Proto-Fargothism

Proto-Fargothism
Basic Information
Aliases	National Humanism Australian Monarcho-Jacobinism Atheism's Natural Conclusion
Alignments	AuthUnity  Monarchists  Welfarists  Capitalists  Culturally Revolutionary  Ultranationalists  Humanists  Atheists
Ideological Influences
Influenced by	Social Authoritarianism State Atheism Cultural Nationalism Human Nationalism Materialism Humanism Moral Relativism Social Democracy Social Capitalism Regulationism Protectionism Authoritarianism One-Party Politics Constitutional Monarchism Bi-Culturalism Feminism Laicism Anti-Religion Transphobia Jordan Shanks Gough Whitlam Alex O'Connor DozenValues 38.9% 61.1% 58.3% 41.7% 66% 34% 38.9% 61.1% 28.5% 71.5% 25.7% 74.3% Closest Match: Saadehism

Proto-Fargothism, or National Humanism as he called himself, were the beliefs that FargothGares held from the late 2021 to December of 2022. He was generally a social democrat with authoritarian leanings, as well as an Australian chauvinist, isolationist and hyper anti-American. He supported the Windsor monarchy, believing that abolishing it would drive Australia culturally closer to America. He wished for Australia to be defined by two primary cultural groups, the Anglo-Celts and the Aboriginals. He was a humanist and anti-theist who supported every effort to better the human condition, having no moral considerations for harm done towards the environment or animals, besides how it might affect humans.

National Humanism

Fargoth coined this term for himself to best describe his form of 'nationalism' which focuses on humans as the supreme group, making it civic, anti-theistic and anthropocentric in nature. Unlike Human Nationalism (which he was not aware of), National Humanism did not advocate for global unity but rather Australian chauvinism, and maintained a cultural character.