CommentStreams:Cc6517cd9a4988b69c00d5af3a080bf3

First of all they are not names for the same totality. They are very different theories of very different things. Technocapital is the accelerationist analysis of the deteritorialization of capital and technology. Spectactle is a theory of the social mediation of images. Civilization is the current structured order of our society. These are very different analysis and saying they're the same ignores their complexiy. You say you want to destroy economic classes but you fundamentally do not, keeping in your relations the petit bourgeoisie. And I do not support planning at all btw. Communization as a horizon can already be seen in the various insurrectionary struggles seen in Greece, current anti-work struggles in asia, recent struggles in California, etc. Anti-capitalist desire is there, I find really you just fall to fatalism. Upheavals to the social order have come throughout history. Communization as a theoretical mileu surely can be coopted, but the idea itself cannot. As the idea is fundamentally opposed to that. Regardless of name the movement remains. Capital is in the current moment inescapable, that is why the TAZ is not an outside but is instead fully within the circuit of capital (same for your mutual aid market btw). I am also a contemporary anarchist, but we can both clearly state that the current state of things is alienating and mediated. We shouldn't settle, rather we should understand radical politics at the level of the everyday. The TAZ form of lifestylism is very much contrained by capital, it is self defeating. Also I would have responded on discord but it isn't working rn