imported>2x2Master (Replaced content with "I'll get around to porting it over here one day") |
imported>2x2Master No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
2x2Masterism is the ideology and self insert of the user 2x2Master. 2x2Masterism has strong [[File:Indiv.png]] {{PCBA|Individualism|individualist}} tendencies, and his political model is largely modeled after [[File:Clib.png]] {{PCB|Classical Liberalism|classical liberalism}}. | |||
Economically speaking, he is an [[File:Econlib.png]] {{PCB|Capitalism|economic liberal}}, favouring [[File:DvCommerce.png]] a free market economy and [[File:DvProperty.png]] private property. Civically, he seeks to [[File:Liberty.png]] limit the role of the government in society, fully implement [[File:Semidirect.png]] {{PCB|Democracy|semi-direct democracy}} and generally [[File:Civlibert.png]] give as many rights to the individual as possible. | |||
He identities with [[File:Progconf.png]] {{PCB|Progressive Conservatism|progressive conservatism}}, believing that while both [[File:Conservative.png]] {{PCB|Conservatism|conservatism}} and [[File:Prog-u.png]] {{PCB|Progressivism|progressivism}} have their own merits, he sees that both usually focus on meaningless [[File:Idpol.png]] collective identities at the expense of the expense of individuality, not to mention that he believes the two ideologies are often too dogmatic to be viable at all. | |||
Revision as of 17:53, 25 July 2023
2x2Masterism is the ideology and self insert of the user 2x2Master. 2x2Masterism has strong 
individualist tendencies, and his political model is largely modeled after 
classical liberalism.
Economically speaking, he is an 
economic liberal, favouring 
a free market economy and 
private property. Civically, he seeks to 
limit the role of the government in society, fully implement 
semi-direct democracy and generally 
give as many rights to the individual as possible.
He identities with 
progressive conservatism, believing that while both 
conservatism and 
progressivism have their own merits, he sees that both usually focus on meaningless 
collective identities at the expense of the expense of individuality, not to mention that he believes the two ideologies are often too dogmatic to be viable at all.