m (ze firsts aliases) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|aliases = | |aliases = | ||
(feel free to add your own) | Evola's true Superfascism (by Xablau Gostoso) <br> | ||
Woke Fascism (by Xablau Gostoso) <br> | |||
(feel free to add your own) <br> | |||
Latest revision as of 04:37, 4 May 2024
Hello. I am "Duginoid", and have created this page to put forward my glorious theory of 'Hyperfascism', a doctrine regarding the gradual unification and eternal war between nations.
Cultural Views:
National Feminism
Androgynization and Queer Acceptance
Futurism
Alternate Modernism
Revolutionary Nationalism
Reconstitution of National Myths
Cultural Relativism
Ethnopluralism
Political and Foreign Policy Views:
Unification/Federalization of Nations
Eternal, Dialectical War
Organic Democracy
Totalitarianism
Republicanism
Meritocratic Aristocracy 
Anti-Westernism
Economic Views:
Proletarian Revolution
National Syndicalism
Non-Marxist Socialism
Third Positionism
Selected Perspectives
On The Dialectical Perfection of Civilizations
Nations are arbitrary but particular constructions which have emerged through contingent historical phenomena and the production of nation-states. The production of nation-states is notably linked to end of feudalism, though not necessarily to the beginning of fascism. Indeed, it can be said that nation-states first emerged through the collapse of feudal systems and the emergence of mass economic accumulation. Capitalism is both the birth and death of the nation. It creates the conditions necessary for the strengthening of a nation, through economic efficiency and streamlining, while simultaneously trending towards globalism and national dissolution. Regardless, nations are historically particular constructions which are created both through legalization, via statehood, and cultural unification, through shared language, myth and tradition.
The nation is, however, simply a reflection of the *civilization* which it is part of. What do I mean here by civilization? Simply an ill-defined 'sphere' of interconnected cultures, religions, states and languages. Examples of civilizations include Western, White civilization, Eurasian civilization, Eastern civilization(including China, Japan and India) as well as Islamic civilization. Civilizations are always in a state of conflict with each other. There has never been a period of history in which civilizational peace has existed. Whether it be Alexander's conquest of the East, the West's invasion of Islam during the crusades, of Genghis Khan's Eurasian wars of domination, civilizations are always, whether literally or figuratively, at war with each other. Presently, we are witnessing a grand confrontation between the hegemonic power of the West with the oppressed nations of Islam, Eurasia and Asia, as well as the Latin Americans and Africans. The whole world has joined together to bring down the West, and we must help them. What is notable, however, is that never has a civilizational war actually *destroyed* a civilization. Instead, it has merely asserted the dominance of one over another. And indeed, civilizations are not always united: During the Second World War, the nations of the East and West tore each other apart while Eurasia remained united under the glorious rule of the Soviet Union. We anti-westerners are not out to destroy western civilization; far from it, we seek to RECONSTITUTE western civilization in a glorious rebirth. But only from the fires of war can this phoenix emerge...
Civilizations are trapped in an endless cycle of growth, decline and rebirth. However, it is only through their interactions with other civilizations that they can regenerate themselves. Never before has a civilization become rejuvenated except through conflict with another; Eurasia reconstructed itself during the Second World War, the East is currently being reborn through the rise of China, etc, etc. The West has been in a position of cultural decline and is currently being gradually outmoded by Eurasia and the East. It is through a great war with these opposed powers that it will regenerate itself, whether through glorious victory or terrible defeat. The East will not destroy the West: It will reconstruct it.
Fascism is an Individualism
The ethnos, or nation, is a structure produced by the intersection of shared values, culture, language, geography and blood. It is a source of community and identity for the individual. The nation state is the ethnos expressed as a legal and political structure.
Contrary to popular belief, Fascism is an individualism. Fascism seeks to create the ideal conditions for the human individual to express their creative freedom. Through the exaltation of the nation state and the ethnos, fascism gives the individual purpose, a sense of identity as well as community with other individuals. The totalitarian state unifies and fulfills the interests of all its constituents. The totalitarian state is the tailoring of the state to serve the community of individuals. Basically, the nation unifies the interests of individuals, while the state fulfills them. The state allows individuals to freely express their creativity with security, while the nation binds individuals together and gives them comfort, stability and identity. The nation creates the inside and outside, while the state solidifies it.
The state facilitates the individual’s creative interaction with the absolute. The state defends the individual’s rights and meritocratically rewards them for their creative expression. It allows the individual to express their ethical freedom and provides for their needs. The state is the paternalistic protector of freedom, stability and prosperity. It is truly as Gentile once said: Everything within the state. Nothing outside the state. Nothing against the state.
Relations
Baxism - Hm. Perhaps an ally? I implore you to reject the anational lie that is communism and embrace corporative socialism.
DECBism Racist fool. You seek to destroy all cultures, all traditions, all nations with your odious atlanticism. Perish.- Nuriskianism I never claimed nor will I ever claim to be racially, culturally or ethnically supremacist(you seem to be quite confused in this regard.) Communism does indeed reject sacredness, and this is why it is worthless: It lacks the anchor of stability that is the sacred, it lacks comfort and identity. It is purely negative rather than being a productive ideology. And no, war and more generalized civilizational/national confrontation is in fact one of the best drivers of progress. War is one of the best progress-stimulants known to man. Additionally, if communism is the ruthless criticism of all that exists, why is the nation immune to this criticism? Does not communism seek to eventually abolish national identity? Is not internationalism a core tenet of genuine communistic politics?
Alstūdism Ah, an authentic fascist! I'd like to respond to your criticisms of my ideological positions. First of all, yes, Duginism, or 'Fourth Theory', claims to move beyond both Fascism and Marxism-Leninism. It performs this through a synthesis of the two. However, rather than viewing this as some kind of 'new' ideological position, I instead view it as simply a higher form of fascism, one synthesizing fascism itself with the fascist-adjacent Marxism-Leninism. Secondly, I support pan-nationalism as a means of building collaboration and unification between like nations, and thus strengthening them. I view fascism as an ultimately internationally applicable system, rather than one specific to certain nations. Following from that view, my position on eternal war is as follows: I support conflict between different groups of nations and through this, the dialectical perfection of nations. As nations compete with and destroy each other, they strengthen themselves, until one day, the perfect society is produced. I support homosexuals and potentially gender-nonconforming individuals as I don't really see them as any kind of threat to the national body, and homosexuality can in fact strengthen national bonds, particularly within the military.
Matteo Thought Not really very good at being fascistic, considering you are christian. Christianity is inherently universalist and seeks to dissolve the national body through replacing national bonds with religious ones. Additionally, homosexuals pose no threat to the national body and we have no reason to oppress a natural variation in human sexuality.
- - Te felicito («I congratulate you»).
- What???
Militant Socialism Useful. Your guilds are basically syndicates, and you seek a socialist and patriotic political system. I think people like you are rather conducive to fascist political goals.
Neocarlism Christians can never be fascists, buffoon. Christianity is a filthy rot which seeks to destroy all national pride, just like atlanticist liberalism. And need I mention your pathetic sexism and homophobia? The nation exists through myth, language and culture, not necessarily through tradition.
Polish Nazism You are a pathetic buffoon who knows nothing of Fascism. You do realize capitalism is inherently globalist and dissolves the national body? Of course you don't, because you're not a fascist! Please, just admit your liberalism rather than playing pretend like the child you are.
LordCompost You are correct, and I have made a mistake, which is unsurprising considering I was quite tired when writing my response. Perhaps next time I should wait until the morning! The human is not an island, for the human mind shapes its environment, and the environment shapes the human. I suppose my position is that the nation is sort of a highly significant macro-culture; a culture shared regardless of smaller separators. It gives the individual form and identity to a great extent, surpassed perhaps only by civilizations and human identity. The state is a crystallization of a nation’s values and myths, morals and laws. A nation, through its fixed nature, brings stability, comfort and safety to the individual. And of course, as I stated, the state protects the individual’s liberties and ability to express their freedom within ethical boundaries, and thus freedom to the greatest extent. The state, as a vast social apparatus, enforces ethics and national identity at a greater level, and as an already existent social phenomenon, it is thus rational to back it if one’s goal is the promotion of freedom and identity.
Rocksism Vile, foul anarchist. You are immoral and profane, the antithesis of my values. The only thing I can see positively is your socialism, but you promote a wretched form of it. Anarchism will destroy the nation, all comfort and stability, all identity. It would create a permanent, schizophrenic rot in the minds of all. Also, add me back.
Schumacherianism 
Another immoral degenerate anarchist(or minarchist), but of the rightist variety. You will also destroy identity, stability, and freedom. Without the totalitarian state, the individual has no freedom, for in an anarchist capitalist system, the bourgeoisie simply freely exploit the proletariat without allowing them to express their creativity. Without the nation, the individual has no identity, for in an anarchist capitalist system, the national identity is dissolved in favor of rampant uncultured consumerism. Without socialism, the individual has no security, for in an anarchist capitalist system, there is no safety net to protect the physically or mentally weak, to allow ALL to express their creativity. In Capitalism, one’s greatness is defined by their ability to contribute to growth, rather than their moral fitness and creative abilities.- https://pcbwiki.net/images/DistribReact.png Distributist Reactionaryism Rather weak. Catholicism, while potentially useful in the short run, is far too universalist and is ultimately an opponent of Fascism. The only good thing is your corporatism, though your version of it appears to lack socialism and syndicalist management. All in all, you’re just another reactionary weakling.
- https://pcbwiki.net/images/Brazlib.png Brazilian Liberalism Perhaps my antithesis. You are the epitome of Atlanticist, liberal rot. You don’t merit an actual critique, so I’m just going to say: Perish.
- Inexistism I strongly appreciate your ideology, and I consider you to be a fascist. I only have a single critique: Why do you dislike Bolshevism? The Bolsheviks from Stalin onwards are commendable allies of the Fascistic cause! They are nationalists, socialists and arguably corporatists! The only disagreement between authentic Fascists and Marxist-Leninists is about philosophy and end goals! I also would appreciate if you were more socially progressive, but that’s something we can get past.
Ziółkowskiizm Positively vile ideology. You seem to follow a retarded and devolved form of fascism, one devoid of revolutionary sentiment, socialism and progress. From your wretched social traditionalism to your weak economic policies, you are overly moderated and traditional. Tradition is only useful in creating individual identity, and when it comes to conflict with human freedom, it must be annihilated. The nation exists to give the individual form, not for the individual to worship it as a god. We must respect tradition, not blindly worship it. Additionally, your pointless hatred for homosexuals is ignorant and foolish. I support the nation as a source of community and identity, as well as a stimulator of progress, not to be preserved for its own sake.
