Revision as of 02:21, 8 September 2024

Argentine Theory is the Political Ideology of Tiller Likky aka Rotadam Otag. He is the biggest opponent of Brazilian Liberalism Note: I'm Rewritting this page.

Economics

I oppose Capitalism as it destroys culture and replaces it with Liberal Subversion, thus I support Socialism, but not the Marxist Kind, which denies Hiarchy and wants to destroy culture for the sake of "progress" and "material dialectics" through class warfare, which is why I turn to (actual) National Socialism (not the Fake kind) which would focus on Nationalisation of Major Industries and Worker's Rights through Guilds and Trade Unions, Markets would be limited but for Pragmatic reasons, Worker Owned businesses would be allowed but highly regulated to not create Liberal/Capitalist Markets.

Government

I argue for a strong, but not Totalitarian State, as that would lead to an unstable society with focus on Ideological Purity Which would easily lead to a Failed state, but the same is true for the Lolberts and Anarkiddies as they deny the idea that people have intricate social Hiarchies, which is the whole reason why society even exists.
On leadership, I support Collective Leadership over Autocracy, as having a multifaceted leadership position that although may have a single symbolic head of state, in practice leadership would be Technocratic, with Intellectual assemblies.
On Local Rule, some form of democracy would be implemented, but it would be different from Liberal Democracy as a way to keep the stability of Undemocratic Governments through regulations to avoid Majority Rule, as it would cause chaos in society.

Relationships

Libtard Slayers

Imperial Socialism - An Amazing Commrade, who fights against Liberalism with their own Medicine.
N.Brioism - A Fellow in killing libtards, though I'm a bit more conservative than you (still a Commrade).
Neocarlism - Commrade from Spain.

Commrades

Sapismo - We Should team up against ((( him))). ~~Even though You're a A filthy Portuguese Speaking Brazilian~~
Socialist World Republic - Based, but drop the Marxism and Embrace Realpolitikism over Anti-Imperialism

Neutral

Second Anidiotoncrack Thought - I agree on some things like Catholicism and Anti-liberalism, but Capitalism is a no for me
Baxism - You have a lot of based takes, but you think that society would lead into Communism, which is impossible as the state and some hiarchy are inevitable. ~~Also You're insufferable as a person~~
Rigby Thought - Close, but Capitalism and some semblances of Liberalism ruin you.

Traitors

Dankeism - Anti-capitalism is good, but outside of that, you're pretty much a Liberal.
Romantic Egoism - While, I do sadly share more in common than I like to admit (such as hatred for liberals), you're still a puny Anarkitty, even if you turn time before the state people still had organisation and not only organisation, but authority and even some highly defined borders being a more extreme version of territories that animals had.
Gumballism - Based Argentinian Nationalism, Cringe Everything Else.

Libtards

Brazilian Liberalism - No need to explain.
DECBism - Libshit Kid
Quarkism - Honest Liberaha
Ludwigism - DIE!
Tom Thought - SJW(Shitty Jehovah's Witnesses), Mayo Nationalism, Capitalism? What can I say except Horrid.

@@ Line 37: / Line 37: @@
 I oppose [[File:Cap.png]] Capitalism as it destroys culture and replaces it with [[File:Lib.png]] Liberal Subversion, thus I support [[File:Soc.png]] Socialism, but not the [[File:Marx.png]] Marxist Kind, which denies Hiarchy and wants to destroy culture for the sake of "progress" and "material dialectics" through class warfare, which is why I turn to (actual) [[File:Strasser.png]] National Socialism (not the [[File:Nazi.png]] Fake kind) which would focus on [[File:Statesoc.png]] Nationalisation of Major Industries and [[File:Guildsoc.png]][[File:Natsynd.png]] Worker's Rights through Guilds and Trade Unions, Markets would be limited but for Pragmatic reasons, [[File:AuthMarkSoc.png]] Worker Owned businesses would be allowed but highly regulated to not create Liberal/Capitalist Markets.
 =Government=
-I argue for a [[File:Auth.png]] strong, but not [[File:Totitarianism.png]] Totalitarian State, as that would lead to an unstable society with focus on Ideological Purity Which would easily lead to a Failed state, but the same is true for the [[File:Libertarian.png]] Lolberts and [[File:An.png]] Anarkiddies as they deny the idea that [[File:Caste.png]] people have intricate social Hiarchies, which is the whole reason why society even exists. <Br>
+I argue for a [[File:Auth.png]] strong, but not [[File:Totalitarian.png]] Totalitarian State, as that would lead to an unstable society with focus on Ideological Purity Which would easily lead to a Failed state, but the same is true for the [[File:Libertarian.png]] Lolberts and [[File:An.png]] Anarkiddies as they deny the idea that [[File:Caste.png]] people have intricate social Hiarchies, which is the whole reason why society even exists. <Br>
 On leadership, I support [[File:CollectiveLeadership.png]] Collective Leadership over [[File:Auto.png]] Autocracy, as having a multifaceted leadership position that although may have a single symbolic head of state, in practice leadership would be [[File:Techcon.png]] Technocratic, with Intellectual assemblies. <Br>
-On [[File:Local.png]] Local Rule, [[File:Illibdem.png]] some form of democracy would be implemented, but it would be different from Liberal Democracy as a way to keep the stability of Undemocratic Governments through regulations to avoid Majority Rule, as it would cause chaos in society.
+On [[File:Local.png]] Local Rule, [[File:IllibDem.png]] some form of democracy would be implemented, but it would be different from Liberal Democracy as a way to keep the stability of Undemocratic Governments through regulations to avoid Majority Rule, as it would cause chaos in society.
 =Relationships=

Argentine Theory: Difference between revisions

Help