CommentStreams:Ce867b2d7cacf6dd94a4646c357e8fae

Well civilization, spectacle and technocapital are different names for the same totality. That's just it. I want to destroy economic classes so labeling me as petit bourgeoisie is wrong, plus any kind of planning is more stratifying than mutual aid. Don't understand me wrong, I oppose everything that communists like you oppose, but we came to a bit different conclusion when it comes to economy. We talked about it endlessly but communization relies on all of the people rising against capital that is impossible for current day, but good that you see autonomous zones as first positive consequences of insurrection. Plus it isn't guaranteed that communization movement will not be recuperated and commodified. Often misunderstood TAZ is self defeating, but lifestylism isn't and Hakim Bey's theory putting aside metaphysics and spirituality is about lifestylism, that was in the past, is in the present and will be in the future. Lifestyle anarchy isn't bound by the existence of capital and civilization. We can also say that civilization and capital are fully inescapable, look, even if you wanna live like Ted you probably will have a hammer and an axe produced by a company, an organization, one of endless simple examples. IF YOU WANT TO ANSWER DO IT ON INSCOM SERVER OR DM ME.