×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 2,438 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki

Vistulism: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
*[[File:Demarchy.png]] {{GlowText|Demarchic|#3F47CB}}
*[[File:Demarchy.png]] {{GlowText|Demarchic|#3F47CB}}
*[[File:Dem.png]] {{GlowText|Democrats|#0303E1}} (self-proclaimed)
*[[File:Dem.png]] {{GlowText|Democrats|#0303E1}} (self-proclaimed)
*[[File:Prgess.png]] {{GlowText|Technophilic|#9D22B1}}
*[[File:Prgess.png]] {{GlowText|Technophilic|#9D22B1}}<br> <br> '''Political Compass:'''<br>
<div class="compass"><span style="z-index:1;position:relative;bottom:-84px;left:10.8px;">[[File:Vistula3.png]]</span><div class="compassline"><div class="compassquad" id="al"></div><div class="compassquad" id="ar"></div></div><div class="compassline"><div class="compassquad" id="ll"></div><div class="compassquad" id="lr"></div></div></div>
|econinfluences=
|econinfluences=
*[[File:Guildsoc.png]] Guild Socialism
*[[File:Guildsoc.png]] Guild Socialism

Revision as of 22:43, 14 February 2024



Civics

Notes

  • A group of Technocrats form the Council of Technocrats (Upper House)
  • The lower house will be the Parliament, made as a form of checks and balances. It shall have one representative from each region. This representative will be called on like in jury duty, but they are allowed to decline if they wish - they shall have a placement for two years.
  • The Parliament can suggest laws and also has a veto on which it must get 50% support in a democratic vote.
  • The most specialised technocrat (MST) is given the role of Supreme Technocrat, the Head of State. They will stay until they recieve 3 law vetos (which would imply them not being specialised). If they pass 5 laws in a row then their veto progress goes down, e.g. if they've been vetoed 2 times but then pass 5 laws in a row successfully, it's like they've been vetoed 1 time.
  • The Council proposes laws, the MST can veto them, but the Council has a counter-veto which they can use in order to have the law be voted on by the Parliament.
  • Federal regions of the nation use direct democracy, voting on the laws given by the Council of Technocrats which they wish to have applied to their nation.
  • Popular campaigning can be a way to suggest laws, although it is not an official process in the system, it can allow for recognition.
  • These are the requirements for any member of the Lower or Upper house:
    • Above the age of 18
    • Below the age of 79
    • Engaged in involvement with the community
    • Proficiency with the English language (reading, writing and speaking)
    • Any kind of degree in a public service field (education, healthcare, economics, law, etc.)
    • Clear criminal record
    • Qualified in at least secondary education
    • Swear an oath to the public called the Oath of Loyalty (basically just a speech)
    • Have lived in the region they are representing for at least 10 years

New Name

As we would not be the United Kingdom anymore for the Monarchy as an institution would be disestablished, a new name would be needed. Maybe the Commonwealth of Great Britain or something? I'll refer to it as Commonwealth from now on.

Northern Ireland

Give it independence and let it choose its own fate from there.

Unified Regional Governance

We must have a unified system of local government for all federal subjects of the Commonwealth. I believe in splitting it into 4 categories - federal subjects, regions, localities, and special cities.

Information about Local Governance System
Info Federal Subjects Regions Localities Special Cities
Amount 3 25 ~800 3
Average[5] Population Range ~22.67 million ~2.72 million 85,000 ~3.29 million
Example of Region Scotland Yorkshire Norfolk London
Level First Level Second Level Third Level Second Level

Economics

All corporations, it is their purpose to serve the public with high quality, well-priced goods which shall satisfy their needs. This is why all corporations shall have an "implied contractual relationship with the public". Corporations will also be nationalised i.e. there to serve the nations and shall follow regulations set by the Upper House which are made to ensure high quality, well-priced goods which satisfy public need.

Workers Democracy

Workers democracy is essential to a new corporation. Workers should either elect their supervisors or be collective supervisors.

Foreign Media Tax

We should tax foreign media, especially if it is political. This is because they would be non-understanding of the situations in the country and would look at them in a wrong perspective. Taxing them would be a punishment for their indecency.

National Energy Company

I think we should nationalise all the energy companies and prepare a merging of all of them into one National Energy Company. They should be directed into things like balanced prices and investment in renewable energy (e.g. hydrogen, wind or nuclear energy).

Revolution

The Revolution

I very much dislike class collaboration and reform. I believe in a socialist revolution tied to class warfare inspired by a new class consciousness is superior. For a very long time and still-going, the capitalist class has oppresed the proletariat who is humbled - made to accept having little being a perfectly fine thing. Liberal Democracy also forces them to accept this as it is a tool of the bourgeoise to get into power those who agree with the bourgeoise, people believe "they were voted in so its only right."


Religious Criticisms

[6]

I condemn false prophets, I condemn the effort to take away the power of rational decision, to drain people of their free will—and a hell of a lot of money in the bargain. Religions vary in their degree of idiocy, but I reject them all.

Gene Roddenberry


Christianity

Islam

Judaism

Ideological Criticisms

Social Democracy

Neoliberalism

Social Capitalism

Third Way

Silence in the face of injustice is complicity with the oppressor.

Ginetta Sagan


Liberal Democracy

Democracy is when the indigent, and not the men of property, are the rulers.

Aristotle


People call democracy "tyranny of the majority" but thats quite problematic because it says that the tyrant has approval from a majority of the citizens when this is not the case. The tyrant has the majority approval from the plutocrat scum who represent 1% of our population. Small parties who stand for actual change, for the many not the few are underfunded and criticised by media because of course they are, the media is run by the same plutocrats who these small parties threaten to take down. It is the will of the common folk for these plutocrats to be gone, it would improve the lives of the 99%, but these plutocrats do not care about the 99%, they care about themselves and themselves only.
Democracy should be rule of the people - if it doesn't even represent those people, it is definitely not democracy.

Relations

If you want to add me

[[File:Vistula3.png]] [[Vistulism]] ([[File:Guildsoc.png|link=Guild Socialism]]/[[File:Fed.png|link=Federalism]]/[[File:Isolationist.png|link=Isolationism]]/[[File:Technocracy.png|link=Technocracy]]/[[File:BritRepub.png|link=Republicanism]])


Which will look like: Vistulism (////)

Incredible (8 - 10)

Agreeable (6 - 8)

  • Venatrixism - Any postie out there probably despises my believes - I can imagine the insults. But honestly, I don't mind the post-left nor communization, I think their both decent theories. (6.5/10)
  • Neosyndicalism - A fellow person who hates the state but finds it necessary. How I wish we could refuse the state...Anyways, beside that, culturally, you're pretty eh, I don't like the Cultural Center because I believe cultural centrism only helps the right as the left lobbies for change, the center will support the status quo meaning they would be more similar to the right than the left. Economically, I don't like your belief in class collaboration - class collaboration is forgiving the oppressors of humanity and whilst punishing the oppressors of humanity may be clemency, forgiving them is cruelty. I like market socialism, let the market drive things sure. Regional specialisation is also pretty good but I personally would want to adapt everything to eventually become hydrogen-powered ecomodernity. Self reliance is okay. I am much more statist than you (despite by hatred for the state. I've really just accepted that no progress is coming.) Overall, the class collaboration and the cultural views really ruin these beliefs. (6.25/10)

Eh (4 - 6)

  • Alstūdism (////) - Eh, you're not that bad I guess. I don't like the theocracy parts of it but overall I guess you aren't the "evil fascist monster from the depths of hel." people would likely imagine you as when they see "Fascists" on your alignments. We both hate current democracy as well as monarchies. Also your belief in green fuels is a bonus. (5/10)

Bad (1 - 3)

Scum (0 - 1)

  • Brazilian Liberalism - My opinion of you still hasn't changed; you're a status quo loving monster and the very depiction of the virus that is liberalism. Anthony Blair started the ruination of the party I used to worship and you face him as a friend. The friend of my enemy is my enemy. (0/10)

Incredible (8 - 10)

Agreeable (6 - 8)

Eh (4 - 6)

Bad (1 - 3)

Scum (0 - 1)

Political Books I've Read (2024-)

Karl Kautsky

Andrew Flood

Karl Marx

Soon

Friedrich Engels

The Principles of Communism (Friedrich Engels)

Unknown Author



  1. Not any persecution or anything, I just think we should try and make our society less religious, especially with Abrahamic religions which have really disgusting ideas in my opinion.
  2. I am anti-Christianity, not anti-Christian
  3. I am anti-Islam, not anti-Muslim
  4. I am anti-Judaism, not anti-Jew
  5. Using average means England's high population distorts the numbers quite a lot.
  6. Note: For religions, I do not hate the believers in any of them, I consider the believers in these religions to be enslaved by false prophecies.