Stirner and marx weren't "heavy conflicting". Even marx knew that stirner's ideas weren't something that were "retarded" or what not, marx himself was a egoist("Communists do not oppose egoism to selflessness or selflessness to egoism, nor do they express this contradiction theoretically either in its sentimental or in its highflown ideological form") albiet he still didn't like stirner that much was obvious he thought stirner was trying to create a self-centered religion(marx was trying to do the same with communism so) if you're purely talking from a political standpoint this still doesn't stand up as camel in discord was talking how about the state(in the case of me, the councils) is a not a idol that stirner hated oh so much but rather a social relations between people, No i'm not saying the state can be turned and idolized into a idol, which can very much happen. but that the state inherently is not something that's forcing you into its submission, it doesn't force(inherently) you to conform into what it wants you to be and takes your self will from you.(inherently) yes the modern capitalist state does many of these things but under a counciliod state you would be pure in control of the state because you(a worker) is the state itself you make the state submit to you and your colleagues rather than the other way around. stirner himself wasn't an anarchist and would find the modern-post left vile. they twisted what he was saying many postie themselves have never even attempted to read stirner and say retarded shit like "spooks"(which he never said and is just massive reddit atheitst nonsense) not to mention marx and him come from both a post-hegelian philosophy. Yes stirner and marx had differences like any at the time, I would be lying saying they didn't but stirner had a influence on marx and never had large enough differences in the realm of philosophy to warrant " heavily conflicting" its more likely stirner would have set himself on fire seeing your slop of a page.
2,439Articles