×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 2,528 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki

CommentStreams:7df114b7f95533a3b8c17003a9b7b7fc

< CommentStreams:Ac405961acf727a92c0570a183dc85ba
Revision as of 17:35, 16 January 2024 by LordCompost (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

"The old model of revolution is dead, there can be no reproduction of power through the conquest of the state as previous communists have proposed in the transitional period, because the proletarian is not a fixed and revolutionary subject at all anymore thanks to its stratification and inter-dependence by and to Capital through Tronti’s conception of the social factory. There can be no affirmation of the proletarian subject, of the misery and shamefulness of its condition." - This is great, but again, why is it the proletariat that is denied, and not say any other political subject? Why are we not denying the subject of women?

"This is where we derive our theory of insurrection, something definitely close to but still different to the insurrection of Stirner. Our insurrection is based upon Tiqqun and The Invisible Committee's conception of it, the active living of the struggle against Capital and against all forms of power vested by it in its apparatuses, the active affirmation against the biopower of Capital which create the modern subject we so wish to negate." Again, why is it only capital we are struggling against?

"The egoist may participate in such active struggle against Capital if they so wish to, but we do not impose on them any causes to follow, we do not so beg them to partake in such action." Good.