×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 2,497 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki

Vistulism: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{BetterIdeology
{{BetterIdeology|
|title=[[File:Vistula3.png]] {{Color|#B22222|Vistulism}}
|title=Vistulism
|aliases=Cooperative Guild Socialism
|quote=We exist for a reason - to exist even greater!
|alignments=
|alignments=
*{{Info/Left Unity}} to {{Info/LibLefts}}
*[[File:Leftunity.png]] {{GlowText|Left|#F9BABA}} {{GlowText|Unity|#C8E4BC}}
*{{Info/Socialists}}
*[[File:Lingnat.png]] {{GlowText|Linguistic|#0055FF}} {{GlowText|Nationalists|#bbbbbb}} (sorta<ref>I think learning language is respectful and useful and people who learn the language should have a much higher chance of citizenship than those who don't..</ref>)
*{{Info/Technocrats}}
*[[File:Fut3.png]] {{GlowText|Futu|#00BFFF}}{{GlowText|rists|#FFEB3B}} (personally denied)<ref>I think my ideas may come across as Futurist for some, considering my rejection of now to chase a future of action, extreme progress and technology, but I am not 100% sure if I would be actually considered one. For now, I deny the idea of being one.</ref>
*{{Info/Democratic}}
*[[File:CultDiss.png]] {{GlowText|Cult of Advance|#7A7154}}<ref>The cult of advance is still an idea but it believes the people should look up to advancement (innovation e.g. transhumanism, exploration, breaking shit that isn't supposed to be broken) and turn away from theistic drool (stunters of the human) and also reject the modern state of humans "being inviolable".</ref><ref>(Read my remark on Futurism, it ties with this.) reject the now, embrace the new, the innovative, dynamic, violent, anti-authority, anti-status quo. I dislike the cultural left for its focus on empowerment rather than on equalization and I hate the right for the same reason - it wishes to empower the majority. I would say the left is better as it wishes to empower more than the other does, but I personally  wish to empower neither, I wish to bring them at a horizontal and then smash everything they knew into an oblivion so everything must be recollected from scratch. If you believe bringing to horizontal is "empowering" oppressed, you must redefine rights and oppression. We are all oppressed, all power is void for all we all serve the establishment, we all serve what we were raised with. We must reject even the core values of man. We must be at a level fine with putting pedophiles in wood chippers after impaling their bodies with robotic spears. I wish for counter-culture to spread this message, let it not be territorialized by corporations.</ref>
|econinfluences=
*[[File:POSTHUMANISMICON.png]] {{GlowText|Post-Humanists|#00A0FF}}<ref>Are you scared of us controlling our evolution? Are you worried about progress? We must advance ourselves, reject the idea of "staying human". We are where we take us, the sky isn't even near our limit for it is infinitely too low.</ref>
*[[File:Guildsoc.png]] {{PCB|Guild Socialism}}
|philo=
*[[File:Cooperative_Socialism.png]] {{PCB|Market Socialism}}
*[[File:Anti-Humanism.png]] {{PHB|Anti-Humanism}}<ref>"To be human" does not have any meaning, if we change extremely, we are still human in my perspective. Embrace change. Adapt.</ref>
|civicinfluences=
*[[File:New_Atheism1.png]] {{PHB|New Atheism}}<ref>Religion loves indoctrinating children, something which I am against for it lives in their values for the rest of their lives. State Atheism has the same problem.</ref>
*[[File:Dem.png]] Vistulian Democracy<ref>Not to be confused with: [[Vistulian Democracy]]</ref>
*[[File:Agnostic.png]] {{PHB|Agnosticism}}<ref>God (the enemy) and Satan (the other enemy) might exist. Who knows? I hate them both, they limit human progress with their incentives. If a bank robber (God) says if you don't give your items (worship him), he will shoot you (make you burn alive for eternity), are they inviting you or forcing you? (I think Pope Francis II is a good person by the way.)</ref>
**{{Arrow}} [[File:TemplateMasked.png]] Candidate Anonymity
**{{Arrow}} [[File:Technocracy.png]] Technocratic Candidates
**{{Arrow}} [[File:Antiparty.png]] Non-Partisan Democracy
**{{Arrow}} [[File:Constitution.png]] Constitutionalism
}}
}}


Vistulism is the ideology of [[User:NewMaritimeVistula|Mari]] after he decided [[File:Awaj.png]] Anarchism is unrealistic for the goals he wishes to achieve. He now accepts a government to protect the people and regulate a model of market socialism where the market is composed of workers cooperatives and all workers cooperatives have an "implied contractual relationship with the public" as wanted in [[File:Guildsoc.png]] Guild Socialism.<br>
This is a big work in progress lol so some things may reference non-existent things. It probably seems like a LARP right now.


The form of market interference Vistulism wishes for is the regulation of products, in order to ensure their quality and that they follow legislation (e.g. allergy legislation so clear display of ingredients for food). Vistulism also wishes for protectionist trade policies to empower a more self-sufficient Britain although he does believe that high levels of imports are still needed due to how unrealistic full self-sufficiency is.
{{#css:
@import url('https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Open+Sans&family=Raleway:wght@500&display=swap');


To rid the British electorate of governments which utilise such disgusting strategies like populist wank, Vistulism wishes for a form of technocratic democracy in which candidates are chosen by the public but people must be fit for the job in order to register as a candidate. He also wants to abolish the bicameral system in favor of a unicameral approach with the supreme legislature as the "House of Technocrats". (He is still not 100% certain on this part meaning changes are to come.)<br>
img{image-rendering:pixelated;}


=Theory=
body {
 
font-family: 'Raleway', sans-serif;
==Intellectual Property==
}
As all cooperatives are founded on the common aspiration of benefiting the public, I believe firm intellectual property should be abandoned. I have more agreement for individual intellectual property such as not copying art someone online made.
}}
 
=Opinions (Political)=
 
==Upper==
 
==Middle==
 
==Lower==
 
==Death by Impalement==

Revision as of 23:29, 23 January 2024


This is a big work in progress lol so some things may reference non-existent things. It probably seems like a LARP right now.


  1. I think learning language is respectful and useful and people who learn the language should have a much higher chance of citizenship than those who don't..
  2. I think my ideas may come across as Futurist for some, considering my rejection of now to chase a future of action, extreme progress and technology, but I am not 100% sure if I would be actually considered one. For now, I deny the idea of being one.
  3. The cult of advance is still an idea but it believes the people should look up to advancement (innovation e.g. transhumanism, exploration, breaking shit that isn't supposed to be broken) and turn away from theistic drool (stunters of the human) and also reject the modern state of humans "being inviolable".
  4. (Read my remark on Futurism, it ties with this.) reject the now, embrace the new, the innovative, dynamic, violent, anti-authority, anti-status quo. I dislike the cultural left for its focus on empowerment rather than on equalization and I hate the right for the same reason - it wishes to empower the majority. I would say the left is better as it wishes to empower more than the other does, but I personally wish to empower neither, I wish to bring them at a horizontal and then smash everything they knew into an oblivion so everything must be recollected from scratch. If you believe bringing to horizontal is "empowering" oppressed, you must redefine rights and oppression. We are all oppressed, all power is void for all we all serve the establishment, we all serve what we were raised with. We must reject even the core values of man. We must be at a level fine with putting pedophiles in wood chippers after impaling their bodies with robotic spears. I wish for counter-culture to spread this message, let it not be territorialized by corporations.
  5. Are you scared of us controlling our evolution? Are you worried about progress? We must advance ourselves, reject the idea of "staying human". We are where we take us, the sky isn't even near our limit for it is infinitely too low.
  6. "To be human" does not have any meaning, if we change extremely, we are still human in my perspective. Embrace change. Adapt.
  7. Religion loves indoctrinating children, something which I am against for it lives in their values for the rest of their lives. State Atheism has the same problem.
  8. God (the enemy) and Satan (the other enemy) might exist. Who knows? I hate them both, they limit human progress with their incentives. If a bank robber (God) says if you don't give your items (worship him), he will shoot you (make you burn alive for eternity), are they inviting you or forcing you? (I think Pope Francis II is a good person by the way.)

Recent changes

  • RealLibtard • 00:06
  • RealLibtard • Yesterday at 23:56
  • Nebeler • Yesterday at 23:41
  • SocialistWorldRepublic • Yesterday at 23:41