×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 2,439 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki
Polcompball Wiki
2,439Articles
  Recent changes
in:
Pages using Tabber parser tag, Self-Insert, Ideologies
Revision as of 16:28, 17 April 2024 by Nebeler (talk | contribs)
Self Insert
"People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism

This page is meant to represent Nebeler's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission.

Work in Progress
"I'll be done any day now!" - Still-Being-Drawnism

This page is not done yet and may still contain inaccurate information or miss important details.


National-Communitarian Theory is an economically far-left, culturally variable, and syncretic ideology which posits the well-being of the national community as being paramount (the nation being defined as a people united by a common cultural/ethnic identity). It is thus Nationalist, but opposes Ultranationalism on count of it being detrimental to common good, instead favouring Internationalism.

Beliefs

The State

On Democracy

Democracy is merely a system of smoke and mirrors which serves the interests of the bourgeois class. It is not the most capable or intelligent who are elected, rather those who are most able to mislead the crowd. Even in a 'real' democracy, the majority often makes choices which are not in their best interest. The truth is that most people are simply not educated enough to make important decisions.

On Law and Violence

Anarchists are correct in their understanding of the state as a monopoly on use of force, which it uses to make its rules into law and affirm its own legitimacy. Or, as Max Stirner put it: “The state calls its own violence law, but that of the individual, crime”. The mistake they make, however, is to assume that violence is unnecessary and wrong — therefore the state is an evil that should be dismantled. Quite the opposite! It is precisely because law and hierarchy is essential for the existence of civil, harmonious society that violence is necessary (and morally neutral).²

Economics

On Capitalism

Since the growth of capital is driven by the profit motive, it is bound to prioritise the continued accumulation of wealth over all else. It will continue to expand to the detriment of all which stands in its way — the rights of the individual, the good of the community, the health of natural ecosystems, cultures and nations — anything which cannot be commodified or exploited to further its advance.

On Compromise

Those who call themselves 'democratic socialists' fall for the trap of believing that bourgeois democracy can be used against the bourgeoisie. Only such a belief can justify the approach of reformists; their approach will fail, since it relies upon this delusion that the system of capitalism will obey democracy to permit its own destruction. The impossibility of such a thing explains then why democratic 'socialism' has not only failed, but has evolved to adopt a slightly more radical form of social democracy: it has fallen to compromise. It no longer seeks to abolish the system of exploitation, but rather to disguise it under the red banner of socialism.

Social

On Nation and Culture

The nation is by definition people united by a common identity, which is formed out of a shared culture, language, heritage, tradition, et al. Individuals within a nation are therefore also united by common interests, and it is natural that they seek to organise themselves on that basis. Ethnic culture acts as a medium of unconscious communication which informs one's reasoning and interpretation of phenomena. It forms a basis for symbolic understanding, providing a unique set of values and relations which is subtle but permeates all interaction. Commonality is essential for mutual trust. Two individuals which are brought up with different cultures will have different values. One cannot truly grasp how the other thinks, nor how he operates. They cannot understand each other on that fundamental frequency for which shared culture is required.

On Immigration

I will spare the poetry. Society is not static, and the influx of a large number of people having own culture will affect a nation. Since the end of the Second World War, immigration has become a growing issue, especially with the 2015 crisis in Europe. But even since long before then, it has been a problem. Not because of the strife and violence it has created, but the inherent problem of bringing together groups which have different ways of living, the discord and the degradation to native culture that it creates. We can cooperate with and help people in other countries without implanting them permanently in ours, we can have cultural exchange without altering our society to accommodate for those who don't even feel at home.

On Feminism

The issue with feminism (especially of the third- and fourth-wave movements) is not its desire for the equality of rights between the sexes, but rather its assertion of Patriarchy as being a structure that has evolved from fundamental differences between them. But the inequalities between men and women is product of principally sociological relations, not the result of some incompatibility between opposites. The only inherent contradiction is that created by property relations underlying the capitalist mode of production, between bourgeoisie and proletariat.

On LGBT issues

On Sexuality
I think that a certain degree of natural variance in human sexuality, which includes homosexuality and bisexuality, is normal. People should not be discriminated against for being attracted to the same sex, though independents reserve the right to refuse non-essential services (in which case the state should not interfere) to whomever they wish, as per freedom of association. One's sexuality is also a highly personal matter, and thus it should remain a private affair rather than a public one. Things like pride parades and campaigns/events which endorse the idea of an 'LGBT community' which is distinct from wider society should not be subsidised but rather discouraged, so as to maintain the idea of secular and civil unity.

On Transgenderism
Making any sure-footed judgement on what place transgender people should or shouldn't have in society would require knowing what transgenderism is and why it exists. Unfortunately, both of these things are difficult to answer (especially since I'm not transgender). Someone is considered to be transgender when their internal sense of 'gender identity' does not align with their birth sex — but then there's also 'gender dysphoria' and the notion that its presence determines if someone is actually transgender, which some think is basically transphobia .
I don't see any reason why transgender individuals shouldn't be allowed to live their lives according to the role that they consider relevant to them, as long as they follow the same civil norms as everyone else and do not demand 'inclusivity' beyond acceptance. Hormone treatment should be available through informed consent to those who wish to access it, as long as they are 16 or older.
I can't really say I care about the whole 'trans people in sports' issue. I'm not a physiologist, so I lack the specialisation needed to make any definite judgement on the matter. I suppose that FtMs shouldn't compete with women if they're on hormones (since that would classify as doping), and MtFs shouldn't compete with cis women until their hormone levels are on par. That much seems fair.

On 'Xenogenders'
Regardless of whether or not you believe gender exists 'beyond the binary', it is provably always expressed in terms of male and female. Some will often bring up examples of cultures with a system more than two genders (the mahu of Hawaii, the bissu of Indonesia, et al.) as a way to bolster the idea that such variance has always been present. What they do not realise, however, is that in every single example these 'non-binary genders' align with one of several descriptions: a 'neither', a 'both', a 'male girl' (eunuch), or a 'female boy'. That is to say, they all exist in relation to the sex binary of male and female, precisely because it is a biological constant.
Therefore, regardless of whether or not you believe it is acceptable for someone to be transgender and/or non-binary, it is demonstrably nonsense to try and describe one's sense of gender identity in terms of anything besides concepts relevant to gender. This is why 'Xenogenders' are only ever used by mentally deficient kids on the internet who overdose daily on whatever micro-identities they just got from the MOGAI ideology store.

On Femboys
I generally dislike femboys, not because they break gender norms but because the wide majority display a great degree of vanity. At the core, the 'femboy' identity and culture revolve around the wish of some young men to continually savour their youth, a futile hope which is obviously bound to come crashing down (see 'twink death') in their mid-twenties at the latest. Since they are all flaming homosexuals (spiritually, if not also literally) and bottoms (even when they are straight), they have a tendency for being overtly submissive pushovers — which becomes a problem when it extends beyond sexuality, where it becomes weakness (not obedience to authority).
Online femboy 'culture' revolves around reddit sexuality and fetish pornography. There is no way around it. Even if some are are modest and civil, it is difficult for femboys as a whole to cut down the perception that they are just perverted cross-dressers — largely because many, if not most, have no problem affirming this stereotype by being expressing their desire to be fetishized and sexualizing themselves on the internet.

Other

On Eugenics
Prohibiting incest is eugenics, yet because incest is bad, prohibiting it is just. Therefore eugenics isn't inherently wrong.
Despite what you might've been taught, eugenics isn't when you castrate poor people or whatever. Today, the issue is dysgenics: the worship of weakness, the vanguard for unhealth, 'fat acceptance', and so on. The result is an increasingly ill, increasingly stupid society that celebrates the loser in the name of 'equity', a tendency of regression spearheaded by neurotic leftists who only feel at home when they are surrounded by other losers.

Specific

  • Israel's attack on the USS Liberty was entirely intentional. The anecdotes given by surviving members of the crew contradict the IDF's claims. They did this most likely because they didn't want the Americans to find out that they were massacring Egyptian POWs.
  • Sacha Baron Cohen should be tried in an international court for having defamed the nation of Kazakhstan.
  • Rhodesia (under Smith) wasn't some white supremacist apartheid state. It did have tremendous racial inequality and it was under minority rule, but it'd be wrong to say that it was just like South Africa. It was certainly wasn't great, but Mugabe undoubtedly took it in a worse direction.
  • Tattoos are for sailors and yakuza. If you aren't either of those, then you probably shouldn't get a tattoo.
    • And face tattoos should be banned, period.
  • Transylvania is rightful Hungarian territory. The topography of the Carpathians proves it.

Quotes

“The cult of the Leader, the cult of personality, not a divine but a human personality, is an even worse social narcotic that we shall define as the cocaine of the proletariat.”

Amadeo Bordiga, The Guignol in History


“... the principal role of conservatism in modern politics is to be humiliated. That is what a perpetual loyal opposition, or court jester, is for.”

Nick Land, The Dark Enlightenment


“The supreme function of statesmanship is to provide against preventable evils. In seeking to do so, it encounters obstacles which are deeply rooted in human nature. One is that by the very order of things such evils are not demonstrable until they have occurred: at each stage in their onset there is room for doubt and for dispute whether they be real or imaginary. By the same token, they attract little attention in comparison with current troubles, which are both indisputable and pressing: whence the besetting temptation of all politics to concern itself with the immediate present at the expense of the future.”

Enoch Powell, 'Rivers of Blood' speech


“A society in which critical thinking is a crime against the state has lost its ability to create and is slated to survive only by spending the intellectual and technological capital created by previous generations.”

Lennart Meri


Relationships

Much like

  • Socialism - Mann der Arbeit, aufgewacht!
  • Titoism - Maybe it was not wise to try and integrate all of the Yugoslav nations together considering that the enmity between them and their desire for independence was strong enough to cause such atrocious conflict. But you did will to resist against Stalin.
  • Left-Wing Nationalism - Finally, a socialist who recognises the importance of the nation!
  • Internationalism - International solidarity between the peoples of the whole world!
  • Cultural Nationalism - More than anything else, it is culture which unites a nation!
  • Paetelism - Uh, based? please don't hate the French, even if Versailles was unfair...
  • Cybercommunism - Based... CYBERSYN was pretty cool.
  • Eco-Socialism - Preserving natural beauty is our collective responsibility.

Like

  • Marxism - Very correct analyses. You were a bit harsh on that Lassalle guy.
  • Market Socialism - Let's face it, centrally planned economies don't work.
  • Left Communism - I am not as keen on orthodoxy as you are and I know we disagree on the national question, but you are authentically Marxist at least, unlike Stalinists and the New Left.
  • Kemalism - You were great. I wish you would come back to fix Turkey.
  • Nationalism - A very mixed bag. Of course nations should exist, but it shouldn't mean bloodshed and hatred.
  • Ethnopluralism - Preserving the demographic composition of all nations is good, but you are sometimes a bit aggressive.

Mixed feelings

  • Authoritarianism - Authority is necessary for efficient direction, but people also want freedom and privacy.
  • Anti-Authoritarianism - Your concerns are understandable, but you shouldn't fear power.
  • Democracy - Letting the uneducated majority make the important decisions? Not a fan.
  • Democratic Socialism - Socialism will not come through the ballot box, Kautsky.
  • Liberal Socialism - Liberal. Rest in peace Mikhail Gorbachev, you did what you could
  • State Socialism - I concede that the state is necessary, but you look a bit too much like that other guy!
  • Leninism - I understand the need for revolutionary violence, but the Red Terror was absolutely barbaric!
  • Trotskyism - Glad you recognise how bad Stalin was. I'm not convinced that you would've done significantly better.
  • National Conservatism - Glad you favour the nation, but you have to realise that capital doesn't.
  • Paternalistic Conservatism - At least you're willing to care for your people.
  • Civic Nationalism - Nationality is more than just a certificate. You can't assimilate everything and everyone like the Borg.
  • Identitarianism - I don't like your chauvinist tendencies. Also, Europe is not a single nation, stop trying to make it one.
  • Ethnic Nationalism - Of course, ethnicity and culture overlap a lot... but you, too, need to learn to love a little.
  • Ethnic Welfare - Well, you might become necessary... but I'm uncomfortable with the idea of having to discriminate...
  • Indigenism - I support the rights of native peoples, but you are often a massive hypocrite.
  • Occult Post-Humanism - Valuable ideas in the current epoch, though your misanthropic tendencies makes me uncomfortable.
  • Landian Accelerationism - Another banger Mr Land.

Dislike

  • Capitalism - Exploitative and inhuman. *notices ur markets* owo what's this??
  • Conservatism - You are a pussy and you stand for absolutely nothing.
  • Libertarianism - You are right about the need for liberty, but you are too individualist. You must realise that those who 'just want to be left alone' can very easily be overwhelmed and destroyed by any organised multiplicity who is determined to take.
  • Hoppeanism - Well, you are right to be critical of democracy. Read Bordiga.
  • Anarchism - Naïve and idealist. Why do you support independence movements while condemning nationalism? Hypocrite.
  • Anarcho-Communism - Not much better.
  • Posadism - Hard to hate a lunatic, but nuclear armageddon? Really?
  • Dissident Right - Rightoid chauvinist. I guess you did force me to broaden my horizons...
  • Pan-Nationalism - Let people have their independence, pal.

Much dislike

Like

  •  Baxism - I am personally sceptical of revolutionary violence, but you seem alright.
  • Shellshocked Communism - I can sympathise with you, and though your formulations carry that poetic vagueness which is characteristic of post-structuralists, they still convey an idea — which I interpret as a dream of a biomechanical world, of horizontality and freedom from alienation. Though maybe I am wrong.
    • - You are very right.
    • (Re-evaluation) Serene, organic. Though our convictions are different, I'm fond of your ideas.
  •  Romantic Egoism - Don't know what else to say. Despite disliking individualism, I like your style and consistency.
  • Psychedelic Liberationism - You seem alright. Read Bordiga, Stalinist (/hj)
    • - Stalinist?!
  • Sundog - I haven't studied some of these concepts you talk about, but your ideas seem quite interesting and you seem like well-read individual. Influenced by Italian left-communism, therefore great and authentic.
  • Ziółkowskiizm - Maybe a bit too aggressively in your anti-Western sentiment, but based in pretty much every other respect. I don't think interventionism is very good for international and diplomatic stability, but that's something I'm willing to overlook.
  • Lankajori Thought - Not a fan of libertarianism, but i'll support Irish nationalism any day of the week. Up the 'RA!

Mixed feelings

  • Alstūdism - I'm really not a fan of fascism, but at least you're more of an ethnopluralist and universal nationalist rather than just a chauvinist — though I'd still object to your revanchism, on the count of it being unworkable (especially for Norway) and likely to backfire. Overall one of the more tolerable fascists I've come across, and at least you're a socialist like Mussolini.
  •  Neocarlism - Weird, but I guess I've seen worse.
  • Distributist Reactionaryism - Distributism is okay, but I wish you were economically socialist instead of just being a corporatist (fascist). And what is culture without the nation?
  • BetterCallSneedism - I don't like fascism and I don't like pan-nationalism... though I certainly would support a revival of Celtic culture.

Neutral

  • Venatrixism - Cool reading list, I recommend CCRU and N1x.
    • Venatrixism - I have read n1x, not a big fan.also better analysis of me plz 😔
      • - Well, I'm not sure how you'd consider yourself a communist while also being post-left and a stirnerite, but I guess you're okay.
        • Venatrixism - not really that hard to be a communist and a stirnerite and post-leftist? Don’t know what you’re pulling at here. Literally one of the first generally accepted ones to be a post-leftist, Tiqqun was communist.
          • - ok
  • Brazilian Liberalism - Liberal, but would probably heal the country a bit.
  • Rocksism - I'm critical of anarchism, but your ideas seem coherent and well-thought-out.
  • Schumacherianism (////) - Disagree with individualism and anarcho-capitalism, but your ideas are fairly well-developed and unique enough that I can respect it.
  • Patrick Thought - Not a fan of monarchism, but you're not too bad.

Dislike

  • Dankeism - Too liberal, too progressive. My advice is that you should read a few books by authors with a variety of different opinions, so as to explore many perspectives. Seek to understand them.
    • - I shouldn't read anything, because reading doesn't influence, I may read millions of books by [enter political author], but I will never change with that, in reality, no one influences anyone, everyone has their different opinions, even if they read all the books of Marx, Lenin or whoever nothing will change. I am on a journey of self-discovery discovering my political thoughts hidden in my mind, I influence myself, everyone does. And I repeat, if I read other authors, nothing will change
  • Imperial Socialism - Have you even actually read Lenin? Also, "pay rool [sic] taxes so that the government can pay for Social Security and insurance"? You sound more like a social democrat than a communist. Please read theory, a bit of Marx at least.
  • Nuriskianism - The Fourth Political Theory is cringe, I'm not adding that to my reading list. How exactly are you influenced by both multiculturalism AND ethnopluralism??? At least you don't seem to be an anti-Western chauvinist like Dugin. Overall, very strange.
  • Volker41ism - I'm really not a fan of fascism and nazism, sorry. Also, please stop denying Axis war crimes, for Christ's sake. It's very easy to just dismiss anything that you don't like as being part of a conspiracy theory, but this isn't a fairy tale where morality is black and white.

Much dislike

  • Theoanarchism - "I fear no man. But that thing... it scares me." - The Heavy
  • N.Brioism - Contrarianism is retarded. You're neither funny nor cool, grow up.
  • N.Cortexism - ...You're actually the same person, aren't you? Coal regardless.

Much like

  • Josip Broz Tito - The only one who could hold Yugoslavia together... wish you were still here.
  • Lee Kuan Yew - Single-handedly made Singapore into the developed country it is today!
  • Bernie Sanders - You are a reformist, a liberal and a progressive, but somehow I still appreciate your authenticity and dedication.
  • Mikhail Gorbachev - The one who refused to employ the cruel methods of his predecessors. If only it hadn't been for the hard-liners...

Like

Mixed feelings

  • Richard Nixon - People judge you too harshly... but not when it comes to Cambodia.
  • Vladimir Lenin - I try to sympathise, but when I think about the Cheka...
  • Leon Trotsky - And you, you executed so many people!
  • Muammar Gaddafi - You were great, but you lost your touch...
  • n1x - You write well, though with you it's hard to tell where sincerity ends and irony begins. You also have a good sense of humour, but I can't really say I support your misandry, even when it's part of an esoteric belief system.
  • Ted Kaczynski - Your analysis about the technological society is very relevant, though your methods are far from ideal.

Dislike

  • Angela Merkel - Ruined Germany! Easily the second-worst chancellor the country has ever had.
  • Tony Blair - Made Britain a worse place. Why did you support the invasion of Iraq?
  • Sadiq Khan - If you want to spread lies about British history, then why on Earth are you the mayor of London?
  • Emmanuel Macron - Immature neoliberal LARPer who never should've been elected.
  • Donald Trump - Incompetent moron.
  • Joe Biden - Brain-dead moron.
  • Justin Trudeau - Cool Hitler costume. Where'd you get it, the Hitler store?
  • Boris Yeltsin - Incompetent drunkard.
  • Vladimir Putin - Chauvinist warmonger!
  • Erdoğan - Warmongering chauvinist bastard. How dare you promote ethnic nepotism in Europe? If you want Turks to further their own interests, then they will have to do it in Turkey, and nowhere else!
  • Malcolm X - Your racialism was really distasteful, but at least you improved in the later years.

Much dislike

Much like

Like

Singapore

Neutral

United States

South Africa

  • Democratic Alliance - Well, you're probably better than the ANC — and certainly better than the EFF.

Mixed feelings

United States

  • Victorian Socialists - You're supposed to be Trotskyists, but liberal IdPol pervades your program. Read Bordiga.

Australia

France

Dislike

United States

United Kingdom

  • Sinn Féin - More immigration won't make Ireland more Irish, you f#$%ing idiots.

Australia

France

Germany

  • SPD - Auf, auf zum Kampf, zum Kampf!
  • AfD - Supports NATO and Israel. Still the lesser evil, but only if you can actually reduce immigration.

South Africa

Much dislike

United States

United Kingdom

Australia

France

  • Renaissance - Robespierre, please send the revolutionary insurrection to kill this guy.

Germany

  • Die Grünen - Anti-German regressive idiots who spread anti-Nuclear propaganda and lies.

South Africa

International

  • NATO - Nazi Aggressor Terrorist Organisation, more like!
  • WEF - I HATE THE DICTATORSHIP OF THE CLERKS I HATE THE DICTATORSHIP OF THE CLERKS I HATE

How to draw

Flag of Nebelerism
Color Name HEX RGB
Red #bd0000 189, 0, 0
Blue #003a84 0, 58, 132
White #ffffff 255, 255, 255
  1. Draw a ball.
  2. Fill it with red.
  3. Fill the bottom one-fifth portion with blue.
  4. Add a white circle of wheat grains, centred relative to the red section.
  5. Add a white hammer, placed vertically in the centre of the circle of wheat grains.

Theory

Have read

Reading

On my bookshelf

To read


Retrieved from "https://pcbwiki.net/index.php?title=Nebelerism&oldid=497452"