×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 2,526 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki


Self Insert
"People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism

This page is meant to represent Jefbol's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission.


Coming svvn... be prepared for many more schizophrenic ramblings

I'll write shit here when I get the chance to/when I feel like it

Icons: (///)

Beliefs

Philosophical and Economic Beliefs

On the Postmodern Condition of Late Capitalism

The Libido and Political Economy

The Symbolic Commodity and Hyperreal Spectacles

The Origin of the Oedipal Family

Civilization and the Death of the Gemeinwesen

Political Beliefs

Notes on Modern Struggle and Spontaneity

The proletariat are not silent and passive players in their struggle, they do not sit back and only act in reaction to the actions of capital, not at all. On the contrary, they play a much heavier role as the slayers of capital and its bourgeois meat hooks, they are active participants indeed, and especially in such a condition of chaos and uncertainty. What do I mean by this?

A new development has taken place in the last century. The proletariat has, even in its weakest moments, has developed a new and more potent form of its own vibrant subjectivity and spontaneity, one particularly threatening to our lord capital, it is a spontaneity that capital must crush. What is spontaneity? Spontaneity in this context is the sudden escape of desire from the constraints of capitalist machines, instantaneous affirmation of it. Through the various forms of labor organization of the 19th and 20th century, it stood its ground against capital and its totality over society. It has been made clear by these proletarian struggles, their struggles to affirm themselves against capital, that the proletariat is an irreducibly autonomous force, one capable of standing up to the fiery dragons of the current order. However, such anger and force by itself has shown itself to not be strong enough against capital, as it is still directionless. Using such a disadvantage, capital has been able to crush such a potentially destructive machine and use it to its own benefit before it even gets a chance to enact its real force.

Our post-modern world is a chaotic and even violent one. Every year, you here about violence and war here, an economic crisis here, nuclear threats here, the globe is in a tough position right now, it seems. Contrarily however, capital seems to be at its strongest. In the face of the forces of the nomads that want it dead, of anti-capitalist affirmation, capital is forced to either adapt or die. Capital, though frankly uncaring of what man thinks, only using them for its own benefit, can only be threatened by such spontaneous forces of social life, so it must always find ways to subjugate such spontaneous resistance to the machines of capital. This is the logic behind the many shifts in social organization of society in the past century, from societies of discipline to control, from national to international.

We can understand this better through Mario Tronti's analysis of the cycle of composition, the partial escapes from capital and the partial subjugating by capital. When the proletarian affirmed himself and escaped for a short while from the clutches of capital, capital could not destroy it completely, it could only counterattack by attempting to stratify the desires of the proletariat more and more through the further coding of social life, strangling spontaneity. It must do this in order to survive, it is in its self-interest to do such a thing out of pure necessity to. Capital therefore develops through this process increasing abilities to suppress the spontaneity of its slaves.

Such a force as the workingmen is directionless in the modern century, it has no push or drive. It has the anger, the bloodthirst, the passion and desire, to reign terror on the institutions which repress it, of course! However, it has no direction or tactics to speak of in its current state, it has only been able to do anything within the roadblocks and the confined territories that capital allows it to, and through only the means capital lets it. Spontaneity and the autonomy of such unconstrainted desire is therefore easily subjugated, brought back into the fold, keeping the proletarian in the metal chains of capitalist production.

What is to be done to solve this problem is nothing more than the giving of such a direction to the proletariat, allowing spontaneity to be effective in practice, allowing us to have a serious way of resistance against capital's iron boot, allowing us to become a true war machine against capital's dominance and to truely have the power to decode capitalism by ourselves. Communism as the movement to abolish the current state of affairs, must act as living, one that not just collective but individual, freeing desire from the stratification of capitalist machinic apparatuses. It must be a molecular movement, one that involves the freeing of all of life from the interference of capitalist territorialization. Everyday life is turned therefore into a battle ground of change and difference, actor against actor. It releases culture, language, education, etc, from capital. We therefore become the assassins of capital, challenging its dominance by our very affirmation of our spontaneity, our own affirmative passion and desire, we are our own liberators and the own drivers of our own revolution.

On Party-Power

Biopolitics, Political Territories, and the Theory of the State

Social Capital and Capitalist Stratification of Spontaneity

Postmodernity and the Societies of Control

Relations

Add an alias to this page if you want to get added

Messtarded Tier

Gemerald

  • Glorified Communism () - Very cool guy with very cool beliefs, perhaps the closest to me in terms of philosophical and political matches. I have little to disagree with.
  • Kimno Thought () - Even with our political and philosophical break with each other (me embracing post-structuralism and spontaneity), you're still quite good in your foundation and in your beliefs, though obviously with typical classical Marxian limitations, alongside your humanism.
  • Venatrixism () - My student! Very much like the above, but less well-read.

Gem

  • Nurulisme () - Very good analysis of for example, capital as a deity, which I for the most part agree with, along with a few other things. My main problem though is how you cling on to psychoanalytic and Hegelian nonsense, which makes it very confusing when you claim to be a Deleuzian at the same time, but otherwise fine.

Dust

Coal

  • Alstūdism () - Very cool as a person, but this blind petit bourgeois romanticism that you and the rest of the fascists hold dear is indeed vile, with it encouraging the self-desiring of his or hers' own repression by the abstract ideal of the "nation" and by such an ideal's militaristic fury.

Brimstone

Post-Post-Post-Post-Incomprehensible Tier

  • Voidvill Rajandeep () - I'm sorry but what the actual fuck is thi-
    • - Blud doesn't even recognize one of his students 💀
      • - I don't know what you expect from a demented old man as myself.
        • - What do you understand or comprehend at least of my thought?
          • - The actual concepts on there I get, I just don’t get how they all fit together into one.
            • - I thought I had finally made something sensible/understandable, but eh, thanks for giving me a writing style that works and frees the insides even if it is not really essays

Comments

Recent changes

  • Samtk5759 • 2 minutes ago
  • PaternalistUnity • 6 minutes ago
  • Samtk5759 • 7 minutes ago
  • PaternalistUnity • 7 minutes ago