×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 2,438 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki

Kaiserism: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 36: Line 36:
<br> These three stances, as I see, are the three major sects of the government discussion.  My position falls on the side of The Libertarian.  I fall into the category due to two major reasons; Libertarianism is Biblical, and both Authoritarianism and Anarchism are unachievable mediums. <br> “How,” you may ask, “Is Libertarianism Biblical?”  Yes, many men point to Romans 13 as the Bible being Anti-Libertarian, for it says “Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God.” (The Book of Romans, Chapter 13, Verse 1).  However, I bring a counterpoint. <br> The Bible is full of Libertarian ideals; The very idea of the story of Exodus is rooted in the ideal of push-back against government enslavement that so many Libertarians strive towards.  This is in addition to the many Bible verses that state that man should live free.  In the First Book of Peter, it states “Live as people who are free, not using your freedom as a cover-up for evil, but living as servants of God.” (The First Book of Peter, Chapter 2, Verse 16). <br> This shows that man must live free, unhindered by man's laws.  However, it should be noted that this does not mean that life must be lived as one of God’s children, and your freedom shouldn’t be used as a crutch to legitimize sin. <br> This idea of liberty is repeated once again, in the Book of Acts, where it is written “But Peter and the apostles answered, “We must obey God rather than men…” (The Book of Acts, Chapter 5, Verse 29).  This is a very clear and distinct message to the world; obey God over Man.
<br> These three stances, as I see, are the three major sects of the government discussion.  My position falls on the side of The Libertarian.  I fall into the category due to two major reasons; Libertarianism is Biblical, and both Authoritarianism and Anarchism are unachievable mediums. <br> “How,” you may ask, “Is Libertarianism Biblical?”  Yes, many men point to Romans 13 as the Bible being Anti-Libertarian, for it says “Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God.” (The Book of Romans, Chapter 13, Verse 1).  However, I bring a counterpoint. <br> The Bible is full of Libertarian ideals; The very idea of the story of Exodus is rooted in the ideal of push-back against government enslavement that so many Libertarians strive towards.  This is in addition to the many Bible verses that state that man should live free.  In the First Book of Peter, it states “Live as people who are free, not using your freedom as a cover-up for evil, but living as servants of God.” (The First Book of Peter, Chapter 2, Verse 16). <br> This shows that man must live free, unhindered by man's laws.  However, it should be noted that this does not mean that life must be lived as one of God’s children, and your freedom shouldn’t be used as a crutch to legitimize sin. <br> This idea of liberty is repeated once again, in the Book of Acts, where it is written “But Peter and the apostles answered, “We must obey God rather than men…” (The Book of Acts, Chapter 5, Verse 29).  This is a very clear and distinct message to the world; obey God over Man.
<br> Your next question may be “How and where has it been shown that Libertarianism, and solely Libertarianism, functions?”  I answer with this; simply look to Europe.
<br> Your next question may be “How and where has it been shown that Libertarianism, and solely Libertarianism, functions?”  I answer with this; simply look to Europe.
<br> Europe has had nearly every ideology under the sun.  It is seen in the East that Authoritarianism, both left and right-wing, has failed.  Take the Nazi Germans for example, They believed in authoritarianism, and they fell within 12 years.  Another case is within the Soviet Union, where, despite lasting longer, it still fell under its own weight.
<br> Anarchism has not yet been seen to work either.  Look at the Makhnovtsi, who toiled with anarchism, and yet fell within 3 years.  Anarchist Capitalism has never really been implemented on a large scale, yet I am sure that it will fail.
<br> So what is the answer to this question?  Socialist nations, both Authoritarian and Anarchist, have failed, and so will Capitalist nations.  What good is the situation if it fails regardless?  I bring up a third, better idea;

Revision as of 19:32, 27 September 2023

Self Insert
"People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism

This page is meant to represent SomekindaKaiser's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission.


Kaiserism is the political ideology of SomekindaKaiser.

It is a Anarchist, Socially Far-Right, and Economically Center, founded by SomekindaKaiser after "A Night at a Civil War reenactment and tiktok vrill edits". Kaiserism entails an agricultural focus within a group of Orthodox Christian communes, unfettered by the government, which Kaiser views as "Jewish and cringe".

History

Kaiserism was formally created on June 10th, 2023, when the creator, SomekindaKaiser, found himself agreeing with a man named Caleb, a Serbian Orthodox Christian who strongly disliked Judaism. Kaiser currently works on a manifesto, titled "On the Topic of Politics". It will be inscribed here.

"On the Topic of Politics"

Chapter I, Part I: The Government

When found in the turmoil that is modern politics, one will always find oneself at one major opinion. That opinion is the one on government, the ones who lord over you. How much power shall they have? What rights shall you be allowed to exercise? Who shall be in power? All questions that people find themselves pondering, and have been pondering ever since civilization first formed. There are three consistent groups within the argument of government; Authoritarians, Libertarians, and Anarchists.

The Authoritarian says that we should have complete subservience to the government and that all it does is justified.
The Libertarian believes that we should distrust the government, and, if necessary, overthrow it.
The Anarchist believes that we should not have a government to overthrow in the first place.


These three stances, as I see, are the three major sects of the government discussion. My position falls on the side of The Libertarian. I fall into the category due to two major reasons; Libertarianism is Biblical, and both Authoritarianism and Anarchism are unachievable mediums.
“How,” you may ask, “Is Libertarianism Biblical?” Yes, many men point to Romans 13 as the Bible being Anti-Libertarian, for it says “Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God.” (The Book of Romans, Chapter 13, Verse 1). However, I bring a counterpoint.
The Bible is full of Libertarian ideals; The very idea of the story of Exodus is rooted in the ideal of push-back against government enslavement that so many Libertarians strive towards. This is in addition to the many Bible verses that state that man should live free. In the First Book of Peter, it states “Live as people who are free, not using your freedom as a cover-up for evil, but living as servants of God.” (The First Book of Peter, Chapter 2, Verse 16).
This shows that man must live free, unhindered by man's laws. However, it should be noted that this does not mean that life must be lived as one of God’s children, and your freedom shouldn’t be used as a crutch to legitimize sin.
This idea of liberty is repeated once again, in the Book of Acts, where it is written “But Peter and the apostles answered, “We must obey God rather than men…” (The Book of Acts, Chapter 5, Verse 29). This is a very clear and distinct message to the world; obey God over Man.
Your next question may be “How and where has it been shown that Libertarianism, and solely Libertarianism, functions?” I answer with this; simply look to Europe.
Europe has had nearly every ideology under the sun. It is seen in the East that Authoritarianism, both left and right-wing, has failed. Take the Nazi Germans for example, They believed in authoritarianism, and they fell within 12 years. Another case is within the Soviet Union, where, despite lasting longer, it still fell under its own weight.
Anarchism has not yet been seen to work either. Look at the Makhnovtsi, who toiled with anarchism, and yet fell within 3 years. Anarchist Capitalism has never really been implemented on a large scale, yet I am sure that it will fail.
So what is the answer to this question? Socialist nations, both Authoritarian and Anarchist, have failed, and so will Capitalist nations. What good is the situation if it fails regardless? I bring up a third, better idea;

Recent changes

  • Gato Matador • 34 minutes ago
  • Gato Matador • 35 minutes ago
  • NewMaritimeVistula • 39 minutes ago
  • Gato Matador • 1 hour ago