 |
Self Insert "People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism This page is meant to represent Mish's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission. |
 |
Work in Progress "I'll be done any day now!" - Still-Being-Drawnism This page is not done yet and may still contain inaccurate information or miss important details. |
Mishist Thought is the political ideology describing the political ideals of the user Mish. It advocates for a laissez-faire society dominated by markets (which would be largely dominated by co-ops and self-employment, although wage labour could theoretically exist and be much less destructive than it is currently) and can be summarized as an ideology that permits any voluntary and consensual exchange (so anything not violating the NAP). It is principally and economically anti-capitalist, seeing it as an unneccesary evil (although Mish views 
Anarcho-Capitalism in a somewhat positive light mostly because they're not real capitalists). It is socially moderate, with slight progressive tendencies (mostly due to its support of LGBTQ+ rights). It is principally anti-nationalist and anti-interventionist
Relations
Gemerald
Alstūdism - Brimstone ideology but gemerald personality
CarrotsRppl2ism - Based ideologue and a great guy but I think you should embrace the NAP
TIIKKETMASTER Thought - Not gonna lie, the very idea of synthesizing Nozick, Konkin and Kaczynski requires balls and extreme schizophrenia so I gotta respect the grind. A lot of your views on economics and society are pretty agreeable too, but you should come over to the dark side and embrace anarchism and become a techno-gaianist
Gem
Hoodism - I do like that you've embraced anarchism, now go and read Benjamin Tucker. Post-leftism is also kinda cringe but seeing as you're 14 you're probably gonna grow out of it
Coem
Messardism - Even though I hate nationalism I can't help but respect the fact that you're a French nationalist considering the way the French have always been. I also respect the fact that you throw empty bottles at toddlers. However, I think fascism is kinda brimstone ngl
Brimstone
Gemerald
Left-Rothbardianism - Can pretty much sum up my entire ideology in a way. I'm a little more left leaning than a lot of left-Roths but we all arrive to similar conclusions. 
Left-Wing Market Anarchism - There's a reason why I call my own personal beliefs C4SS thought ironically sometimes (I'm especially influenced by a lot of Left-Roths on C4SS like Long) 
Anarcho-Transhumanism - I wanna become a cyborg one day.
Agorism - Great praxis and Konkin had great intrepretations of Rothbard.
Panarchism - So you mean to tell me that everyone gets political representation? Fucking awesome!Gem
Democratic Confederalism - For the longest time I thought Bookchin had good ideas but was unrealistic altogether until I really read up on Rojava and honestly I've grown really sympathetic towards Democratic Confederalism as a whole. There's parts of democratic confederalism I disagree with (I wish it was more market oriented for example, although Öcalan stated that he is not against markets), I am willing to accept it. Also, free Kurdistan!
Mutualism - Mutualists are correct on a lot of things, but their ideology is a bit of a mixed bag depending on author (Proudhon especially, Tucker was much better). Even though I no longer consider myself a mutualist, I'm still pretty sympathetic to the ideology
Coem
Eco-Anarchism - I think that a synthesis between anarcho-transhumanism and eco-anarchism is pretty ideal (go read up on technogaianism and apply that to an anarchist perspective, and you basically have my thoughts on environmentalism). However a shitton of eco-anarchists are also luddites and that's pretty cringe imho
Anarcho-Capitalism - My biggest problem with anarcho-capitalism is that it's called anarcho-capitalism, as that's inaccurate to the definition of capitalism (I recall Bookchin had a pretty good write up regarding this), however aside from that I can't really dislike anarcho-capitalism too much. Sure I disagree with ancaps on topics such as wage labour and property norms (somewhat) but it's honestly not too major considering ancaps at their very core are basically confused LWMAs. 
Hoppeanism - Basically take my points on ancapism. Hoppe was a man who had some incredibly good opinions (his views on communities in an individualist society for example), but also some horrible takes as well (his stance on borders, AE). Hoppe's a mixed bag really, he isn't literally Jesus 2.0 but by no means is he mega-Hitler like some like to say.
Anarcho-Communism - As much as I'd like to put anarcho-communism in Coal tier due to my own pro-market biases, it is a valid and consistent strain of ideology much like anarcho-capitalism (despite its name). Most of my issues with ancoms are because of my overall distain for communism.
Coal
Anarcho-Egoism - The biggest problem with Stirnerism is that you eventually grow up, and that's coming from a former Stirnerite myself. With that being said however Stirner was still better than Rand, but anyone with half a brain cell is probably smarter than her. Reject egoism, embrace individualist liberalism. Although ngl, Tucker's egoist phase wasn't half bad.
Minarchism - The thing about the state is that it's basically comparable to a rolling ball of shit that gets bigger over time. Also, the US constitution is basically fancy toilet paper at this point, and has been ever since Lincoln called the military on a tax protest.
Brimstone
Objectivism - Every good idea Rand had was pioneered either by classical liberals or Stirner (and that's not saying much considering Stirner probably had only five good ideas in total), and everything else is straight up garbage. 
Luddism - I'd honestly kill to watch a bunch of self-proclaimed "luddites" on the internet try to start their own primitivist society. 
Anarcho-Primitivism - I'd kill to watch a bunch of anprims start an anprim society. Although ngl Earth Crisis is a great band, despite their anprimmery.
National Anarchism - The brimstone of anarchism. Troy Southgate was a fucking retard and thought that synthesizing pseudo-"individualist" (even though Troy was never an individualist despite calling himself one, since he's a racialist and racialism is inherently a collectivistic concept) anarchism with his own wignatery would be good. Now to be fair, some of his ideas on community within anarchism weren't terrible, it's just that Hoppe came up with them long before he did 
Fascism - Basically the complete opposite of my views in many regards, it shouldn't be surprising that I, as an individualist anarchist don't exactly hold fascism in a favourable light. 
Stalinism - Basically fascism but red and with different propaganda. Nah.
