×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 2,427 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki
Self Insert
"People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism

This page is meant to represent D4sh's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission.

I'll be working more on this page soon


Icons: (//)

Plan To Read About

General

Metamodernism
Frankfurt School
Acid Communism
Neo-Marxism in general
Council Communism

Currently Reading

Red Star
Bhagavad-gītā

Plan To Read After

The Soul of Man under Socialism


Beginning

What is D4sh Thought

Caatinguism or D4sh Tought is a Leninist ideology but not the bad kind Inspired by various authors and revolutionaries linked the Fourth International, such as Nahuel Moreno, Trotsky himself and Posadas yep, Posadism isnt just "nuke the planet" you.. uhm.. can see more below

Internationalism Has Been Misunderstood

Of course, when talking about Trotskyism, many automatically associate it with internationalism, as if it were a specific doctrine of Trotskyism, when in fact, internationalism is a fundamental part of Marxism in general
Internationalism is not only against nationalism and desiring international revolution, internationalism is you recognizing that: no matter the strength of the peasantry or the proletarian, socialism in one country It is unfeasible, the capitalist system has reached an international level for many years, with international exchanges and governance, an isolated socialist nation will still have a lot of difficulty in overcoming this international capital, Expanding the revolution is a matter of life and death for any revolution

The Permanent Revolution Was Misunderstood

Another misunderstood, and sometimes purposely distorted, concept by the overwhelming majority of today's "Marxists" The theory of permanent revolution presents a solution to the problems posed by semi-colonial countries and third world countries, Let's start from the basics:
Trotsky analysed in his time that there were countries where capitalism had barely developed, In which in several of these countries, workers' demands that in theory could be realized under capitalism (such as the right to vote) become more and more limited, Trotsky asserts that the only solution for countries of dubious democracy is a revolution, Trotsky also refutes the false assertions that he completely ignored the peasantry, Trotsky places the peasantry as a key player in Third World revolutions.


The revolution does not stop at the national level

The revolution on a national level is only the first step, the vanguard party, leading the workers and peasantry, must take upon itself the monopoly of violence and overthrow every remnant of the national-liberal bourgeoisie, But it doesn't stop there! On the contrary, the revolution at the national level is only the first step, to become a permanent revolution, it must reach a continental, international scale and ends only on a global level, an isolated socialist nation cannot consider that its revolution is over.

To be a communist, it is necessary to be against Lula

Lula's election was not a victory, the PT elections are not victories, President Lula is a member of the bourgeoise, Constantly involved in corruption schemes and agreements with the "center" and bankers to consolidate political power, since his first victory in 2002, little has been done to really improve Brazil's situation, other than of course, giving power to reactionary unions/syndies, giving the false impression that the workers are with him.
There is a traumatic feeling of the military dictatorship (1964-1985) everyone thought in 2002 that those responsible would finally be guilty, everyone had hopes for a better democracy and, perhaps, an agrarian reform, but not even that the years of government of the Workers' Party were able to concede, it is clear that Lula is a tool to distract the workers from the real enemies.
The theory of permanent revolution reveals itself here, showing that even the most basic demands cannot be met, the only way out is revolution.

Other Ideas

Technology and Innovation in Socialism

A problem that was pointed out by Juan Posadas involving technology, The bourgeois class can have no interest or perspective in objectively seeking to develop society. It is only a question of material goods, from which it can extract profits and, therefore, the perpetuation and extension of private property. It limits your understanding and prevents you from thinking, The bourgeois class is the most reactionary and antiquist of all classes, They have a monopoly on all the goods needed for art, education, technology, and the like, but even with so much power, little is done to actually advance
Look at the Soviet Union, which even with so many mistakes managed to conquer the space


Relations
Ideologies that I show a support for, usually people who share the same revolutionary sentiment

That communist southerner! - I heard you were a reformist in the past, I'm glad you changed, probably the only things we differ on are the form of organization or the lack of it and about culture, I don't believe that all the culture of the past should be erased, but I believe that it should be reformed/changed, culture is still a source of morale and joy for the proletarian, totally changing with it is something.. dangerous.. Overall, you look great, 9/10


Lucy's father - We mostly have different inspirations and different organizations, but we agree that a deicide against this being is the key to liberating the masses 9/10


Bring on the guillotine - YES YES YES YES, Let's guilotine all the social democrats 😈
Now seriously, I think we've just distanced ourselves in terms of philosophy, universal nationalism isn't that bad and your "Culturally Revolutionary" is pretty based, I just find your admiration for.. Certain ideologies suspicious, 8,8/10


Insurrectionary Philosopher - You're a revolutionary leftist, but you present different things, i dont know very much about these guys But you've got the spirit, 8,9/10


Indonesian Nazbol - wip
ideologies that share a revolutionary sentiment or have something that pleases me, but are not fully compatible

anarcho-hitlerist - (cool page btw) Definitely a revolutionary, already up a tier, but I mostly disagree with your economic method and I don't have an opinion as to your philosophy..uhmm..6,?/10
I hope you like this image 🥺


The Anarcho-Anarchist - I really liked your influences but we 100% differentiate ourselves in Civics and some on Economy, but you are still good, you will stay on "the similar" rank, 8,1/10
ideologies that I share little or no similarity

literalmente um fascista 🙄 - Liberal Stalinism, Liberal Stalinism, LIBERAL STALINISM
But honestly, you're not that bad for a liberal, but you support death penalty for crimes against the state in general? i think im gonna die- 2,5/10


Esoteric Dengist - I'm not going to lie, you're pretty confusing, but I liked the vibe?? you ain't got nothing similar to me, but there are a few things that catch my eye , kinda like Meadowsin but far-right

  • - How exactly am I confusing I would like to know how I can fix my ideology so it becomes more sensible
    • - I made a bad use of words, You're not exactly confusing, you are just certainly quite different from the other pages I've seen, but being a libertarian and a market socialist and the same time is fr strange


Bolsonaro, só que versão furry - damn, you are pro-ARENA, pro-Putin your economics are quite different from mine, at least we share an opinion about this ladrão fdp


That with a self-explanatory name - wip