No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
No edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
||
| Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
<div style="grid-area:1/3/3/4;"> | <div style="grid-area:1/3/3/4;"> | ||
{{B|Derrida's points are important ones, even if his insights into the multi-strained nature of Marx's legacy are not original. Marxism is a diversity-- so much so that it would be possible to speak, in exemplary postmodern fashion, not so much of Marxism as of 'the Marxisms'. This heterogeneity goes right back to the oeuvre of Marx himself. For Marx said and wrote different things t different times, not all of which are consistent, or---more importantly-- all of which can be arranged to form different consistencies. In the historical development of Marxism these statements have been selected, permutated, and refracted into an arrary of very different, and sometimes fiercely antagonistic forms.}} <br> <br> [[File:PostMarxism.png]] {{B|Nick Dyer-Witheford}} | {{B|Derrida's points are important ones, even if his insights into the multi-strained nature of Marx's legacy are not original. Marxism is a diversity-- so much so that it would be possible to speak, in exemplary postmodern fashion, not so much of Marxism as of 'the Marxisms'. This heterogeneity goes right back to the oeuvre of Marx himself. For Marx said and wrote different things t different times, not all of which are consistent, or---more importantly-- all of which can be arranged to form different consistencies. In the historical development of Marxism these statements have been selected, permutated, and refracted into an arrary of very different, and sometimes fiercely antagonistic forms.}} <br> <br> [[File:PostMarxism.png]] {{B|Nick Dyer-Witheford}} | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 09:34, 14 September 2024
 |
Self Insert "People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism This page is meant to represent Aperson14's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission. |
"People who support “natural selection” fail to understand that they aren’t and *never* will be at the top of the food chain."
- 
Aperson14 [1]
"People who support “natural selection” fail to understand that they aren’t and *never* will be at the top of the food chain."
- 
Aperson14 [1]
But for sake of argument let's take a clear one, an oil shortage. I'm not even talking about peak oil here, I'm just going with an oil shortage, or even a oil price rise, take whatever possible trigger you like and understand that the scenario is this: Oil suddenly becomes quite difficult to acquire. Well of course people can no longer drive to work, or have to alter their entre lives to be able to afford to. The production of a mass of plastic materials ceases due to it no longer being profitable. Trucks can no longer deliver goods as regularly as they used to and towns begin to go without prescriptions and essentials for weeks at a time. The lack of people driving to and from work means that entire industries begin to falter; mechanics, car dealers, radworkers, carwashes, etc. The death of these industries sends waves through local and interconnected economies and it eventually ripples out.
James Ellis
James Ellis
If it is true, for instance, that depression is cnstituted by low serotin levels, what sill needs to be explained is why particular individuals have low levels of serotonin.
Mark Fisher
Mark FisherDerrida's points are important ones, even if his insights into the multi-strained nature of Marx's legacy are not original. Marxism is a diversity-- so much so that it would be possible to speak, in exemplary postmodern fashion, not so much of Marxism as of 'the Marxisms'. This heterogeneity goes right back to the oeuvre of Marx himself. For Marx said and wrote different things t different times, not all of which are consistent, or---more importantly-- all of which can be arranged to form different consistencies. In the historical development of Marxism these statements have been selected, permutated, and refracted into an arrary of very different, and sometimes fiercely antagonistic forms.
Nick Dyer-Witheford
Summary
Hey, I'm 
galaxy, also known as Aperson14 or edelex. This is my page. For those who don't know me, I 
don't believe in God, I 
follow social contract theory, 
despise crime & chaos, 
enjoy technology, 
tend to criticize democracy, 
prefer pre-1960s leftist movements [2], 
love my country, 
enjoy deconstructing Marxism, 
follow and theorize about geopolitics, 
advocate for a land value tax, and support various politicians such as 
Josip Tito, 
Clement Attlee, 
Deng Xiaoping, 
Gamel Nasser, and 
Jeremy Corbyn.
User Relations
Asked to be added and I'll add you, shocking am I right?
Fellow Tradcath Edelexians
Luisian Brethren
Meh
Pantheonism - I don't have much to say for this except meh. I can't bring myself to hate or love your ideology. Economics and social policy are good, but monarchism? Humanism? World federalism? It's not for me.
Eleutherianism - Love your analysis and we kinda agree on some stuff, but you're too radical for me. Abandon communist revolution and embrace social-democratic IMPERIUM.
Unholy Sinners
DECBism - Liberal. Not much to say.
Brazilian Liberalism - Same as above.
Distributist Reactionaryism - You're a nice guy and you are diagnosed autistic so I can't be mad at you, but we do not agree politically.
Venatrixism - Shameless NRxer, another victim of the wave of quarkism that seems to be infecting a few communists on this site recently (I AM NOT A UTOPIAN EXPERIMENT).
Liars, Montagers and Sodomites
G-Man Toiletism - Fascism is the ideology of monkeys. We don't have much in common, but trying to be Genghis Khan 2.0 kinda kills any hope of this moving up to a more favorable position.
N.Brioism - Do I really need to explain?
Comments
- Pantheonism - Please add me, oh Galaxy, please add me.
- Brazilian Liberalism - Add me
- Distributist Reactionaryism - add me
- DECBism - Oh hi Galaxy, add me pleaseee
- G-Man Toiletism - Add me.
- Venatrixism - Add me.
- N.Brioism - Add me
- Eleutherianism - Add me please.
- Brazilian Liberalism - Update me