×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 2,397 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki
Polcompball Wiki
2,397Articles
  Recent changes
in:
Pages using Tabber parser tag, Self-Insert, Authoritarian Unity,
and 17 more

Distributist Reactionaryism

(Redirected from Distributist Reactionarism)


Self Insert
"People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism

This page is meant to represent Luís Miguel2680's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission.

This page is being rewritten
"This page has been nuked to give lebensraum for a better page to grow." - Burgundian System
Luis miguel is currently working on this page. Please do not interfere with their work. Instead, contact them to propose additional edits.
Reason:
the page was not written correctly and looks like a copypasta from borker's page



Hi Jreg, I still hate your content😈!!!!


Distributist reactionarism or Luisism is Luís Miguel's ideology after he stopped being an absolutist and is now reactionary and Christian Democrat and other things. He defends that distributism and Catholic-style corporatism be introduced in Brazil and the world and that feudalism returns { feudalism will be reformed for this} and this ideology is quite traditional and conservative and defends the introduction of guilds in sectors that do not depend on industries, factories or industrial methods and this ideology is internationalist and hates nationalism, especially ultranationalism, but it does not hate moderate Nationalism so much and it also does not hate more moderate patriotism and this ideology is also very Catholic and is against the separation between Church and State and argues that Catholicism should be the official religion and that everyone should be Catholic


-Table of Contents-

24 Principles of Distributist Reactionaryism

  • Reactionaryism
  • Catholicism
  • Distributism
  • Corporativism
  • Monarchism
  • Democracy
  • Traditionalism
  • Conservatism
  • Federalism
  • Protectionism
  • Internationalism
  • Industrialism
  • Environmentalism
  • Counter-Enlightment
  • Regulationism
  • Aristocracy
  • Welfarism
  • Authoritarianism
  • Third Positionism
  • Maternalism
  • Feudalism
  • Statism
  • Irredentism
  • Integralism

Political Journey

  1. 2009-2018/2019 I didn't care about politics at that time, because I was still a child and generally ignored political things.
  2. 2019-2020/2021 At that time, because my mother was a Bolsonarist, I was too, another reason I was a Bolsonarist was because I didn't know that capitalism was incompatible with conservatism and reactionism
  3. 2020/2021-2023 At that time I supported absolute monarchy, until one day I realized that absolute monarchy came after feudalism, and that was bad.
  4. 2023- When I discovered that the church supported Christian democracy I stopped being a supporter of absolutism

Government and executive power

Distributist reactionaryism wants to end the republic and replace it with a traditional and feudal monarchy and also thinks that the republic is revolutionary and therefore should be abolished, distributist reactionaryism also wants an emperor as head of state and government and does not like the absolute monarchy because absolutism weakens feudalism and weakens papal authority, but it also detests constitutional and semi-constitutional monarchies because they derive from the Enlightenment Distributist Reactionaryism also wants a federal system, but the provinces are not called states, they are called Provinces and the governors of the provinces are nobles and the provinces also have executive, legislative and judicial powers and the provinces are divided into counties [as if they were regions of the province] and the counties have governors from the nobility [i.e., the executive power has participation of the nobility] and the legislative and judicial powers and the counties are divided into cities that are led by mayors elected by the people and the cities have legislative and judicial powers and the cities are divided into towns and villages, but these places have neither legislative nor judicial power and only have chiefs of villages and sub-mayors to govern the towns and villages and will not appear on national maps, neither the regions nor the Counties and the regions have governors coming from the nobility and legislative and judicial power but are not shown on the maps [unless the map is of the regions of the province or the map of the regions of the country or the map of the city]

Legislative Power and Congress

The Congress will be dissolved and in its place the Imperial Assembly will emerge, which will have three chambers, the people's chamber, which will have 1000 seats for representatives elected by the people, the nobility chamber, which will have seats for all the nobles of Brazil and When the global unification will take place, it will have seats for all the nobles of the world if possible, and the chamber of clergy, which will have seats for all Catholic clergy in Brazil, except cloistered clergy, when global unification occurs, if possible All Catholic Clergy in the World, In rare cases and emergencies and urgencies, all chambers will meet in a room with all the members of the people's chamber and all the members of the clergy chamber, except the clergy who are cloistered, chamber of the nobility and the meeting will be directed by the Emperor, the same for regions, counties, cities and provinces, except for the fact that it does not have all the country's non-cloistered clerics and nobles and the meeting is not commanded by the emperor except in rare cases



Economics

Distributist Reactionaryism asserts that the economy should embrace the nationalization of all companies that were privatized in order to reverse the liberal capitalist nonsense and create state-owned companies in sectors of interest to the state And extinguish state and private companies that use things that harm nature and the environment, and adopt the idea that Workers should be owners and businesses should be comprised of worker co-operatives, family businesses, or ESOP-based traditional businesses whenever possible and that people should own both their own personal private property as well as maintain some kind of ownership of private productive property whenever possible, drawing inspiration from Distributism principles. Distributist Reactionaryism contends that the profit-driven nature of the bourgeoisie inherently conflicts with interests of the church and God, necessitating their separation from the nation. syndicates, representing every industry and worker, would be given a autonomy from the state, though still held tightly to prevent inefficiency or dissent. Within the syndicates, the unions would have their interests and strikes would only be allowed if there was justification, if not...

Moreover, Distributist Reactionaryism advocates for substantial expansion in Brazil's vital industries, particularly those currently reliant on foreign imports Over time, the goal is to gradually reduce foreign imports, incrementally boosting domestic industries until achieving complete autarky.

Regarding farming and agriculture, Distributist Reactionaryism believes that feudal principles should be applied entirely with the only differences being more up-to-date technology, robots working as peasant serfs, and peasant serfs would receive wages that were enough to support them. The ultimate aspiration is to achieve complete self-sufficiency in food production.

Social Views

In its social views, Distributist Reactionaryism self-identifies as a blend of Ultraconservatism, and the characterization is completely accurate as it retains all traditionalist elements and beliefs. The ideology embraces the view of women in the home, stating that women should be taking care of the children and the home if she is non-cleric nor nun. Distributist Reactionaryism defends the full inclusion of women in education up to high school and in jobs that ''are'' women's due to tradition. However, it rejects the inclusion of women in men's activities since the governance of Distributist Reactionaryism adheres strongly to a traditional approach

Distributist Reactionaryism wants to end LGBTQA+ And to limit corruption of the public prohibitions apply, such as Any form of Pride celebration is prohibited and organizing such events can lead to legal consequences. Homosexual marriage is illegal, and the death penalty by burning must be applied to LGBTQA+ people except if the LGBTQA+ criminal wants to become truly straight and cis

Transphobia characterizes Distributist Reactionaryism stance on transgender individuals. The ideology opposes gender transition, and if a person wants to stop being cis and become trans and turned trans, they will suffer the death penalty unless they repent.

As for heterosexuals, Distributist Reactionaryism emphasizes the promotion of traditional marriage[1] and encourages couples to have more children. Social benefits are provided to alleviate the financial responsibilities associated with raising a family. Distributist Reactionaryism does not support legal abortion under any circumstances and if someone wants to have an abortion or has had an abortion they must suffer the death penalty The ultimate objective of these policies is to augment birth rates, fortify the nation, and ensure its enduring survival.

. Finally, Distributist Reactionaryism strongly opposes the dissemination of pornography or sexually explicit materials for any purposes in society. This is rooted in the belief that viewing such content is a sin which consequently makes society more sinful as a whole.

Cultural Views

Distributist Reactionaryism believes strongly in the fact that the Brazilian culture is being perveted by enlightment and Progressivism and leftism, being forced to accept evil values and evil systems. For this to be remedied, Brazil has to return to tradition, to let it's culture resurge, and the state also has to take charge of making the nation return to tradition and good customs. One of the foremost matters Distributist Reactionaryism believes in is reviving Catholicism as it is a more authentic Brazilian religion than lack of religion, which were and are being imposed on the nation today. Now, this would involve heavily suppressing any religion other than the Catholic variant of christianity, offering incentives to the public to convert and centering more social activities around Catholic Christianity, and finally introducing religious doctrine into schools to ensure that the new generation is more inclined to faith. Along with this, Halloween should be replaced by All Souls' Day. The reasoning behind this is similar to the opposition to Atheism, that it is a foreign element, with Halloween being adapted from the English world, while All Souls' Day is a more authentic form of Brazilian and is Catholic.

Foreign Policy

The new Brazilian state must remain neutral in most conflicts because of ideological differences with the West and the East, but if Donald Trump or a Trumpist president is elected, Brazil will support the West. as both are liberal Reformist Maoism and orthodox statist conservatism. However, in the case that similar-minded states arise, Distributist Reactionarism would be very willing to show solidarity with them against the two revolutionary blocs, and engage in equal dealings with these states.

Military and Defense

Distributist Reactionaryism holds that the military should be one of the first and foremost focuses of the state, in order to ensure the defense of the nation, and the spread of the counterrevolution. It espouses the policy that the state must "arm the entire population, fortify the state, educate every soldier to become a party cadre, and modernize the military".

Along with this, Distributist Reactionaryism believes that the military should be heavily politicized in order to ensure ideological loyalty and fervor among each soldier and officer. Political commissars should make up a middle portion of the officer corps. This ensures the centralization of military within the state's control, and cuts down on disloyalty within the military.

To defend the nation from external threats via deterrence, the state must develop non-radioactive weapons as quickly as possible.

Technological Views

Distributist Reactionaryism holds that for the nation to advance and maintain sovereignty, technological progression must take place, and must be heavily developed by the state and companies. If unemployment were to occur, the state would not provide wages, but rather a universal basic income. The technological advancement part should be in everything, to keep the nation on the same ground as other nations.

Green Power

Distributist Reactionaryism believes that Brazil should completely abandon fossil fuels as quickly as possible and become greener and more productive. Hydroelectric energy, powered by water, should be the massive source of energy until solar and wind energy are targets for investment by states. Thermoelectric and gas-fired power have proven to be inefficient compared to these methods, and hydroelectric power has been unfairly maligned in the media, particularly by those elements who would like to keep fossil fuels in use.

The Nation

Distributist Reactionaryism defines the Brazilian nation as the following:

  1. Current Faith, being Catholicism.
  2. The Residence, wishing to be in Brazil forever.
  3. The Soil, that being Brazil, and our land currently held by Uruguayans and colonized by French


Do we need an era of romantic nationalism?

Brazil experienced an era of romantic nationalism like Europe, as Brazilian intellectuals were inspired by Europe. Because of this, Brazil was able to fully experience this and the cultural development that the period brought to other countries. For example, many artists born in Brazil were inspired in Europe, which is why a new Brazilian state should not repeat, due to nationalism, another romantic nationalist era.

National Essence and Immigration

Distributist Reactionaryism not follows the idea of "National Essence," as proposed by Giovanni Gentile. This concept suggests that you can have a profound connection to the cultural identity of a nation, like the Italian nation or Norwegian nation, even if you weren't born there. Distributist Reactionaryism advocates for the repatriation of individuals who strongly identify with a specific nationality, as exemplified by Borker who, despite being born outside of Norway, identifies as Norwegian.

However, individuals would need to fulfill certain criteria, including demonstrating Catholic Religion and meeting specific qualifications, in order to be eligible for imigration.

Revanche!

Distributist Reactionaryism holds the beliefs that to work towards a renewed Brazilian nation the coming state must take Revanche against Uruguay and France and Angola and Benin And Portuguese colonies, and reform the nation partly through conflict. The specific territories that Distributist Reactionaryism wishes to return to Brazil are Angola, All Portuguese colonies, Uruguay, and Benin and French Guyana. All of these territories were once part of Brazil or sought to become Brazilians and, until recently, these Brazilians were gradually assimilated by the population of the Dominant Countries, in a form of cultural genocide. As this is clearly a result of imperialism and the petty intentions of the Dominant Countries, it must be eliminated, as with any other form of imperialism and colonialism. This also works to expand the Brazilian population through the reincorporation of former lands and lands desired by the State.

The Delusion of Racialism

Distributist Reactionism holds that Racial Nationalism, and by extension race, are meritless categorizations that are based on outdated theories, and race is often very racist and unscientific in its interpretation, and also lacks a biological basis . But the concept of Race is necessary to use in Statistics But only for that. Along with this, Distributist Reactionaryism sees Racial Nationalism as a form of Racial Supremacism, and incompatible with the church, as it often posits that other races are inferior to the race they claim to be superior, which prevents individual nations from joining together and unify with racial equality, a principle in which Distributist Reactionaryism strongly believes.

"Race Mixing"

Distributist Reactionaryism does not believe in biological race, it is still against forced "race mixing". He believes that if the church accepts the mixing of races it is not necessary to prohibit it but he does not think that forcing the mixing of races is a good idea

Curiosities about me

  • Distributist Reactionaryism doesn't like things in food that he doesn't like but he doesn't force it on anyone
  • Distributist Reactionaryism Would Like to End the Position of Chief Minister of the Civil House.

How to Draw

Flag of Distributist Reactionarism
  1. Draw a ball with a black outline.
  2. Fill with dark blue.
  3. Make a yellow circle
  4. Draw the cross and the dog with the torch in its mouth at the same time
  5. Add eyes.
  6. (Optional) Draw a black Tricorne hat with yellow lines on top, with a Crucifix.
  7. Done!

Literature

Have Read

Ones I've read since making this page
  • none yet

Reading

  • none yet

Plan to Read

Suggestions

  • Feel free to add whatever book you'd like me to read here!
  • - The Third Way; the renewal of the Social Democracy - by Anthony Giddens
  • -Industrial Society and Its Future - by uncle ted
  • Counterrevolutionary5708 - Rerum Novarum - By the Pope Leo XIII

Finished Suggestions

  • Principles of communism by Engels

User Test

Pick only one from each category :]

  • Civic Axis
    • Chaoist (-2000)
    • Anarchist (-100)
    • Minarchist (+23)
    • Libertarian (+60)
    • Civically Moderate (+0)
    • Statist (+56)
    • Dictablanda (+100)
    • Authoritarian (+60)
    • Totalitarian (+40)
    • Orwellian (+25)
  • Type of Rule Axis
    • (Anarchist) Anti-Democracy (-100)
    • Direct Democracy (-+26)
    • Semi-Direct Democracy (+59)
    • Representative Democracy (-+15)
    • Authoritarian Democracy (+100)
    • Totalitarian Democracy (+25)
    • (Authoritarian) Anti-Democracy (-15)
  • If none above apply...
    • Organic Centralism (-100)
    • Kultokratic System (-100)
  • Economic Axis
    • Marxist Communist (-100)
    • Socialist (-100)
    • Welfarist/Gift Economy (+100)
    • Mixed (-100)
    • Liberal Economics (-100)
    • Capitalist (-100)
    • Darwinist (-100)
  • If none above apply...
    • Third Positionism (+100)
    • Anti-Economy (-100)
    • Non-Marxist Communist (-100)
    • Fiscal Federalism (+50)
  • Economic Freedom
    • Anti-Economy (-100)
    • Dirigisme (-100)
    • Regulationism (+100)
    • Mixed (-100)
    • Liberal Economics (-100)
    • Free Market (+10)
    • Laissez-Faire (-100)
  • If none above apply...
    • Central Planned (-100)
    • Decentral Planned (-100)
  • Diplomatic Axis
    • Autarchy (-100)
    • Autarky (+100)
    • (Alter-) Globalist (-100)
    • World Federalist (+100)
    • Cosmopolitan (-20)
    • Internationalist (+100)
    • Moderate (-100)
    • Patriotic (-100)
    • Nationalist (-100)
    • Chauvinist (-100)
    • Racial Nationalist (or similar broad category) (-100)
    • Ethno-Nationalist (or similar narrow category) (-100)
  • Geopolitics
    • Western (-90)
    • Western Adjacent (-100)
    • Non-Aligned (+100)
    • East Adjacent (-100)
    • Eastern (-100)
  • If none above apply...
    • Anarchistic Unaligned (-100)
  • Cultural Axis
    • Revolutionary (-100)
    • Progressive (-100)
    • Reformist (-100)
    • Syncretic (-100)
    • Conservative (+40)
    • Traditionalist (+100)
    • Reactionary (+100)
  • Technological Axis
    • Primal (-100)
    • Primitivist (-100)
    • Pre-Industrial (-100)
    • Deceleration (-100)
    • Moderate (-100)
    • Acceleration (-100)
    • Automated (+100)
    • Transhumanist (-100)
    • Posthumanist (-100)
  • If none of the above apply...
    • Post-Civ (-100) [and/or] Archeofuturism (-100)
  • Environmental Axis
    • Human Extinction (-100)
    • Radical Environmentalism (+100)
    • Eco-Fascism (-100)
    • Ecocentrism (+50)
    • Environmentalist (+100)
    • Moderate (-100)
    • Post-Industrialism (+100)
    • Industrialist (+100)
    • Anthropocentric (-100)
    • Anti-Environmentalism (-100)
  • Neurological Axis
    • Anti-Praxis (-100)
    • Utopian (+100)
    • Dogmatic (+100)
    • Idealist (+100)
    • In Between (-100)
    • Realist (+100)
    • Pragmatic (+100)
    • Rational (-100)
    • Dystopian (-100)
    • Anti-Theory (-100)
  • War Axis
    • Pacifism (-90)
    • Non-engagement (-90)
    • De-escalation (-90)
    • Intervention (+100)
    • Irredentism (+100)
    • Revachism (+100)
    • Jingoism (-90)
  • If none above apply...
    • Class Warfare (-100)
  • Praxis
    • Insurrectionism (+100)
    • Revolutionism (-100)
    • Moderatism (-100)
    • Reformism (-100)
    • Stagnationism (-100)
  • Ethnic Axis Optional
    • Chinese (+100)
    • Indian (+100)
    • Other Asian (+100)
    • Other Southeast Asian(+100)
    • Western European (+100)
    • Northen European (+100)
    • Celtic (+100)
    • Eastern European (+100)
    • Southern European (+100)
    • American (+100)
    • South American (+100)
    • African (+100)
    • Arabian (+100)
    • Jewish (+100)
    • Indonesian (+100)
    • Korean (+100)
  • Religious Axis Optional
    • Original Paganism (-100)
    • Zoroastrianism (-100)
    • Buddhism (-100)
    • Hinduism (-100)
    • Orthodoxy (-100)
    • Catholicism (+100)
    • Islam (-100)
    • Judaism (-100)
    • Protestantism (-100)
    • Neo-Paganism (-100)
    • Wicca (-100)
    • Irreligion (-100)
    • Satanism (either atheistic or theistic) (-100)
    • Shinto (-100)
    • Syncretic (-100)

Post your results here:

Relations

If you are the type who adds balls in relations to show your perception of their beliefs or a short summary, then use the following: (Code Stolen from Quark) 

[[File:Alstudism2.png]] [[Alstūdism]] ([[File:Sansepolcrismo.png|link=Fascism]]/[[File:Natsynd.png|link=National Syndicalism]]/[[File:OrgDem.png|link=Authoritarian Democracy]]/[[File:NorseTheo.png|link={{PCBA|Norse Theocracy}}]]/[[File:Republicanismpix.pnglink=Republicanism]])

Which will look like this: Alstūdism (////)

Friends

  • Counterrevolutionary5708 thought - You are very good, seriously you are more than very good, we only disagree on little things that do not exceed our agreements. You would be a perfect follower of mine abroad, may you have a good and perfect life
  • Distributism - The church supports you, unfortunately, you are slandered by others and they even say that you are supposedly left-wing, but we know very well that the left is not always egalitarian and good and the right is not egalitarian and evil, this Manichaean dichotomy should have been abolished a long time ago
  • Feudalism - your order was exactly the state of things before the Renaissance and the Enlightenment and the revolution ruined everything and led to the current state of things which is terrible especially after 1789
  • Christian Democracy - You are very good because the Catholic Church supports you and all you have to do is remove liberalism and improve your ideology to become completely Catholic and it will be great
  • Corporatism - You are good, the church supports you but unfortunately your legacy was tarnished by the terrible and evil Nazi fascism but we know that there are different types of corporatism and there is the Catholic type and the pre-revolution type so...
  • Reactionarism - I am literally you, you are very good, just calm down about technology and accept church things and you will be PERFECT

Frenemies

  • Conservatism - Sir, what happened to you? Why do you now betray your principles made by true conservatives and replace them with economic liberalism and social moderatism? I am you because reactionaries are ultraconservative, that is, real conservatives and I improve you
  • Evenoskyism - a strange amalgamation of ideas, I don't think technocracy is a good thing, I much prefer monarchy to it, but even though you are culturally right-wing, you are not reactionary and you are transhumanist, which is even worse
  • Corporatist_Pan-Hispanism - despite you being good things like religious, Christian and reactionary and supporting social welfare policies and others you are imperialist and racist and nationalist which is terrible
  • Guild Socialism - your name already gives me a little butterflies and reservations but the guilds are good but if you at least left socialism you would be in a better position
  • Rigby Thought - Well you are good, just stop supporting capitalist Hamilton and Nazbol Putin and you will be perfect
  • Patrick Thought - I saw your page and discovered that you are a classic conservative and some other good things, but isolationism and the fact that you are from the authoritarian left disgusts me, agrarianism is inefficient and only makes nations eternally poor and dependent on imports and become underdeveloped
  • Fictional Nationalism - pretty crazy but anyway, I don't know your political positions because you're not in the quadrant but you have nationalism inside and political syncretism is crazy but you save yourself because if you defend fictional nations then you probably wouldn't be angry with a reactionary nation
    • - Reactionaries allowed. Everyone allowed! Max and his "boys" are not allowed.
  • Hispanic Reactionary Bourbonism - you seem very good but you are an authoritarian leftist and you are ultranationalist and nationalist and ethnonationalist and fascist and these things are very bad only nationalism is not that bad

Enemies

  • Rocksism - strange anarchist whose motto seems to say that everyone is a fascist and that he thinks I'm a nationalist even though I hate nationalism, it's incomprehensible
  • Psychocommunism - communist detected, extermination mode activated
  • User:Sundog - communism is bad, why are you a communist?
  • Lankajori Thought - A capitalist liberal... what a terrible thing, my god
  • Leerderism - a stupid socialist who is a liar and wants the impossible
  • Capitalism - the pig who exploits at the cost of lives and the birth rate of the planet and who really likes liberalism you are so terrible that they tried to fix you but you are beyond repair you need to be taken down immediately you shouldn't even exist
  • Gamerism - a fake Nazi but still very bad and shameless
  • DECBism - a progressive liberal who keeps telling lies about me
  • Schumacherianism - libertarian, capitalist, progressive, in short, there is so much nonsense that you believe...
  • Waldnelkeism - ultranationalism and other things are terrible and you are even worse than fascisticguy
  • N.Brioism - communism is bad and you look like communism but without a mask and dozens of times more unintelligent
  • N.Cortexism - LGBT capitalism and other nonsense are terrible I hope you one day know the truth
  • Sapismo - false conservative and a shameless liberal is so much rot in a single being, what a shame
  • National Wodenism - He's pagan and fascist and other bad things, he's terrible
  • Neo-Killer Kittyism - 99 percent larp the only thing that doesn't seem to be LARP is you being racist against Latin Americans and Spanish
  • Romantic Egoism a typical AnarKKKidie L, you are an anarchist you are a stirnerite there are a lot of bad things that are inapplicable in real life
  • Baxism now you seem less mentally insane because of the decrease in Jacobinism but you are still communist and leftist, that's why I hate you
    • ¡Facho! ¡Nazi con crisis de identidad!'
  • Dr Pepperism too liberal, libertarian and centrist for my taste, and Christophobia is too coal and brimstone
  • Anarchism the idea that the state should not exist is too stupid for my taste, even for people who only have a basic knowledge of politics, only donkeys would believe in something like that, and you seem too leftist for my taste, and a thing GROW UP, LEARN POLITICS BE REALISTIC YOU ANARKKKIDIE
  • Darwin's Ideology too moderate for my taste
  • Gumballism false reactionary, you are a capitalist, you accept certain things from the Enlightenment, you are almost non-traditional, in short you are a stupid moralist
  • Finnian Fascism you seem so boring, even in ideology, and isolationism and fascism is bullshit and hating reactionaries and liking futurism is worse bullshit
  • Fitocracy false reactionary, racism only appeared after the crusades and racism is nationalist
  • Vynism - you're just a fake conservative who keeps sending very suspicious furry things
  • BERNHEism - You're not a real conservative, you're a progressive who LARPs, and capitalism is bad
  • Agricoetism - you are a fascist and you defend the madness of pederasty you are crazy you defend the indefensible I have no more words to say about this madman
  • Brazilian Liberalism - You've improved a little but you're still liberal and now you're too capitalist for my taste
    • - Certo Sub-Humano, Tambem consertei os seus erros ortograficos. você já foi pra escola algum dia da sua vida? (Alright Utermensch, i also fixed some of your ortographic errors. you've already gone to school atleast one day of your life?)
  • Hoodism I hate you because of communism and you hood aren't even a real marxist because marx hated turks, jews, russians, indians and blacks and engels and marx hated lgbts
  • Ack-Soc Theory I hate you because of revisionist Marxism, which is still part Marxist and you're not even a real Marxist because you support the markets, anyway, it's worse than orthodox Marxism because it will attract more people
  • Neo-MugiKotobuki8814ism You're not even a real Nazi, you're just a modified Nazbol and anyway, Nazism and Communism together are worse than separately.
  • Pantheonism We know you're a socialist so I don't like you because I hate the entire left and anyway you're not a real distributist
  • Alstūdism I disagree with almost everything that your Excellency the owner of the wiki presents as solutions for Norway and I am neither gay nor fascist
  • Nurulisme you are a communist so you would never be my friend ideologically unless you leave the terrible and evil communism and join the true reactionaries
  • Second Anidiotoncrack Thought I don't like you because you are racist and capitalist and anyway you are a nazcap and a liberal fascist made by Alberto de Stefani and a revisionist Nazifascist like most neo-Nazifascists
  • Tedcruzfan Thought I don't like you because you are racist and capitalist and anyway you are a nazcap and a liberal fascist made by Alberto de Stefani and a revisionist Nazifascist like most neo-Nazifascists
  • Proletariat Builderism You would be good if you weren't an Anarchist, Racist, Communist and Socialist. And you are also a heretic, admit it lol!
  • Mordecaism He is here because of his evil liberalism and also because he is socially progressive, well, there are several reasons
  • Neo-Anthony Bax Thought literally the neo-Jacobins, my God, this is crazy
    • Neo-Anthony Bax Thought - Fuck you, reactionary!
  • Dokevism We know you're a culturally leftist so I don't like you because I hate the entire left and anyway you're not a real distributist
    • - Atleast i aint a Nazi with Identity crisis
  • Post-Jefbolism I don't like you because you are a communist and unjustifiably call me a fascist, communist and social democrat
  • Vistula Thought you have many ideologies in your name but anyway they are leftist so they are bad
  • Ultranationalism These are one of the consequences of the Enlightenment and the consequence of nationalism [in excess]
  • Liberalism aiai here is the terrible ideology of the liberals that as the Carlists said guiris we know that the liberals seduced and devoured the nations of the world into their arms so that in the end the terrible consequences would be triggered, you liberalism will be condemned to eternity by God due to so many stupid things that his followers did
  • National Bolshevism If Nazism and Communism are already bad, naturally, imagine together? and paetel's national bolshevism is inherently ultranationalist and forces paganism and is marxist
  • Communism As the pope said But in the face of these threatening attempts, it could not remain silent and in fact the Catholic Church did not remain silent. This Apostolic See has not remained silent, which knows very well that its peculiar mission is to defend truth, justice and all immortal goods, which communism despises and impugns. Already from the time when certain classes of scholars intended to free humanistic civilization and culture from the bonds of religion and morality, Our Predecessors judged it their duty to draw the world's attention, in very explicit terms, to the consequences of the de-Christianization of human society. And with regard to the errors of the communists, already in 1846, Our Predecessor of happy memory, Pius IX, solemnly condemned them, and later confirmed this condemnation in the Sílabo. These are the words he uses in the Encyclical Qui pluribus: “Here is the nefarious doctrine of so-called communism, extremely contrary to natural law itself, which, once admitted, would lead to the radical subversion of rights, things and properties. of all and of human society itself” (Encyclical Qui pluribus, November 9, 1846: Acta Pii IX, vol. I, page 13. Cf. Sílabo, IV: A.A.S., vol. III, page 170). Later, another Our Predecessor of immortal memory, Leo XIII, in his Encyclical Quod Apostolici muneris (28 December 1878: Acta Leonis XIII, vol. I, p. 40), distinctly and expressly described these same errors: “Plague deadly, which invades the core of human society and leads it to extreme danger”; and with the clairvoyance of his luminous spirit he demonstrated that the precipitate movement of the crowds towards the impiety of atheism, at a time when the progress of technology was so extolled, had its origin in the follies of a philosophy that had long struggled to separate science and life of the faith of the Church. anyway, as the pope said, communism and socialism were consequences of liberalism and because of that they emerged but they give wrong solutions that would never work for poverty, we know that feudalists, distributists and corporatists have the best solutions and communism is too terrible and evil to be applied
  • Socialism as the pope said In any case, we are convinced, and everyone agrees on this, that it is necessary, with prompt and effective measures, to come to the aid of men of the lower classes, given that they are, for the most part, in a situation of misfortune and misery. undeserved. The last century destroyed, without replacing them with anything, the old corporations, which were a protection for them; religious principles and sentiment disappeared from laws and public institutions, and so, little by little, workers, isolated and defenseless, have found themselves, over time, delivered to the mercy of inhumane masters and to the greed of a unbridled competition. Voracious usury further aggravated the evil. Condemned many times by the judgment of the Church, it has not ceased to be practiced in other forms by men eager for greed and insatiable ambition. To all this must be added the monopoly of work and credit papers, which have become the lot of a small number of rich and opulent people, who thus impose an almost servile yoke on the immense multitude of proletarians. Socialists, to cure this evil, instigate in the poor an envious hatred against those who possess, and claim that all ownership of private goods must be suppressed, that the goods of any individual must be common to all, and that their administration must be return to - the Municipalities or the State. Through this transfer of properties and this equal distribution of the wealth and comforts they provide among the citizens, they flatter themselves by applying an effective remedy to present evils. But such a theory, far from being able to put an end to the conflict, would harm the worker if it were put into practice. On the contrary, it is extremely unfair, as it violates the legitimate rights of owners, vitiates the functions of the State and tends towards the complete subversion of the social structure. anyway, as the pope said, communism and socialism were consequences of liberalism and because of that they emerged but they give wrong solutions that would never work for poverty, we know that feudalists, distributists and corporatists have the best solutions and communism is too terrible and evil to be applied
  • Nazism you are basically one of the worst ideologies ever created in history you exterminated innocent people you are racist you were created by a crazy mind
  • Social Democracy well I hate you you are an EVIL leftist ideology that wants to turn everyone into a progressive and you are no good for anything you are stupid at creating the ideal state of things
  • Centrism (Disambiguation) centrists are usually just lazy capitalists who do NOTHING and don't support radical solutions that REALLY IMPROVE SOCIETY
  • Progressivism I found you, you were responsible for the third stage of destruction of tradition in 1968, you SUPPORT ABOMINABLE THINGS like legalizing addictive things, etc.
  • Fascism I hate you because the church condemns you, and because you want everything within the state, nothing outside the state and nothing against the state which is crazy and you are an ultranationalist
  • Social Democracy well I hate you you are an EVIL leftist ideology that wants to turn everyone into a progressive and you are no good for anything you are stupid at creating the ideal state of things
  • Argentinian Nazbolism you are so ideologically stupid, for example you are a white supremacist, you are a communist at the same time as a Nazi, you are an anarchist... anyway, he is very bad

Gallery

How I Would’ve Voted

these are the elections from the time of the empire

generally I would vote for the conservative party except when there were no political parties and when there was a Catholic party, maybe I would have voted for that party

these are the elections from the time of the republic

  • 1891- José Higino Duarte Pereira [reluctantly]
  • 1894- none of the candidates in this election
  • 1898- Prince Gaston of Orleans
  • 1902- none of the candidates in this election
  • 1906- Isabel, Princess Imperial of Brazil
  • 1910- Venceslau Brás
  • 1914- Pinheiro Machado [reluctantly]
  • 1918- none of the candidates in this election
  • 1919- Epitácio Pessoa
  • 1922- Urbano Santos
  • 1926- Melo Viana [reluctantly]
  • 1930- João Pessoa [reluctantly]
  • 1934- Plínio Salgado [reluctantly]
  • 1938-[if this election had taken place] Plínio Salgado [reluctantly]
  • 1945- none of the candidates in this election
  • 1950- none of the candidates in this election
  • 1955- Plínio Salgado [reluctantly]
  • 1960- none of the candidates in this election
  • 1964- Castelo Branco
  • 1965-[if this election had taken place] none of the candidates in this election
  • 1966- Costa e Silva
  • 1969- Emílio Garrastazu Médici [Reluctantly]
  • 1974- Ernesto Geisel [Reluctantly]
  • 1978- João Figueredo [Reluctantly]
  • 1985- none of the candidates in this election
  • 1989- Zamir José Teixeira [reluctantly]
  • 1994- none of the candidates in this election
  • 1998- José Maria Eymael [Reluctantly]
  • 2002- none of the candidates in this election
  • 2006- José Maria Eymael [Reluctantly]
  • 2010- José Maria Eymael [Reluctantly]
  • 2014- José Maria Eymael [Reluctantly]
  • 2018- José Maria Eymael [Reluctantly]
  • 2022- José Maria Eymael [Reluctantly]

Movements

Feel free to ask me about my placements here
  • This is not a comprehensive list of movements and parties I like, this is only ones I feel strongly about

Comrades

  • Carlist Movement (Spain, 1836–)
  • Catholic and Royal Armies (France, 1793-1800)
  • Viva Maria (Italy, 1799-1800)
  • Army of Holy Faith in our Lord Jesus Christ (Italy, 1789–1799)
  • Veronese Reactionaries (Italy, 1797-1797)
  • National League for the Defense of Religious Liberty (Mexico, 1925-????)
  • Royalists (Spanish Empire, 1810-1826)
  • Christian Democracy (Brazil, 1997-)
  • Carlist Traditionalist Communion (Spain, 1986-)
  • Jacobite Movement(Great-Britain, 1688-)
  • Catholic Party (Brazil, 1870-1911)

Mixed

  • White Movement (Russia, 1917-1922)
  • Nationalist faction (Spanish Civil War) (Spain, 1936-1939)
  • Restorative Party (Brazil, 1834-1831)

Atrocious Knaves

  • Democratic Socialists of America (United States, 1982-)
  • Nazi Germany (Germany, 1933-1945)
  • Quisling Regime (Norway, 1942-1945)

Aesthetics

Don’t call me a larper for this or I will cry

Comments

If you would like to be added to relations, add a comment here

Navigation


  1. ↑ Not Hydra's gross definition, which is child marriage. I mean marriage between 1 man and 1 woman, both adults and consenting
Retrieved from "https://pcbwiki.net/index.php?title=Distributist_Reactionaryism&oldid=503367"