×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 2,528 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki

Knyaz Nesanel Ideology

Revision as of 11:37, 20 September 2023 by NesanelReborn (talk | contribs)




BEWARE, ANTI-FAUSTIANS!

This page contains possibly disturbing content for:

Socialists (Actual Economic Theory)

Neoluddites (Acceptance of Medicine)

Nationalists (Rejection of Tribalism)


Self Insert
"People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism

This page is meant to represent NesanelReborn's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission.

Work in Progress
"I'll be done any day now!" - Still-Being-Drawnism

This page is not done yet and may still contain inaccurate information or miss important details.

Remodulism is an ideology that exists after the death of Neo-Phibunsongkhram Thought.

Since so many people all over the PCB community usually have curiosity towards what I believe in, or misunderstand my ideology, claiming that I’m either an ancap, a liberal, a technocrat, a transhumanist, a fascist, or whatever. I bet nobody here truly cares about what I believe in. I’ll just say that I believe that the LVT is the only good tax, a Monarch-CEO should be able to create their own kingdom to secede from a nation-state, morality is either fake or subjective, and there’s no logical way to escape from capitalism’s nihilistic, technologically deterministic, and materialistic deconstruction of humanity. I’m here to answer your questions, listing down what I believe in below here.

But before we get to the point, you should take a test for FPCBallers I made first, to prove how close you are to what I believe in.

After you’ve finished the test, let’s get to the point below.

Economy

Georgism

  • W.I.P.

Pigouvianism

  • W.I.P.

Laissez-Faire Economy

  • W.I.P.

Free Trade

  • W.I.P.

Formalism

  • W.I.P.

Copyleft

  • W.I.P.

Corporatocracy

  • W.I.P.



Politics

Royalism

  • W.I.P.

Patchwork

  • W.I.P.

Profit-based Autocracy

  • W.I.P.

Post-Libertarianism

  • W.I.P.

Civil Libertarianism

  • W.I.P.

Anti-Idpol

  • W.I.P.

Imperialism

  • W.I.P.

Freedom of Religion

  • W.I.P.



My Political Journey

Name Time Ideologies
Apolitical Phase 200?-2018 + +
Thaksinist Phase 2018-2019 + +
3rd Way Dengist Phase 2019-2020 + +
Sam Kib Phase 2020-2021 + +
Neoconservative Populist Phase aka First Nesanel Thought 2021-2022 + +
Paleolibertarian Phase aka Second Nesanel Thought 2022-2022 + +
Neo-Phibunist Phase aka Third Nesanel Thought 2022-2023 + +
Neocameralist Phase aka Knyaz Nesanel Ideology 2023- + +

Relationships

Note that this is my opinion on ideologies, not personalities, so I’ll only analyze your ideologies.

Template (Reserved for inserting views on Self-inserts)

[Reserved] (////)

  • W.I.P.



Naive Majoritarians (Reserved for Democrats and Non-Planned Economy Socialists)

Meridionalism (////)

  • Ah, you seem to be a standard left-libertarian. Claiming to stand for liberty, but also support populism, democracy, humanism, socialism, and also nationalism, all which are rooted from herd morality and religion. Well, atleast I can admire your support for separatism especially from the United States.




Control Freaks (Reserved for Paternalists who restrict the individuals from facing their consequences)

Pragmatic 16384ism (////)

  • It seems like you have become skeptical towards my new direction, and I can say the same to you. First of all, your belief on Christian moralism is antithetical to my Nietzschean philosophical views as Christianity breeds slave morality. Secondly, your focus on identity politics from the Right, like from the Left, is cringeworthy, as it reduces individuals into nothing but part of conformity rather than themselves. Also, the Third Positionism is also vile, even though you’re not as economically radical as fascists, but the state interfering on the economy (rather than on the land) will always backfire, even if you want to regulate the markets for conservative or nationalist reasons rather than for the sake of utilitarianism. Perhaps be less focused on idpol and I’ll like your ideology more.




Insecure Collectivists (Reserved for Hardcore Socialists and Nationalists)

Neo-Majapahitism (////)

  • Ah, my old friend. I think I have made a criticism towards your ideology before, and it may not change that much. Atleast you have fully embraced absolutism and ditched populism. But on the other hands, problems like your extreme cultural conservatism, extreme nationalism, or economic overregulation need to be ditched away because a coercive society doesn’t last forever even if you try so hard to suppress individuals who oppose your ideals by coercion. I can give you one advice: If you embrace the technocapital pill and be less coercive, your dream for your Neo-Majapahit Empire will become real.




Unproductive Tree Huggers (Reserved for Bioconservatives and Anti-Tech Environmentalists)

[Reserved] (////)

  • W.I.P.




Spooky Ultraprogressives (Reserved for Revolutionary Progressives and Intersectionalists)

[Reserved] (////)

  • W.I.P.




Lawless Savages (Reserved for Anarchists of any types)

[Reserved] (////)

  • W.I.P.




Vanguards of the Future (Reserved for self-inserts deemed excellent for Darth Nesanel Ideology)

Neo-Optimateism (////)

  • We basically have a lot of things in common, such as corporatocracy, laissez-faire economy, or technological determinism, except you’re ten times more violent than me.



Neo-Erissianism (////)

  • You are basically me without the NRx stuffs. The only bad parts of your ideology are world federalism, hedonism, and multiculturalism I guess.




Unclassifiable (Reserved for unclassifiable self-inserts)

Chaotic Oddo Thought (////)

  • This ideology is very confusing to me, it seems like you’re trying to do a weird mix of both metaphysics and politics at the same time. I have no comments or ideas to put you in any classifications.