Great British New Left

Self Insert "People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism This page is meant to represent MrNoNonsense's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission.

Great British New Left
Basic Information
Aliases	Psychedelic Corbynism Average British Socialist Naïve Left Unity Compromising Corbynism Manchester Red Wall Syndicalism Armchair Mancunian User Aliases (add if you want) Nouvelle Union Populaire écologique et sociale but in the UK
Alignments	LeftUnity Socialists
Ideological Influences
Influenced by	Jeremy Corbyn Tony Benn Ken Livingstone (Somewhat, he has some iffy takes on Zionism, and although i am Anti Zionist, i would like some more evidence before i jump on his Zion-Nazi collaboration bandwagon.)

The Great British New Left is a Socialist and Progressive political belief held by MrNoNonsense advocating for more Left Centre-left consolidation within the British Labour Party. He supports the parties more moderate leanings, while personally preferring the parties more leftist tendencies. despite this, he is an ardent critic of the administrations of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, giving slightly more credit to the latter. He is an aggressive opponent of Keir Starmer, considering him to be a Political Opportunist. He is also a vocal supporter of the NHS strikes and an open critic of Transphobic sentiments, seeing them as a bi-product of a Manufactured Culture War . He proposes a Reconciled Left-Wing Coalition within the Labour Party, with the intention of ensuring victory against the much more uniform Conservative establishment. He is also an advocate for an electoral coalition with the Breakthrough Party, the Green Party, and other smaller democratic socialists party such as Tower Hamlet's Aspire Party. Of course, this plan is primarily aimed towards britain, but it is applicable to other areas because of how compromising it is designed to be. Being from Manchester, he is also a strong supporter of Andy Burnham.

The little ideology sprite things: (/////)

Beliefs

Economic Policy

I believe that the economy, locally and nationally, must prioritise those who control the means of production. Britain must begin the process of renationalising industries, especially in cases such as Royal Mail, where privatisation has led to nothing but mass strikes and detrimental working conditions. To this extent, I largely support Corbyn's approach to the economy; utilise idealism to give the workers their fair share, but utilise pragmatism to regulate the economy while these actions are being taken. for this reason, I refer to my economics as Social Regulationist pragmatically, and Regulationary Socialist Ideally.

Unions

Radicalised by the worker's strikes that plague Britain's politics today, I have no further opinion than that unions are the core of our society, and that they are in a functioning democracy, an absolute necessity for a cooperative society. Unions are, in a Tory country, the last line of defence for the common worker. I am no Syndicalist, I feel there is better governance to be had from the party, but I can say with firm belief that I stand with the unions, through all of their ventures. In conclusion, i refer to myself as a Trade Unionist, and sympathise with Syndicalists.

My Definition Of Socialism

Socialism is inherently a very broad ideology, but in the context of my ideology, i see it as the inevitable Idealist future, once elections are won and the benefits are made clear to the people, socialism can be achieved. I also believe in Left-Collaborationism as a core tenant of my believes, to the testament that hopefully, long after I am gone, a true utopic Communist society can be achieved. Although I personally would never refer to myself as a Communist, I still see a Communist future as inevitable, defining it as a stateless, classless, moneyless society. Marx got many a thing right in regards to the exploitative relationship between the upper and lower classes, but he also had some Choice words about jewish people as part of his clear hatred of religion, the kind of things that could not be justified as merely State Athiest. While i personally refer to myself as a Catholic, and define my opinions on class and the working class as stemming from the teachings of Jesus Christ, I still recognise the importance of the seperation of Church from Politics. For these reasons, I refuse to define my beliefs as 'Marxist', as I believe that we should not define ourselves through the theories of other people, and should instead strive to identify ourselves by our own theories. So to conclude this section, I define myself as highly sympathetic of Marxists, while abstaining from referring to myself as such, and moderately sympathetic to Communists, only not to the extent of being an apologists for the crimes committed by such groups. I define myself not as a Democratic Socialist, but as a Socialist, since i believe that true socialism directly implies democracy.

Conclusion

In Conclusion, I describe my economic values as Regulationarily Socialist, Trade Unionist, and Moderately Socialist (although i refer to my economics as Moderately Socialist, i refer to my ideology as a whole as Socialist, as opposed to Democratic Socialism, as i believe true socialism implies democracy.)

Social Policy

LGB

As far as i can see from my Guardian reading, tofu eating Neomarxist ivory tower, in recent years a lot of the Tory pressure has been taken off of Lesbian, Gay and Bisexuals in Britain. Yet not completely. Because despite the decent enough strides in the past two decades from Bl*ir and C*meron, within the depths of the dustbin of history lie a very small minority of High Tories [ who still harbour resentment against people for committing the Devilish crime of... existing. So unfortunately, despite efforts taken in recent years, this rant is still nessesary.

So it is with a heavy heart that i find myself still having to say that it should be universally recognised that Gay, Bisexual and Lesbian people have all their right to love whoever they want to love, and express that love in exactly the same public extremity as a heterosexual couple would. And, in addition to that, due to the actual centuries of oppression for existing these groups have faced, and because of my belief in the doctrine of freeze peach, i refuse to in good conscience disallow pride events to continue. Churches reserve the right to refuse marriage to these individuals based on religious traditions, but civil unions should be strong enough that the churches definition of marriage should hold equal weight anyway.

Now the Moggites have tuned out, we can begin to discuss the actual meat of the controversy of modern social politics.

CULTURE WAR!!!!!!11

Culture war narrative has preconditioned us to believe that a large subset of people believe in an anti transgender rhetoric, when really it isn't a vocal majority, it is a loud minority of people. on the flipside of this, people have become preconditioned into a polarised belief set that was very fringe until the alt-right started attacking it, giving it a new voice as the 'other side' in the culture war. both of these groups are in the minority, and neither should be in any way made to represent the state of politics. as far as i am concerned, it is when the culture war reaches Westminster that it will be irreversible. the right should focus on destroying itself, and the left should focus more on what unites us than divides us- we dont fight our war over whether or not trans people exist, because scientifically and demographically they do. we should be fighting our war over class. this is why i never describe myself as culturally left, as leftism for me is purely economic- i am culturally progressive, much like i am socialistic- radical for moderates, moderate for radicals. willing to work with moderates and radicals for the shared goal of eventual liberation. speaking of...

Why gender equality is non negotiable

Andrew tate killed our discussions, at least here in britain.

A new generation of british schoolchildren are growing up with the mainstream belief that there is some vague distinction between a man and a woman that makes men superior. now of course, i wouldn't trust a teenager to know what private parts are, they can barely use a map. but of course if you havent stopped reading and aren't already in the comments calling me a Cultural Marxist (and then requesting to be added) by now, then you probably know that there is more to man and woman than the bits downstairs. so what gives? what does the opinion of a handful of schoolkids mean to the domestic politics of the country? well it is all quite simple; whether we like it or not some working class people do vote tory, and that largely happens when the rich clowns in charge of team blue pander to culture war narrative, telling fairy tales about a 'bill of rights'. now unfortunately, the working class of tomorrow is the public school educated of today, thanks 'Equal Opportunity', and if the Tories of tomorrow want to get votes, they are gonna have to pander to a very, very toxically masculine working class gene pool. which affects policy. so if you are here still, you probably understand what feminism is past some strawman version, and you understand roughly what i want from feminism. however, you now understand why i believe that it is a moral imperative that we educate people on the importance of gender equality today to prevent the furthering of systemic patriarchy on archaic pseudo-statistics tomorrow.

Scratch all of that, gender is meaningless

This next bit is almost entirely just specifically about me, so if you want juicy ideological details, you have reached the end.
I believe that gender is some shit we made up, just to placate the reactionaries of yesterday, the traditionalists of today and the conservatives of tomorrow. as a result of that, i, personally, reject the blue and black tea party, and instead brought a coffee machine. Why agender and not non binary? Agenderism to me is really just the athiest to Non binary's agnostic. people who are Enby don't necessarily reject the notion of labels, they just think that a third one would suit them better than he or she. I go a step further, and personally (not systemically) reject the notion of these meaningless labels. in spite of this, i appear to have grown attached to my pronouns, and will be keeping them. all inquiries about seizure of said pronouns will be ignored unless monetary incentive is put forward. thank you.

-MrNoNonsense (He/Him (Fuck/You))

Relations

I've gutted this so i can begin to add people onsite.

Invited to the coalition

• Meridionalism - When i initially met you, i saw what i believed at first to be a colourblind neoconfederate. Having gotten to know you, however, i can see the nuance in your beliefs, the specifications of the Cofano Model, and the intricacies of your relationships with Marx and Lenin. And i respect you for it. Otherwise of course, i disagree with your progressive conservatism, but I can only ask for so much from a comrade as true as you <3.

Invited to the coalition with skepticism

• Neo-Glencoeism - I had already held you to your former insert's standards last time i wrote this, so i will not inhibit my criticisms once again with that little disagreement. Outside of what i did used to agree with, you have maintained the culturally progressive politics that allow me to tolerate any right wing tendencies, and I respect that your current ideology is much more mature in it's belief than it's predecessor. However, you have become something idolized by the right as what 'a leftist should look like', which is a hilarious notion, i am sure you will admit.

Would have better luck joining the BNP

• Ziółkowskiizm - 'Irredentism for me, but not for thee.'

Comments

Venatrixism - add me

• You're quick man

Neo-Glencoeism - add me please

• - Okay, but don't wipe me from your comments this time :D
  • I will add once I find time and motivation to do so
    • I get that
•  BERNHEism - Add me please.