No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|themecolor = #8f012e | |themecolor = #8f012e | ||
|bordercolor= #8f012e | |bordercolor= #8f012e | ||
|title = Rykszon Thought | |title = [[File:Ryk.png]] '''Rykszon Thought''' | ||
|alignments = | |alignments = | ||
{{Template:Info/AuthLefts}}<br> | {{Template:Info/AuthLefts}}<br> | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
:[[File:Lingnat.png]] [[Linguistic Nationalism|Its language]] | :[[File:Lingnat.png]] [[Linguistic Nationalism|Its language]] | ||
:[[File:Volknat.png]] [[Volkish Nationalism|Its folk]] | :[[File:Volknat.png]] [[Volkish Nationalism|Its folk]] | ||
[[File:Autonat.png]] [[Left-Wing Nationalism|Appropriating Left-Wing Aesthetics]] | |||
|dislikes= | |dislikes= | ||
[[File:Cap.png]] [[Capitalism]]<br> | [[File:Cap.png]] [[Capitalism]]<br> | ||
| Line 41: | Line 42: | ||
}} | }} | ||
Rykszon Thought is the ideology of Rykszon. Rykszon Thought advocates for [[File:Unitary.png]] [[Authoritarianism|a centralised state]], [[File:Leftnat.png]] [[Left-Wing Nationalism|socialist economic policies for the well-being of the nation]], and [[File:Patern.png]] [[Paternalism|its families]]. It is also anti-christian (and anti-abrahamic in general) as it sees Christianity as an invasive religion on the British Isles, which has been forced upon the English people, and therefore is anti-nationalist. It also sees christianity is also anti-nationalist by scripture, citing its humanistic interpretations (The English Soil belongs to England, not to all descendants of Christ.) To fix this problem, Rykszon Thought wishes for [[File:Anti-Christian.png]] [[Nationalism|the end of Christianity]], as well as [[File:Republicanismpix.png]] [[Republicanism|the end of the Christian Windsor monarchy]]. I am not literally hitler, literally 1984, nor am i literally joseph goebbels :/ | [[File:Ryk.png]] '''Rykszon Thought''' is the ideology of Rykszon. Rykszon Thought advocates for [[File:Unitary.png]] [[Authoritarianism|a centralised state]], [[File:Leftnat.png]] [[Left-Wing Nationalism|socialist economic policies for the well-being of the nation]], and [[File:Patern.png]] [[Paternalism|its families]]. It is also anti-christian (and anti-abrahamic in general) as it sees Christianity as an invasive religion on the British Isles, which has been forced upon the English people, and therefore is anti-nationalist. It also sees christianity is also anti-nationalist by scripture, citing its humanistic interpretations (The English Soil belongs to England, not to all descendants of Christ.) To fix this problem, Rykszon Thought wishes for [[File:Anti-Christian.png]] [[Nationalism|the end of Christianity]], as well as [[File:Republicanismpix.png]] [[Republicanism|the end of the Christian Windsor monarchy]]. I am not literally hitler, literally 1984, nor am i literally joseph goebbels :/ | ||
==[[File:Unitary.png]] {{Template:Bold|The State}}== | ==[[File:Unitary.png]] {{Template:Bold|The State}}== | ||
Revision as of 23:36, 4 September 2024
Rykszon Thought is the ideology of Rykszon. Rykszon Thought advocates for 
a centralised state, 
socialist economic policies for the well-being of the nation, and 
its families. It is also anti-christian (and anti-abrahamic in general) as it sees Christianity as an invasive religion on the British Isles, which has been forced upon the English people, and therefore is anti-nationalist. It also sees christianity is also anti-nationalist by scripture, citing its humanistic interpretations (The English Soil belongs to England, not to all descendants of Christ.) To fix this problem, Rykszon Thought wishes for 
the end of Christianity, as well as 
the end of the Christian Windsor monarchy. I am not literally hitler, literally 1984, nor am i literally joseph goebbels :/
The State
Economics
Capitalism
By establishment of the principle of no reward without service, and the consequent elimination of the parasite who creates the barrier of social class. Functional differences will exist according to difference of function, but differences of social classes will be eliminated. They arise from the fact that in present society the few can live in idleness as a master class upon the production of the many.
Under capitalism, there is no system where service and reward are in a direct relationship. The Lords up in the state enjoy luxuries off of the back of the nation; how can we call this anything but anti-nationalist? Just look at how the families of the English nation are squashed under their aristocratic boots! Capitalism is also internationalist, which clearly goes against my previously established views...
