No edit summary |
|||
| Line 97: | Line 97: | ||
=== [[File:AustrianSchool.png]] Economics === | === [[File:AustrianSchool.png]] Economics === | ||
The economy has been shit for a while now, getting worse and worse, almost like the gods of our rock have damned us to [https://www.wikiwand.com/en/articles/Great_Recession worse] and [https://www.wikiwand.com/en/articles/COVID-19_recession worser] recessions. But in this hellscape of economics, I might've just found the exit. First, I need to kill the elephant in the room: these [https://www.wikiwand.com/en/articles/Keynesian_economics bastards] who have been basically calling the shots since the '20s. It is obvious that most Keynesians are people in suits who might look smart but otherwise know nothing about how the economy works. It was what the capitol wanted because guess what? They don’t like the lack of money. It makes them look better to the public if they just pay everything in sight to shut up and take my money. But under Batman’s mask, you see what hides beneath—since that about matters as money's being in the presidential chair, it seemed to already [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5llMaZ80ErY happened] through. Increasing the amount of money, you guessed it, will lead to a fall in the price of money, thus robbing people of the value of the money, basically leading to nothing. How do we fix this? Well, first of all, remove the current liberal government. You can’t do much with that mess of split powers. Once we do that, move to a fixed fiat monetary system, which, unlike gold, still gets produced. Fiat money is fixed, and more cannot be made. But we still have the problem of the disaster of Keynes. So how do we fix it? I'll just get Yarvin to say it for me (for convenience’s sake): "Basically, the only painless, specific, and lasting way out of the banking cycle is to purchase all financial assets with freshly issued dollars, then sell the assets and destroy the dollars paid for them, and start lending back up with new banks and maturity-matched accounting. This is a full reboot of the financial system. Accept no substitutes. Yes, it involves some inflation, but the inflation is (a) one-time, and (b) pointed at the actual problem." Probably the simplest way to kill all that crap. You may ask what to do with the poor who are enormously in debt? Cancel the debt, at least for the state of this new order. After this all happens, it should be clear I don’t like it when the government involves itself with the work of the economy. I think the shareholders, who are most likely owners of their own company, wouldn’t want some patch they don’t even live in to limit the profits of other companies. That would be fire, which is not tolerated. It also goes back to the principle of unless that corp does something entirely rebellious against the realm, we can’t really mess with you. Economic freedom should be around at large—no point in any of that regulation nonsense if we even have a fixed money system that the government can’t mess around with. Make the economy free, for god’s sake! Let capital rule the waves and be free, not only in its nihilist conception of the state but of the economy as well. this analysis leads me to the boring world of taxes. I mostly think we should run on property taxes. To buy a share in a realm, you are basically buying into a land-based company whose whole purpose is to protect its land and get profit from that land. And no, I don’t care who is 'supposed' to own the land—I am all about that moral nihilism, so I don’t care. This allows for the free market to run free, without those annoying taxes, and also allows the state to be profitable. Boot, bop, bam—there is neocameralism right at your front door. | The economy has been shit for a while now, getting worse and worse, almost like the gods of our rock have damned us to [https://www.wikiwand.com/en/articles/Great_Recession worse] and [https://www.wikiwand.com/en/articles/COVID-19_recession worser] recessions. But in this hellscape of economics, I might've just found the exit. First, I need to kill the elephant in the room: these [https://www.wikiwand.com/en/articles/Keynesian_economics bastards] who have been basically calling the shots since the '20s. It is obvious that most Keynesians are people in suits who might look smart but otherwise know nothing about how the economy works. It was what the capitol wanted because guess what? They don’t like the lack of money. It makes them look better to the public if they just pay everything in sight to shut up and take my money. But under Batman’s mask, you see what hides beneath—since that about matters as money's being in the presidential chair, it seemed to already [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5llMaZ80ErY happened] through. Increasing the amount of money, you guessed it, will lead to a fall in the price of money, thus robbing people of the value of the money, basically leading to nothing. How do we fix this? Well, first of all, remove the current liberal government. You can’t do much with that mess of split powers. Once we do that, move to a fixed fiat monetary system, which, unlike gold, still gets produced. Fiat money is fixed, and more cannot be made. But we still have the problem of the disaster of Keynes. So how do we fix it? I'll just get Yarvin to say it for me (for convenience’s sake): "Basically, the only painless, specific, and lasting way out of the banking cycle is to purchase all financial assets with freshly issued dollars, then sell the assets and destroy the dollars paid for them, and start lending back up with new banks and maturity-matched accounting. This is a full reboot of the financial system. Accept no substitutes. Yes, it involves some inflation, but the inflation is (a) one-time, and (b) pointed at the actual problem." Probably the simplest way to kill all that crap. You may ask what to do with the poor who are enormously in debt? Cancel the debt, at least for the state of this new order. After this all happens, it should be clear I don’t like it when the government involves itself with the work of the economy. I think the shareholders, who are most likely owners of their own company, wouldn’t want some patch they don’t even live in to limit the profits of other companies. That would be friendly fire, which is not tolerated. It also goes back to the principle of unless that corp does something entirely rebellious against the realm, we can’t really mess with you. Economic freedom should be around at large—no point in any of that regulation nonsense if we even have a fixed money system that the government can’t mess around with. Make the economy free, for god’s sake! Let capital rule the waves and be free, not only in its nihilist conception of the state but of the economy as well. this analysis leads me to the boring world of taxes. I mostly think we should run on property taxes. To buy a share in a realm, you are basically buying into a land-based company whose whole purpose is to protect its land and get profit from that land. And no, I don’t care who is 'supposed' to own the land—I am all about that moral nihilism, so I don’t care. This allows for the free market to run free, without those annoying taxes, and also allows the state to be profitable. Boot, bop, bam—there is neocameralism right at your front door. | ||
===== [[File:Geo-Landianism.png]] I see those cats ===== | ===== [[File:Geo-Landianism.png]] I see those cats ===== | ||
Revision as of 02:01, 18 September 2024
 |
Self Insert "People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism This page is meant to represent JAcket's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission. |
 |
In Development "I'll stop reading eventually." - Left Communism This page is still in development due to ongoing reading by JAcket, multiple things may change drastically. |
Icons: (
/
/
/
)
-
Jacques Camatte
-
Friedrich Nietzsche
-
Georges Bataille
Venatrixism is a Neoreactionary theory founded on the principles of the 
opposition to the democratic state, as democracy leads to anarchy; after all, what has democracy shown us but strife, its politics leading to an eternal battle between the two idiots who "run" this state? We can find no order in literal lies that the "congress" is the representation of humanity, while they still govern on private ends. This leads me to 
neocameralism, power finally constructed against anarchy and its representatives in communism and the like. So, such the state is ruled like it should be: a corporation in a fiefdom of many that are alike. Monarchy is realized in this form, like with a corporation totality for the corporation and only for the corporation. Leave if you must, but nothing will make us change our minds. Thus, with philosophy in hand, it leads me towards accelerationism, that capital had escaped the bourgeoisie and is becoming a force of deterritorialization against all that opposed it. Having these keys became what the communist sought to take—the revolutionary power of capital—yet it did it for itself.
Views
Government
The world on which we live needs to experience order, or death will rain upon this earth like acid. This government, unlike the mess of modern democracy, needs to return to monarchy. What kind of monarchy? A corporate model of monarchy, where the state works for profit and only profit for its shareholders. The king who has absolute power; must align himself with these shareholders, who have given him the highest elite position in this small state. The shareholders are foreign investors who have a stake in the state and, then they elect the monarch. For Carlyle’s sake, we should put the people who can run a government while generating profit in charge—no more fools. The biggest mistake of democracy is assuming that the majority is the biggest factor in determining leadership. Where has that gotten us? It has brought us closer to anarchy and terror; just look at Hitler and Stalin! The majority is uninformed and relies on the media to help them choose someone, which has led us to the current issues and their consequences. Because the state wants control over the people but using force is against rational principles, they mentally drain your freedom until you have nothing left for mental concentration. Is it only me who sees that schools, universities, and beyond seem to be indoctrinating people into the liberal ideology, claiming it is the only truth and always will be, yet they are not open about this control over society? Our neoreactionary state uses force and monitors everything you do and everything you own. You know this, which is why, even if you leave one small realm for another, they will know what you're doing, so border control isn't really necessary. What if they abuse their power? Just leave, or the shareholders will remove the tyrant—it's not very profitable when a tyrant is in power. Anyway, we also find this in the law of the land: "Be a good citizen, and we won't mess with you." Simple, innit? The majority is not suited for politics; they aren’t smart enough to know what’s better. Some people are worse, and some are better. Most of humanity is unwise when it comes to politics, so it should be left to those who understand it and know how to manage it. The monarchy should be absolute so it can address the political disaster that arises from allowing votes. Look at Singapore, for example; it is nearly apolitical, and the people there seem to enjoy a high level of stability. The Citizens receive customer service rather than political freedom, which is a nonsense of its own. For a company to achieve profit, it must give its employees reasons to work for it, make the environment pleasant, and please the shareholders at the same time. It’s a win-win for all. I hope I haven’t implied the monarchy is a figurehead. He is the leader and the commander, the true head of state, with power no longer split into groups with little interest in each other and little power as well. His/Her role is to enforce the law and achieve the state's goals within the parameters of its wealth.
Why Patchworks?
Capital in Power
Radioactive Democracy
Economics
The economy has been shit for a while now, getting worse and worse, almost like the gods of our rock have damned us to worse and worser recessions. But in this hellscape of economics, I might've just found the exit. First, I need to kill the elephant in the room: these bastards who have been basically calling the shots since the '20s. It is obvious that most Keynesians are people in suits who might look smart but otherwise know nothing about how the economy works. It was what the capitol wanted because guess what? They don’t like the lack of money. It makes them look better to the public if they just pay everything in sight to shut up and take my money. But under Batman’s mask, you see what hides beneath—since that about matters as money's being in the presidential chair, it seemed to already happened through. Increasing the amount of money, you guessed it, will lead to a fall in the price of money, thus robbing people of the value of the money, basically leading to nothing. How do we fix this? Well, first of all, remove the current liberal government. You can’t do much with that mess of split powers. Once we do that, move to a fixed fiat monetary system, which, unlike gold, still gets produced. Fiat money is fixed, and more cannot be made. But we still have the problem of the disaster of Keynes. So how do we fix it? I'll just get Yarvin to say it for me (for convenience’s sake): "Basically, the only painless, specific, and lasting way out of the banking cycle is to purchase all financial assets with freshly issued dollars, then sell the assets and destroy the dollars paid for them, and start lending back up with new banks and maturity-matched accounting. This is a full reboot of the financial system. Accept no substitutes. Yes, it involves some inflation, but the inflation is (a) one-time, and (b) pointed at the actual problem." Probably the simplest way to kill all that crap. You may ask what to do with the poor who are enormously in debt? Cancel the debt, at least for the state of this new order. After this all happens, it should be clear I don’t like it when the government involves itself with the work of the economy. I think the shareholders, who are most likely owners of their own company, wouldn’t want some patch they don’t even live in to limit the profits of other companies. That would be friendly fire, which is not tolerated. It also goes back to the principle of unless that corp does something entirely rebellious against the realm, we can’t really mess with you. Economic freedom should be around at large—no point in any of that regulation nonsense if we even have a fixed money system that the government can’t mess around with. Make the economy free, for god’s sake! Let capital rule the waves and be free, not only in its nihilist conception of the state but of the economy as well. this analysis leads me to the boring world of taxes. I mostly think we should run on property taxes. To buy a share in a realm, you are basically buying into a land-based company whose whole purpose is to protect its land and get profit from that land. And no, I don’t care who is 'supposed' to own the land—I am all about that moral nihilism, so I don’t care. This allows for the free market to run free, without those annoying taxes, and also allows the state to be profitable. Boot, bop, bam—there is neocameralism right at your front door.
I see those cats
Addressing the Accursed Share
What the Libertarians got wrong
Social
Philosophy
The basis for my reality is philosophy. I see the world as a mystery, and I am a connoisseur of nihilism, embracing it with shadowy delight. The gods of this world are obstacles, and I will not fall for the sacred—not again. My pure narcissism of self is what keeps me alive and well. Do I support the sacred? No, it’s me against the idealist, me against the moralist, me against the religious—send them to be accursed! My own livelihood shouldn’t be a game for the high characters to shape into its being. No, I should do that myself.... you fools! You are in your own madhouse! Chasing these ghosts to the ends of the earth, yet they are always out of reach until you face death. You say it will be glorious with the cries of the weak; they are not for me. Übermensch is what I would answer to them, help yourself my friends, you have a power to overcome and like I did, strike yahweh in the heart. A man in the back calls for me, "morals are absolute!" He cries with the righteousness of the lord himself. What do I say? I answer, "yes, morals are absolute, because they are of the democratic state. But I say morals have no use for me and they are a lie, like the christian god. Don't you see? I have no order for morals; they hold no ground for me. The abstract law of nature will not be my guide, because in the end of all of rome, morals lead you back to the gods. You are too scared to disagree with them, because to disagree with state law will lead to the prison of another 120 days of sodom. I have no allegiance to the moral ground. Morals do nothing for me, and the ideal moralist is like the christian—they have no power over themselves because they have given everything to the constitution of my broken heart. I next ask the question of the monist. Have you seen what I asked? I attack the idealist, which you are. You have fallen back into the soulless drive of idealism, as much as you try to escape it. Marx and his materialism are now dead with the hand of Bataille. This world is mystical, and the monist idea of physicality is nothing but a lie of a new idealism, in which his escape from the economy leads him to utopianism. What is us but raw instincts? I drive forever onward in search of something new. Ah yes, what I see in the future and the present carnage capital is to commit deterritorialization on all the memetics that have invaded the world, for this I support you and your business of unclogging the toilet of the world science, its most understandable that the concepts are all in some way is absolute human logic that has no beginning on nature and of the greater universe and this logic can provide nothing for me. May we investigate further into the madness of civilization.
The Hegelian Travesty
Materialism and its Relation with Nihilism
Liberal Decadence
“Praxis”
Relations
Charming Romanticism - The true unique of france
G-Man Toiletism - I had a terrible experience even thinking about adding you, but here’s my half caring attempt to critique this clear alt. You claim to be a fascist while clearly you no nothing about the fascist ideologue, because fascism is a revolutionary concept it opposed the monarchies of old because fascism whole thing is derived from the jacobins. Furthermore killing other real presented nations/cultures for a “turan empire” is also against fascism is its goal for nationally self determination not for some impossible goal presented by a former region of the world that no longer had any united culture. Finally a “turan empire” who be defeated in days full stop the Russian military would invade back their lost territories and even you tried to defend nukes exist, the western powers would probably support Russia in this because of how your ideology is against the current capital regime.
Distributist Reactionaryism - What a disastrous utopian ideology to create a liberal state in a reactionary society. Why be a classical reactionary? What is the benefit it will lead to a decentralized society of fools who is dependent on an outside source to give the full meaning, all individuality is lost, we can find no freedom in reaction because it leads to control society of the highest level and democracy? Are you kidding me? If the people cannot think for themselves they surely cannot vote for anyone but only the ones whom there lord wants them to vote for! Anyhow this ideology is deeply EVIL and is the pure opposite of what I want in a society. The modern sacred but not too modern, the ancient fetishism back again to haunt us. Times have changed and the christian religion is a belief made by retards(the convinced are the deceived) for retards. Furthermore calling progressive view points as “evil” is wrong because for another person to is good because he found goodness in progressive values(an impossible task indeed!) and you found it in the old vaules, which little is to be different from the “evil” values. The old is morr mad that’s all you have on the metaphysical side of the word. You have indeed set your cause on nothing!
Nyhilism - Glad to see you have embraced capitalism, the dark side of the force or however we poetically LARP about it. Capitalism is the ultimate creation of the general economy; it creates, it destroys, it does many things. It is the ultimate form of multitasking and anti-rationalism. It is not very wise to destroy gender; it would give them more control, but they do it anyhow. Besides that, I have my critiques. I agree with my friend Fichett in regards to the movement that pushed for the feminine apocalypse on male conservatism. But to forget the male side of things, which, in its own cosmic queerness, has created its own destruction of gender, is to forget Bataille. The destruction of gender is not just feminine but also masculine, in its own twisted sense, a complete complex of the two, interdimensionally entwined to destroy itself. “What could be more accelerationist than the triumph of the anus as an instrument of libidinal liberation? The sun, shining as the representative of inevitable cosmic dissolution, is, as Bataille informs us, an anus. Accelerating cosmic dissolution is waste, expenditure as an end in itself. Q/acc isn’t just an acceleration towards the feminine; it’s an acceleration towards the anal, in the most deliciously anti-Freudian sense: the freed anus as the exemplar par excellence of a world beyond traditional masculinity and traditional gender relations." -
Adam Fichett.
All I have to say on the philosophical side. But for politics, I don’t see the point in not being a neoreactionary at this point. It is the ultimate consequence of accelerationism, purely. It requires the death of communism and the creation of reaction, in its own defiance against the world’s morals. It is all to say the most beautiful world in what seems to be a dystopia. I recommend reading Yarvin (not Gray Mirror; that shit sucks) if you are interested.
What I've Read
The Bible
Syndicalism
The Principles of Communism
The Futurist Manifesto- The Communist Manifesto
Critique of the Gotha Program- Socialist Industrial Unionism - The Workers’ Power
On Authority- Industrial Unionism
- Reform or Revolution
Abolition of Work
Brief Description of Egoist Communism
Violence and Autonomy
An Introduction to the Situationists- Egoist Communism what it is and what it isn’t
The Democratic Mystification
How Moldbug got Pwned
Workers' Councils
Thesis on Feuerbach
May-June 1968: The Exposure- A Quick-and-Dirty Introduction to Accelerationism
- The Party and Class
- Society of the Spectacle
Unique and Its Property- Anti-Duhring
- The Wandering of Humanity
- On Organization
Post-Anarchism- Dark Deleuze
- Insurrectionary Foucault
- Beyond Good and Evil
A Formalist Manifesto
The Case Against Democracy
Why Do Atheist Believe in Religion- Capital Volume 1
- A Gentle Introduction to Unqualified Reservations
- Against political freedom
- Vulvocosmic Dissolution: Queerness, Feminism & Accelerationism
- Patchwork: A Political System for the 21st Century
Reading
The Postmodern Condition
- The Field : Knowledge in Computerized Societies
- Thus Spoke Zarathustra
- Second Part
The Accursed Share
- Death
- Joyful Science
- Book One
My name is not important. What is important is what I'm going to read
- Visions of Excess
- The Thirst For Ahnihilation
The Myth Of Sisyphus
Libidinal Economy
The Subject and Power- The Birth Of Biopolitics
- Madness And Civilization
Capitalism and Schizophrenia
What Is Philosophy?- Difference And Repetition
- The German Ideology
Reflections on Violence
Simulacra and Simulation- Fatal Strategies
Writings 1997–2003- The Dark Enlightenment
- Hyper-Racism
My shit
Ideological Evolution
 Southern Boi |
 +  + 
|
-2021 |
 And I wonder... |
 +  + 
|
2021-2023 |
 Red and Dead |
 + + 
|
2023-2024 |
| Smartass |
+  +
|
2024- |