×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 2,525 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki

Venatrixism: Difference between revisions

Line 148: Line 148:


== My name is not important. What is important is what I'm going to read ==
== My name is not important. What is important is what I'm going to read ==
* [[File:Nietzsche.png]] Joyful Science
* [[File:Bataille.png]] Visions of Excess
* [[File:Bataille.png]] Visions of Excess
* [[File:Bataille.png]] The Thirst For Ahnihilation
* [[File:Bataille.png]] The Thirst For Ahnihilation

Revision as of 17:51, 29 August 2024

Self Insert
"People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism

This page is meant to represent JAcket's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission.

In Development
"I'll stop reading eventually." - Left Communism

This page is still in development due to ongoing reading by JAcket, multiple things may change drastically.


Welcome to my page, be ready for a whole lotta yapping about Stirner, Marxoid Theory, and other shit in the future


Icons: (///)

"eliminated at the time of the rise of exchange value. All human activity is exploited by capital. We can rephrase Marx's statement, "Labor, by adding a new value to the old one, at the same time maintains and eternizes [capital] " 2 to say : all human activity "eternizes" capital."

- Jacques Camatte


"When the worldly egoist had shaken off one higher power, such as the Old Testament, the Roman Pope, etc., then immediately there was one seven times higher over him again, such as faith in place of the law, the transformation of all laypeople into priests in place of the limited body of clergy, etc. He was like the possessed man whom seven devils entered when he thought he had freed himself of one."

- Max Stirner

Venatrixism is a communist theory founded on Egoism, the belief that we have surrendered our cause to external forces that seek to destroy our self-being for their ideals. If we want freedom from this, we must embrace our irrational desires, which we try to suppress for the gods we follow. This leads me to communism, a system where we can truly express ourselves through the arts of your works. This can only happen through councils, which are the organic organizations of our irrationalism. Now we need to find the way out. Revolution through historical materialism has failed; capital no longer negates itself because it has escaped the fixed ideas of its captor. Therefore, we must use a new method, one that embraces the logic of capital, then we will find a way to twist this logic into its own demise; then the exit is found.

Views

Government

If I was to finally get out of this hellish earth, I would have to(with the help of my mates—whom made it out of the fire with me) establish the society of midgard. This is why I propose workers' councils as the communist form of governance, think about it communism was at its best when the councils had a place and were prominent. Look at the russian revolution for example, during the start of the war when the beginning of bolshevik sediment was starting to sink onto the map, it was disorganized still yet; the only real form of organization to ever had was the organic state of the irrationalist own form of expression, workers' councils. Russia was finally consumed by the commune, until the workers gave power to the party and even for lenin, they knew communism was losing its grasp into plato's dream under the control of that mad fox. The reason the workers gave into the party in the first place was because, the times of russian capitalism where at its lowest point of development and had no real workers they didn't have enough of a fighting change so they collaborating with the peasantry so to give power to the party and not themselves, we lost communism and after capitalism ate both revolution and insurrection, praxis itself was found dead and so came my fellow communist—xenogothic to rule the outside and forever be lost, this talk about the revolution is for a different time though. This is just one of the many examples of why councils are the irrationalist example of governance. But I am yet to get to the bottom of this; shall we?

The Meat of Irrational Organization

With the Presents of the Party-Form

The Anarchist Argument

Economics

Economics is the fundamental part, it's why governments exist, lets get started shall we? The communist way for the economy is simple, you get what you build and finally you get back the necessary items of work. If you don't work well you get nothing but what is left over, if you can't work the community will help you along. Everything is held in common, now what do I mean by that? Well in effect private property only allows the person who bought it to mess with its grounds, this is the bounds of the legality of things at least. In communism, my friends will be able to decide what happens to this so called property in the capitalist sense with the ease of a pack, the decision of what happens is held in common no longer with the rein of the landowner. In a communist society a true communist society there will be councils which decide where it ends and begins. There'll be no communism if there is no system of organization for communism, it would revert back to anarchy of production which we communist cannot stand for it is a product of capitalism. Councils are the new life of the land—the life line of the factories; the land will be free from the crisis of bread.

Daily Life of Work in Communism

Why Communism

Pauper's Life in Communism

Social

Truly the most idiotic battle in human history up to this point—I fancy none of them. I cannot possibly ground myself in the social norms that capital has imposed upon us even more harshly than before the bourgeoisie devoured itself. The socialite wars are nothing more than humans domesticated by some sort of self-negation, turning our experiences into a hodgepodge of rules that rarely change unless the old ways implode under the logic of capitalism’s ever-shifting direction. This so-called society, founded on these social views, has seen nothing but defeat in the face of real change. Instead, we witness the rise of meaningless squabbles that twist and turn into the Whiggish abyss of a so-called 'greater future,' achievable only through this or that social view. Society has been domesticated to such a level that even the mere idea of social progress has been commodified, turned into the products of social insurrections that now pop up alongside the ads of various campaigns, all fighting for the same thing. Truly, self-thinking has been defeated by capitalism’s grasp. The Progressives fight for the continuation of the Whiggish interpretation of History, an interpretation proven wrong multiple times—even in my lifetime, with events like COVID. But this means nothing to them. Even regimes that attempt to turn back time and fade the Whiggish dream are met with stubborn resistance, as they continue to fight for this inescapable future that seems forever out of reach. When society falls—as it will in the long run—they will blame their evil brother, the reactionaries, those who oppose the bright, optimistic way of the happy few. But before we dive into the rant about my oh-so-reactionary policies on this social abuse, we must mention the elephant in the room: the conservatives. They are as conservative as the Progressives, so much so that they share the same Whiggish history. They claim that progress is only achievable by maintaining the status quo. There is not much differentiating them except in name—the one above all. Now they call me a revolutionary! No, no—the 'status quo' is revolutionary in its own right. It changes so rapidly that there is nothing truly conservative about it, except its desire to maintain the status quo of social advancement. Then, with the force of a hundred fists, we must explore reaction once again. By 'reaction,' I mean opposition to the status quo, which is my true foe. The man who sees past the lies of Whiggish history embraces the anarchy of history, a form of reaction that existed before any real conception of the social and its history. The true status quo is that there is none—run free with your soul. To be a reactionary in this sense is to believe that all social ideas are products of the machine, perpetuating the machine's fixed ideals. The classical conservative races towards the old order, yet finds it out of reach, leading him into the delusion that he can restore the past in its old form. The reactionary, with all his might, halts the moral grounds of the liberal future, turning away from them. Aristocratic in a way, he is aristocratic in his creation of nothing but the end of the social, a sort of revolt against the modern world. The past was filled with various points of view on how social life should be. Now, it is nothing but a trajectory of treachery, always feeding back into the Forefront of History. We must bring back the relativism that existed before capitalist society. In that sense, we have defeated the social and made it our own—not through a hollow revolution that seems fluid but is not, as it revolts against itself to remake itself anew. Rather, we must reject society altogether, along with its social norms. Only a fool would want to be held back by the social policies of another man, whether born in the past or born for a different life than ours, with different experiences. Annihilate the social, never to rise again—what a true expression of social regression!

Philosophy

The basis for my reality is philosophy. I see the world as a mystery, and I am a connoisseur of nihilism, embracing it with shadowy delight. The gods of this world are obstacles, and I will not fall for the sacred—not again. My pure narcissism of self is what keeps me alive and well. Do I support the sacred? No, it’s me against the idealist, me against the moralist, me against the religious—send them to be accursed! My own livelihood shouldn’t be a game for the high characters to shape into its being. No, I should do that myself, you fools! You are in your own madhouse! Chasing these phantasms to the ends of the earth, yet they are always out of reach until you face death. You say it will be glorious with the cries of the weak; they are not for me. Übermensch is what I would answer to them, help yourself my friends, you have a power to overcome and like I did, strike yahweh in the heart. A man in the back calls for me, "morals are absolute!" He cries with the righteousness of the lord himself. What do I say? I answer, "yes, morals are absolute, because they are of the capitalist state. But I say morals have no use for me and they are a lie, like the christian god. Don't you see? I have no order for morals; they hold no ground for me. The abstract law of nature will not be my guide, because in the end of all of rome, morals lead you back to the gods. You are too scared to disagree with them, because to disagree with state law will lead to the prison of another 120 days of sodom. I have no allegiance to the moral ground. Morals do nothing for me, and the ideal moralist is like the christian—they have no power over themselves because they have given everything to the constitution of my broken heart. I next ask the question of the monist. Have you seen what I asked? I attack the idealist, which you are. You have fallen back into the soulless drive of idealism, as much as you try to escape it. Marx and his materialism are now dead with the hand of Bataille. This world is irrational. If you try to assign the physical as the absolute, you get a sad idealism. Embrace the irrationality of life instead of trying to play it down with sticks. I drive forever onward in search of something new. Ah yes, the post-modernists are right to say that metanarratives are false in every sense of the word and to deconstruct the meaning of all, for this I support you and your business of unclogging the toilet of the world science, its most understandable that the concepts are all in some way is absolute human logic that has no beginning on nature and of the greater universe and this logic can provide nothing for me. May we investigate further into the madness of civilization.


Sacred Ego

Materialism and its Relation with Nihilism

Philosophy of Civilization

“Praxis”

Relations

  • Charming Romanticism - The true unique of france
  • G-Man Toiletism - I had a terrible experience even thinking about adding you, but here’s my half caring attempt to critique this clear alt. You claim to be a fascist while clearly you no nothing about the fascist ideologue, because fascism is a revolutionary concept it opposed the monarchies of old because fascism whole thing is derived from the jacobins. Furthermore killing other real presented nations/cultures for a “turan empire” is also against fascism is its goal for nationally self determination not for some impossible goal presented by a former region of the world that no longer had any united culture. Finally a “turan empire” who be defeated in days full stop the Russian military would invade back their lost territories and even you tried to defend nukes exist, the western powers would probably support Russia in this because of how your ideology is against the current capital regime.
  • Distributist Reactionaryism - What a disastrous utopian ideology to create a liberal state in a reactionary society. Why be a classical reactionary? What is the benefit it will lead to a decentralized society of fools who is dependent on an outside source to give the full meaning, all individuality is lost, we can find no freedom in reaction because it leads to control society of the highest level and democracy? Are you kidding me? If the people cannot think for themselves they surely cannot vote for anyone but only the ones whom there lord wants them to vote for! Anyhow this ideology is deeply EVIL and is the pure opposite of what I want in a society. The modern sacred but not too modern, the ancient fetishism back again to haunt us. Times have changed and the christian religion is a belief made by retards(the convinced are the deceived) for retards. Furthermore calling progressive view points as “evil” is wrong because for another person to is good because he found goodness in progressive values(an impossible task indeed!) and you found it in the old vaules, which little is to be different from the “evil” values. The old is morr mad that’s all you have on the metaphysical side of the word. You have indeed set your cause on nothing!

What I've Read

  • The Bible
  • Syndicalism
  • The Principles of Communism
  • The Futurist Manifesto
  • The Communist Manifesto
  • Critique of the Gotha Program
  • Socialist Industrial Unionism - The Workers’ Power
  • On Authority
  • Industrial Unionism
  • Reform or Revolution
  • Abolition of Work
  • Brief Description of Egoist Communism
  • Violence and Autonomy
  • An Introduction to the Situationists
  • Egoist Communism what it is and what it isn’t
  • The Democratic Mystification
  • How Moldbug got Pwned
  • Workers' Councils
  • Thesis on Feuerbach
  • May-June 1968: The Exposure
  • A Quick-and-Dirty Introduction to Accelerationism
  • The Party and Class
  • Society of the Spectacle
  • Unique and Its Property
  • Anti-Duhring
  • The Wandering of Humanity
  • On Organization
  • Post-Anarchism
  • Dark Deleuze
  • Insurrectionary Foucault
  • Beyond Good and Evil

Reading

  • Capital Volume 1
    • Chapter Fourteen: Division of Labour and Manufacture
  • Thus Spoke Zarathustra
    • The Flies in the Market-Place
  • The Accursed Share
    • The Transition from Animal to Man

My name is not important. What is important is what I'm going to read

  • Visions of Excess
  • The Thirst For Ahnihilation
  • The Myth Of Sisyphus
  • The Postmodern Condition
  • Libidinal Economy
  • The Subject and Power
  • The Birth Of Biopolitics
  • Madness And Civilization
  • Capitalism and Schizophrenia
  • What Is Philosophy?
  • Difference And Repetition
  • The Poverty of Philosophy
  • The German Ideology
  • Reflections on Violence
  • The Civil War in France
  • Simulacra and Simulation
  • Fatal Strategies
  • Writings 1997–2003
  • The Dark Enlightenment
  • Unqualified Reservations

My shit