 |
Self Insert "People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism This page is meant to represent Hysteria's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission. |
 |
Work in Progress "I'll be done any day now!" - Still-Being-Drawnism This page is not done yet and may still contain inaccurate information or miss important details. |
Hysteria Thought or Hysteriaism t̂hͧ̒ǐͬs ̫̚is̰̍ ͍̆̌a̬n̑ͪ ̯ͫ͌ö́͆m̘niͅ-̂͊of̒f̗̐-א͕ͮ-̅̂c̰ȍ͊mͮ̉p̻a͊̇s̈̓s̆ ͬs̺̋̄c̝h͋ͨiz̥̈̂oͯͭ-̞̌iͦ̉d̜̒e̫o̗l̩ő̎g͔y̥̓ ̳̈͛t̗ͫ̄ĥͤa͉ͨt͎͂̾ ̐̓i̔ͅs̄ ̺͆be͈y̬̑̀on͇ͧd ̾ͦa̘̓ͨl͚ͮ̎l̈̑ ͋p͇ͥoͦ̔ss̖i͙̎̾b̚l̲ͮ̾ẽ̓ ̖̋ͤḁͨn̟d̦ͯ̒ ͔̏i͓̅mp̲ö́ŝ̻ͭs̀͋ȋ͚b̅͋l̪ḙ l͈i̙mị͂ts͍ ͎ͨ̚o͇ͯf̟ ͚poͣ̋ḻi̿ͤt͍̽͂ḯ͈c̎a̺̔̆l ̪ex̻͒ͮi̲ͪs̆͒t̳͂e͑̚n̪cͯ́e̯̓, ̱ͯ͐b̼e͚ÿ́̚o̽nͧ̏d̳ ̗t̬ḧ͂e̔ ͦͧun̫͗d̜͌ͦerͫst̄a̰n̑̅d̊i̲ͭn̯g̅ ͫ̽oͦf̹͛ ̌͗e̿̐v͒e͕ͥͣn ͋͋m̓ul̬̒t̬i̝d̟i͆̐m̱̑enͧ̔s̄i͙o̚nal͍ ͊ḃ̟e͂̂ȋngͧ̿sͤ.̩̅ͨ
overview
PERALIPSYS
The ideas of Hysteria are as absurd as they are indescribable. For indescribability and inaccessibility to the occupation of other people's thoughts makes it itself. Hysteria thought is afraid of foreign intrusion of words and ideas into infinite consciousness, so one can only guess what goals command this essence...However, it can be said that the Thought of Hysteria stands for the absolute hypothetical creative and for the abolition of familiarity in all its understanding.
Thassaria
Thassaria or Thassaria Hypothesis represents macroextension global relativity theory of logic by Jean Da Faldier. According to the doctrine, she is nothing more than rational astilla, powerful and timeless comfort system. It is distinguished by the "shadow of ideas", abstract but at the same time free in interpretation and somehow reproduced in our world through a prism. This distinguishes it from other more fundamental features of ideology because by definition they cannot be realized even so.
Epaliph of Mind
This is something that evokes purely associative feelings... it seems to me that a m̸̡ͮ̋ͦ̿̀ͣͭͪ̾̀͘͢͠͡͝͝ú̴̦͎̠̞͈͍͉̠̠̞̰̤̃̀ͬ͒̄ͨ̌ͅl̸̴̵̢̦̲̯ͯ͂͗ͫ̾̊̈́̈́͊̏ͤ͒̃̉ͭͥ̉̄̀́̚̕͜͟͢͝͡͏̢̡ṭ̷̨̘̭̻̠̗̮̳̮̤͉̠̹̟̂̅͒̃̑̈ͭ͛̕͜͡͝͝͞ͅ͏̀i̤̳̥͚̟̞̝̪̺̰͉̯̳̬̦̅ͧ̽̀́͝͞҉͘҉̷̴́̀͠ḏ̴̸̴̷̡̡͖͔͙̬̼̫̜͇̟̩̝̽̔̽̊̌ͦ͌̽̂͑̇̌̀͘̕͜͢͠͡͡͝ḭ̵̧̧̙̥̩̰̱̟̤̻̦̩̯̈́̏ͦ̑̿̊̏̋̀̓̋̈̆͂̕͟͜͞͠͝͝͏̵͡͞͡m̵̸̷̸̵̡̧̢̟̱͙͖̭̮̰̫̼̫̰̙̜̙̙̖̮̼͈ͨͮ̿ͫ͂̃͂ͯ̒ͭ́̾̅̈́̅ͯ͐́́̀͘͡͞͝͠e̸͚̟̝͔͚̫̝̺̗̺̭̼̹͈̝͔͇̪̓̆̔ͤͮ̓̅̇͐ͨͯ̆̿͘ͅ҉̵̵̴̛͟͢͝͡͏̵̸́͡n̴̸̷̷̶̸̸̡̢̛̛̪̭̖̰͚̥̝̞̹͓͙̱̹͉̳ͤͬ͗ͦ̂ͩ͊͛ͥ͆̕͟͢͞s͓̹̯̻̦͕͙͍͖̼͙͚̎̒̋ͣͯ̄ͭ̈ͯ͑͌̐̔͆ͤḭ̶̴̷̧͉̼̤̞͍͎͎̲̫̜̫̽ͫ͋͂̃ͮ̃̽ͮ̂̓̑̓̀͢͞͠͡͏͟͝͝҉̀ó̴̵̻͉̻̗̬̘̗̘̠̬̫̘̮̉̓͌̇̄̄ͫ̂̈́ͅ҉̵̡̛͢͟͏̷̨͏̶́̀͘͟͝͡n͕͖͓̝͎̳̣̞͚̟̞̥̦̥̓̆ͮ̽̎ͤ̃͋̈ͩͭͩ͛ͣ̈́ͫ̌͌ͅ͏̡̀ă̸̷̗͍̻͔̟̠̼̭̠̭̠̰ͮ̾̿͋̅͑͐̎ͧ̀̽͑̄ͥ̾̽́͢͡l̘̮͉̥̭̹̫͚̝̹̭̪̥̰̤͍̹̫̜ͤͮ̈̈́̓̑̽ͫ͋̎̆ͮ̂͂͐̀̚͟҉͠҉̵͜ ̶̴̸̷̨̗̱̜̯͉͍̹̠̠̱̰ͣ̂̿̓̆ͤ̑͒̊ͣ̊͊͒͊̚͟͜͠ͅ͏̶̷̛̕̕͠͞͡ entity has started up in my in my mind...I hear a voice calling for action and coercion... and it seems to me that now this multidimensional one is in my power and it breeds in the diversity and singularity of ideas.
Oh... If only I knew what it was, if only someone other than me could feel her presence in head...What is this? A new disease, an astral parasite or a broken fabric of existence that is exactly like the singularity of the melting sky, marking the end of everything familiar...
Continitalism
Every person interested in politics or philosophy is in one way or another interested in politics and philosophy. But if he has a sufficient number of understandable particles within himself, in the long term he could still be adherent of the same psychosystem. At the same time, there is...another path, which lies in the plane of heavy substances and sincere fantasy. It is when a person dissolves and begins to devote himself to the search for new knowledge in the fundamentally previously unknown, he becomes a continintalist. Fundamentally, a person stands at a fork in ever-increasing paths of thinking and new ideas, eventually until they absorb him completely. But having curbed this power, you will clearly be unattainable in the circulation of the mind and hypothetical generation
Chuchareanic Theocracy
An ideology that has emerged from the crowds of sick minds, the purpose of which is to establish a serene and theoretically endless creative absolute, the power given by the Mother of the All-Containing Being, in the territories of the entire space of space and the extermination in a bloody battle of all the creations of the wormhole. Using ideas that are described in the dream diaries of those enslaved by fantasy, she rejects the postulates of religions in the usual sense, instead giving preference to freedom of expression in all the glory of its manifestation, be it the psychosis of a sick schizophrenic or the systematic dissertation of a scientist. Here structure and post-structure, ideas and thoughts, logic and surrealism, war concept and enslavement of hakuna are intertwined, changing to the chaotic songs from the palaces of distant, indescribable Lidyah. In different years of its existence, this term united both creative circles and entire terrorist sects. But despite all the differences that, like an abyss, do not allow the Chucharians to be united, there is only one similarity between them - their faith, which lies in identifying the very act of creating, in all its indescribable power, with something that is precisely beyond terms, but in the same time, for us, in a simplified way, is called the living mind or Mother and which is opposed to the Wormhole, some form of the complete opposite of Chucha, or absolute destructiveness. The Chucharean society is a society of creative creators who in this can raise their sword against the actions of any other driving force that can disrupt or completely destroy humanity in the event of a centuries-old creative process that occurs naturally. The difference in the Chucharians' approaches to responding to aggression is fundamentally different; everyone believes that it is necessary to accept humility, and they are ready to declare endless war on all their enemies with their faith. Culturally, the Chuchareans are also heterogeneous, because in religion there is no framework and, as such, a moral basis, thus giving the opportunity to their different branches to produce what they consider best for themselves and their loved ones. Chucharenism believes that cultures, like the eternal battlefield of thought, are constantly changing and taking on previously unseen forms, but at the same time constantly progressing, thus constantly abolishing the concept of the “dark age”, leading humanity to victory through art.The Chucharean Church advocates in the long term for the complete destruction of the economy and the transition to creating everything that a person can imagine out of nothing, but in the short term they see salvation in a form of economy that will not interfere with their personal lives, but at the same time give absolute will, This understanding may include various types of libertarian schools of thought, including their synthesized versions or new reinterpreted ones. For most Chucharians, the market is like a canvas, where every creative person can receive a well-deserved reward, because the market itself is a kind of art.
Hypsoleptic thought
On the day when the Grail protocol is launched, the sun will fall from the sky and lead us through the boring swamps. Passing edge after edge, she will take us to Tocheon alive, where we part with the flesh of thoughts. And when the steps dissolve in this madness of the march of souls and minds of people. This is a hymn, the apogee of tachestic and psychoanalytic ideas that in the end achieves development and detachment from everything that came before. The sword will hit the river Gamora and the garden of unprecedented plants will fall into small fragments. This is how the whole world will be. Ethereal but full of struggle and will alien to us today and thoughts inconceivable oceans.
The web of dreams will spread with the march of the Gods, the march of the fatherland. With her the flames of pride will dissolve and the banners will fly. Every sighted person will be beheaded and every blind person will be enlightened. Farther and farther the formidable campaign goes, dissolving the hungry walls into a mad rush of lines and reason.
Economy
Overview
My economic views are based mainly on the works of the 
neoclassical school, as well as the 
Austrian, as well as 
several others, but I am not used to associating myself with any of them to specifically. I prefer to take inspiration from there and change it in my head, but on the basis I believe that the 
market is one of the keys to freeing a person from the shackles of existence. There can be no individual freedom without economic freedom. Therefore, I absolutely do not tolerate all left-wing forms of economics, except perhaps 
/
/
left-wing market anarchists or lovers of the 
gift economy. However, in a developed society nothing else can exist except a stateless market.
Why market?
The following information will be based mainly on Hayekism and on several more ideas of thought of Austrian economics, however my actual views are slightly different and will be described in other points, but this is enough to understand why I generally support right-wing economics. The first argument for me can be considered that the market provides a synthesis of ultimate knowledge with an abstract limit. First, individual knowledge of the peculiarities of the conditions of time, place and course of action is understood. The passing part of such information is unformalized and non-verbalizable, and cannot be expressed in words or any other symbols. Remaining implicit, it includes practical skills and abilities, experience and craftsmanship, professional techniques and habits. Another one provides “local” knowledge - its transience: many favorable opportunities open to an individual who exists only here and now, and if they are not taken advantage of immediately, they will be missed forever. But it is the ability to take advantage of the unique opportunities of time and place that ultimately determines success in any business and provides individual advantages in labor productivity. The market creates conditions for the effective use of all this personal knowledge, giving the right to dispose of it to its bearers themselves. This, however, is not enough. It is also necessary to create conditions for coordinating disparate knowledge scattered among many individuals, which is impossible without providing them with generalized information about the state of the entire system. Prices act as clusters of such abstract information. In a condensed form, they contain information about the preferences, production capabilities and future plans of market participants, thereby helping each of them to fit their specific knowledge into the general knowledge sharing system.Although the coordination achieved through price signals is far from flawless, it is accomplished well enough to be considered a “miracle.” This word need to emphasize that no other mechanism - including the mechanism of central planning - is capable of producing the results provided by the market. The decisive argument in favor of capitalism is epistemological: a competitive market allows for more efficient use of a greater amount of knowledge dispersed among members of a modern complex society who, as a rule, have no idea about each other than any alternative system. Next I would like to say that To make rational economic decisions (that is, achieve the best results at the lowest cost), you need to know the prices (mind assistants). Without prices, it is impossible to calculate profits and costs, and therefore it is impossible to know whether a particular set of resources produces a product that has the highest value. “Where there is no market, there is no price system, and where there is no price system, there can be no economic calculation.” In the absence of prices and a common denominator in which they can be expressed, society is doomed to “calculation chaos.” The experience of Soviet “war communism” became a kind of experimental confirmation of this thesis.Besides “planometric” scheme is untenable primarily because it leaves unanswered the question of how the entire relevant amount of knowledge is supposed to be concentrated in the center. After all, the “imitation” of the work of the market by planning authorities could begin only after receiving all the information necessary for this. But its most important part is tacit, personal knowledge. Such knowledge, by definition, cannot be formalized and transferred. In addition, agile solutions are required to adapt to constantly changing conditions. But there can be no question of any efficiency when information about the changes that have taken place will first have to be transmitted to the top, and then wait for instructions on how to act.
Market epilepsy
W.I.P
Interfusion of natural concepts
W.I.P
Vicious current
W.I.P
𒊹 𒂃𒃳𒄤𒉲𒊿 𒊹
Tͩh͙́e̠ ͧínͨc̘e̒s̥sa̤n̟t̎ ̃r͂ea̭sͬọn̅i̳n̘ḡ ̟i̲ͯṋ my ͭh̭e͕ḁ͆d̦̈́ ̅h̘a͕sͤ cr̳e̚ăt͌ḙ̊dͬ ̳̾a̳͊n̘ ̾ḁͭl̩m̀oŝ̺t͓ ͉e̗͗n̺ͮd̼ľe̞s̼̒s̏ v̫ͬoi̓d̹ ̅of̟ ͉ͧc͇on͙s̳̀t͒anͫṭl̦ͧÿ̱́ ͤchaňgi͋n̦ǧ ͍́s̟t̄ͅat͍e̳ͥm̲̓e͖ͩn͚t̲̓s ͕̒o̮f͕ ͌pôst̞ŭl̥ͫa̟te͇s̠ͫ ̪͒t̻h͑a̦t͎̏ ̊mo͔͛vͣê̯ ̟aͬl̻o̯̔nͣgͯ ̥̈thé ͈sͧṗ͓ec̟t̥̍r̩ͬu͚m̳ͧ ͔ͮc̅h̭a̳o͚ẗ́í̻ca͕lly̞ a̱nd̚ un͓ͬpr͈ë́d͊ic̃tͦa̪̿b̪ly̜. ̟̌T̳he͚̿y ̼͐c̮̾an ̰mͧóve f͇̓ă̜r̐ ͇́b̗ͧey͗on̬ͫdͮ ̹ͫth̥ͯẹͬ ͈̅t͕̅heo̙reẗiͫc̤a͎l̹ḽyͩ p̮̉oͣss̞̔ib͋l̲e̗ p͚oͪw̞êȑ͉ ͨōf͖ ̬a̋l̦l͔̑ īn̫f̓i̺̓nī͙t̒í͚e͚ͪs i̳͆n̰ ̯ͣthͯe͙̿iͭr͙̿ ̚äbͮs̾t̬r̦aĉtͩ,͓ͤ o͙ͮr̉ ̜ͤt͐h̓eyͭ ̺̀ca̠ͨn̥ b͐eͧ ̜͊a͓͒tt̘rac̪tͤed̲͒ ̈́t̊o ̀ṣyšt̪e̺̿m͛at̙i͛c̼ͣḯẗ̜́y͍ ̞ͨt͓o ͮt̹heͥ p͔o̻in̠̎t̼̆ ͯo̥͒fͣ ͚s̭̄iͅn̍ĝu̥l͖ͩa̫̐ŕi̜͊t̎y̟̚.̜ ͌Th̺e͛i̙̿r̳̆ ͮv͊ȁ̗rͯì̫e̺ty̔ d̜̍oe͑s͊ ͂n̠ȍ͇t̬ͫ l͖̍ẹn͈ď͍ ̒it̝̄ṡ̫elf̙͌ ̪̆t̞o͊ ͔s̓c͋i͔e͔n͂t̾i̮͆fͩic̏ c̳ͬla̜ͬs̉si̲ͣf̃i͕c̱͂aṭi̫o͌n̫,̲ ̪o̙ńl̙͋ỵ͑ i͋fͪ ͇i̲̽t̟ ͌ìs͑ ̙ve͕͑r̩̾y ̥ͪs͉̄up̟̾erfic͕i͆a͕ͬl̻ͦ,͎ ͮb̟u̿t̊ ̖͐h̋oͥw̓e͇͋v̀er ̭̇t͖h̦i̞͆s ͂wi̿lͩl̝̅ ̳n̻o̊t͚ ͕re͉f̥l͈ͫẽct ̲͂th̦̋ē ̈́whͪǒlẻ ͆ess͚e̳ͧn̤͛ĉe͕.̈́ ̹Ẉ͐ỏ͕r̻l͐ds̥ a̜ͫr̲ͨo͌sḛ ̏in ͂m͚ÿ ̹̈́h̾e̔a̙d,̗̂ ͨe͂n̥t̙i̱rͩe ̦́n̹̉e̦t̤ͩw͖ͩórḱs̞̈ ̅o̿f ind̑eͭsc̱ri̗͊ba͕̅b͊lͪeͣ ̻l̑a̟yer͋s̼̒ ̺̽o̅f̩̃ gr͈ͫad͙at̂i̜͒o̳n̬ öf ͆vͦͅar̤͊ḭͪoùs̲ ̲u̖ͯn͚ͭi͇͛v͙er̰͐sͬe̟s̘͒,̯́ ̦̔eàc͔h̗ ̮̀of̬͒ ̜̓w̠h̘ḭc͉h ͓i̦ͬn͎̓ ̹it́sͥ ͔frac̖t͈al͙-l̺i̪k̦̀e̋n̼͗ë͙s͈̓s ̘w̑őṵ̅l̦d́ d̥ee͎p̜enͦ ͧt͓̾o̍ i̱n̬ͤfͣiṋͯit̚y.̺Tͩh͙́e̠ ͧínͨc̘e̒s̥sa̤n̟t̎ ̃r͂ea̭sͬọn̅i̳n̘ḡ ̟i̲ͯṋ my ͭh̭e͕ḁ͆d̦̈́ ̅h̘a͕sͤ cr̳e̚ăt͌ḙ̊dͬ ̳̾a̳͊n̘ ̾ḁͭl̩m̀oŝ̺t͓ ͉e̗͗n̺ͮd̼ľe̞s̼̒s̏ v̫ͬoi̓d̹ ̅of̟ ͉ͧc͇on͙s̳̀t͒anͫṭl̦ͧÿ̱́ ͤchaňgi͋n̦ǧ ͍́s̟t̄ͅat͍e̳ͥm̲̓e͖ͩn͚t̲̓s ͕̒o̮f͕ ͌pôst̞ŭl̥ͫa̟te͇s̠ͫ ̪͒t̻h͑a̦t͎̏ ̊mo͔͛vͣê̯ ̟aͬl̻o̯̔nͣgͯ ̥̈thé ͈sͧṗ͓ec̟t̥̍r̩ͬu͚m̳ͧ ͔ͮc̅h̭a̳o͚ẗ́í̻ca͕lly̞ a̱nd̚ un͓ͬpr͈ë́d͊ic̃tͦa̪̿b̪ly̜. ̟̌T̳he͚̿y ̼͐c̮̾an ̰mͧóve f͇̓ă̜r̐ ͇́b̗ͧey͗on̬ͫdͮ ̹ͫth̥ͯẹͬ ͈̅t͕̅heo̙reẗiͫc̤a͎l̹ḽyͩ p̮̉oͣss̞̔ib͋l̲e̗ p͚oͪw̞êȑ͉ ͨōf͖ ̬a̋l̦l͔̑ īn̫f̓i̺̓nī͙t̒í͚e͚ͪs i̳͆n̰ ̯ͣthͯe͙̿iͭr͙̿ ̚äbͮs̾t̬r̦aĉtͩ,͓ͤ o͙ͮr̉ ̜ͤt͐h̓eyͭ ̺̀ca̠ͨn̥ b͐eͧ ̜͊a͓͒tt̘rac̪tͤed̲͒ ̈́t̊o ̀ṣyšt̪e̺̿m͛at̙i͛c̼ͣḯẗ̜́y͍ ̞ͨt͓o ͮt̹heͥ p͔o̻in̠̎t̼̆ ͯo̥͒fͣ ͚s̭̄iͅn̍ĝu̥l͖ͩa̫̐ŕi̜͊t̎y̟̚.̜ ͌Th̺e͛i̙̿r̳̆ ͮv͊ȁ̗rͯì̫e̺ty̔ d̜̍oe͑s͊ ͂n̠ȍ͇t̬ͫ l͖̍ẹn͈ď͍ ̒it̝̄ṡ̫elf̙͌ ̪̆t̞o͊ ͔s̓c͋i͔e͔n͂t̾i̮͆fͩic̏ c̳ͬla̜ͬs̉si̲ͣf̃i͕c̱͂aṭi̫o͌n̫,̲ ̪o̙ńl̙͋ỵ͑ i͋fͪ ͇i̲̽t̟ ͌ìs͑ ̙ve͕͑r̩̾y ̥ͪs͉̄up̟̾erfic͕i͆a͕ͬl̻ͦ,͎ ͮb̟u̿t̊ ̖͐h̋oͥw̓e͇͋v̀er ̭̇t͖h̦i̞͆s ͂wi̿lͩl̝̅ ̳n̻o̊t͚ ͕re͉f̥l͈ͫẽct ̲͂th̦̋ē ̈́whͪǒlẻ ͆ess͚e̳ͧn̤͛ĉe͕.̈́ ̹Ẉ͐ỏ͕r̻l͐ds̥ a̜ͫr̲ͨo͌sḛ ̏in ͂m͚ÿ ̹̈́h̾e̔a̙d,̗̂ ͨe͂n̥t̙i̱rͩe ̦́n̹̉e̦t̤ͩw͖ͩórḱs̞̈ ̅o̿f ind̑eͭsc̱ri̗͊ba͕̅b͊lͪeͣ ̻l̑a̟yer͋s̼̒ ̺̽o̅f̩̃ gr͈ͫad͙at̂i̜͒o̳n̬ öf ͆vͦͅar̤͊ḭͪoùs̲ ̲u̖ͯn͚ͭi͇͛v͙er̰͐sͬe̟s̘͒,̯́ ̦̔eàc͔h̗ ̮̀of̬͒ ̜̓w̠h̘ḭc͉h ͓i̦ͬn͎̓ ̹it́sͥ ͔frac̖t͈al͙-l̺i̪k̦̀e̋n̼͗ë͙s͈̓s ̘w̑őṵ̅l̦d́ d̥ee͎p̜enͦ ͧt͓̾o̍ i̱n̬ͤfͣiṋͯit̚y.Tͩh͙́e̠ ͧínͨc̘e̒s̥sa̤n̟t̎ ̃r͂ea̭sͬọn̅i̳n̘ḡ ̟i̲ͯṋ my ͭh̭e͕ḁ͆d̦̈́ ̅h̘a͕sͤ cr̳e̚ăt͌ḙ̊dͬ ̳̾a̳͊n̘ ̾ḁͭl̩m̀oŝ̺t͓ ͉e̗͗n̺ͮd̼ľe̞s̼̒s̏ v̫ͬoi̓d̹ ̅of̟ ͉ͧc͇on͙s̳̀t͒anͫṭl̦ͧÿ̱́ ͤchaňgi͋n̦ǧ ͍́s̟t̄ͅat͍e̳ͥm̲̓e͖ͩn͚t̲̓s ͕̒o̮f͕ ͌pôst̞ŭl̥ͫa̟te͇s̠ͫ ̪͒t̻h͑a̦t͎̏ ̊mo͔͛vͣê̯ ̟aͬl̻o̯̔nͣgͯ ̥̈thé ͈sͧṗ͓ec̟t̥̍r̩ͬu͚m̳ͧ ͔ͮc̅h̭a̳o͚ẗ́í̻ca͕lly̞ a̱nd̚ un͓ͬpr͈ë́d͊ic̃tͦa̪̿b̪ly̜. ̟̌T̳he͚̿y ̼͐c̮̾an ̰mͧóve f͇̓ă̜r̐ ͇́b̗ͧey͗on̬ͫdͮ ̹ͫth̥ͯẹͬ ͈̅t͕̅heo̙reẗiͫc̤a͎l̹ḽyͩ p̮̉oͣss̞̔ib͋l̲e̗ p͚oͪw̞êȑ͉ ͨōf͖ ̬a̋l̦l͔̑ īn̫f̓i̺̓nī͙t̒í͚e͚ͪs i̳͆n̰ ̯ͣthͯe͙̿iͭr͙̿ ̚äbͮs̾t̬r̦aĉtͩ,͓ͤ o͙ͮr̉ ̜ͤt͐h̓eyͭ ̺̀ca̠ͨn̥ b͐eͧ ̜͊a͓͒tt̘rac̪tͤed̲͒ ̈́t̊o ̀ṣyšt̪e̺̿m͛at̙i͛c̼ͣḯẗ̜́y͍ ̞ͨt͓o ͮt̹heͥ p͔o̻in̠̎t̼̆ ͯo̥͒fͣ ͚s̭̄iͅn̍ĝu̥l͖ͩa̫̐ŕi̜͊t̎y̟̚.̜ ͌Th̺e͛i̙̿r̳̆ ͮv͊ȁ̗rͯì̫e̺ty̔ d̜̍oe͑s͊ ͂n̠ȍ͇t̬ͫ l͖̍ẹn͈ď͍ ̒it̝̄ṡ̫elf̙͌ ̪̆t̞o͊ ͔s̓c͋i͔e͔n͂t̾i̮͆fͩic̏ c̳ͬla̜ͬs̉si̲ͣf̃i͕c̱͂aṭi̫o͌n̫,̲ ̪o̙ńl̙͋ỵ͑ i͋fͪ ͇i̲̽t̟ ͌ìs͑ ̙ve͕͑r̩̾y ̥ͪs͉̄up̟̾erfic͕i͆a͕ͬl̻ͦ,͎ ͮb̟u̿t̊ ̖͐h̋oͥw̓e͇͋v̀er ̭̇t͖h̦i̞͆s ͂wi̿lͩl̝̅ ̳n̻o̊t͚ ͕re͉f̥l͈ͫẽct ̲͂th̦̋ē ̈́whͪǒlẻ ͆ess͚e̳ͧn̤͛ĉe͕.̈́ ̹Ẉ͐ỏ͕r̻l͐ds̥ a̜ͫr̲ͨo͌sḛ ̏in ͂m͚ÿ ̹̈́h̾e̔a̙d,̗̂ ͨe͂n̥t̙i̱rͩe ̦́n̹̉e̦t̤ͩw͖ͩórḱs̞̈ ̅o̿f ind̑eͭsc̱ri̗͊ba͕̅b͊lͪeͣ ̻l̑a̟yer͋s̼̒ ̺̽o̅f̩̃ gr͈ͫad͙at̂i̜͒o̳n̬ öf ͆vͦͅar̤͊ḭͪoùs̲ ̲u̖ͯn͚ͭi͇͛v͙er̰͐sͬe̟s̘͒,̯́ ̦̔eàc͔h̗ ̮̀of̬͒ ̜̓w̠h̘ḭc͉h ͓i̦ͬn͎̓ ̹it́sͥ ͔frac̖t͈al͙-l̺i̪k̦̀e̋n̼͗ë͙s͈̓s ̘w̑őṵ̅l̦d́ d̥ee͎p̜enͦ ͧt͓̾o̍ i̱n̬ͤfͣiṋͯit̚y
Theory
Antonin Artaud
- The Theatre and its Double
- Tarahumara
- Watchfiends and Rack Screams
Arsenius Gerth 
- The Revolution
Mark Wülberg
- Garden of the last era
- Glucose
- Taxonomy of the State
Eugen Böhm Ritter von Bawerk
- Karl Marx and the Close of His System: A Criticism of the Marxist Theory of Value and the Price of Production
Ludwig von Mises
- Economic Policy: Thoughts for Today and Tomorrow
- Bureaucracy
- Human action, a treatise on economics
- The Anti-Capitalistic Mentality
- Albert Junis
- Harvard Thought
- The Human
- Incorrect date
Friedrich Hayek
- Individualism and Economic Order
- The Sensory Order: An Inquiry into the Foundations of Theoretical Psychology
- Capital and Interest (Collected Works of F. A. Hayek)
- David Newman
- Natural War
- Barbara Thomas
- Gaspitalier on the moon
- Steven Fisher
- Someone from my dreams
- Lauriel Miller
- Die at night
- Live by day
- Blind all-seeing
- Cross of Islam
- Jean Da Faldier
- Tea Mind
- Book without volume
- Fire in chimney
- Sunflowers and their destinies
- Yellow
- Cloud Shard
- Far-fetched nonsense
- Notes from March 1957
- Letter to Foucault
- Moment, Infinity, Art
Guattari & Deleuze 
- A Thousand Plateaus
- Capitalism and Schizophrenia: Anti-Oedipus
- Difference and Repetition
Adriano Polidori
- Neo-layout mechanics
- Development and extermination of desires
- The fine line of meaninglessness
- Anti-book
- Granville Pelland
- Blur and Time
- Cansargillia and Psychomantosis of the Market Economy
- Diary from another world
- Father and son
- Lost cassette of logical connection
- Neo-Kabbalah and the UN Constitution
- Gate of Gray Matter
- Psilocybe revolution in Guatemala
- Howard Gretchen
- The meaningful ramblings of a sick psychopath from Wyoming
- Ansell Virkler
- Secularism of planned consciousness
- Iceberg of ideologies
Andrew Blackwood
- Market and his exogigant
- The city's population and its creative problems
- Constructive politics in schemes
- Popular and forgotten ideas
Bryan Caplan
- Why Did So Many Libertarians Support the War?
- Gerard White
- Criticism of the Left Wing
- About the problems of modern capitalism
- Artistic economics
Russell Moore
- The flow of thoughts within the framework of the schedule and abstraction of life
- An attempt to restructure the economy through a revolution of thought
- Ubermarginal
- Cultivation of off-compass ideology
- Illiterate personal genocides
- Schizonomics and neo-formations
- Theory of State and Society
- Antigoni Pauliade
- Lastly, before I die, I will leave you a letter
- Origin of origin
- Perennial questions about space
- Confrontation with yourself
C̶̛̝͙ͥ͗͝҉̵͟͞h̤̯̘̩̎̄ͬ͂ͮ́ͮ͡ų̷̸̡̮̇̕͜͠c̶̢͍̝̍ͭͥ͆ͭ͘͡͏͡ḧ̶̷̡́ͥͤ͆ͅaͤ̿̓ͮͪͨ͋͜ ͉̅̃̉ͤ̕
- M̶̺̜̪̳͚̘͆ͯ̓ͫ̀̌͒͛̃ͦͦy̩̗̯̞͕̋ͧͅ͏̴҉ ͓̦͓͙͍̂ͣ͋ͥͭ̓̿̀͢d̰͇͙͓͛̌̈́̒̋͊̃̈́ͭ̚͠ͅ҉̴҉͢͡i͜͝͏̶a̹̳̬͓̤̩ͩ͊̄͆͋̆̀ͩ̍ͨ̊͠͞r̻̝̼͓̱̣̀y̸̵̨̛͔͚̫͔͉̱̳̩ͨͥͮ̓ͣ̽̓̇̾̀̀̚͘
