 |
Self Insert "People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism This page is meant to represent Pollere's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission. |
 |
Work in Progress "I'll be done any day now!" - Still-Being-Drawnism This page is not done yet and may still contain inaccurate information or miss important details. |
Folcalonism is the ideology of Pollere. He takes influence from people like 
Andrew Jackson, 
Huey Long, 
Pierre Bietry, and 
Thomas Jefferson, among others. He believes that the state should be 
very decentralized, but while still maintaining a 
strong executive with the freedom and ability to act decisively in federal affairs. He is also deeply religious, believing in 
Christianity. He is a strong supporter of 
traditional morality. He also supports a 
national rejuvenation, as he views the present culture in his country to be dead and in need of revival. He supports a staunchly 
populist economic system based heavily on 
Distributism, Yellow Socialism, and 
Economic Nationalism, and also borrowing some elements from 
Georgism.
Three Goals of Folcalonism
To bring about a national rejuvenation to the United States, fostering a return to communitarianism, Christianity, dynamism, the Cavalier Ideal, connection to nature, and Romanticism
To destroy the current elitist economy, and replace it with one which reins in the power of the moneyed aristocracy and uses it to serve the people
To preserve the American Republic through a number of political reforms such as greater administrative decentralization, strengthened executive control over the federal government, and the ending of the dominance of the moneyed aristocracy
Government Structure 
Confederalism 
Folcalonism asserts that a 
centralized structure for the state leads only to polarization, the decay of local culture, and elitism. Thus, it is necessary to the goals of Folcalonism that the state be a decentralized confederation, with minimal power given to the federal government, and the majority of power being delegated to the states.
Return of Dueling 
Folcalonism believes that citizens should be allowed to solve certain disputes outside of the purview of the state. One of the ways they should be allowed to do this is by 
dueling, in whatever manner they see fit. Dueling allows for the rest of society not to be brought into their dispute, and avoids burdening their community and other taxpayers by using government courts. Dueling also gives people a reason to be physically fit and able to defend themselves, instilling a renewed willpower and strength in them.
A Strong Executive 
Folcalonism holds that the 
executive branch should be strong, and should exert more control over the federal government. The ideology asserts that the chief executive, elected by a system similar to how the states of Nebraska and Maine elect presidents, should use their wide ranging powers to act as a defender of the common man and his rights, similarly to Andrew Jackson’s philosophy on the American presidency. The executive would not, however, interfere in areas constitutionally delegated to lower levels of government unless they violate the constitution.
The Ward System 
Folcalonism promotes Thomas Jefferson’s idea of the 
ward system. The ward system is a method of organization below the county level in which a group of people who all know one another personally perform the functions of government for one another. Folcalonism believes that a system such as this could foster a return of 
communitarianism to American culture, and serve as a starting point from which 
hyperindividualism could be dismantled without utilizing extensive 
social engineering.
Local Democracy
Folcalonism believes that, differently from the ideology's view of a federal government mostly under executive control, the local level of government should generally be more 
democratic in nature, with a particular emphasis on 
referendums on local laws.
Republicanism 
Folcalonism opposes 
monarchy and supports a 
republican form of government. The ideology believes that a monarchy elevates an individual to the level of God, and it justifies that individual’s right to rule and level above the common man using solely their 
birthright, instead of popular approval, 
competence, or righteousness.