No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
}} | }} | ||
== | ==Plan To Read About== | ||
===General=== | |||
[[File:Metamodernism.png]] Metamodernism<br> | [[File:Metamodernism.png]] Metamodernism<br> | ||
[[File:Frankfurt.png]] Frankfurt School<br> | [[File:Frankfurt.png]] Frankfurt School<br> | ||
[[File:Acidcomf.png]] Acid Communism<br> | [[File:Acidcomf.png]] Acid Communism<br> | ||
[[File:Neomarx.png]] Neo-Marxism in general | [[File:Neomarx.png]] Neo-Marxism in general<br> | ||
[[File:Councom.png]] Council Communism<br> | [[File:Councom.png]] Council Communism<br><br> | ||
===Currently Reading=== | |||
[[File:Vpered.png]] Red Star<br> | |||
[[File:Hind.png]] Bhagavad-gītā<br> | |||
===Plan To Read After=== | |||
[[File:IndCom.png]] The Soul of Man under Socialism | |||
===Beginning=== | ===Beginning=== |
Revision as of 07:33, 9 December 2023
Self Insert "People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism This page is meant to represent D4sh's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission. |
Plan To Read About
General
Metamodernism
Frankfurt School
Acid Communism
Neo-Marxism in general
Council Communism
Currently Reading
Plan To Read After
The Soul of Man under Socialism
Beginning
What is D4sh Thought
Caatinguism or D4sh Tought is a Leninist ideology but not the bad kind Inspired by various authors and revolutionaries linked the Fourth International, such as Nahuel Moreno, Trotsky himself and Posadas yep, Posadism isnt just "nuke the planet" you.. uhm.. can see more below
Internationalism Has Been Misunderstood
Of course, when talking about Trotskyism, many automatically associate it with internationalism, as if it were a specific doctrine of Trotskyism, when in fact, internationalism is a fundamental part of Marxism in general
Internationalism is not only against nationalism and desiring international revolution, internationalism is you recognizing that: no matter the strength of the peasantry or the proletarian, socialism in one country It is unfeasible, the capitalist system has reached an international level for many years, with international exchanges and governance, an isolated socialist nation will still have a lot of difficulty in overcoming this international capital, Expanding the revolution is a matter of life and death for any revolution
The Permanent Revolution Was Misunderstood
Another misunderstood, and sometimes purposely distorted, concept by the overwhelming majority of today's "Marxists" The theory of permanent revolution presents a solution to the problems posed by semi-colonial countries and third world countries, Let's start from the basics:
Trotsky analysed in his time that there were countries where capitalism had barely developed, In which in several of these countries, workers' demands that in theory could be realized under capitalism (such as the right to vote) become more and more limited, Trotsky asserts that the only solution for countries of dubious democracy is a revolution, Trotsky also refutes the false assertions that he completely ignored the peasantry, Trotsky places the peasantry as a key player in Third World revolutions.
The revolution does not stop at the national level
The revolution on a national level is only the first step, the vanguard party, leading the workers and peasantry, must take upon itself the monopoly of violence and overthrow every remnant of the national-liberal bourgeoisie, But it doesn't stop there! On the contrary, the revolution at the national level is only the first step, to become a permanent revolution, it must reach a continental, international scale and ends only on a global level, an isolated socialist nation cannot consider that its revolution is over.
To be a communist, it is necessary to be against Lula
Lula's election was not a victory, the PT elections are not victories, President Lula is a member of the bourgeoise, Constantly involved in corruption schemes and agreements with the "center" and bankers to consolidate political power, since his first victory in 2002, little has been done to really improve Brazil's situation, other than of course, giving power to reactionary unions/syndies, giving the false impression that the workers are with him.
There is a traumatic feeling of the military dictatorship (1964-1985) everyone thought in 2002 that those responsible would finally be guilty, everyone had hopes for a better democracy and, perhaps, an agrarian reform, but not even that the years of government of the Workers' Party were able to concede, it is clear that Lula is a tool to distract the workers from the real enemies.
The theory of permanent revolution reveals itself here, showing that even the most basic demands cannot be met, the only way out is revolution.
That communist southerner! - I heard you were a reformist in the past, I'm glad you changed, probably the only things we differ on are the form of organization or the lack of it and about culture, I don't believe that all the culture of the past should be erased, but I believe that it should be reformed/changed, culture is still a source of morale and joy for the proletarian, totally changing with it is something.. dangerous.. Overall, you look great, 9/10
Lucy's father - wip
Bring on the guillotine - YES YES YES YES, Let's guilotine all the social democrats 😈
Now seriously, I think we've just distanced ourselves in terms of philosophy, universal nationalism isn't that bad and your "Culturally Revolutionary" is pretty based, I just find your admiration for.. Certain ideologies suspicious, 8,5/10
anarcho-hitlerist - (cool page btw) Definitely a revolutionary, already up a tier, but I mostly disagree with your economic method And I don't have an opinion as to your philosophy
I hope you like this image 🥺
literalmente um fascista 🙄 - Liberal Stalinism, Liberal Stalinism, LIBERAL STALINISM
But honestly, you're not that bad for a liberal, but you support death penalty for crimes against the state in general? i think im gonna die- 2,5/10
Esoteric Dengist - I'm not going to lie, you're pretty confusing, but I liked the vibe?? you ain't got nothing similar to me, but there are a few things that catch my eye , kinda like Meadowsin but far-right
- - How exactly am I confusing I would like to know how I can fix my ideology so it becomes more sensible