes) should embrace fiscal conservatism more; it's listed in the ideological influences, but most of them are very comfortable with an inflated welfare state.