×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 2,409 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki
Atronism - Add?
  • Borker Just did, please add me back :3
  • Glencoe- add me

    • Borker Just added ya, if you could add me back that'd be cool :3

    O'Langism - Add me?

    • Borker Added, would you add me back :3?
      • O'Langism - For sure, but could I have 4 icons to represent your ideology?

    • Template:UserPirateTails - Add me to your mapping video, I want to be a new ruler of Gorol nation in the next part of Alternative Future of Poland!!!! Love your maps SwordC HD Mapping!!!!!
    • Dr. Occo - Add me, Börker.
      • Borker added, thanks for adding me :3

    File:Nay-Fur.png Nayism - Hi there, add me.

    Template:Violetlink borker add me:3!!!!!!!!!!!!
    

    Template:2x2Master - You should ADD ME, NOW!

    • Borker just added ya, thanks for adding me :333

    Template:Im not Dead nor Drunk Add me!

     Hitler Rouge - Can you add me? I’ve already added you.

    Neo-Glencoeism- Add me plz? I have added you back

    Borker Thought, but as I said on the Proto-Borkerism page, only people I knew at the time will be added.

    *Nguy - "The economic vision of Borker Thought centers around the idea of worker ownership and control of the means of production. This means that the workers, rather than a small group of owners, would control the resources and decision-making power in the workplace." vague shit that doesnt account for if this is a capitalist workplace(like co-ops) or a truly proletarian form of organisation.

    " Local, community-based economies that prioritize the needs of the people who live there. Upholding the values of nationalism and religion as important cultural aspects that strengthen communities."
    Of course, who could have expected from the anarchist. This guy seeks to reinforce national delusions among the proletariat and does exactly what capitalists wants him to do, that is prevent the true emancipation of the proletariat.
    "In this system, the government would be organized into decentralized, horizontally organized collectives that are empowered to make decisions on issues affecting their particular community. " And how do you seek to do this without some form of enforcement on the minority, which by all means would be considered means of authority?
    "In addition to the other elements, it also draws on the principles of Classical Nationalism. This aspect of the ideology emphasizes the importance of a shared cultural identity and collective heritage as the foundation for a strong and unified society. It seeks to seclude itself from other cultures, so it can keep a shared identity and common goals. By combining the principles of classical nationalism with those of collectivism and socialism, Borker Thought presents a vision for a society that is both unified and egalitarian." Some weird statist Maoism at best, Hitlerism at worst. By doing all this, you seek to divide the proletariat into segregated sectors of culture and such. This is in no way socialism but instead petit-bourgeois capitalism.
    "Borker Thought emphasizes the need for a balanced and holistic approach to technology, which takes into account its impact on society, the environment, and human well-being. It seeks to promote a lifestyle that is less dependent on material possessions and consumption, and more focused on community, creativity, and personal growth." The products of the community and creativity apparently are excluded from material consumption. One must ask, what is truly material then?
    "Borker Thought's economic system is based on the principles of Democratic Socialism and Anarcho-Collectivism." The perfect mixture of the two bourgeois movements, which historically have done nothing but impede the progress of the proletariat.
    "To ensure that goods and services are produced and distributed efficiently, Borker Thought's economic system uses artificial markets. These markets are designed to simulate the conditions of a market economy, but without the exploitation and inequality that comes with it. Artificial markets are controlled by the community, which sets prices based on the cost of production and the needs of the community. This allows for the efficient allocation of resources and ensures that everyone has access to the goods and services they need." So you recreated the market, which implies the recreation of value and the re-introduction of commodity production, thus invalidating all that rambling about labour vouchers. If more people want to buy than there are sellers, then it’s a sellers market and the buyers compete with one another to make the purchase. As someone inevitably falls from this competition, he onces again become a proletarian while the others can easily exploit the situation to accumulate capital and win in competitions, leading to class society all over again. You need to generate surplus value in order to stay competitive with rival firms. Otherwise, you're going out of business.
    "At the core of Borker Thought's cultural philosophy is a strong sense of national identity and pride, which emphasizes the unique traditions, history, and values of the community. The ideology recognizes the role of culture in shaping social norms and values, and seeks to promote a culture of equality, cooperation, and mutual respect. It supports the arts and humanities, and seeks to provide equal access to cultural institutions and resources for all members of society. (...) Culturally, Borker Thought is moderately progressive, supporting LGBTQ+ Rights, though not liking SJW types, seeing them not as a force for positive change, but an obstacle to progress. It view SJWs as overly focused on identity politics, and believe that this focus can lead to division and tribalism. Borker Thought also disagrees with the tactics used by some SJWs, such as "cancel culture" and online harassment, which it see as counterproductive and harmful to free speech." So identity politics can lead to division and tribalism(which is non-sense because it emancipates the proletariat), but nationalism and national identity can't? What mental gymnastics is this? Nationalism has brought upon us the worst barbarism between man and man, sending proletarians to die fighting against eachother. What has identity politics done to divide the proletariat?
    "Borker Thought's progressive views do not conflict with its view of the family as a foundational element of society. While Borker Thought seeks to challenge traditional notions of the family, it does not seek to abolish it altogether." Because obviously socialism, which abolishes all classes and is the very foundation of true individual self-development will preserve the family(which has already been dying under Capitalism, and is only going to be hampered by free society even further). The individual household is dying. It is giving way in our society to collective housekeeping, any prevention of this can only mean a reactionary measure to preserve the family as it was under class society.
    "The ideology supports a strong sense of nationalism and believes that families should instill a sense of pride in their nation and its cultural values. It also believes that the family should serve as a spiritual center, promoting a connection to the gods and a sense of religious faith. The ideology emphasizes the importance of maintaining traditional religious values and promoting the spiritual growth of individuals and families." ...so where did all your talk about progress under socialist society go?
    "How the Revolution would look" One cannot determine what a revolution would truly look like.
    "The revolution would begin with a period of mass mobilization, including strikes, protests, and other forms of direct action. The goal of this initial stage would be to disrupt the functioning of the capitalist economy and demonstrate the power of the working class. As the revolution progressed, workers and other groups would begin to seize control of factories, farms, and other means of production. This would involve the establishment of workers' councils and other forms of democratic decision-making to ensure that the new system was truly controlled by the people." So does the proletariat have political power or not? You cannot have this and also reject the dictatorship of the proletariat, or do you want a society dominated by cooperatives?
    " Council Communism The only Marxoid I'd consider a friend, and definitely the only tolerable sort of leftcom. (...) Classical Social Democracy The real Social Democrats, not the right deviationist traitors" Because Gorter, Pannekoek, Mattick and Debord totally liked anarchism.

    It should also be reminded that Kautsky was one of the most important figures against anarchism and such.
    • Template:UserDualPlay - what do you think about Norwegian Society Party?
      • Borker I like them, and their trolling is pretty funny, though I don't think Anarchism can be achieved through electoral means. I also drew the icon for them on the main wiki.
    • Template:Violetlink so hecking holsum.....,,,
    • Template:AshleyHere - The File:Kropotkin beard.png icon is uploaded separately as Kropotkin beard.png, you don't need to revert the regular one.
      • Borker yeah but like why keep changing it to the worse looking one?
        • Template:AshleyHere - The image has been standardized on the other two wikis, it makes things simpler. If you want the bearded one then
    • Template:Violetlink erm like coffee isnt a marxoid, coffee is a based and trad hyperborkian smh
      • Borker If it looks like a marxoid, soys out like a marxoid, and is on leftist hub like a marxoid, then it probably is a marxoid
        • Borker what the hell are they then, if not a marxist? Only marxoids dwell on liberal hub
    • Citizenism - lmao what’s with the anti-Semitism
      • Borker don't loik 'em, simple as