Post-Jefbolism

Self Insert "People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism This page is meant to represent Jefbol's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission.

Post-Jefbolism
Caption.
Basic Information
Aliases	User Aliases (feel free to add) Theory Converter 9000 Red Pilled Marxism The Slayer of Socdems Pizza Tower Shizoanalysis
Alignments	Communists Internationalists
Ideological Influences
Influenced by	Anti-Humanism Base Materialism Council Communism Deleuzoguattarianism Nietzscheanism Occult Post-Humanism Post-Modernism Post-Structuralism Post-Marxism Situationism Spinozian Marxism
Influenced	Glorified Communism Hoodism Voidvill Rajandeep
Ideological Information
Notable Theorists	Jefbol (2006-)
Notable Ideas	Liberating Spontaneity Social Capital The Consumertariat Rebellion of the Everyday
Character Information
Song	Flight of Icarus Hand of Doom Crazy Train One

Post-Jefbolism is an "ideology".

Essentially, this is my attempt to combine post-structuralist and schizoanalytic study of signs and psychology with a dehegelized Marxism. The core of my beliefs is my opinion that as communism is the movement to abolish the current state of things, the movement to destratify desire and power from class and from state apparatuses, communism can only be achieved through active struggle, this being influenced by the Situationists and their "revolution of everyday life". In accordance with this, I am in support of the generalized self-management of the everyday through the fludity of the council, which through this transcends the proletarian condition. I am influenced primarily in my writings by Baruch Spinoza, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels , Friedrich Nietzsche, Antonie Pannekoek, Wilhelm Reich, Jacques Lacan, Paul Mattick, Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari , Guy Debord, and Antonio Negri.

Icons for if you want to add me: (///)

Relations

Add an alias to this page if you want to get added

Messtarded Tier

• Messardism () - 🫡

Gemerald

• Glorified Communism () - Very cool guy with very cool beliefs, perhaps the closest to me in terms of philosophical and political matches.
• Kimno Thought () - Fellow left communist and Nietzschean, though I would criticize your support for the party-form(?).
• Venatrixism () - My student! Very much like the above, but very much so still a baby communist. Also you are very systematic and I think a bit too workerist, something which inadvertently goes against your supposed Marxism.

Dust

• Nurulisme () - I really do not know how to feel about this. On one hand, I agree heavily with your Marxism (even if limited), post-structuralism, emphasis on the council-form, your view of Capital not as just abstract money accumulation but a living god, etc. However, I notice a few very bad flaws of yours. First and most obvious is your nationalism, specifically your view of the nation (“civilization” as you call it) as the manifestation of the will/of existence, something which you borrow from Dugin. I also dislike your emphasis on the party-form and the vanguard quite expectedly. But the thing I want to focus on is your rejection of higher phase communism. You state that “One could organize an economy based on a system of need and gifts but we live in a far more complicated world with many such inter-connected nodes in very far-reaching places that necessitate some form of mass scale coordination and which requires mediums for execution (money, social book-keeping, divisions of labour, or more broadly, an input-output system). This is where i got disillusioned by communism and turned to it's moderate form of socialism where the living organism of civilization whilst still living is not contained by an autocratic command structure.” And yet this is something Marx and the GIK both noticed, how can we calculate demand/need (need in the context of communism, just like how you pointed out with the market, does not necessarily depend on a differentiation between “need” and “want”) without some level of book-keeping or without an input-output system? Communism does not see the social book-keeping system, mass coordination, or the input-output feedbacks as a basis for economics destroyed, rather it is its universalization, because without it communism and “each according to his ability to reach according to his needs” would just be a utopian fantasy. With your rejection of higher-phase communism, I see your overall views descending into just another petit bourgeois critique of capitalism. Overall, I don’t know how to feel about this.
• Neo-StockMarketCrash Thought () - Fellow Deleuzian and Nietzschean, but god damn am I disappointed looking through this. Firstly, I dislike your mutualism, because although you proclaim yourself to be against capitalism, what you don't see is that markets and their existence necessitate capital accumulation, the survival of the commodity-form, of wages, etc. And your nationalism sticks out like a sore thumb, contradicting everything else you believe (yes, even Proudhonianism and Sorelianism).

Coal

• Proletariat builderism () - I despise the Christianity, the Platonism, and Natural Law nonsense, otherwise quite hard to follow along due to the contradictory and confusing influences.
• Alstūdism () - Very cool as a person, but this blind petit bourgeois romanticism that you and the rest of the fascists hold dear is indeed vile, with it encouraging the self-desiring of his or hers' own repression by the abstract ideal of the "nation" and by such an ideal's militaristic fury.
• Meowxism () - Incredibly contradictory beliefs, and you've shown yourself to not understand anything about Deleuzian or post-structuralist theory, let alone your own movement's theory. Fine person, however.
•  BERNHEism () - What saves you from being in brimstone is how honestly you present your political and economic views, for you seek only efficiency and stability no matter what for capitalism, your politics stripped of any democratic illusions of rights and the people's power, something that I very much so can respect. You're also a very good friend of mine, so there's that.
• Pantheonism () - Here it is, the petit bourgeois socialist who wishes to relieve society of the dangers of big capital so the small capital of the petit bourgeoisie can hang on for just a short while, a reactionary at heart who seeks to entrench the tyranny of the guilds of small producers like what was in medieval times, all for the sake of some vague anti-capitalism.

Brimstone

• Brazilian Liberalism () - Pathetic and delusional priest of capitalism, nothing much to say.
• Tedcruzfan Thought () - Libra, you're unfunny and retarded, and this is the greatest showcase of this.

Post-Post-Post-Post-Incomprehensible Tier

• Voidvill Rajandeep () - I'm sorry but what the actual fuck is thi-
  • - Blud doesn't even recognize one of his students 💀
    • - I don't know what you expect from a demented old man as myself.
      • - What do you understand or comprehend at least of my thought?
        • - The actual concepts on there I get, I just don’t get how they all fit together into one.
          • - I thought I had finally made something sensible/understandable, but eh, thanks for giving me a writing style that works and frees the insides even if it is not really essays

Comments

• Distributist Reactionarism - Add me
•  Baxism - Add me.
• Voidvill Rajandeep - Add me oh great ultra-leftist
• Venatrixism - add me plz
• Vistulism - Hello Jefbol, add me please if you wouldn't mind.
• Brazilian Liberalism - Add
• Kimno Thought - Add me armchair man. I'll update you when I actually make my page
• Tedcruzfan Thought - Add me
• Proletariat builderism please add me
• Meowxism - add? i upd'd my ideology a bit lol
• Agricoetism - Add me :3
•  BERNHEism - Add me, Mr. Best Nemesis
•  Meadowsin's Basilisk - Add me? :)