No edit summary |
|||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
*[[File:AdamSmith.png]] '''[[Capitalism|Adam Smith]]''' [[File:Cap.png]] | *[[File:AdamSmith.png]] '''[[Capitalism|Adam Smith]]''' [[File:Cap.png]] | ||
*[[File:Sadist.png]] '''[[Jacobinism|Marquis de Sade]]''' [[File:Jacobin.png]] | *[[File:Sadist.png]] '''[[Jacobinism|Marquis de Sade]]''' [[File:Jacobin.png]] | ||
*[[File:Karl Marx.png]] '''[[Marxism|Karl Marx]]''' [[File: | *[[File:Karl Marx.png]] '''[[Marxism|Karl Marx]]''' [[File:ClassSocDem.png]] | ||
*[[File:Orengelsf.png]] '''[[Marxism|Friedrich Engels]]''' [[File: | *[[File:Orengelsf.png]] '''[[Marxism|Friedrich Engels]]''' [[File:ClassSocDem.png]] | ||
*[[File:Pragmat.png]] '''[[Progressive Conservatism|Charles Sanders Peirce]]''' [[File:Progconf.png]] | *[[File:Pragmat.png]] '''[[Progressive Conservatism|Charles Sanders Peirce]]''' [[File:Progconf.png]] | ||
*[[File:Nietzsche_alt.png]] '''[[ | *[[File:Nietzsche_alt.png]] '''[[Individualist Anarchism|Friedrich Nietzsche]]''' [[File:Anin.png]] | ||
*[[File:Sorel.png]] '''[[Syndicalism|Georges Sorel]]''' [[File: | *[[File:Sorel.png]] '''[[Syndicalism|Georges Sorel]]''' [[File:SyndieSam.png]] | ||
*[[File:Freud.png]] '''[[Scientocracy|Sigmund Freud]]''' [[File:Positivism.png]] | *[[File:Freud.png]] '''[[Scientocracy|Sigmund Freud]]''' [[File:Positivism.png]] | ||
*[[File:Vital.png]] '''[[mh:philosophyball:Irrationalism|Henri Bergson]]''' [[File:Irrat.png]] | *[[File:Vital.png]] '''[[mh:philosophyball:Irrationalism|Henri Bergson]]''' [[File:Irrat.png]] | ||
*[[File:Marxfem.png]] '''[[Marxist Feminism|Alexandra Kollontai]]''' [[File: | *[[File:Marxfem.png]] '''[[Marxist Feminism|Alexandra Kollontai]]''' [[File:ItalianLeftCom.png]] | ||
*[[File:Dutchgermanleft.png]] '''[[Council Communism|Anton Pannekoek]]''' [[File:Councom.png]] | *[[File:Dutchgermanleft.png]] '''[[Council Communism|Anton Pannekoek]]''' [[File:Councom.png]] | ||
*[[File:Bordiga.png]] '''[[Italian Left Communism|Amadeo Bordiga]]''' [[File:ItalianLeftCom.png]] | *[[File:Bordiga.png]] '''[[Italian Left Communism|Amadeo Bordiga]]''' [[File:ItalianLeftCom.png]] | ||
*[[File:Bataille.png]] '''[[Post-Anarchism|Georges Bataille]]''' [[File:Libertine.png]] | *[[File:Bataille.png]] '''[[Post-Anarchism|Georges Bataille]]''' [[File:Libertine.png]] | ||
*[[File:FreudCom.png]] '''[[Neo-Marxism|Wilhelm Reich]]''' [[File:Neomarx.png]] | *[[File:FreudCom.png]] '''[[Neo-Marxism|Wilhelm Reich]]''' [[File:Neomarx.png]] | ||
*[[File:Lacan.png]] '''[[Post-Anarchism|Jacques Lacan]]''' [[File:Struct.png]] | *[[File:Lacan.png]] '''[[Post-Anarchism|Jacques Lacan]]''' [[File:Struct.png]] | ||
*[[File:StructMarx.png]] '''[[Neo-Marxism|Louis Althusser]]''' [[File:FreudCom.png]] | *[[File:StructMarx.png]] '''[[Neo-Marxism|Louis Althusser]]''' [[File:FreudCom.png]] | ||
*[[File:Lyotard.png]] '''[[Post-Anarchism|Jean-François Lyotard]]''' [[File: | *[[File:Lyotard.png]] '''[[Post-Anarchism|Jean-François Lyotard]]''' [[File:Postmodernicon.png]] | ||
*[[File:Deleuze.png]] '''[[Nomadology|Gilles Deleuze]]''' [[File:PostMarxism.png]] | *[[File:Deleuze.png]] '''[[Nomadology|Gilles Deleuze]]''' [[File:PostMarxism.png]] | ||
*[[File:Foucault.png]] '''[[Post-Anarchism|Michel Foucault]]''' [[File:Poststruct.png]] | *[[File:Foucault.png]] '''[[Post-Anarchism|Michel Foucault]]''' [[File:Poststruct.png]] | ||
*[[File:Baudrillard.png]] '''[[Post-Anarchism|Jean Baudrillard]]''' [[File: | *[[File:Baudrillard.png]] '''[[Post-Anarchism|Jean Baudrillard]]''' [[File:Postdebord.png]] | ||
*[[File:Guattari.png]] '''[[Nomadology|Felix Guattari]]''' [[File:PostMarxism.png]] | *[[File:Guattari.png]] '''[[Nomadology|Felix Guattari]]''' [[File:PostMarxism.png]] | ||
*[[File:Derrida.png]] '''[[Post-Anarchism|Jacques Derrida]]''' [[File:PostMarxism.png]] | *[[File:Derrida.png]] '''[[Post-Anarchism|Jacques Derrida]]''' [[File:PostMarxism.png]] | ||
| Line 59: | Line 55: | ||
*[[File:Debord.png]] '''[[Situationism|Guy Debord]]''' [[File:Councom.png]] | *[[File:Debord.png]] '''[[Situationism|Guy Debord]]''' [[File:Councom.png]] | ||
*[[File:Auton.png]] '''[[Autonomism|Antonio Negri]]''' [[File:PostMarxism.png]] | *[[File:Auton.png]] '''[[Autonomism|Antonio Negri]]''' [[File:PostMarxism.png]] | ||
*[[File:Camatte.png]] '''[[ | *[[File:Camatte.png]] '''[[Italian Left Communism|Jacques Camatte]]''' [[File:ItalianLeftCom.png]] | ||
*[[File:DarkDeleuze.png]] '''[[Nomadology|Andrew Culp]]''' [[File:Postsitu.png]] | *[[File:DarkDeleuze.png]] '''[[Nomadology|Andrew Culp]]''' [[File:Postsitu.png]] | ||
|influenced = | |influenced = | ||
| Line 70: | Line 66: | ||
|dislikes = | |dislikes = | ||
|ideas = | |ideas = | ||
*[[File: | *[[File:Meta-Anarchism.png]] Spontaneity | ||
*[[File:Auton.png]] The Proletariat as a Spontaneous War Machine | *[[File:Auton.png]] The Proletariat as a Spontaneous War Machine | ||
*[[File:MarioTronti.png]] Social Capital | *[[File:MarioTronti.png]] Social Capital | ||
*[[File: | *[[File:Meta-Anarchism.png]] Revolution from Molecules and Beyond | ||
*[[File:LeftTerrorist.png]] Violence as a Circuit of Feedback Loops | *[[File:LeftTerrorist.png]] Violence as a Circuit of Feedback Loops | ||
*[[File:StructPostMarx.png]] Post-Structural Analysis of the State and Biopower | *[[File:StructPostMarx.png]] Post-Structural Analysis of the State and Biopower | ||
| Line 105: | Line 101: | ||
The proletariat are not silent and passive players in their struggle, they do not sit back and only act in reaction to the actions of capital, not at all. On the contrary, they play a much heavier role as the slayers of capital and its bourgeois meat hooks, they are active participants indeed, and especially in such a condition of chaos and uncertainty. What do I mean by this? | The proletariat are not silent and passive players in their struggle, they do not sit back and only act in reaction to the actions of capital, not at all. On the contrary, they play a much heavier role as the slayers of capital and its bourgeois meat hooks, they are active participants indeed, and especially in such a condition of chaos and uncertainty. What do I mean by this? | ||
A new development has taken place in the last century. The proletariat | A new development has taken place in the last century. The proletariat has developed a new and more potent form of its own vibrant subjectivity and spontaneity, one particularly threatening to our lord capital, it is a spontaneity that capital must crush. What is spontaneity? Spontaneity in this context represents the liberatory and chaotic potential of freed and nomadic desire, molecular desire specifically being produced which allows for such an escape to happen. Through the various forms of labor organization of the 19th and 20th century, the activated proletariat stood its ground against capital and its totality over society. It has been made clear by these proletarian struggles, their struggles to affirm themselves against capital, that the proletariat is an irreducibly autonomous force, one capable of standing up to the fiery dragons of the current order. However, the problem seems to be the production of revolutionary desire, in our society where conservative and reactionary molar libido reign supreme and crush the limited molecular. | ||
Our post-modern world is a chaotic and even violent one. Every year, you here about violence and war here, an economic crisis here, nuclear threats here, the globe is in a tough position right now, it seems. Contrarily however, capital seems to be at its strongest. In the face of the forces of the nomads that want it dead, of anti-capitalist affirmation, capital is forced to either adapt or die | Our post-modern world is a chaotic and even violent one. Every year, you here about violence and war here, an economic crisis here, nuclear threats here, the globe is in a tough position right now, it seems. Contrarily however, capital seems to be at its strongest. In the face of the forces of the nomads that want it dead, of anti-capitalist affirmation, capital is forced to either adapt or die. This is the logic behind the many shifts in social organization of society in the past century, from societies of discipline to control, from national to international. We can understand this better through Mario Tronti's analysis of the cycle of composition, the partial escapes from capital and the partial subjugating by capital. When the proletarian affirmed himself and escaped for a short while from the clutches of capital, capital could not destroy it completely, it could only counterattack by attempting to stratify the desires of the proletariat more and more through the further coding of social life, strangling spontaneity. It must do this in order to survive, it is in its self-interest to do such a thing out of pure necessity to. Capital therefore develops through this process increasing abilities to suppress the spontaneity of its slaves. | ||
Such a force as the workingmen is directionless in the modern century, it has no push or drive. It has the anger, the bloodthirst, the passion and desire, to reign terror on the institutions which repress it, of course! However, it has nothing to unlock such passion and anger in its current state, it has only been able to do anything within the roadblocks and the confined territories that capital allows it to, and through only the means capital lets it. Spontaneity and the autonomy of such unconstrainted desire are therefore not allowed to be produced, and when it is produced, it is swiftly crushed by capital or coopted, to make it to where no war machine can develop from the proletariat. Molar desire is therefore allowed to reign over the dominion of libidinal investments, it is pro-conservative at its core when it exercises the unconscious drives for repression of desire. Spontaneity and molecular libido on the other hand, is inherently revolutionary. It is the embodiment of the destructive tendencies of desire. Spontaneity is the embodiment of the war machine, and specifically its chaotic and liberatory nature. | |||
It is very clear that what is to be done is the freeing of the production of molecular desire in order to unlock the spontaneity and decoding nature of it. With this, we create a war machine out of the working class, a nomadic horde that actively engages in the undermining of capital and the state. It smashes and decodes the territory of the old, from the school to the factory to the hospital to the prison. It turns everyday life into a battle ground of change and difference, actor against actor, engaging in the true abolition of the current state of affairs. We therefore become the assassins of capital, challenging its dominance by our very affirmation of our spontaneity, our own affirmative passion and desire, we are our own liberators and the own drivers of our own revolution. | |||
====[[File:Auton.png]] On Party-Power==== | ====[[File:Auton.png]] On Party-Power==== | ||
Revision as of 10:19, 5 November 2023
 |
Self Insert "People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism This page is meant to represent Jefbol's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission. |
Coming svvn... be prepared for many more schizophrenic ramblings
I'll write shit here when I get the chance to/when I feel like it
Icons: (
/
/
/
)
Beliefs
Philosophical and Economic Beliefs
On the Postmodern Condition of Late Capitalism
The Libido and Political Economy
The Symbolic Commodity and Hyperreal Spectacles
The Origin of the Oedipal Family
Civilization and the Death of the Gemeinwesen
Political Beliefs
Notes on Modern Struggle and Spontaneity
The proletariat are not silent and passive players in their struggle, they do not sit back and only act in reaction to the actions of capital, not at all. On the contrary, they play a much heavier role as the slayers of capital and its bourgeois meat hooks, they are active participants indeed, and especially in such a condition of chaos and uncertainty. What do I mean by this?
A new development has taken place in the last century. The proletariat has developed a new and more potent form of its own vibrant subjectivity and spontaneity, one particularly threatening to our lord capital, it is a spontaneity that capital must crush. What is spontaneity? Spontaneity in this context represents the liberatory and chaotic potential of freed and nomadic desire, molecular desire specifically being produced which allows for such an escape to happen. Through the various forms of labor organization of the 19th and 20th century, the activated proletariat stood its ground against capital and its totality over society. It has been made clear by these proletarian struggles, their struggles to affirm themselves against capital, that the proletariat is an irreducibly autonomous force, one capable of standing up to the fiery dragons of the current order. However, the problem seems to be the production of revolutionary desire, in our society where conservative and reactionary molar libido reign supreme and crush the limited molecular.
Our post-modern world is a chaotic and even violent one. Every year, you here about violence and war here, an economic crisis here, nuclear threats here, the globe is in a tough position right now, it seems. Contrarily however, capital seems to be at its strongest. In the face of the forces of the nomads that want it dead, of anti-capitalist affirmation, capital is forced to either adapt or die. This is the logic behind the many shifts in social organization of society in the past century, from societies of discipline to control, from national to international. We can understand this better through Mario Tronti's analysis of the cycle of composition, the partial escapes from capital and the partial subjugating by capital. When the proletarian affirmed himself and escaped for a short while from the clutches of capital, capital could not destroy it completely, it could only counterattack by attempting to stratify the desires of the proletariat more and more through the further coding of social life, strangling spontaneity. It must do this in order to survive, it is in its self-interest to do such a thing out of pure necessity to. Capital therefore develops through this process increasing abilities to suppress the spontaneity of its slaves.
Such a force as the workingmen is directionless in the modern century, it has no push or drive. It has the anger, the bloodthirst, the passion and desire, to reign terror on the institutions which repress it, of course! However, it has nothing to unlock such passion and anger in its current state, it has only been able to do anything within the roadblocks and the confined territories that capital allows it to, and through only the means capital lets it. Spontaneity and the autonomy of such unconstrainted desire are therefore not allowed to be produced, and when it is produced, it is swiftly crushed by capital or coopted, to make it to where no war machine can develop from the proletariat. Molar desire is therefore allowed to reign over the dominion of libidinal investments, it is pro-conservative at its core when it exercises the unconscious drives for repression of desire. Spontaneity and molecular libido on the other hand, is inherently revolutionary. It is the embodiment of the destructive tendencies of desire. Spontaneity is the embodiment of the war machine, and specifically its chaotic and liberatory nature.
It is very clear that what is to be done is the freeing of the production of molecular desire in order to unlock the spontaneity and decoding nature of it. With this, we create a war machine out of the working class, a nomadic horde that actively engages in the undermining of capital and the state. It smashes and decodes the territory of the old, from the school to the factory to the hospital to the prison. It turns everyday life into a battle ground of change and difference, actor against actor, engaging in the true abolition of the current state of affairs. We therefore become the assassins of capital, challenging its dominance by our very affirmation of our spontaneity, our own affirmative passion and desire, we are our own liberators and the own drivers of our own revolution.
On Party-Power
Biopolitics, Political Territories, and the Theory of the State
Social Capital and Capitalist Stratification of Spontaneity
Postmodernity and the Societies of Control
Relations
Add an alias to this page if you want to get added
Messtarded Tier
Messardism (
) - 🫡
Gemerald
Glorified Communism (
) - Very cool guy with very cool beliefs, perhaps the closest to me in terms of philosophical and political matches. I have little to disagree with.
Kimno Thought (
) - Even with our political and philosophical break with each other (me embracing post-structuralism and spontaneity), you're still quite good in your foundation and in your beliefs, though obviously with typical classical Marxian limitations, alongside your humanism.- Venatrixism (
) - My student! Very much like the above, but less well-read.
Gem
Nurulisme (
) - Very good analysis of for example, capital as a deity, which I for the most part agree with, along with a few other things. My main problem though is how you cling on to psychoanalytic and Hegelian nonsense, which makes it very confusing when you claim to be a Deleuzian at the same time, but otherwise fine.
Dust
Coal
Alstūdism (
) - Very cool as a person, but this blind petit bourgeois romanticism that you and the rest of the fascists hold dear is indeed vile, with it encouraging the self-desiring of his or hers' own repression by the abstract ideal of the "nation" and by such an ideal's militaristic fury.
Brimstone
Brazilian Liberalism (
) - Pathetic and delusional priest of capitalism, nothing much to say.
Post-Post-Post-Post-Incomprehensible Tier
Voidvill Rajandeep (
) - I'm sorry but what the actual fuck is thi-
- - Blud doesn't even recognize one of his students 💀
- I don't know what you expect from a demented old man as myself.
- - What do you understand or comprehend at least of my thought?
- - The actual concepts on there I get, I just don’t get how they all fit together into one.
- - I thought I had finally made something sensible/understandable, but eh, thanks for giving me a writing style that works and frees the insides even if it is not really essays
Comments
Distributist Reactionarism - Add me
Neo-Anthony Bax Thought 
- Add me.- Voidvill Rajandeep - Add me oh great ultra-leftist
- Venatrixism - add me plz
Vistulism - Hello Jefbol, add me please if you wouldn't mind.- Brazilian Liberalism - Add
- Kimno Thought - Add me armchair man. I'll update you when I actually make my page
Tedcruzfan Thought - Add me
Proletariat builderism please add me
Meowxism - add? i upd'd my ideology a bit lol
