No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|headercolor=#141414 | |headercolor=#141414 | ||
|textcolor=#F3F3F3 | |textcolor=#F3F3F3 | ||
|buttoncolor=# | |buttoncolor=#141414 | ||
|buttontextcolor=#F3F3F3 | |buttontextcolor=#F3F3F3 | ||
|linkcolor=#6FA8DC | |linkcolor=#6FA8DC | ||
Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
}} | }} | ||
[[File:Archeofuturist.png]] '''Archeofuturism''' <br> | [[File:Archeofuturist.png]] '''Archeofuturism''' <br> | ||
[[File:Eugen.png]] '''[[Eugenicism]]''' <br> | [[File:Eugen.png]] '''[[Eugenicism]]''' <br> {{Collapse| | ||
*[[File:Genh+.png]] '''CRISPR Gene Editing''' | |||
}} | |||
[[File:Biomech.png]] '''{{PCBA|Biomechanicalism}}''' <br> | [[File:Biomech.png]] '''{{PCBA|Biomechanicalism}}''' <br> | ||
[[File:Postgenderism.png]] '''[[Postgenderism]]''' {{Collapse| | [[File:Postgenderism.png]] '''[[Postgenderism]]''' {{Collapse| | ||
*[[File: | *[[File:Antr.png]] '''Morphological Freedom''' | ||
}} | }} | ||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
Line 141: | Line 143: | ||
#What does not overcome itself decays. | #What does not overcome itself decays. | ||
#The conservative is purblind, the traditionalist recidivist. | #The conservative is purblind, the traditionalist recidivist. | ||
= Relations = | |||
=== The Masters === | |||
People I like and pretty much agree with. | |||
=== {{Color|D9D9D9|The Warriors}} === | |||
Not bad, worthy of some criticism. | |||
=== {{Color|B3B3B3|The Blessed}} === | |||
Disagreeable but respectable. | |||
*[[File:Neo-ABax.png]] [[Neo-Anthony Bax Thought]] - I appreciate your nationalistic sentiments and I think you explain them well, though yours is a profound modern type of nationalism which I don't like. Your philosophy is interesting and respectable, even if I do have some criticism (moral nihilism <u>not</u> being one of those). Your economical views are the worst thing on your page, mainly because I dislike socialism and I consider it to be outdated and not a viable alternative to capitalism anymore, but also because of your definition of socialism (dirigisme is not socialism what are you talking about). I think your argument against suicide (based on Camus' absurdism) is weak and can be addressed best with a Nietzschean viewpoint. Overall I think your thought is quite sound, especially if we compare it with other people's arguments. | |||
=== {{Color|8C8C8C|The Sorcerers}} === | |||
Too different from my views. | |||
=== {{Color|666666|The Humble}} === | |||
Poor argumentation and viewpoints. | |||
=== {{Color|404040|The Outcasts}} === | |||
The worst of the worst. |
Revision as of 02:45, 7 November 2023
Yeah so this is my self-insert, I am Modular, a mythological deity writing about my own opinions about the world in my free time. I like Heraclitus, Gorgias, Machiavelli, Nietzsche, Saint-Point, Faye, Land, and some other people I probably forgot. Some of my interests are philosophy, politics, theology, sociology, psychology, future studies, and science, though I also like learning about other stuff. Oh and I like duels, of course I like duels. And brownies. I love brownies. I also want more lesbian aristocrats.
Don't expect the page to ever be finished.
Aphorisms
- I have intended to desecrate the Human. Not enough have I done yet, nor will I ever do, but I don't need to: the future will do it for me.
- The Human is dead, and so is God. Leave Modernity's fallen glory to the coward, for I proclaim the beginning of a new aeon.
- The Orbs do not care about the binary, for conflict makes harmony. Man's obliviousness made him blind, and the true embracer is cast off.
- The quest for the holy grail of man's essence is yet to have a conclusion, though the conclusion is chimeric.
- To have a word with God is to wrangle with man.
- The illusory is real, as reality is the illusory.
- Cowardice is the ethos of the late-modern man.
- What does not overcome itself decays.
- The conservative is purblind, the traditionalist recidivist.
Relations
The Masters
People I like and pretty much agree with.
The Warriors
Not bad, worthy of some criticism.
The Blessed
Disagreeable but respectable.
- Neo-Anthony Bax Thought - I appreciate your nationalistic sentiments and I think you explain them well, though yours is a profound modern type of nationalism which I don't like. Your philosophy is interesting and respectable, even if I do have some criticism (moral nihilism not being one of those). Your economical views are the worst thing on your page, mainly because I dislike socialism and I consider it to be outdated and not a viable alternative to capitalism anymore, but also because of your definition of socialism (dirigisme is not socialism what are you talking about). I think your argument against suicide (based on Camus' absurdism) is weak and can be addressed best with a Nietzschean viewpoint. Overall I think your thought is quite sound, especially if we compare it with other people's arguments.
The Sorcerers
Too different from my views.
The Humble
Poor argumentation and viewpoints.
The Outcasts
The worst of the worst.