Hyperfascism

Hyperfascism
"The Dance of Civilizations Carries On - Will You Join It?"
Basic Information
Aliases	(feel free to add your own)
Alignments	Fascists Socialists
Ideological Influences
Influenced by	Napoleon Bonaparte G.W.F Hegel Karl Marx Friedrich Nietzsche Georges Sorel Gabriele D'Annunzio Karl Otto Paetal The Strassers Ernst Niekisch Ernst Junger Oswald Spengler Mircea Eliade Julius Evola Antonio Gramsci Benito Mussolini F.T Marinetti Nicola Bombacci Giovanni Gentile Marcel Deat Oswald Mosley Ikki Kita Shumei Okawa Mao Zedong Guy Debord Franco Freda Lev Gumilyov Alexander Dugin Deng Xiaoping The Kims Guillame Faye Alain de Benoist Francis P. Yockey Jean-Francois Thiriart The Ba'athists, Pan-Arabists and Arab Socialists The National Bolsheviks The National Socialists The Conservative Revolutionaries File:Niekisch.png

Hello. I am "Duginoid", and have created this page to put forward my glorious theory of 'Hyperfascism', a doctrine regarding the gradual unification and eternal war between nations.

Cultural Views:

• National Feminism
• Queer Acceptance
• Futurism
• Alternate Modernism
• Revolutionary Nationalism
• Reconstitution of National Myths
• Cultural Relativism
• Ethnopluralism

Political and Foreign Policy Views:

• Unification/Federalization of Nations
• Eternal, Dialectical War
• Organic Democracy
• Totalitarianism
• Republicanism
• Meritocratic Aristocracy
• Pro-East

Economic Views:

• Proletarian Revolution
• National Syndicalism
• Non-Marxist Socialism
• Third Positionism

Selected Perspectives

On The Dialectical Perfection of Civilizations

Nations are arbitrary but particular constructions which have emerged through contingent historical phenomena and the production of nation-states. The production of nation-states is notably linked to end of feudalism, though not necessarily to the beginning of fascism. Indeed, it can be said that nation-states first emerged through the collapse of feudal systems and the emergence of mass economic accumulation. Capitalism is both the birth and death of the nation. It creates the conditions necessary for the strengthening of a nation, through economic efficiency and streamlining, while simultaneously trending towards globalism and national dissolution. Regardless, nations are historically particular constructions which are created both through legalization, via statehood, and cultural unification, through shared language, myth and tradition.

The nation is, however, simply a reflection of the *civilization* which it is part of. What do I mean here by civilization? Simply an ill-defined 'sphere' of interconnected cultures, religions, states and languages. Examples of civilizations include Western, White civilization, Eurasian civilization, Eastern civilization(including China, Japan and India) as well as Islamic civilization. Civilizations are always in a state of conflict with each other. There has never been a period of history in which civilizational peace has existed. Whether it be Alexander's conquest of the East, the West's invasion of Islam during the crusades, of Genghis Khan's Eurasian wars of domination, civilizations are always, whether literally or figuratively, at war with each other. Presently, we are witnessing a grand confrontation between the hegemonic power of the West with the oppressed nations of Islam, Eurasia and Asia, as well as the Latin Americans and Africans. The whole world has joined together to bring down the West, and we must help them. What is notable, however, is that never has a civilizational war actually *destroyed* a civilization. Instead, it has merely asserted the dominance of one over another. And indeed, civilizations are not always united: During the Second World War, the nations of the East and West tore each other apart while Eurasia remained united under the glorious rule of the Soviet Union. We anti-westerners are not out to destroy western civilization; far from it, we seek to RECONSTITUTE western civilization in a glorious rebirth. But only from the fires of war can this phoenix emerge...

Civilizations are trapped in an endless cycle of growth, decline and rebirth. However, it is only through their interactions with other civilizations that they can regenerate themselves. Never before has a civilization become rejuvenated except through conflict with another; Eurasia reconstructed itself during the Second World War, the East is currently being reborn through the rise of China, etc, etc. The West has been in a position of cultural decline and is currently being gradually outmoded by Eurasia and the East. It is through a great war with these opposed powers that it will regenerate itself, whether through glorious victory or terrible defeat. The East will not destroy the West: It will reconstruct it.

Relations

• Baxism - Hm. Perhaps an ally? I implore you to reject the anational lie that is communism and embrace corporative socialism.
• DECBism Racist fool. You seek to destroy all cultures, all traditions, all nations with your odious atlanticism. Perish.
• Nuriskianism Funny, how you have claimed I am not a real Duginist while you are a communist. You do realize that the Ethnos can only be properly administrated and constituted through a state, yes? Allow me to elaborate: If the state were to dissolve, there would be no legal expression of the national body. The body would be unable to assert itself politically and thus have no true substance, and thus, it would essentially become powerless. The state is the political expression of a particular national body. Ideally, the two are one and the same.
• Alstūdism Ah, an authentic fascist! I'd like to respond to your criticisms of my ideological positions. First of all, yes, Duginism, or 'Fourth Theory', claims to move beyond both Fascism and Marxism-Leninism. It performs this through a synthesis of the two. However, rather than viewing this as some kind of 'new' ideological position, I instead view it as simply a higher form of fascism, one synthesizing fascism itself with the fascist-adjacent Marxism-Leninism. Secondly, I support pan-nationalism as a means of building collaboration and unification between like nations, and thus strengthening them. I view fascism as an ultimately internationally applicable system, rather than one specific to certain nations. Following from that view, my position on eternal war is as follows: I support conflict between different groups of nations and through this, the dialectical perfection of nations. As nations compete with and destroy each other, they strengthen themselves, until one day, the perfect society is produced. I support homosexuals and potentially gender-nonconforming individuals as I don't really see them as any kind of threat to the national body, and homosexuality can in fact strengthen national bonds, particularly within the military.
• Matteo Thought Not really very good at being fascistic, considering you are christian. Christianity is inherently universalist and seeks to dissolve the national body through replacing national bonds with religious ones. Additionally, homosexuals pose no threat to the national body and we have no reason to oppress a natural variation in human sexuality.
• Militant Socialism Useful. Your guilds are basically syndicates, and you seek a socialist and patriotic political system. I think people like you are rather conducive to fascist political goals.
• Neocarlism Christians can never be fascists, buffoon. Christianity is a filthy rot which seeks to destroy all national pride, just like atlanticist liberalism. And need I mention your pathetic sexism and homophobia? The nation exists through myth, language and culture, not necessarily through tradition.
• Polish Nazism You are a pathetic buffoon who knows nothing of Fascism. You do realize capitalism is inherently globalist and dissolves the national body? Of course you don't, because you're not a fascist! Please, just admit your liberalism rather than playing pretend like the child you are.
• LordCompost I suppose I must respond to your critique, no? Well then, here I go: It is true that a state is not necessary for the functioning of a culture. But is it not true that a state is necessary for the wide-scale administration, reinforcement and reproduction of a culture? The culture/ethnos/nation as a structure can only properly and fully express itself as the state, because without the state it has no border, no 'inside and outside', no separation. Without the state the culture can bleed into others, it can become muddled and unclear. This is why a state is necessary for the proper functioning of a culture. The nation is a set of relations between individuals which separates and defines them, while the state is a set of relations between individuals which enables and frees them. The state enables the efficient functioning of the nation and is its structural expression, while it also acts as a sort of guardian of the individual. The nation gives the individual form, while the state gives the nation form, and it is the state that allows the individual to properly express their creative freedom. Fascism is the organic unity of the three, simply put. The civilization, is, of course, a collection of like national bodies which can potentially be defined and organized through a state, though this has only happened very rarely in history, a prime example being the Soviet Union's hegemonic unification of Eurasia or the Umayyad's rule over the Islamic World. Civilizations, even in the absence of a civilization-state, share common interests through a shared cultural heritage and opposition to 'rival' civilizations. The reason I seek the unification of civilizations is simply in order to enable ever-greater progress, stimulated by centralized power-structures and civilizational arms-races.