×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 2,496 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki

Gallegism: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 39: Line 39:
*[[File:Marx.png]] [[Marxism]] You are just an authoritarian in denial.
*[[File:Marx.png]] [[Marxism]] You are just an authoritarian in denial.
*[[File:ML.png]] [[Marxism-Leninism]] Same as above, but you reject Communism even more explicitly, I hate you, you destroyed Communism's reputation. Fuck you.
*[[File:ML.png]] [[Marxism-Leninism]] Same as above, but you reject Communism even more explicitly, I hate you, you destroyed Communism's reputation. Fuck you.
*[[File:Fash.png]] [[Fascism]] The enemy of freedom incarnated.
*[[File:Fash.png]] [[Fascism]] The enemy of freedom incarnated, nothing but Capitalism in denial.
*[[File:Neolib.png]] [[Neoliberalism]] The ideology of evil.
*[[File:Neolib.png]] [[Neoliberalism]] The ideology of evil.
*[[File:Zio.png]] [[Zionism]] Disgusting bloodthirsty maniacs.
*[[File:Zio.png]] [[Zionism]] Disgusting bloodthirsty maniacs.

Revision as of 03:43, 3 January 2024

Gallegism is libertarian left and culturally right-wing ideology, represents political ideology of the fictional Ecuadorian politician Julio Gallego (1987-).


History

Julio Gallego is an Ecuadorian politician, he was the leader of the ¡Ya Basta! Party, a party based upon Socialism of the 21st century, its main inspirations were Chavez, Evo Morales, Kim Il-Sung, Kim Jong-Il and Kim Jong-Un. However, Gallego became disillusioned by the ideology, since he considered it as a "betrayal of Socialism", as a "Progressive Fascist" ideology that didn't create Socialism, but "State Capitalist dictatorships based upon the Caudillo figure". He also considers the modern left to be Liberal in denial, since they are no more concerned with the class struggle, but with "Bourgeois perversions made to distract the Proletariat". He also became disillusioned with the State, considering it "the monopoly of oppression" and eventually with Socialism itself, since he perceives it as an "ideology that was completely subverted by the hands of authoritarian maniacs", therefore he decided to went further and embrace Communism. He proposes however a non-Marxist version of Communism, condemning the Marxist conception of the "dictatorship of the proletariat", arguing that "it's just a way to delay and cancel any possibility for Communism to take over". He further argues that such dictatorship would not bring Communism and would not put the Proletariat in charge, but it would just create a new Bourgeois class represented by the State officials. He also argues that Communism has to be a movement in which the proletariat rejects proletarianism, as "the proletariat" is another class defined by its oppression. He doesn't consider himself explicitly as an Anarchist, but he is sympathetic of Kropotkin and Bakunin's ideas, considering them both as an alternative to Marxism. He also argues that a Communist revolution must be carried by a small group of revolutionaries that conspire against the system, since he sees mass actions as no longer a viable way to bring Communism.

Personality

Relations

Friends

  • National Communism I am a Nationalist and a Communist, my goal is to free ourselves and our nation from the menace of International Globalism.
  • Communization Theory We are pretty much the same, but your movement is pretty heterogeneous.
  • Anarcho-Communism Even if I don't define myself as an Anarchist, I still support you and consider Kropotkin a great man who corrected Marx's errors and eventually inspired me.
  • Christophobia This religion of lies and centralized oppression must disappear, at all costs.
  • Post-Left I support most of your ideas, but the "Post-Left" movement is more of a compilation of different (and even opposing) ideologies, than an ideology per se.

Frenemies

  • Left-wing Populism The problem with you is that you devolve to Authoritarianism and, in the end, you fail to protect the same people you claim to protect. Not to mention that revolution does not happen by mass action.
  • Ultranationalism While I still support the Nationalist struggle, you keep being used as a tool to protect Capitalism, which is the root of all our evils in our Nation.
  • Juche I don't support you anymore like I used to, since you are way too authoritarian, but to be fair we don't really know much about you and your actions and you are unfairly maligned by the West, but you're still better than "South Korea" though.
  • Blanquism While I support the idea that a Workers' revolution can only be carried by a small group of revolutionaries that conspire against the system to destroy it, your goals are authoritarian and in contradiction of Communism.

Enemies

  • Chavismo Dictators that destroyed Socialism in South America and tarnished even more its reputation, shame on you.
  • Socialism of the 21st Century Same as above, you are State Capitalist in denial, you ruined the reputation of Socialism, I hate you so much.
  • Socialismo Militar I used to consider you as the pinnacle of Socialism, before realizing you are just Fascism in denial, shame on you.
  • Marxism You are just an authoritarian in denial.
  • Marxism-Leninism Same as above, but you reject Communism even more explicitly, I hate you, you destroyed Communism's reputation. Fuck you.
  • Fascism The enemy of freedom incarnated, nothing but Capitalism in denial.
  • Neoliberalism The ideology of evil.
  • Zionism Disgusting bloodthirsty maniacs.
  • Neoconservatism ¡FUERA TIO SAM, FUERA YANQUIS!
  • Liberalism Liberalism is a cancer.
  • Capitalism The ideology of greed.
  • Civic Nationalism You forgot the Nationalism at home.
  • Pink Capitalism Disgusting Western Degenerate.

Further information

See also

References