×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 2,528 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki

Itapism: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 106: Line 106:
Itapism is the political ideology of [[User:Itapi|Itapi]]. Some of his major influences are from both [[File:Sorel.png]] Georges Sorel and [[File:Natsynd.png]] Georges Valois. Itapism agrees with Georges Valois on his criticism of [[File:Fash.png]] '''Fascism'''. Especially with his disagreements with class collaboration and them abandoning class warfare all together. Itapism sees fascism as a betrayal of Sorelian ideas and it sees Fascism as nothing more than a watered down version of national syndicalism that cannot overcome liberalism in the long run. Itapism also views Left-wing national syndicalism as the only legitimate version of national syndicalism [[File:Natsynd.png]]. Itapism isn't anti-communist and pragmatically will work with certain communists [[File:Com.png]].Itapism also disagrees with the anti-communist sentiments because of fascists soured relations historically with the USSR and this caused tensions with other communists and socialist organizations and it ultimately made the fascist and third positionist movement weaker. Also because of diplomatic isolation it pressured them to work with falsifiers [[File:Nazi.png]]
Itapism is the political ideology of [[User:Itapi|Itapi]]. Some of his major influences are from both [[File:Sorel.png]] Georges Sorel and [[File:Natsynd.png]] Georges Valois. Itapism agrees with Georges Valois on his criticism of [[File:Fash.png]] '''Fascism'''. Especially with his disagreements with class collaboration and them abandoning class warfare all together. Itapism sees fascism as a betrayal of Sorelian ideas and it sees Fascism as nothing more than a watered down version of national syndicalism that cannot overcome liberalism in the long run. Itapism also views Left-wing national syndicalism as the only legitimate version of national syndicalism [[File:Natsynd.png]]. Itapism isn't anti-communist and pragmatically will work with certain communists [[File:Com.png]].Itapism also disagrees with the anti-communist sentiments because of fascists soured relations historically with the USSR and this caused tensions with other communists and socialist organizations and it ultimately made the fascist and third positionist movement weaker. Also because of diplomatic isolation it pressured them to work with falsifiers [[File:Nazi.png]]


Itapism does support monarchism however it does not support feudal monarchs, nor does it support capitalist monarchism, because these types of monarchies are not in favor of the people. Feudalism supports the nobility more than the people and capitalism supports the merchants and the bourgeoisie over the people. So it does not like either of these type of monarchies. It supports a popular monarch that brings people together. Itapism does like Bonaprtist style monarchy [[File:Bonaparte.png]] because it embodies a popular monarchy and it unites people under a rule and it values merit above inheritance. Itapism likes anti-capitalist monarchies like monarcho-syndicalism [[File:Monsynd.png]] and monarcho-socialism [[File:Monsoc.png]]. Itapism also views in realtion to monarchism that the D.O.T.P will be a more modern Bonpartist equivalent and that is a good thing because Itapism believes a charismatic strong man will lead the revolution. Although Itapism likes monarchism it views it secondary because it can see a strong autocratic holding a equivalent position. Itapism holds a plationist view of monarchy compared to other monarchist and that is why Itapism is more pragmatic when it comes to monarchism. Also Itapism beleieves that a monarch should be elected through a syndicalist type system as well and Itapism is not a fan of hereditary monarchs due to the fact they can become stagnant. If a ruling dynasty has a low approval rating the people can vote out the dynasty and put in a new dynasty.
Itapism does support monarchism however it does not support feudal monarchies, nor does it support capitalist monarchies, because these types of monarchies are not in favor of the people. Feudalism supports the nobility more than the people and capitalism supports the merchants and the bourgeoisie over the people. So it does not like either of these type of monarchies. It supports a popular monarch that brings people together. Itapism does like a Bonaprtist style monarchy [[File:Bonaparte.png]] because it embodies a popular monarchy and it unites the people under a ruler and it values merit above inheritance. Itapism likes anti-capitalist monarchies like monarcho-syndicalism [[File:Monsynd.png]] and monarcho-socialism [[File:Monsoc.png]]. Itapism also views in realtion to monarchism that the D.O.T.P will be a more modern Bonpartist equivalent and that it is a good thing because Itapism believes a charismatic strong man will lead the revolution. Although Itapism likes monarchism it views it secondary because it can see a strong autocratic holding a equivalent position. Itapism holds a plationist view of monarchy compared to other monarchist and that is why Itapism is more pragmatic when it comes to monarchism. Also Itapism beleieves that a monarch should be elected through a syndicalist type system as well and Itapism is not a fan of hereditary monarchs due to the fact they can become stagnant. If a ruling dynasty has a low approval rating the people can vote out the dynasty and put in a new dynasty.





Revision as of 07:23, 10 November 2024

Self Insert
"People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism

This page is meant to represent Itapi's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission.

Work in Progress
"I'll be done any day now!" - Still-Being-Drawnism

This page is not done yet and may still contain inaccurate information or miss important details.



Itapism is the political ideology of Itapi. Some of his major influences are from both Georges Sorel and Georges Valois. Itapism agrees with Georges Valois on his criticism of Fascism. Especially with his disagreements with class collaboration and them abandoning class warfare all together. Itapism sees fascism as a betrayal of Sorelian ideas and it sees Fascism as nothing more than a watered down version of national syndicalism that cannot overcome liberalism in the long run. Itapism also views Left-wing national syndicalism as the only legitimate version of national syndicalism . Itapism isn't anti-communist and pragmatically will work with certain communists .Itapism also disagrees with the anti-communist sentiments because of fascists soured relations historically with the USSR and this caused tensions with other communists and socialist organizations and it ultimately made the fascist and third positionist movement weaker. Also because of diplomatic isolation it pressured them to work with falsifiers

Itapism does support monarchism however it does not support feudal monarchies, nor does it support capitalist monarchies, because these types of monarchies are not in favor of the people. Feudalism supports the nobility more than the people and capitalism supports the merchants and the bourgeoisie over the people. So it does not like either of these type of monarchies. It supports a popular monarch that brings people together. Itapism does like a Bonaprtist style monarchy because it embodies a popular monarchy and it unites the people under a ruler and it values merit above inheritance. Itapism likes anti-capitalist monarchies like monarcho-syndicalism and monarcho-socialism . Itapism also views in realtion to monarchism that the D.O.T.P will be a more modern Bonpartist equivalent and that it is a good thing because Itapism believes a charismatic strong man will lead the revolution. Although Itapism likes monarchism it views it secondary because it can see a strong autocratic holding a equivalent position. Itapism holds a plationist view of monarchy compared to other monarchist and that is why Itapism is more pragmatic when it comes to monarchism. Also Itapism beleieves that a monarch should be elected through a syndicalist type system as well and Itapism is not a fan of hereditary monarchs due to the fact they can become stagnant. If a ruling dynasty has a low approval rating the people can vote out the dynasty and put in a new dynasty.



Literature

Have Read

Ones I've read since making this page

For My Legionaries
Reflections on Violence
Against Anti-Fascism: Amadeo Bordia's Last Interview
What is To Be Done
Principles of Communism
Communist Manifesto
On the Jewish Question
Condition of England
26 points of Falangism
Disintegration of the System
Rerum Novarum

Hamilton Plan

Reading

The Republic

Plan to Read

Imperialism and the Highest Stage of Capitalism, Lenin
Revolution or War, Georges Valois
Illusions of Progess

Suggestions

  • Feel free to add whatever book you'd like me to read here!

Relations

Friends

Frenemies

Enemies