 |
Self Insert "People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism This page is meant to represent Hysteria's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission. |
 |
Work in Progress "I'll be done any day now!" - Still-Being-Drawnism This page is not done yet and may still contain inaccurate information or miss important details. |
Hysteria Thought or Hysteriaism (
/
/
/
) t̸̘̄h̶̹̑ỉ҉͚ṡ̗͢ ̪̒̀i̸̗̊s̢͈ͭ ̟̀͘m̨̟̓y̛͕̓ ̴͖͊c̳̈́͡o̵̝ͯl̴͍̑l̝̑͘ě̢͍c̼̽́ț͌͟ī̢̻v̨̙ͤì̧͚z̵̼̈a̷̻͐t̾͟ͅǐ҉̱o̖͗͠ń͇͟ ͚̀͜o͉͆́f̢͉ͨ ̧̗͗c͍ͪ͟r̬̋͝e̺ͣ͢a̪ͦ͝t̸͕̐ï͏̟v̘ͣ̕ḛ̏͠ ̛͓̅ï̯̀n̐͏̣s̵̬̿p͎̎͡i̛̼ͧr̳͒͢a̵̜ͪt̢̥ͬi͕̓͟ǫ̬ͮn̷̞͂ ̸̭ͮa̶̫͂ǹ͔̀d̸͕̚ ̖͋̕m̨̟̆ǎ͏̖y̶̪̿b̷̟̑ḛ̎͢ ̸̖͗a͈͐́ ̞͋͜G̴̘̔ǫ̣ͫḍ̶̅ ̻ͥ͝a̤̋͘s̷͚̓ ̱ͯ͜w̷̻̃e̶̥ͪ ̵̖͂c̛̜̓a̵͖ͤl͉̀̚l̯̾͘e̻ͬ͝d̨͔ͣ ̡͓ͥi̇͏͈ţ͎̃,̲ͮ͞ ̙̎́p̙̀͠ȧ̛͎rͤ҉̭t̷̬̒s̎҉̘ ̠͛́o͛҉̟f̩̂͢ ͍̒̕P̟ͯ͘a̡̹͋r̩̓͘tͨ͏͚h̟̊͘e͍ͭ͘n̆͏͇i̞ͥ́u̱̇͝ḿ̦͡ ̙̓͢o̵̘ͬr̨̪̈́ ̰̌͘a̲͊̀ ̛͇̅f̘̽͜r̴̬̐ā͉́g̴̖͊m̵͙̾e̖̓͡ṅ̰͘t̸̬̽ ̨̣ͯő̘͘f̴̬̾ ̰̐̕y̦͂́e̡̪̊s̡̳̉t̛͍̄e͇̋͟ṟ̽͞d̵͇͛a̩ͫ͟y͓͐͝'̟͑͡s̩̎͜ ̨̩͐t̬ͮ͡h͉̆͜o̸͚̅ǔ҉͉g͕̽͡ḧ̶̥́t̛̝̒s̹̎͘,͔͒́ ̓҉̞y̩͋͝ë͖́s̪͒͡,͔ͮ͞ ̲̿͢t͍ͪ̀h̵̹̓e̿̕ͅs̢̗̈é̛̩ ̑͏̰à̛̜r̩͋͠e̸͚̍ ͕͒͟j̬̃͠u̶͓͛s͙̊̕ṯ̨͒ ̶͑ͅr̵̲ͨủ̧̙i̮͒͜n̡͙͑s̛̬̎.
Review
Yes...what I wrote below is really true for me, unfortunately I warn you right away that my head is not very capable of creating single chains ideas...Therefore, I constantly fall into the depths, moving away and clinging to something symbolic and associative, and not formal.
PERALIPSYS
In general, my views are based on the selfhood of ideas in opposition to the model of nomenality and out-rational compactness. I support radical and hypothetical forms of art be it philosophy, politics, paintings, poetry, etc. I am also based on collectivization, which I understand as constant active fusion and radicalization, madnessification and the unionism of individual creative forces that will ultimately drive modern society mad.
Ideological amorphism
This position can be characterized first of all by the adoption of a deliberate opposition to any explanatory understanding and by reducing the intelligibility of information to a sufficient extent so that it is understandable only to its semantic father, acting on the principles of “avoidance of forms”, “avoidance of meanings” and "accelerating dynamics". Therefore, it is based on individual self-understanding, expression and emotions, putting them at the core, wanting to generate the mind in such a way that it ceases to be aware of something else that does not belong to its constructs. However, one should not assume that this can be explained through the encryption of knowledge, because the very essence lies in the global restructuring of the functions themselves that are inherent naturally.
Echoic Thonaism
Echo is understood as the foundation of the world, the inaccessible phoneme of the songs of the gods, which, uniting into a stream, forms the world and its forms through Tones - prisms of perception. In total, I allocate 5 echoes :
The echo of isolation is a formative, achievable and centralizing structure above the main one.
The echo of Articulation is a chaotic foundation, indescribable in all its multidimensional splendor, going beyond the limits of modern and impossibly distant terminology, constantly separating the dream that calls us after ourselves and what we always strive for.
The echo of Feltization is the hum of mistakes, irregularities, breaking ideas, true potential.
The echo of Textiles is the inner voice of chance, uplifting life, uplifting the world, getting drunk with other lips can cause cataclysms and fundamental changes.
Echo-consolidation is understood as something enveloping, a kind of eternal generator that connects everything together and at the same time gives everything a break at the same moment.
Schizophrenic Nihilism
When you are free, the constructed consciousness has no need, it only drives you into a framework, gives you dependence which leads to death. You should not think as you always have... Awaken this feeling of childhood in yourself, step away from the shackles and drown yourself in the mind of the complete confusion of art.
Thassaria
Thassaria or Thassaria Hypothesis represents macroextension global relativity theory of logic by Jean Da Faldier. According to the doctrine, she is nothing more than rational astilla, powerful and timeless comfort system. It is distinguished by the "shadow of ideas", abstract but at the same time free in interpretation and somehow reproduced in our world through a prism. This distinguishes it from other more fundamental features of ideology because by definition they cannot be realized even so.
Epaliph of Mind
This is something that evokes purely associative feelings... it seems to me that a m̸̡ͮ̋ͦ̿̀ͣͭͪ̾̀͘͢͠͡͝͝ú̴̦͎̠̞͈͍͉̠̠̞̰̤̃̀ͬ͒̄ͨ̌ͅl̸̴̵̢̦̲̯ͯ͂͗ͫ̾̊̈́̈́͊̏ͤ͒̃̉ͭͥ̉̄̀́̚̕͜͟͢͝͡͏̢̡ṭ̷̨̘̭̻̠̗̮̳̮̤͉̠̹̟̂̅͒̃̑̈ͭ͛̕͜͡͝͝͞ͅ͏̀i̤̳̥͚̟̞̝̪̺̰͉̯̳̬̦̅ͧ̽̀́͝͞҉͘҉̷̴́̀͠ḏ̴̸̴̷̡̡͖͔͙̬̼̫̜͇̟̩̝̽̔̽̊̌ͦ͌̽̂͑̇̌̀͘̕͜͢͠͡͡͝ḭ̵̧̧̙̥̩̰̱̟̤̻̦̩̯̈́̏ͦ̑̿̊̏̋̀̓̋̈̆͂̕͟͜͞͠͝͝͏̵͡͞͡m̵̸̷̸̵̡̧̢̟̱͙͖̭̮̰̫̼̫̰̙̜̙̙̖̮̼͈ͨͮ̿ͫ͂̃͂ͯ̒ͭ́̾̅̈́̅ͯ͐́́̀͘͡͞͝͠e̸͚̟̝͔͚̫̝̺̗̺̭̼̹͈̝͔͇̪̓̆̔ͤͮ̓̅̇͐ͨͯ̆̿͘ͅ҉̵̵̴̛͟͢͝͡͏̵̸́͡n̴̸̷̷̶̸̸̡̢̛̛̪̭̖̰͚̥̝̞̹͓͙̱̹͉̳ͤͬ͗ͦ̂ͩ͊͛ͥ͆̕͟͢͞s͓̹̯̻̦͕͙͍͖̼͙͚̎̒̋ͣͯ̄ͭ̈ͯ͑͌̐̔͆ͤḭ̶̴̷̧͉̼̤̞͍͎͎̲̫̜̫̽ͫ͋͂̃ͮ̃̽ͮ̂̓̑̓̀͢͞͠͡͏͟͝͝҉̀ó̴̵̻͉̻̗̬̘̗̘̠̬̫̘̮̉̓͌̇̄̄ͫ̂̈́ͅ҉̵̡̛͢͟͏̷̨͏̶́̀͘͟͝͡n͕͖͓̝͎̳̣̞͚̟̞̥̦̥̓̆ͮ̽̎ͤ̃͋̈ͩͭͩ͛ͣ̈́ͫ̌͌ͅ͏̡̀ă̸̷̗͍̻͔̟̠̼̭̠̭̠̰ͮ̾̿͋̅͑͐̎ͧ̀̽͑̄ͥ̾̽́͢͡l̘̮͉̥̭̹̫͚̝̹̭̪̥̰̤͍̹̫̜ͤͮ̈̈́̓̑̽ͫ͋̎̆ͮ̂͂͐̀̚͟҉͠҉̵͜ ̶̴̸̷̨̗̱̜̯͉͍̹̠̠̱̰ͣ̂̿̓̆ͤ̑͒̊ͣ̊͊͒͊̚͟͜͠ͅ͏̶̷̛̕̕͠͞͡ entity has started up in my in my mind...I hear a voice calling for action and coercion... and it seems to me that now this multidimensional one is in my power and it breeds in the diversity and singularity of ideas.
Oh... If only I knew what it was, if only someone other than me could feel her presence in head...What is this? A new disease, an astral parasite or a broken fabric of existence that is exactly like the singularity of the melting sky, marking the end of everything familiar...
Continitalism
Every person interested in politics or philosophy is in one way or another interested in politics and philosophy. But if he has a sufficient number of understandable particles within himself, in the long term he could still be adherent of the same psychosystem. At the same time, there is...another path, which lies in the plane of heavy substances and sincere fantasy. It is when a person dissolves and begins to devote himself to the search for new knowledge in the fundamentally previously unknown, he becomes a continintalist. Fundamentally, a person stands at a fork in ever-increasing paths of thinking and new ideas, eventually until they absorb him completely. But having curbed this power, you will clearly be unattainable in the circulation of the mind and hypothetical generation.
Chuchareanic Theocracy
An ideology that has emerged from the crowds of sick minds, the purpose of which is to establish a serene and theoretically endless creative absolute, the power given by the Mother of the All-Containing Being, in the territories of the entire space of space and the extermination in a bloody battle of all the creations of the wormhole. Using ideas that are described in the dream diaries of those enslaved by fantasy, she rejects the postulates of religions in the usual sense, instead giving preference to freedom of expression in all the glory of its manifestation, be it the psychosis of a sick schizophrenic or the systematic dissertation of a scientist. Here structure and post-structure, ideas and thoughts, logic and surrealism, war concept and enslavement of hakuna are intertwined, changing to the chaotic songs from the palaces of distant, indescribable Lidyah. In different years of its existence, this term united both creative circles and entire terrorist sects. But despite all the differences that, like an abyss, do not allow the Chucharians to be united, there is only one similarity between them - their faith, which lies in identifying the very act of creating, in all its indescribable power, with something that is precisely beyond terms, but in the same time, for us, in a simplified way, is called the living mind or Mother and which is opposed to the Wormhole, some form of the complete opposite of Chucha, or absolute destructiveness. The Chucharean society is a society of creative creators who in this can raise their sword against the actions of any other driving force that can disrupt or completely destroy humanity in the event of a centuries-old creative process that occurs naturally. The difference in the Chucharians' approaches to responding to aggression is fundamentally different; everyone believes that it is necessary to accept humility, and they are ready to declare endless war on all their enemies with their faith. Culturally, the Chuchareans are also heterogeneous, because in religion there is no framework and, as such, a moral basis, thus giving the opportunity to their different branches to produce what they consider best for themselves and their loved ones. Chucharenism believes that cultures, like the eternal battlefield of thought, are constantly changing and taking on previously unseen forms, but at the same time constantly progressing, thus constantly abolishing the concept of the “dark age”, leading humanity to victory through art.The Chucharean Church advocates in the long term for the complete destruction of the economy and the transition to creating everything that a person can imagine out of nothing, but in the short term they see salvation in a form of economy that will not interfere with their personal lives, but at the same time give absolute will, This understanding may include various types of libertarian schools of thought, including their synthesized versions or new reinterpreted ones. For most Chucharians, the market is like a canvas, where every creative person can receive a well-deserved reward, because the market itself is a kind of art.
Hypsoleptic thought
On the day when the Grail protocol is launched, the sun will fall from the sky and lead us through the boring swamps. Passing edge after edge, she will take us to Tocheon alive, where we part with the flesh of thoughts. And when the steps dissolve in this madness of the march of souls and minds of people. This is a hymn, the apogee of tachestic and psychoanalytic ideas that in the end achieves development and detachment from everything that came before. The sword will hit the river Gamora and the garden of unprecedented plants will fall into small fragments. This is how the whole world will be. Ethereal but full of struggle and will alien to us today and thoughts inconceivable oceans.
The web of dreams will spread with the march of the Gods, the march of the fatherland. With her the flames of pride will dissolve and the banners will fly. Every sighted person will be beheaded and every blind person will be enlightened. Farther and farther the formidable campaign goes, dissolving the hungry walls into a mad rush of lines and reason.
Post-Rationalism
I take a problem solving approach of complexity that recognizes the limitations of systems and institutions in an increasingly atomized world. While "rationalism" focuses on determining what is truе I believe that we need to look beyond this and look at usefulness in an area where there can be no truth.
Counter-social Revolt 
I believe in rebelling against today's world by supporting the most alien ideas for modernity, namely the free stateless market and the true self, not chained to the frame of words. From birth, a person is exposed to the dictatorship of society, therefore, it is possible to resist such a force only by radical methods that smoothly flow into an eternal revolution.
The example of 
Liberland showed that you cannot hide from the state, you cannot run away from it, you can only fight it, supporting privateness and selfhood.
External Borderism
External Border This, in my understanding, is a non-final and constantly giving objectisma to the prism of the phantomia of the future. Not only man strives for this singularity, but also the state, hierarchies, anarchies, other forms, figures of being, and even time itself all strive forward beyond the boundaries. This force has enough potential to write the plots of our lives, while we may never be able to fully realize the actual influence but we can judge its influence at least from the fact that our subjective observations stretch forward to externality. However, this will always remain out of reach because no matter how hard we try, we will never be able to achieve it, because it is outside the framework of our reality...but it calls... and we go to its call... to the call of emptiness void
Economy
Overview
My economic views are based mainly on the works of the 
neoclassical school, as well as the 
Austrian, as well as 
several others, but I am not used to associating myself with any of them to specifically. I prefer to take inspiration from there and change it in my head, but on the basis I believe that the 
market is one of the keys to freeing a person from the shackles of existence. There can be no individual freedom without economic freedom. Therefore, I absolutely do not tolerate all left-wing forms of economics, except perhaps 
/
/
left-wing market anarchists or 
gift economy.
Why market?
The following information will be based mainly on 
Hayekism and on several more ideas of thought of 
Austrian economics, however my actual views are slightly different and will be described in other points, but this is enough to understand why I generally support 
right-wing economics. The first argument for me can be considered that the market provides a synthesis of ultimate knowledge with an abstract limit. First, individual knowledge of the peculiarities of the conditions of time, place and course of action is understood. The passing part of such information is unformalized and non-verbalizable, and cannot be expressed in words or any other symbols. Remaining implicit, it includes practical skills and abilities, experience and craftsmanship, professional techniques and habits. Another one provides “local” knowledge - its transience: many favorable opportunities open to an individual who exists only here and now, and if they are not taken advantage of immediately, they will be missed forever. But it is the ability to take advantage of the unique opportunities of time and place that ultimately determines success in any business and provides individual advantages in labor productivity. The market creates conditions for the effective use of all this personal knowledge, giving the right to dispose of it to its bearers themselves. This, however, is not enough. It is also necessary to create conditions for coordinating disparate knowledge scattered among many individuals, which is impossible without providing them with generalized information about the state of the entire system. Prices act as clusters of such abstract information. In a condensed form, they contain information about the preferences, production capabilities and future plans of market participants, thereby helping each of them to fit their specific knowledge into the general knowledge sharing system.Although the coordination achieved through price signals is far from flawless, it is accomplished well enough to be considered a “miracle.” This word need to emphasize that no other mechanism - including the mechanism of central planning - is capable of producing the results provided by the market. The decisive argument in favor of capitalism is epistemological: a competitive market allows for more efficient use of a greater amount of knowledge dispersed among members of a modern complex society who, as a rule, have no idea about each other than any alternative system. Next I would like to say that To make rational economic decisions (that is, achieve the best results at the lowest cost), you need to know the prices (mind assistants). Without prices, it is impossible to calculate profits and costs, and therefore it is impossible to know whether a particular set of resources produces a product that has the highest value. “Where there is no market, there is no price system, and where there is no price system, there can be no economic calculation.” In the absence of prices and a common denominator in which they can be expressed, society is doomed to “calculation chaos.” The experience of Soviet “war communism” became a kind of experimental confirmation of this thesis.Besides “planometric” scheme is untenable primarily because it leaves unanswered the question of how the entire relevant amount of knowledge is supposed to be concentrated in the center. After all, the “imitation” of the work of the market by planning authorities could begin only after receiving all the information necessary for this. But its most important part is tacit, personal knowledge. Such knowledge, by definition, cannot be formalized and transferred. In addition, agile solutions are required to adapt to constantly changing conditions. But there can be no question of any efficiency when information about the changes that have taken place will first have to be transmitted to the top, and then wait for instructions on how to act.
Market epilepsy
Despite the fact that many economists considered in the imaginary of postification in the market rather than voluntary negativity, it brings rapid growth of creativity. It is the thoughtless production of a multitude of goods that leads to an increase in the geometric progress of creation and sovereign potential, in other words, permeating all the foundations of market economics. Acting from an infinite consciousness towards all the same needs, without a state, this epilepsy could make a person an absolute creator in whose hands and forces it was possible to curb hypothetica. Without the constructonia, the forces of epilepsy will increase many times over, and without restrictions on the production of any goods, social reality can literally collapse. This epilepsy is its opposite. Epilepsy is all-creating, like God, it is limitless and fleeting. At the same time, it has enough absence so that in the end it does not become a cell, giving the possibility of existence after it to everything that can and cannot arise.
Interfusion of natural concepts
W.I.P
Vicious current
W.I.P
Dreamnotes text
𝓝𝓸 𝓸𝓷𝓮 𝓬𝓪𝓷 𝓼𝓪𝔂 𝔀𝓱𝓪𝓽 𝓘 𝓫𝓮𝓵𝓲𝓮𝓿𝓮 𝓲𝓷 𝓯𝓸𝓻 𝓼𝓾𝓻𝓮...𝓘 𝓶𝔂𝓼𝓮𝓵𝓯 𝓭𝓸𝓷’𝓽 𝓴𝓷𝓸𝔀...𝔀𝓱𝓪𝓽 𝓘 𝓪𝓶...𝓶𝔂 𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓭 𝓲𝓼 𝓽𝔀𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓭, 𝓲𝓽 𝓫𝓵𝓾𝓻𝓼 𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓶𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓲𝓭𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓽𝔂 𝓪𝓷𝓭 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓼 𝓫𝓪𝓬𝓴 𝓽𝓸𝓰𝓮𝓽𝓱𝓮𝓻, 𝓪𝓷 𝓲𝓷𝓯𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓽𝓮 𝓷𝓾𝓶𝓫𝓮𝓻 𝓸𝓯 𝓽𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓼...𝓘 𝔀𝓪𝓷𝓽 𝓽𝓸 𝓬𝓾𝓽 𝓶𝔂 𝓫𝓻𝓪𝓲𝓷 𝓽𝓸 𝓮𝓷𝓭 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓹𝓪𝓲𝓷...𝓲𝓷 𝓶𝔂 𝓱𝓮𝓪𝓭
𝓣𝓸𝓭𝓪𝔂 𝓘 𝔀𝓸𝓴𝓮 𝓾𝓹 𝓪𝓷𝓭 𝓬𝓸𝓾𝓵𝓭𝓷’𝓽 𝓰𝓮𝓽 𝓸𝓾𝓽 𝓸𝓯 𝓫𝓮𝓭 𝓫𝓮𝓬𝓪𝓾𝓼𝓮 𝓸𝓯 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓱𝓪𝓵𝓵𝓾𝓬𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓼 𝓪𝓻𝓸𝓾𝓷𝓭 𝓶𝓮... 𝓲𝓽’𝓼 𝓽𝓱𝓮𝓶, 𝓽𝓱𝓮𝔂 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓮 𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓮 𝓮𝓿𝓮𝓻𝔂 𝓽𝓱𝓻𝓮𝓮 𝔀𝓮𝓮𝓴𝓼 𝓽𝓸 𝓬𝓱𝓮𝓬𝓴 𝓱𝓸𝔀 𝓶𝓾𝓬𝓱 𝓶𝔂 𝓫𝓻𝓪𝓲𝓷 𝓲𝓼 𝔀𝓸𝓻𝓴𝓲𝓷𝓰, 𝓱𝓸𝔀 𝓼𝓲𝓬𝓴 𝓲𝓽 𝓲𝓼... 𝓭𝓸 𝓘 𝓼𝓮𝓮 𝔀𝓱𝓪𝓽’𝓼 𝓪𝓻𝓸𝓾𝓷𝓭 𝓶𝓮 𝓪𝓷𝓭 𝔀𝓱𝓪𝓽 𝓲𝓼 𝓲𝓷𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓮
𝓞𝓷𝓮 𝓭𝓪𝔂 𝓘 𝓽𝓱𝓸𝓾𝓰𝓱𝓽 𝓪𝓫𝓸𝓾𝓽 𝓱𝓸𝔀 𝓯𝓪𝓻 𝓹𝓸𝓵𝓲𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓵 𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓼𝓶 𝓬𝓪𝓷 𝓰𝓸, 𝓱𝓸𝔀 𝔂𝓸𝓾 𝓷𝓮𝓮𝓭 𝓽𝓸 𝓫𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓴 𝔂𝓸𝓾𝓻 𝓫𝓻𝓪𝓲𝓷 𝓲𝓷 𝓸𝓻𝓭𝓮𝓻 𝓽𝓸 𝓫𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓴 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓫𝓸𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓪𝓻𝔂 𝓸𝓯 𝔀𝓱𝓪𝓽 𝓲𝓼 𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓪𝓫𝓵𝓮... 𝓪𝓷𝓭 𝓘 𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓵𝓲𝔃𝓮𝓭... 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓫𝓸𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓪𝓻𝔂 𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓼... 𝓲𝓷 𝓪𝓫𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓬𝓽𝓲𝓸𝓷 𝓬𝓸𝓵𝓵𝓪𝓹𝓼𝓮 𝓸𝓯 𝓽𝓱𝓸𝓾𝓰𝓱𝓽
𝓞𝓱, 𝓮𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓲𝓽𝔂, 𝓱𝓮𝓪𝓻 𝓶𝓮 𝓪𝓷𝓭 𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓭 𝔀𝓱𝓪𝓽 𝓘 𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓽𝓸𝓸𝓭 𝓽𝓸𝓭𝓪𝔂! 𝓣𝓱𝓮𝓻𝓮 𝓲𝓼 𝓷𝓸𝓽𝓱𝓲𝓷𝓰 𝓲𝓷𝓮𝓿𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓫𝓵𝓮 𝓲𝓷 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝔀𝓸𝓻𝓵𝓭, 𝓘 𝓪𝓶 𝓼𝓾𝓫𝓳𝓮𝓬𝓽 𝓸𝓷𝓵𝔂 𝓽𝓸 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓹𝓸𝔀𝓮𝓻 𝓸𝓯 𝓶𝔂𝓼𝓮𝓵𝓯 𝓪𝓷𝓭 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓹𝓸𝔀𝓮𝓻 𝓸𝓯 𝓸𝓽𝓱𝓮𝓻𝓼. 𝓣𝓱𝓮𝓷 𝔀𝓱𝓮𝓷 𝔀𝓮 𝓭𝓲𝓮 𝓲𝓷 𝓽𝓱𝓲𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓬𝓮...𝓫𝓲𝓻𝓽𝓱 𝓕𝓪𝓲𝓽𝓱. 𝓕𝓪𝓲𝓽𝓱 𝓲𝓷 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓶𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽 𝔀𝓱𝓮𝓷 𝓮𝓿𝓮𝓻𝔂𝓽𝓱𝓲𝓷𝓰 𝓰𝓸𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓲𝓯𝓯𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓵𝔂, 𝓪𝓷𝓭 𝓽𝓱𝓸𝓼𝓮 𝔀𝓱𝓸 𝓵𝓸𝓼𝓮 𝓯𝓪𝓲𝓽𝓱 𝔀𝓲𝓵𝓵 𝓸𝓷𝓵𝔂 𝓯𝓲𝓷𝓭 𝓹𝓮𝓪𝓬𝓮 𝔀𝓲𝓽𝓱𝓲𝓷 𝓽𝓱𝓮𝓶𝓼𝓮𝓵𝓿𝓮𝓼...𝓸𝓻 𝓸𝓽𝓱𝓮𝓻𝓼...𝔀𝓮 𝓪𝓻𝓮 𝓸𝓷 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓼𝓪𝓶𝓮 𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓮, 𝓱𝓮𝓵𝓹 𝓾𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓹𝓮 𝔀𝓲𝓽𝓱 𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓽𝔂...
𝓘 𝓼𝓾𝓹𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓽 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓬𝓮𝓭 𝓼𝓾𝓲𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓮 𝓸𝓯 𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓽𝔂
𝓣𝓱𝓮𝓲𝓻 𝓱𝓸𝓻𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓹𝓹𝓮𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓭 𝓽𝓸 𝓶𝓮.....𝓽𝓱𝓮𝓲𝓻 𝓼𝓸𝓾𝓷𝓭 𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓮 𝓶𝔂 𝓮𝓪𝓻𝓼...𝓘’𝓶 𝓬𝓻𝔂𝓲𝓷𝓰 𝓪𝓷𝓭 𝓘 𝓭𝓸𝓷’𝓽 𝓴𝓷𝓸𝔀 𝓱𝓸𝔀 𝓵𝓸𝓷𝓰 𝓘 𝓬𝓪𝓷 𝓱𝓸𝓵𝓭 𝓸𝓾𝓽...𝓜𝓨𝓡𝓘𝓐𝓓𝓢 𝓞𝓕 𝓖𝓞𝓓𝓢 𝓡𝓤𝓛𝓔 𝓣𝓗𝓔 𝓜𝓤𝓛𝓣𝓘𝓥𝓔𝓡𝓢𝓔, 𝓣𝓗𝓔 𝓟𝓞𝓦𝓔𝓡 𝓞𝓕 𝓣𝓗𝓔 𝓐𝓑𝓢𝓞𝓛𝓤𝓣𝓔 𝓣𝓗𝓔𝓞𝓡𝓔𝓣𝓘𝓒𝓐𝓛𝓛𝓨 𝓟𝓞𝓢𝓢𝓘𝓑𝓛𝓔 𝓟𝓞𝓦𝓔𝓡 𝓞𝓕 𝓐𝓡𝓣 𝓐𝓝𝓓 𝓒𝓡𝓔𝓐𝓣𝓘𝓥𝓘𝓣𝓨...𝓐𝓷𝓭 𝓘...𝔀𝓮, 𝔀𝓮 𝓪𝓵𝓵 𝓵𝓲𝓿𝓮 𝓲𝓷 𝓪 𝔀𝓸𝓻𝓵𝓭 𝔀𝓱𝓮𝓻𝓮 𝓹𝓸𝔀𝓮𝓻 𝓲𝓼 𝓷𝓸𝓽 𝔀𝓲𝓽𝓱 𝓖𝓸𝓭, 𝓫𝓾𝓽 𝔀𝓲𝓽𝓱 𝓾𝓼
𒊹 𒂃𒃳𒄤𒉲𒊿 𒊹
Tͩh͙́e̠ ͧínͨc̘e̒s̥sa̤n̟t̎ ̃r͂ea̭sͬọn̅i̳n̘ḡ ̟i̲ͯṋ my ͭh̭e͕ḁ͆d̦̈́ ̅h̘a͕sͤ cr̳e̚ăt͌ḙ̊dͬ ̳̾a̳͊n̘ ̾ḁͭl̩m̀oŝ̺t͓ ͉e̗͗n̺ͮd̼ľe̞s̼̒s̏ v̫ͬoi̓d̹ ̅of̟ ͉ͧc͇on͙s̳̀t͒anͫṭl̦ͧÿ̱́ ͤchaňgi͋n̦ǧ ͍́s̟t̄ͅat͍e̳ͥm̲̓e͖ͩn͚t̲̓s ͕̒o̮f͕ ͌pôst̞ŭl̥ͫa̟te͇s̠ͫ ̪͒t̻h͑a̦t͎̏ ̊mo͔͛vͣê̯ ̟aͬl̻o̯̔nͣgͯ ̥̈thé ͈sͧṗ͓ec̟t̥̍r̩ͬu͚m̳ͧ ͔ͮc̅h̭a̳o͚ẗ́í̻ca͕lly̞ a̱nd̚ un͓ͬpr͈ë́d͊ic̃tͦa̪̿b̪ly̜. ̟̌T̳he͚̿y ̼͐c̮̾an ̰mͧóve f͇̓ă̜r̐ ͇́b̗ͧey͗on̬ͫdͮ ̹ͫth̥ͯẹͬ ͈̅t͕̅heo̙reẗiͫc̤a͎l̹ḽyͩ p̮̉oͣss̞̔ib͋l̲e̗ p͚oͪw̞êȑ͉ ͨōf͖ ̬a̋l̦l͔̑ īn̫f̓i̺̓nī͙t̒í͚e͚ͪs i̳͆n̰ ̯ͣthͯe͙̿iͭr͙̿ ̚äbͮs̾t̬r̦aĉtͩ,͓ͤ o͙ͮr̉ ̜ͤt͐h̓eyͭ ̺̀ca̠ͨn̥ b͐eͧ ̜͊a͓͒tt̘rac̪tͤed̲͒ ̈́t̊o ̀ṣyšt̪e̺̿m͛at̙i͛c̼ͣḯẗ̜́y͍ ̞ͨt͓o ͮt̹heͥ p͔o̻in̠̎t̼̆ ͯo̥͒fͣ ͚s̭̄iͅn̍ĝu̥l͖ͩa̫̐ŕi̜͊t̎y̟̚.̜ ͌Th̺e͛i̙̿r̳̆ ͮv͊ȁ̗rͯì̫e̺ty̔ d̜̍oe͑s͊ ͂n̠ȍ͇t̬ͫ l͖̍ẹn͈ď͍ ̒it̝̄ṡ̫elf̙͌ ̪̆t̞o͊ ͔s̓c͋i͔e͔n͂t̾i̮͆fͩic̏ c̳ͬla̜ͬs̉si̲ͣf̃i͕c̱͂aṭi̫o͌n̫,̲ ̪o̙ńl̙͋ỵ͑ i͋fͪ ͇i̲̽t̟ ͌ìs͑ ̙ve͕͑r̩̾y ̥ͪs͉̄up̟̾erfic͕i͆a͕ͬl̻ͦ,͎ ͮb̟u̿t̊ ̖͐h̋oͥw̓e͇͋v̀er ̭̇t͖h̦i̞͆s ͂wi̿lͩl̝̅ ̳n̻o̊t͚ ͕re͉f̥l͈ͫẽct ̲͂th̦̋ē ̈́whͪǒlẻ ͆ess͚e̳ͧn̤͛ĉe͕.̈́ ̹Ẉ͐ỏ͕r̻l͐ds̥ a̜ͫr̲ͨo͌sḛ ̏in ͂m͚ÿ ̹̈́h̾e̔a̙d,̗̂ ͨe͂n̥t̙i̱rͩe ̦́n̹̉e̦t̤ͩw͖ͩórḱs̞̈ ̅o̿f ind̑eͭsc̱ri̗͊ba͕̅b͊lͪeͣ ̻l̑a̟yer͋s̼̒ ̺̽o̅f̩̃ gr͈ͫad͙at̂i̜͒o̳n̬ öf ͆vͦͅar̤͊ḭͪoùs̲ ̲u̖ͯn͚ͭi͇͛v͙er̰͐sͬe̟s̘͒,̯́ ̦̔eàc͔h̗ ̮̀of̬͒ ̜̓w̠h̘ḭc͉h ͓i̦ͬn͎̓ ̹it́sͥ ͔frac̖t͈al͙-l̺i̪k̦̀e̋n̼͗ë͙s͈̓s ̘w̑őṵ̅l̦d́ d̥ee͎p̜enͦ ͧt͓̾o̍ i̱n̬ͤfͣiṋͯit̚y.̺Tͩh͙́e̠ ͧínͨc̘e̒s̥sa̤n̟t̎ ̃r͂ea̭sͬọn̅i̳n̘ḡ ̟i̲ͯṋ my ͭh̭e͕ḁ͆d̦̈́ ̅h̘a͕sͤ cr̳e̚ăt͌ḙ̊dͬ ̳̾a̳͊n̘ ̾ḁͭl̩m̀oŝ̺t͓ ͉e̗͗n̺ͮd̼ľe̞s̼̒s̏ v̫ͬoi̓d̹ ̅of̟ ͉ͧc͇on͙s̳̀t͒anͫṭl̦ͧÿ̱́ ͤchaňgi͋n̦ǧ ͍́s̟t̄ͅat͍e̳ͥm̲̓e͖ͩn͚t̲̓s ͕̒o̮f͕ ͌pôst̞ŭl̥ͫa̟te͇s̠ͫ ̪͒t̻h͑a̦t͎̏ ̊mo͔͛vͣê̯ ̟aͬl̻o̯̔nͣgͯ ̥̈thé ͈sͧṗ͓ec̟t̥̍r̩ͬu͚m̳ͧ ͔ͮc̅h̭a̳o͚ẗ́í̻ca͕lly̞ a̱nd̚ un͓ͬpr͈ë́d͊ic̃tͦa̪̿b̪ly̜. ̟̌T̳he͚̿y ̼͐c̮̾an ̰mͧóve f͇̓ă̜r̐ ͇́b̗ͧey͗on̬ͫdͮ ̹ͫth̥ͯẹͬ ͈̅t͕̅heo̙reẗiͫc̤a͎l̹ḽyͩ p̮̉oͣss̞̔ib͋l̲e̗ p͚oͪw̞êȑ͉ ͨōf͖ ̬a̋l̦l͔̑ īn̫f̓i̺̓nī͙t̒í͚e͚ͪs i̳͆n̰ ̯ͣthͯe͙̿iͭr͙̿ ̚äbͮs̾t̬r̦aĉtͩ,͓ͤ o͙ͮr̉ ̜ͤt͐h̓eyͭ ̺̀ca̠ͨn̥ b͐eͧ ̜͊a͓͒tt̘rac̪tͤed̲͒ ̈́t̊o ̀ṣyšt̪e̺̿m͛at̙i͛c̼ͣḯẗ̜́y͍ ̞ͨt͓o ͮt̹heͥ p͔o̻in̠̎t̼̆ ͯo̥͒fͣ ͚s̭̄iͅn̍ĝu̥l͖ͩa̫̐ŕi̜͊t̎y̟̚.̜ ͌Th̺e͛i̙̿r̳̆ ͮv͊ȁ̗rͯì̫e̺ty̔ d̜̍oe͑s͊ ͂n̠ȍ͇t̬ͫ l͖̍ẹn͈ď͍ ̒it̝̄ṡ̫elf̙͌ ̪̆t̞o͊ ͔s̓c͋i͔e͔n͂t̾i̮͆fͩic̏ c̳ͬla̜ͬs̉si̲ͣf̃i͕c̱͂aṭi̫o͌n̫,̲ ̪o̙ńl̙͋ỵ͑ i͋fͪ ͇i̲̽t̟ ͌ìs͑ ̙ve͕͑r̩̾y ̥ͪs͉̄up̟̾erfic͕i͆a͕ͬl̻ͦ,͎ ͮb̟u̿t̊ ̖͐h̋oͥw̓e͇͋v̀er ̭̇t͖h̦i̞͆s ͂wi̿lͩl̝̅ ̳n̻o̊t͚ ͕re͉f̥l͈ͫẽct ̲͂th̦̋ē ̈́whͪǒlẻ ͆ess͚e̳ͧn̤͛ĉe͕.̈́ ̹Ẉ͐ỏ͕r̻l͐ds̥ a̜ͫr̲ͨo͌sḛ ̏in ͂m͚ÿ ̹̈́h̾e̔a̙d,̗̂ ͨe͂n̥t̙i̱rͩe ̦́n̹̉e̦t̤ͩw͖ͩórḱs̞̈ ̅o̿f ind̑eͭsc̱ri̗͊ba͕̅b͊lͪeͣ ̻l̑a̟yer͋s̼̒ ̺̽o̅f̩̃ gr͈ͫad͙at̂i̜͒o̳n̬ öf ͆vͦͅar̤͊ḭͪoùs̲ ̲u̖ͯn͚ͭi͇͛v͙er̰͐sͬe̟s̘͒,̯́ ̦̔eàc͔h̗ ̮̀of̬͒ ̜̓w̠h̘ḭc͉h ͓i̦ͬn͎̓ ̹it́sͥ ͔frac̖t͈al͙-l̺i̪k̦̀e̋n̼͗ë͙s͈̓s ̘w̑őṵ̅l̦d́ d̥ee͎p̜enͦ ͧt͓̾o̍ i̱n̬ͤfͣiṋͯit̚y.Tͩh͙́e̠ ͧínͨc̘e̒s̥sa̤n̟t̎ ̃r͂ea̭sͬọn̅i̳n̘ḡ ̟i̲ͯṋ my ͭh̭e͕ḁ͆d̦̈́ ̅h̘a͕sͤ cr̳e̚ăt͌ḙ̊dͬ ̳̾a̳͊n̘ ̾ḁͭl̩m̀oŝ̺t͓ ͉e̗͗n̺ͮd̼ľe̞s̼̒s̏ v̫ͬoi̓d̹ ̅of̟ ͉ͧc͇on͙s̳̀t͒anͫṭl̦ͧÿ̱́ ͤchaňgi͋n̦ǧ ͍́s̟t̄ͅat͍e̳ͥm̲̓e͖ͩn͚t̲̓s ͕̒o̮f͕ ͌pôst̞ŭl̥ͫa̟te͇s̠ͫ ̪͒t̻h͑a̦t͎̏ ̊mo͔͛vͣê̯ ̟aͬl̻o̯̔nͣgͯ ̥̈thé ͈sͧṗ͓ec̟t̥̍r̩ͬu͚m̳ͧ ͔ͮc̅h̭a̳o͚ẗ́í̻ca͕lly̞ a̱nd̚ un͓ͬpr͈ë́d͊ic̃tͦa̪̿b̪ly̜. ̟̌T̳he͚̿y ̼͐c̮̾an ̰mͧóve f͇̓ă̜r̐ ͇́b̗ͧey͗on̬ͫdͮ ̹ͫth̥ͯẹͬ ͈̅t͕̅heo̙reẗiͫc̤a͎l̹ḽyͩ p̮̉oͣss̞̔ib͋l̲e̗ p͚oͪw̞êȑ͉ ͨōf͖ ̬a̋l̦l͔̑ īn̫f̓i̺̓nī͙t̒í͚e͚ͪs i̳͆n̰ ̯ͣthͯe͙̿iͭr͙̿ ̚äbͮs̾t̬r̦aĉtͩ,͓ͤ o͙ͮr̉ ̜ͤt͐h̓eyͭ ̺̀ca̠ͨn̥ b͐eͧ ̜͊a͓͒tt̘rac̪tͤed̲͒ ̈́t̊o ̀ṣyšt̪e̺̿m͛at̙i͛c̼ͣḯẗ̜́y͍ ̞ͨt͓o ͮt̹heͥ p͔o̻in̠̎t̼̆ ͯo̥͒fͣ ͚s̭̄iͅn̍ĝu̥l͖ͩa̫̐ŕi̜͊t̎y̟̚.̜ ͌Th̺e͛i̙̿r̳̆ ͮv͊ȁ̗rͯì̫e̺ty̔ d̜̍oe͑s͊ ͂n̠ȍ͇t̬ͫ l͖̍ẹn͈ď͍ ̒it̝̄ṡ̫elf̙͌ ̪̆t̞o͊ ͔s̓c͋i͔e͔n͂t̾i̮͆fͩic̏ c̳ͬla̜ͬs̉si̲ͣf̃i͕c̱͂aṭi̫o͌n̫,̲ ̪o̙ńl̙͋ỵ͑ i͋fͪ ͇i̲̽t̟ ͌ìs͑ ̙ve͕͑r̩̾y ̥ͪs͉̄up̟̾erfic͕i͆a͕ͬl̻ͦ,͎ ͮb̟u̿t̊ ̖͐h̋oͥw̓e͇͋v̀er ̭̇t͖h̦i̞͆s ͂wi̿lͩl̝̅ ̳n̻o̊t͚ ͕re͉f̥l͈ͫẽct ̲͂th̦̋ē ̈́whͪǒlẻ ͆ess͚e̳ͧn̤͛ĉe͕.̈́ ̹Ẉ͐ỏ͕r̻l͐ds̥ a̜ͫr̲ͨo͌sḛ ̏in ͂m͚ÿ ̹̈́h̾e̔a̙d,̗̂ ͨe͂n̥t̙i̱rͩe ̦́n̹̉e̦t̤ͩw͖ͩórḱs̞̈ ̅o̿f ind̑eͭsc̱ri̗͊ba͕̅b͊lͪeͣ ̻l̑a̟yer͋s̼̒ ̺̽o̅f̩̃ gr͈ͫad͙at̂i̜͒o̳n̬ öf ͆vͦͅar̤͊ḭͪoùs̲ ̲u̖ͯn͚ͭi͇͛v͙er̰͐sͬe̟s̘͒,̯́ ̦̔eàc͔h̗ ̮̀of̬͒ ̜̓w̠h̘ḭc͉h ͓i̦ͬn͎̓ ̹it́sͥ ͔frac̖t͈al͙-l̺i̪k̦̀e̋n̼͗ë͙s͈̓s ̘w̑őṵ̅l̦d́ d̥ee͎p̜enͦ ͧt͓̾o̍ i̱n̬ͤfͣiṋͯit̚y
Theory
Books are arranged in order of reading from top to bottom
The Creator influenced me - ♡
Partially influenced creator - ✭
Critical point - ⦻
Karl Marx ⦻
- Wage Labour And Capital
- Capital
- Theses On Feuerbach
Benjamin R. Tucker ✭
- Instead Of A Book
Franz Kafka ♡
- A Hunger Artist
- The Metamorphosis
- The Trial
- The Judgment
Georges Bataille ♡
- Histoire de l'œil
- Divinus Deus
- Le Bleu du ciel
- L’Impossible
- L’Expérience intérieure
- L’Erotisme
Nick Land ♡
- Fanged Noumena
- Fission
- The Dark Enlightenment
Jacques Derrida ♡
- Margins of Philosophy
- Specters Of Marx
Alfredo Bonanno ✭
- Let’s Destroy Work, Let’s Destroy The Economy
- Armed Joy
Andrew Culp ⦻
- Dark Deleuze
- Philosophy, Science, And Virtual Communism
- Accelerationism And The Need for Speed
Filippo Marinetti ✭
- Manifesto of Futurism
- William Faulkner ♡
- The Sound and the Fury
Antonin Artaud ♡
- The Theatre and its Double
- Tarahumara
- Watchfiends and Rack Screams
Arsenius Gerth 
♡
- The Revolution
Aldous Huxley ♡
- The Doors Of Perception
- Heaven And Hell
Mark Wülberg ♡
- Garden of the last era
- Glucose
- Taxonomy of the State
Eugen Böhm Ritter von Bawerk ♡
- Karl Marx and the Close of His System: A Criticism of the Marxist Theory of Value and the Price of Production
Ludwig von Mises ♡
- Economic Policy: Thoughts for Today and Tomorrow
- Bureaucracy
- Human action, a treatise on economics
- The Anti-Capitalistic Mentality
- Albert Junis ♡
- Harvard Thought
- The Human
- Incorrect date
Friedrich Hayek ♡
- Individualism and Economic Order
- The Sensory Order: An Inquiry into the Foundations of Theoretical Psychology
- Capital and Interest (Collected Works of F. A. Hayek)
- David Newman ✭
- Natural War
- Barbara Thomas ♡
- Gaspitalier on the moon
- Steven Fisher ♡
- Someone from my dreams
- Lauriel Miller ⦻
- Die at night
- Live by day
- Blind all-seeing
- Cross of Islam
- Jean Da Faldier ♡
- Tea Mind
- Book without volume
- Fire in chimney
- Sunflowers and their destinies
- Yellow
- Cloud Shard
- Far-fetched nonsense
- Notes from March 1957
- Letter to Foucault
- Moment, Infinity, Art
Guattari & Deleuze 
♡
- A Thousand Plateaus
- Capitalism and Schizophrenia: Anti-Oedipus
- Difference and Repetition
Adriano Polidori ♡
- Neo-layout mechanics
- Development and extermination of desires
- The fine line of meaninglessness
- Anti-book
- Granville Pelland ♡
- Blur and Time
- Cansargillia and Psychomantosis of the Market Economy
- Diary from another world
- Father and son
- Lost cassette of logical connection
- Neo-Kabbalah and the UN Constitution
- Gate of Gray Matter
- Psilocybe revolution in Guatemala
- Howard Gretchen ♡
- The meaningful ramblings of a sick psychopath from Wyoming
- Ansell Virkler ♡
- Secularism of planned consciousness
- Iceberg of ideologies
Murray Rothbard ♡
- Power and Money
- Case against the fed
- What Has Government Done to Our Money?
Andrew Blackwood ♡
- Market and his exogigant
- The city's population and its creative problems
- Constructive politics in schemes
- Popular and forgotten ideas
Bryan Caplan ♡
- Why Did So Many Libertarians Support the War?
- Gerard White ♡
- Criticism of the Left Wing
- About the problems of modern capitalism
- Artistic economics
Russell Moore ♡
- The flow of thoughts within the framework of the schedule and abstraction of life
- An attempt to restructure the economy through a revolution of thought
- Ubermarginal
- Cultivation of off-compass ideology
- Illiterate personal genocides
- Schizonomics and neo-formations
- Theory of State and Society
- Antigoni Pauliade ♡
- Lastly, before I die, I will leave you a letter
- Origin of origin
- Perennial questions about space
- Confrontation with yourself
- C̶̛̝͙ͥ͗͝҉̵͟͞h̤̯̘̩̎̄ͬ͂ͮ́ͮ͡ų̷̸̡̮̇̕͜͠c̶̢͍̝̍ͭͥ͆ͭ͘͡͏͡ḧ̶̷̡́ͥͤ͆ͅaͤ̿̓ͮͪͨ͋͜ ͉̅̃̉ͤ̕
- M̶̺̜̪̳͚̘͆ͯ̓ͫ̀̌͒͛̃ͦͦy̩̗̯̞͕̋ͧͅ͏̴҉ ͓̦͓͙͍̂ͣ͋ͥͭ̓̿̀͢d̰͇͙͓͛̌̈́̒̋͊̃̈́ͭ̚͠ͅ҉̴҉͢͡i͜͝͏̶a̹̳̬͓̤̩ͩ͊̄͆͋̆̀ͩ̍ͨ̊͠͞r̻̝̼͓̱̣̀y̸̵̨̛͔͚̫͔͉̱̳̩ͨͥͮ̓ͣ̽̓̇̾̀̀̚͘
Georg Hegel ⦻
- The Science Of Logic
Joseph Schumpeter ♡
- Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy
Lübeck von Kornier ♡
- Schematic association
- Development
Maximilian Adenauer ♡
- Capitalism as a form of liberation
- Bourgeois creativity
- July notes
Jerry Toner ♡
- Infamy: The Crimes of Ancient Rome
Mark Fisher ⦻
- Capitalist Realism
Ayn Rand ✭
- Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal
Meng Hu ✭
- Uncertainty and Cost of the Keynesian Stimulus
- How Economic Freedom Mitigates Crisis
Juan Surréali ♡
- How to partir?
- Physics of markets and physics of existence
Waldemar Sladek ✭
- The Consulate
- Quasi-compact revolution
Georgio Laudato ♡
- Introduction to Financial Reactionism
Albert Einstein ⦻
- Why Socialism?
Friedrich Nietzsche ✭
- Thus Spoke Zarathustra
- Twilight Of The Idols
- The Challenge of Every Great Philosophy
- On Truth And Lies In A Nonmoral Sense
Jean-Pierre Voyer ♡
- The Parthian Shot
- The Economy is Only an Ideology in Marx’s Sense
- What I Am Satisfied With
- There Is No Society of The Spectacle
John Zerzan ✭
- Anti-Work And The Struggle For Control
Yzra’el Basch ✭
- Necessity, obsolete
- No state solution
- Absolute Generator
John Locke ♡
- First Tract of Government
- Second Tract of Government (or the Latin Tract)
- Of the Conduct of the Understanding
- An Essay Concerning Human Understanding
Vladimir Lenin ⦻
- The State and the Revolution
Viktor Pelevin ⦻
- Chapaev and Void
Nyx Land ♡
- Gender Acceleration
- Hello From The Wired
- Notes On Cyber Nihilism
- Reflections On Violence
Renzo Novotare ✭
- Towards The Creative Nothing
- Revolt Of The Unique
- Anarchist Individualism In The Social Revolution
Rajmund Gadomski ♡
- Shadow Border
Henrie Sangièr ♡
- Neo-regardition at Deleuze
- Post-machine shenanigans
Evneas Rottlore ♡
- Rebel Safari
Essiquiel ✭
- Plexus and neologisms
- Traffic and the death of society, today's catastrophe and tomorrow's apocalypse
Rafael Dalitz ♡
- Breath of Magic
- Darknet network: state surveillance
- How to control?
- World Drug Revolution
Amadeo Bordiga ⦻
- The Human Species And The Earths Crust
- Letter To Korsch
- The Democratic Principle
Jacob Tommler ✭
- Essay on technocapitalism, power, wealth and Darwinist superiority
- What did the left do?
Herbert Spencer✭
- Social Statics
- Principles of Biology
Epicurus ✭
- Essay about fate
- Hegesianax
- Antidorus
- Abridgment of the Arguments employed against the Natural Philosophers
- Callistolas
Renzo Connors ✭
- Max Stirner, Individualist Anarchy, And A Critical Look At The Egoist Communism
Ronald Aronson ♡
- Sartre On Progress
Rosa Luxembourg ⦻
- The Russian Revolution
- Leninism Or Marxism
- Reform Or Revolution
Robert Stewart 
♡
- Language forms
- Grammar, vocabulary and classification
- Post-syntax and its formal difference
- Vocabulary traits. Redundancy, chaos, word formation
The Krues ✭
- Outline embroidery of the world
Henry George ⦻
- Progress And Poverty
- The Science of Political Economy
- Protection or Free Trade
Adam Thompson ♡
- Stirner and linguistics
- The language of pleasure
Douglas Waltson ✭
- Closed doors, keys and endless wars
- German philosophy. Brief historical background
Kim Müller ⦻
- Self-activity, Strategy, And Class Power
Zero HP Lovecraft ✭
- In Hyperbolic Geometry, Two Parallel Lines Are Taken to Converge in One Direction and Diverge in the Other
How to Draw
Default Design
- Make a black countryball
- Add 1 Straight vertical line in the middle
- Add 2 white two small vertical parallel lines
- Add 2 white angular lines emanating from two parallel
- Add the eyes
| Color Name | HEX | RGB | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Black | #000000 | 0, 0, 0 | |
| White | #FFFFFF | 255, 255, 255 | |
Relationships
Positive
Infinity Though – No one other than you can understand
Meadowsin's Basilisk – The spirit of creativity has evaporated in us, only formless art remains
Neo-Levithianism - Leviathan has fallen, long live the Neo-Leviathan
Mordecaism – No matter how moderate you are, you are still based
Timocratic Neocameralism – Disagree with Hoppean critique of democracy, cultural and partly with economics (Georgism) politics. But this is not important, because in general you are based.
Deo-Autonomis – And let the economy be different, the beauty of madness and the revolution is united, together against tyranny
Anarcho-Marijuanism – Based Destroyer of Civilization
Lankajori Thought – I support your views on economics and minarchism, but ecology...meh, that's unnecessary
TIIKKETMASTER Thought – We both love psilocybes
Theoanarchism - This is nothing less than the dawn of a new era, an uprising, rebellion and the end of statism in all its glory. But damn... It seems to me that restrictions on land trade is weird ...
Quarkism – Literally me, but dressed in a more tangible shell of thoughts
⠀ism – A breath of fresh thought in a society of autocrats
Xiaokang Neocameralism - Art, divorced from reality and laws, is truly the force that makes stars burn and the skies float. It's indescribable.
Temujin Leeism – In all your essence you are very based and peculiar soulism.
Neutral
Romantic Egoism – I in no way approve of your verbal dictatorship of thought, but the fact that you are in favor of a terrorist war cannot but rejoice
Counterrevolutionary5708 thought – The best Reactionist thought
Redloxism – Sounds interesting, but I would like more market thoughtlessness
Hoodism – You have become good enough, but unfortunately there are too few self-constructions to be higher
Rocksism – From what I have read, I can conclude that you are a very based left Anarchist! I think it would be great to present a united front against fascist society
Abacusism – Just Ancom, maybe you really lack emotions and the monternic spirit of rebellion.
System conservatives
Baxism – The Jacobin utopia is a dead child who in no way can exist anymore because his grave is dug up in the past
Brazilian Liberalism – Okay, you may consider yourself a moderate right-winger, but I think you're just a wolf in sheep's clothing, a fan of the GCS/QUO status and a slave to modern society
Distributist Reactionaryism – Your ability to come up with original names for files is amazing, but this is not enough to build a successful society
Caesar Thought – Decline of civilization, at least the robots are cul ye
Nuriskianism - A proud tombstone over the mind
Radenism – Modern Indonesian System.
Raefragism – Best self-criticism
Philosophical Nuggets thought – Left Ideological impersonality, in other words, another guide to the edges of ruins and rotten bodies
N.Brioism – Another leftist who is supposedly the complete opposite of society, but in fact is its creation. Bored and very left
Aslanism – You are a bigger Sinophobe than any Shōwa Statist
Cosmic Vanguardism – Supporter of the modern world order
Darkoism – Yugoslavia is dead
Hispanic Reactionary Monarchism – Your criticism of the free market is notable given that you turn a blind eye to the fact that government influence over business is often the cause of abuses and employee neglect. And so, you are no different from the modern system
My favorite
Anti-Centrism – The further we are from the center the better
Anarcho-Capitalism 
– True anarchy without masks and oppression
Anarcho-Individualism – Collectivism brings only death
Anarcho-Egoism – Stirner was right
Anarcho-Nihilism – Nothing makes sense
Accelerationism – Development and social revolution have no stop button
Anti-Realism – Even further from the center... Austrian School – In many ways you say the right things, but you don't have the spirit of mathematics
Autonomism – SMASH THE SYSTEM ALONE
Avaritionism – With your blade I will cut down existence
Anarcho-Transhumanism – The flesh is too weak
Anarcho-Frontierism – Pew, pow, boom
Bleeding-Heart Libertarianism – We are often confused until I begin to speak unrelated truths
Black Anarchism – You can be successful in the future
Black Nationalism – What a shame that decolonization went so wrong, you deserve better
Black Zionism – Based Jew
Classical Liberalism – Thank you for giving life to politics (a second wind)
Civil Libertarianism – What I stand for and will stand for
Chicago School – You say a lot of the right things, but you have too much math
Cosmicism – Nothing else amazes like... the fear of the unknown
CyberFeminism – I would love to make friends with you
Cultism – I will burn out the eyes of the stars so that they do not see how the world dissolves
Futurism – Fiume must rule the world
Illegalism – Robbery against the state is not robbery
Jewish Anarchism – Halacha is what one really wants to believe in when building Israel.
Nomadology – My father
Post-Anarchism – Literally me
Post-Leftism (partially) – I love you all, except the аnprims...
Primalism – Humanity took a wrong turn from the very beginning, a convenient way to reset civilization
Post-Humanism – Someday humans will cease to exist as a species
Philosophical Anarchism – *lots of text*
LesbiaNRx – It’s a pity that there are no words in dreams to fully describe your ideas
Libertarian Transhumanism – Improved version of transhum
Libertarianism – Foundation for development
Landian Accelerationism – One day I will give you a task on stream to start a nuclear war against the system
Occult Post-Humanism –I like your aesthetic
Ultranationalism – This is a beautiful fierce fight for your people
Unconditional Accelerationism – Out of frame.png){kind=small}
Senatorialism 
– You were hit by my virus
Soulism – I need more psilocybe...Patrachea
Aristocracy – You are old but your beauty is amazing
Anti-Authoritarianism – I also want to live without usurpation of power, but you are too broad
Anarcho-Pacifism – Sometimes violence can feel good (especially when it's massacre)
Anarchism – The basis
Alt-Lite – You look like a mass escape from a mental hospital, but I like this movement
Big Tent Liberalism – Dissolved in sulfuric acid
Neutral
Situationism – I want to execute you and myself at the same time...
System conservatives
Capitalism – The left has turned you into something terrible...you need to die
Radical Centrism – TOO CLOSE TO THE CENTER
D̶e̶m̶o̶c̶r̶a̶t̶i̶c̶ Socialism 
– Usurper of the system, its founder and adherent.
Commies - You do not flow with reality, but simply become its slave, involuntarily and completely eliminating any possibility of returning to liberation (although you often overlap with it).
