×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 2,529 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki
Polcompball Wiki
2,529Articles
  Recent changes
in:
Pages with broken file links, Pages using Tabber parser tag, Self-Insert,
and 2 more

Armandonian Liberalism: Difference between revisions

VisualWikitext
m (Reverted edits by JeansDeck (talk) to last revision by LocalLiberal)
Tag: Rollback
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Self Insert Notice|GeneraleArmando}}
{{Self Insert Notice|GeneraleArmando}}


Line 4: Line 6:
|bannercolor =  
|bannercolor =  
|headercolor = #000000
|headercolor = #000000
|textcolor = #000000
|textcolor = #ffffff
|buttoncolor =#002C84
|buttoncolor =#002C84
|buttontextcolor =#466F99
|buttontextcolor =#ffffff
|linkcolor =#001359
|linkcolor =#76D7C4
|background =#466F99
|background =#00103f
|hovercolor = #eee8aa
|hovercolor = #eee8aa
}}  
}}  


{{Ideology
{{Ideology
  | themecolor  =#025692
  | themecolor  =#002C84
  | textcolor    =#FFFFFF
  | textcolor    =#FFFFFF
  | title        = {{Armando}}
  | title        = {{Armando}}
Line 26: Line 28:
  | aliases      =
  | aliases      =


[[File:Cball-EU.png]] [[File:LBubble.png]] Socialism with European Characteristics [[File:RBubble.png]] <br>
[[File:Cball-EU.png]] [[File:LBubble.png]] Market Socialism with European Characteristics [[File:RBubble.png]] <br>


[[File:ML.png]] [[File:LBubble.png]] The third way between [[File:Marketsoc.png]] Market Socialism and [[File:Neolib.png]] Neoliberalism [[File:RBubble.png]] <br>
[[File:ML.png]] [[File:LBubble.png]] The third way between [[File:Marketsoc.png]] Market Socialism and [[File:Neolib.png]] Neoliberalism [[File:RBubble.png]] <br>


[[File:ArmandoBert.png]] [[File:LBubble.png]] Statist libtard [[File:RBubble.png]] <br>
[[File:ArmandoBert.png]] [[File:LBubble.png]] Statist libtard [[File:RBubble.png]] <br>
[[File:Eurolib.png]] Euroliberal Cooperativism [[File:CoopTrees.png]] <br>
[[File:Veryradlib.png]] Neoradicalism (By myself) <br>
[[File:Bernst.png]] Bernstein 2 <br>


'''Add whatever you want''' <br>
'''Add whatever you want''' <br>
Line 36: Line 44:
[[File:AkzetArmy.png]] [[File:LBubble.png]] Market Socialist Liberal [[File:RBubble.png]]
[[File:AkzetArmy.png]] [[File:LBubble.png]] Market Socialist Liberal [[File:RBubble.png]]


[[File:Hered.png]] [[File:LBubble.png]] [[File:MarketsocFem.png]] Market Socialist Enjoyer [[File:RBubble.png]] <br>
[[File:Hered.png]] [[File:LBubble.png]] [[File:L-lib.png]] Revisionist Left-Liberalist [[File:RBubble.png]] <br>


[[File:Gbnl.png]] [[File:LBubble.png]] [[File:LibSocKey.png]] Me 2 years ago if i was actually intelligent [[File:RBubble.png]] <br>
[[File:Gbnl.png]] [[File:LBubble.png]] [[File:LibSocKey.png]] Me 2 years ago if i was actually intelligent [[File:RBubble.png]] <br>
Line 54: Line 62:
[[File:Goober-icon.png]][[File:LBubble.png]][[File:Liberalsoc.png]]AELS (Actually existing liberal socialism)[[File:RBubble.png]]<br>
[[File:Goober-icon.png]][[File:LBubble.png]][[File:Liberalsoc.png]]AELS (Actually existing liberal socialism)[[File:RBubble.png]]<br>


  | alignments  ={{Info/CenterLefts}} (Generally) <br> {{Info/CentreLibLefts}} (Claimed) <br> {{Info/Left Unity}} (Arguably) <br> {{Info/CultCentreLefts}} <br>{{Info/Liberals}} <br> {{Info/MarketSocialists}}
[[File:Otz.png]] [[File:LBubble.png]] Europe's best step forward! [[File:RBubble.png]] <br>
 
  | alignments  ={{Info/CenterLefts}} (Generally) <br> {{Info/CentreLibLefts}} (Claimed) <br> [[File:Syncretism.png]] Syncretic <br> {{Info/CultCentreLefts}} <br>{{Info/Liberals}} <br> {{Info/MarketSocialists}}


  | influences  =  
  | influences  =  
<tabber>
<tabber>
Political =
Political =
[[File:Civilib.png]] '''[[Civil Liberalism]]''' <br>
[[File:Radlib.png]] '''{{PCB|Radicalism}}''' <br>
[[File:Radlib.png]] '''{{PCB|Radicalism}}''' <br>
[[File:Liberalsoc.png]] '''{{PCB|Liberal Socialism}}''' <br>
[[File:Liberalsoc.png]] '''{{PCB|Liberal Socialism}}''' <br>
[[File:European Federalism.png]] '''{{PCB|European Federalism}}''' <br>
[[File:NonMarxSoc.png]] '''{{PCB|Utopian Socialism}}''' <br>
[[File:Modprog.png]] '''[[Moderate Progressivism]]''' <br>
[[File:Modprog.png]] '''[[Moderate Progressivism]]''' <br>
[[File:World.png]] '''{{PCB|Globalism}}''' <br>
[[File:World.png]] '''{{PCB|Globalism}}''' <br>
Line 70: Line 81:
|-|  
|-|  
Cultural =  
Cultural =  
[[File:Civilib.png]] '''[[Civil Liberalism]]''' <br>
[[File:CultLib.png]] '''[[Cultural Liberalism]]''' <br>
[[File:CultLib.png]] '''[[Cultural Liberalism]]''' <br>
[[File:Modprog.png]] '''[[Moderate Progressivism]]''' <br>
[[File:Modprog.png]] '''[[Moderate Progressivism]]''' <br>
[[File:Pro-Choice1.png]] '''Pro-Choice''' <br>
[[File:Pro-Choice1.png]] '''Pro-Choice''' <br>
[[File:MuscLib.png]] '''{{PCB|Interculturalism|Muscular Liberalism}}''' <br>
[[File:Intercult.png]] '''{{PCB|Interculturalism}}''' <br>
[[File:Gay.png]] '''Pro-LGBT+''' <br>
[[File:Gay.png]] '''Pro-LGBT+''' <br>
[[File:Indivfem.png]] '''[[Individualist Feminism]] ''' <br>
[[File:Indivfem.png]] '''[[Individualist Feminism]] ''' <br>
Line 89: Line 99:
Economic =
Economic =
[[File:LibMarketsoc.png]] '''[[Liberal Market Socialism]]'''[[File:LiberalMarkSocStar.png]] <br>
[[File:LibMarketsoc.png]] '''[[Liberal Market Socialism]]'''[[File:LiberalMarkSocStar.png]] <br>
[[File:Newkeynes.png]] '''{{PCB|Keynesianism|Mainstream Economics}}''' <br>
[[File:Newkeynes.png]] '''{{PCB|Keynesianism|New Keynesian School}}''' <br>
[[File:New-Neoclassical.png]] '''{{PCB|Chicago School|New Classical School}}''' <br>
[[File:FreiburgSchool.png]] '''[[Freiburg School]]''' <br>
[[File:FreiburgSchool.png]] '''[[Freiburg School]]''' <br>
[[File:Georgist.png]] '''{{PCB|Georgism}}''' <br>
[[File:GeoAust.png]] '''{{PCB|Geolibertarianism|Geo-Austrian School}}''' (Limited) <br>
[[File:Regulationism.png]] '''{{PCB|Regulationism|Regulationism}}''' <br>
[[File:Welf3.png]] '''{{PCB|Welfarism}}''' <br>
[[File:Soclib.png]] '''{{PCB|Social Liberalism}}''' <br>  
[[File:Soclib.png]] '''{{PCB|Social Liberalism}}''' <br>  
[[File:Orlib.png]] '''{{PCB|Ordo-Liberalism}}''' <br>  
[[File:Orlib.png]] '''{{PCB|Ordo-Liberalism}}''' <br>  
[[File:Clibdistributist.png]] '''[[Classical Liberal Distributism]]''' <br>
[[File:CathSocial.png]] '''{{PCB|Catholic Theocracy|Catholic Social Teaching}}''' <br>
[[File:Socliber.png]] '''{{PCB|Social Libertarianism}}''' <br>  
[[File:Socliber.png]] '''{{PCB|Social Libertarianism}}''' <br>  
[[File:3way.png]] '''{{PCB|Third Way}}''' <br>  
[[File:3way.png]] '''{{PCB|Third Way}}''' <br>  
[[File:Socdem.png]] '''{{PCB|Social Democracy}}''' (Limited) <br>  
[[File:Socdem.png]] '''{{PCB|Social Democracy}}''' (Limited) <br>
[[File:Regulationism.png]] '''{{PCB|Regulationism|Regulationism}}''' <br>
[[File:Clibdistributist.png]] '''[[Classical Liberal Distributism]]''' <br>
[[File:Welf3.png]] '''{{PCB|Welfarism}}''' <br>
[[File:SocialEconomy.png]] '''[[Social Economy]]''' <br>
[[File:SocialEconomy.png]] '''[[Social Economy]]''' <br>
[[File:Eco-Cooperativism-small.PNG]] '''[[Eco-Cooperativism|Eco-cooperativism]]''' <br>
[[File:Eco-Cooperativism-small.PNG]] '''[[Eco-Cooperativism|Eco-cooperativism]]''' <br>
Line 107: Line 119:
[[File:Internation.png]] '''{{PCB|Internationalism}}''' <br>
[[File:Internation.png]] '''{{PCB|Internationalism}}''' <br>
[[File:Ecoglob.png]] '''[[Environmental Globalization]]''' <br>
[[File:Ecoglob.png]] '''[[Environmental Globalization]]''' <br>
[[File:European Federalism.png]] '''{{PCB|European Federalism|European Federalism}}''' <br>
[[File:European Federalism.png]] '''{{PCB|European Federalism|European Confederalism}}''' <br>
|-|  
|-|  
Sympathetic =
Sympathetic =
Line 114: Line 126:
[[File:Libms.png]] '''{{PCB|Libertarian Market Socialism}}''' <br>
[[File:Libms.png]] '''{{PCB|Libertarian Market Socialism}}''' <br>
[[File:Dsa.png]] '''{{PCB|Democratic Socialism}}''' (Non-Statist ones)<br>
[[File:Dsa.png]] '''{{PCB|Democratic Socialism}}''' (Non-Statist ones)<br>
[[File:Auton.png]] '''{{PCB|Autonomism}}''' <br>
[[File:Helv.png]] '''{{PCB|Helvetic Model}}''' <br>
[[File:Nordmodel.png]] '''{{PCB|Nordic Model}}''' <br>
[[File:Globnat.png]] '''{{PCB|Alter-Globalism}}''' <br>
[[File:Globnat.png]] '''{{PCB|Alter-Globalism}}''' <br>
[[File:SyndieSam.png]] '''{{PCB|Syndicalism}}''' <br>
[[File:SyndieSam.png]] '''{{PCB|Syndicalism}}''' <br>
[[File:Libconserv3.png]] '''{{PCB|Liberal Conservatism}}''' <br>
|-|  
|-|  
Anti-Ideologies =
Anti-Ideologies =
[[File:Antisjw.png]] '''Anti-SJW''' <br>
[[File:Antisjw.png]] '''Anti-SJW''' <br>
[[File:Thar.png]] '''{{PCB|Anti-Authoritarianism|Anti-Authoritarianism}}''' <br>
[[File:Thar.png]] '''{{PCB|Anti-Authoritarianism}}''' <br>
[[File:Antilais.png]] '''Anti-Laissez Faire''' <br>
[[File:Antilais.png]] '''Anti-Laissez Faire''' <br>
[[File:AntiConLib.png]] '''Anti-Conservative Liberalism''' <br>
[[File:AntiConLib.png]] '''Anti-Conservative Liberalism''' <br>
Line 126: Line 140:
[[File:Anti-Racism.png]] '''[[Anti-Racism]]''' <br>
[[File:Anti-Racism.png]] '''[[Anti-Racism]]''' <br>
[[File:Anti-Corrupt.png]] '''Anti-Corruption''' <br>
[[File:Anti-Corrupt.png]] '''Anti-Corruption''' <br>
[[File:AntiCorp.png]] '''Anti-Corporatocracy''' <br>
[[File:Trustbust.png]] '''Anti-Corporatocracy''' <br>
[[File:AntiPlanning.png]] '''Anti-Economic Planning''' <br>
[[File:AntiPlanning.png]] '''Anti-Economic Planning''' <br>
[[File:Antizion.png]] '''[[Anti-Zionism]]''' <br>
[[File:Antizion.png]] '''[[Anti-Zionism]]''' <br>
Line 136: Line 150:
|-|  
|-|  
Self Insert =
Self Insert =
{{Template:NameEvolutionarySocialism}} <br>
'''{{Template:NameEvolutionarySocialism}}''' <br>
[[File:CalafaxBall.png]] '''[[Geoliberal Social Democracy]]''' <br>
[[File:VEnlight.png]] '''[[Ultra-Enlightenment]]''' <br>
[[File:DarkNeoOptim.png]] '''{{PCM|Neo-Optimateism}}''' <br>
[[File:Goober-icon.png]] '''[[Gooberism]]'''
 
</tabber>
</tabber>
  | influenced  =
  | influenced  =
Line 150: Line 167:
   
   
{{Collapse|
{{Collapse|
*[[File:Cooperative_Socialism.png]] {{PCB|Market Socialism|Cooperativism}}
*[[File:CoopTrees.png]] {{PCB|Market Socialism|Cooperativism}}
*[[File:AuthSocialEconomy.png]] [[Social Economy|Forced Social Economy]]
*[[File:AuthSocialEconomy.png]] [[Social Economy|Forced Social Economy]]
*[[File:Steinval.png]] {{PCB|Steiner-Vallentyne School}}
*[[File:Steinval.png]] {{PCB|Steiner-Vallentyne School}}
Line 156: Line 173:
*[[File:Clib.png]] {{PCB|Classical Liberalism}}
*[[File:Clib.png]] {{PCB|Classical Liberalism}}
*[[File:Chilib.png]] [[Chicago School]]
*[[File:Chilib.png]] [[Chicago School]]
*[[File:Austrobert.png]] {{PCB|Austrian School}} (Limited)
*[[File:Austrobert.png]] {{PCB|Austrian School}}  
}}
 
[[File:ArmandoKing.png]] {{Outline|'''[[Armandonian Monarcho-Liberalism|{{Color|#9425A0|Armandonian Monarcho-Liberalism}}]]'''|#000000}}
{{Collapse|
*[[File:Conmon.png]] {{PCB|Constitutional Monarchism}}
*[[File:CBall-Veneto.png]] {{PCB|Elective Monarchism|Venetian Model}}
*[[File:Parl.png]] {{PCB|Parliamentarism}}
*[[File:Neotech.png]] {{PCB|Technoliberalism}}
*[[File:Anti-Elite.png]] Anti-Aristocracy
*[[File:CoopTrees.png]] {{PCB|Market Socialism|Cooperativism}}
*[[File:AuthSocialEconomy.png]] [[Social Economy|Forced Social Economy]]
}}
}}


[[File:Armando3P.png]] {{Outline|'''[[Armandonian Libertarianism|{{Color|#025692|Armandonian Corporatism}}]]'''|#000000}}
[[File:Armando3P.png]] {{Outline|'''[[Armandonian National Syndicalism|{{Color|#025692|Armandonian National Syndicalism}}]]'''|#000000}}
   
   
{{Collapse|
{{Collapse|
*[[File:Corptism.png]] {{PCB|Corporatism}}
*[[File:PostYellsoc.png]] {{PCB|Yellow Socialism|Post-Yellow Socialism}}
*[[File:PostYellsoc.png]] {{PCB|Yellow Socialism|Post-Yellow Socialism}}
*[[File:SocialEconomy.png]] [[Social Economy]]
*[[File:Natsynd.png]] {{PCB|National Syndicalism}}
*[[File:Statecap.png]] {{PCB|State Capitalism}}
*[[File:Pron.png]] {{PCB|Peronism}}
*[[File:Welf.png]] {{PCB|Welfarism}}
*[[File:Cultural_Nationalism.png]] {{PCB|Cultural Nationalism}}
*[[File:Keynes.png]] {{PCB|Keynesian School}}
*[[File:Tucn-EcoAuth.png]] {{PCB|Eco-Authoritarianism}}
}}
}}


Line 203: Line 232:


  | regional    =
  | regional    =
  | likes        = [[File:SocialEconomy.png]] [[Social Economy]] <br> [[File:Radlib.png]] {{PCB|Radicalism}} <br> [[File:Lingnat.png]] Using language as the main cultural identity <br> [[File:European Federalism.png]] The EU <br> [[File:ArcitectReact.png]] Traditional Buildings <br> Kindness :D
  | likes        = [[File:SocialEconomy.png]] [[Social Economy]] <br> [[File:CoopTrees.png]] [[Social Economy|Cooperatives]] <br> [[File:Radlib.png]] {{PCB|Radicalism}} <br> [[File:Lingnat.png]] Using language as the main cultural identity <br> [[File:European Federalism.png]] The EU <br> [[File:ArcitectReact.png]] Traditional Buildings <br> Kindness :D
  | dislikes    = [[File:ML.png]] Red Fascists <br> [[File:Conservative.png]] Conservatism <br> [[File:Totdereg.png]] Laissez-Faire economics [[File:Lfree.png]]
  | dislikes    = [[File:ML.png]] Red Fascists <br> [[File:Conservative.png]] Conservatism <br> [[File:Totdereg.png]] Laissez-Faire economics [[File:Lfree.png]] <br> [[File:Agorismf.png]] Tax Evaders <br>
  | song        =  
  | song        =  
}}
{{Quote
|quote= "Men are no more dependent beings that need protection from a hierarchical and paternalistic system; they are independent beings capable of guiding themselves and can approach others as equals."
|speaker= [[File:OrdoLibMarkSoc.png]] [[User:GeneraleArmando|Armando]]
}}
}}


Line 216: Line 251:


= Politics =
= Politics =
* <span style="font-size:117%">[[File:Statist.png]] '''Form of Government'''</span>
I believe in a [[File:Semidirect.png]] Semi-Direct [[File:Liberal_Democracy.png]]  {{PCB|Liberalism|Liberal Democratic}} [[File:Fed.png]] {{PCB|Federalism|Federative}} [[File:Republicanismpix.png]] {{PCB|Republicanism|Republic}} with a strong [[File:Consti.png]] {{PCB|Constitutionalism|Constitution}} (In order to protect [[File:Liberty.png]] {{PCB|Civil Libertarianism|Civil Liberties}} from [[File:OchloAngry.png]] {{PCB|Ochlocracy|Dictatorship of the Majority}}) and a strong emphasis on [[File:Neotech.png]] {{PCB|Technoliberalism|Experts}} making sensible policies based on the will of the elected politicians and, thus, of the people.  
I believe in a [[File:Semidirect.png]] Semi-Direct [[File:Liberal_Democracy.png]]  {{PCB|Liberalism|Liberal Democratic}} [[File:Fed.png]] {{PCB|Federalism|Federative}} [[File:Republicanismpix.png]] {{PCB|Republicanism|Republic}} with a strong [[File:Consti.png]] {{PCB|Constitutionalism|Constitution}} (In order to protect [[File:Liberty.png]] {{PCB|Civil Libertarianism|Civil Liberties}} from [[File:OchloAngry.png]] {{PCB|Ochlocracy|Dictatorship of the Majority}}) and a strong emphasis on [[File:Neotech.png]] {{PCB|Technoliberalism|Experts}} making sensible policies based on the will of the elected politicians and, thus, of the people.  


I support replacing all [[File:Gero.png]] {{PCB|Gerontocracy|Senates}} with a '[[File:Scientocracy_Small.png]] [[File:Technocracy.png]] {{PCB|Technocracy|House of Experts}} [[File:Nooc.png]] [[File:Merit.png]]', where actual experts, nominated by the [[File:Republicanismpix.png]] {{PCB|Republicanism|President}} or the [[File:Cermon.png]] {{PCB|Monarchism|Monarch}} [[File:Conmon.png]], also vote on laws.
I support replacing all [[File:Gero.png]] {{PCB|Gerontocracy|Senates}} with a '[[File:Scientocracy_Small.png]] [[File:Technocracy.png]] {{PCB|Technocracy|House of Experts}} [[File:Nooc.png]] [[File:Merit.png]]', where actual experts, nominated by the [[File:Republicanismpix.png]] {{PCB|Republicanism|President}} or the [[File:Cermon.png]] {{PCB|Monarchism|Monarch}} [[File:Conmon.png]], also vote on laws.


In principle, I have nothing against [[File:Cermon.png]] {{PCB|Ceremonial Monarchism|Ceremonial Monarchies}}, and I would even support a [[File:Conmon.png]] {{PCB|Constitutional Monarchism|Constitutional Monarchy}} where the monarch has [[w:Reserve Power|Reserve Powers]] comparable to those of a [[File:Parl.png]] {{PCB|Parliamentarianism|Parliamentarian Republic}}.
In principle, I have nothing against [[File:Cermon.png]] {{PCB|Ceremonial Monarchism|Ceremonial Monarchies}}, and I would even support a [[File:Conmon.png]] {{PCB|Constitutional Monarchism|Constitutional Monarchy}} where the monarch has either [[w:Reserve Power|Reserve Powers]] comparable to those of a [[File:Parl.png]] {{PCB|Parliamentarianism|Parliamentarian Republic}}, or executive power and the duty to nominate '''''capable''''' ministers.
 
* <span style="font-size:117%">[[File:Thar.png]] '''State Powers and its Limits [[File:Sec.png]]'''</span>


The [[File:Statist.png]] [[Statism|State]] is both a necessity and a benefit for society, even though I do have my reservations against excessive [[File:Regulationism.png]] {{PCB|Regulationism|Economic Regulations}}, excessive [[File:Statecap.png]] {{PCB|State Capitalism|State Intervention}} and most forms of state-mandated [[File:Authprog.png]] [[File:Authoritarian_Conservatism.png]] Culture.
The [[File:Statist.png]] [[Statism|State]] is both a necessity and a benefit for society, even though I do have my reservations against excessive [[File:Regulationism.png]] {{PCB|Regulationism|Economic Regulations}}, excessive [[File:Statecap.png]] {{PCB|State Capitalism|State Intervention}} and most forms of state-mandated [[File:Authprog.png]] [[File:Authoritarian_Conservatism.png]] Culture.
Line 226: Line 266:
I am extremely [[File:Thar.png]] {{PCB|Anti-Authoritarianism|Anti-Authoritarian}} and I critique [[File:Strato.png]] {{PCB|Stratocracy|Military Conscription and Compulsive Military Service}}, [[File:PolState.png]] {{PCB|Police Statism|Government Surveillance}}, [[File:Imp.png]] {{PCB|Imperialism}}, [[File:Statecap.png]] {{PCB|State Capitalism}} and [[File:Necon.png]] {{PCB|Neoconservatism|Excessive Interventionism}} as [[File:Sec.png]] {{PCB|Authoritarianism|Authoritarian Actions and Government Overreach}}.
I am extremely [[File:Thar.png]] {{PCB|Anti-Authoritarianism|Anti-Authoritarian}} and I critique [[File:Strato.png]] {{PCB|Stratocracy|Military Conscription and Compulsive Military Service}}, [[File:PolState.png]] {{PCB|Police Statism|Government Surveillance}}, [[File:Imp.png]] {{PCB|Imperialism}}, [[File:Statecap.png]] {{PCB|State Capitalism}} and [[File:Necon.png]] {{PCB|Neoconservatism|Excessive Interventionism}} as [[File:Sec.png]] {{PCB|Authoritarianism|Authoritarian Actions and Government Overreach}}.


I overall personally support [[File:FusionRef.png]] {{PCB|Reformism|Fusion Reformism}} in the form of both [[File:SocialEconomy.png]] [[Social Economy|Social Economy Activism]] ([[File:Cooperative Socialism.png]] Co-operative Ownership, [[File:Chesterton.png]] Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOP), [[File:LibSyndieSam.png]] Board-Level Employee Representation (BLER)) and of [[File:FreiburgSchool.png]] [[Freiburg School|Ordoliberal-adiacent economics]].
* [[File:Reform.png|frameless]] <span style="font-size:117%">'''Political Methodology'''</span>


I overall personally support [[File:FusionRef.png]] {{PCB|Reformism|Fusion Reformism}} in the form of both [[File:SocialEconomy.png]] [[Social Economy|Social Economy Activism]] ([[File:CoopTrees.png]] Co-operative Ownership, [[File:Chesterton.png]] Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOP), [[File:LibSyndieSam.png]] Board-Level Employee Representation (BLER)) and of [[File:FreiburgSchool.png]] [[Freiburg School|Ordoliberal-adiacent economics]]. In the event of an [[File:Sec.png]] {{PCB|Authoritarianism|Authoritarian Government}} I do however support both [[File:Pac.png]] Peaceful and [[File:Revlib.png|frameless]] Violent means to attain [[File:Liberty.png]] Liberty once again.
* <span style="font-size:117%">[[File:World.png]] '''Foreign Policy''' [[File:Necon.png]]
</span>
Diplomatically, I am a strong [[File:European Federalism.png]] {{PCB|European Federalism|Pro-Europeanist}} that would like closer European integration, but not to the level of a [[File:Fed.png]] {{PCB|Federalism|Federation}}. I also support close [[File:World.png]] {{PCB|Globalism|International Cooperation}} as a mean of peace rather than [[File:Necon.png]] {{PCB|Neoconservatism|Military Interventionism}}. However, I still recognize how military intervention can potentially be better in some situations (E.g. against ISIS or in genocidal countries).
Diplomatically, I am a strong [[File:European Federalism.png]] {{PCB|European Federalism|Pro-Europeanist}} that would like closer European integration, but not to the level of a [[File:Fed.png]] {{PCB|Federalism|Federation}}. I also support close [[File:World.png]] {{PCB|Globalism|International Cooperation}} as a mean of peace rather than [[File:Necon.png]] {{PCB|Neoconservatism|Military Interventionism}}. However, I still recognize how military intervention can potentially be better in some situations (E.g. against ISIS or in genocidal countries).


I am an [[File:Antizion.png]] [[Anti-Zionism|Anti-Zionist]], however, I propose either a two-state solution with [[File:Zio.png]] Israel mostly going back to 1947 borders (With obvious adjustments for modern times) and abandoning illegal settlements in Cisgiordania or a one-state solution where religion is completely banned from state legislation (Other than respecting freedom of religion and religious festivals).
* [[File:Zio.png]]<span style="font-size:117%"> '''Palestine - Israel Question''' [[File:Cball-Palestine.png]]
 
I define myself as an [[File:Antizion.png]] [[Anti-Zionism|Anti-Zionist]], since I, in principle, refuse any legitimacy of the state of [[File:Zio.png]] Israel; however, I also believe that the current situation has gone too far to delete Israel from the map without creating unnecessary suffering, so I propose either a two-state solution with [[File:Zio.png]] Israel mostly going back to 1947 borders (With obvious adjustments for modern times based on the 1967 borders) and abandoning illegal settlements in [[File:Cball-Palestine.png]] Cisgiordania, or a [[File:LibZion.png]] one-state solution where religion is completely banned from state legislation (Other than respecting freedom of religion and religious festivals) and total equality between all ethnic groups is upheld.


= Culture and Society =
= Culture and Society =
I define myself as a [[File:Radlib.png]] {{PCB|Radicalism|Radical Liberal}}, as I have a strong commitment to [[File:Civlibert.png]] {{PCB|Civil Libertarianism|Civil Liberties}}, [[File:Laicism.png]] [[Laicism|Freedom From Religion]], [[File:CapAnti_Clerical.png]] [[Anti-Clericalism]], [[File:Equality.png]] {{PHB|Egalitarianism|Liberal Egalitarianism}}, [[File:CultLib.png]] [[Cultural Liberalism]], primacy of the [[File:Indiv.png]] {{PHB|Individualism|Individual}}, [[File:Indivfem.png]] [[Individualist Feminism]] and supporting government programmes that make it possible for everyone to put their rights and liberty into practice (Support programmes for the homeless, for abandoned LGBT teens, economic safety nets, ...). I also support a moderate form of [[File:Modprog.png]] [[Moderate Progressivism|Progressivism]] in society, without forcing it on people 9 times out of 10 (As it has generally the opposite effect). <br> As part of my [[File:CapAnti_Clerical.png]] [[Anti-Clericalism|Anti-Clerical]] and [[File:Laicism.png]] [[Laicism|Laicistic]] policies, I believe that religious authorities should not partecipate in political life and that the state should have an [[File:Atheist.png]] {{PHB|Atheism|Atheistic}} approach to life, without devolving into [[File:StateathFedora.png]] {{PCB|State Atheism|a priori Repression}} of religion.
I define myself as a [[File:Radlib.png]] {{PCB|Radicalism|Radical Liberal}}, as I have a strong commitment to [[File:Civlibert.png]] {{PCB|Civil Libertarianism|Civil Liberties}}, [[File:Laicism.png]] [[Laicism|Freedom Of and From Religion]], [[File:CapAnti_Clerical.png]] [[Anti-Clericalism]], [[File:Equality.png]] {{PHB|Egalitarianism|Liberal Egalitarianism}}, [[File:CultLib.png]] [[Cultural Liberalism]], primacy of the [[File:Indiv.png]] {{PHB|Individualism|Individual}}, [[File:Indivfem.png]] [[Individualist Feminism]] and supporting [[File:Welf.png]] {{PCB|Welfarism|Government Programs}}  that make it possible for everyone to put their rights and liberty into practice (Support programmes for the homeless, for abandoned LGBT teens, economic safety nets, ...). I also support a [[File:PragmatProg.png]] [[Pragmatic Progressivism|Pragmatic]] and [[File:Modprog.png]] [[Moderate Progressivism|Moderate]] form of [[File:PROG.png]] {{PCB|Progressivism}} in society, without forcing it on people 9 times out of 10 (As it has generally the opposite effect).
 
* <span style="font-size:117%">[[File:Secular.png|frameless]] '''Religion and the State'''</span>
 
As part of my [[File:CapAnti_Clerical.png]] [[Anti-Clericalism|Anti-Clerical]] and [[File:Laicism.png]] [[Laicism|Laicistic]] policies, I believe that religious authorities should not partecipate in political life and that the state should have an [[File:Atheist.png]] {{PHB|Atheism|Atheistic}} or [[File:Deist.png]] {{PHB|Deism|Deistic}} approach to life, without devolving into [[File:StateathFedora.png]] {{PCB|State Atheism|a priori Repression}} of religion.
 
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''Nation'''</span>
 
I deem [[File:Civnat.png]] {{PCB|Civic Nationalism|Citizenship}} and [[File:Lingnat.png]] [[Linguistic Nationalism|Language]] as the two main factors of nationality, with [[File:Cultural_Nationalism.png]] {{PCB|Cultural Nationalism|Culture}} playing only a smaller part overall. [[File:Modnat.png]] Patriotism is a necessity in my opinion, as it just means "Love for one's own country and cultural characteristics" and not [[File:Ultranat.png]] {{PCB|Ultranationalism|"Belief in one's own supremacy on the basis of country and nation"}}. 
 
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''Immigration'''</span>
 
I am supportive of immigration; however, I also understand that [[File:Intercult.png]] {{PCB|Interculturalism}} is necessary to preserve the [[File:Civlibert.png]] {{PCB|Civil Libertarianism|Civil Liberties}} from [[File:Conservative.png]] {{PCB|Conservatism|Conservative}} Immigrants that want to change their host country to a less [[File:Liberty.png]] Free one. I am thus critical, at times, of [[File:Multicult.png]] {{PCB|Multiculturalism}}, especially in regards of [[File:RelNat.png]] {{PCB|Religious Nationalism|Religions}}. I support the 'Ius Culturae' rather than the 'Ius Soli' and I am against the 'Ius Sanguinis' past the parents.
 
I think we should crackdown on [[File:Illeg.png|frameless]] Illegal immigration and accept less refugees overall (still helping them and treating them humanely), but at the same time, we should simplify the process for legal immigration, as today it is excessively slow and cumbersome. 
 
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''Crimes and Punishments'''</span>
□ '''''Restorative or Retributive Justice?'''''{{Quote|quote="Tough on crime, tough on causes of crime"|speaker=[[File:TonyBlair2.png]] Sir Tony Blair}}I believe that justice should be fundamentally retributive (but not cruel and not excessive) and restoration should be seen as an important part of justice, but not it's first and foremost objective.
 
At the same time, we should still work towards resolving the causes of crime (Poverty, corruption, discrimination, lack of education, bad parenting, ...) through government programmes.


I deem [[File:Civnat.png]] {{PCB|Civic Nationalism|Citizenship}} and [[File:Lingnat.png]] [[Linguistic Nationalism|Language]] as the two main factors of nationality, with [[File:Cultural_Nationalism.png]] {{PCB|Cultural Nationalism|Culture}} playing only a smaller part overall. [[File:Modnat.png]] Patriotism is a necessity in my opinion, as it just means "Love for one's own country and cultural characteristics" and not [[File:Ultranat.png]] {{PCB|Ultranationalism|"Belief in one's own supremacy on the basis of country and nation"}}. <br>
□ '''''Expulsion of Criminal Immigrants'''''


I am supportive of immigration; however, I also understand that [[File:Intercult.png]] {{PCB|Interculturalism}} is necessary to preserve the [[File:Civlibert.png]] {{PCB|Civil Libertarianism|Civil Liberties}} from [[File:Conservative.png]] {{PCB|Conservatism|Conservative}} Immigrants that want to change their host country to a less [[File:Liberty.png]] Free one. I am thus critical, at times, of [[File:Multicult.png]] {{PCB|Multiculturalism}}, especially in regards of [[File:RelNat.png]] {{PCB|Religious Nationalism|Religions}}. I support the 'Ius Culturae' rather than the 'Ius Soli' and I am against the 'Ius Sanguinis' past the parents. <br>
□ '''''Self-Defence'''''


I regard myself as [[File:Anti-Identi2.png]] Anti-Identity politics and would like to see a society where people are not judged or classified on the basis of [[File:Racenat.png]] {{PCB|Racial Nationalism|Race}}, [[File:Ethnonat.png]] {{PCB|Ethnonationalism|Ethnicity}}, [[File:Sexocracy.png]] [[Sexocracy|Sex]], [[File:Lingnat.png]] [[Linguistic Nationalism|Language]] (<s>Mostly</s>), [[File:Gay.png]] Sexual Orientation [[File:Straight.png]] or [[File:Enby.png]] Gender, but rather on their [[File:Nooc.png]] Knowledge, [[File:Merit.png]] Merits, [[File:Cultural_Nationalism.png]] {{PCB|Cultural Nationalism|Culture}} (As in, how they behave in regards to their culture) and content of their character. <br>
□ '''''Death Penalty'''''


I am [[File:Modcon.png]] [[Moderate Conservatism|Moderately Conservative]] on a few issues: I strongly oppose Anti-Gender Neutral Language (In romance languages, my native langs); I am moderately Anti-Xenogenders, as I see both as [[File:Authprog.png]] {{PCB|Revolutionary Progressivism|Forceful}} [[File:SJW.png]] changes of the ways of speaking; I personally oppose open relationships and [[File:Naturism.png]] [[Naturism]]; I legally oppose open marriages and pro-open-marriage legislation.
I disdain death penalty in all cases but these ones:
However, I will never support [[File:AntiEnby.png]] [[Non-Binarism|Anti-Non-Binary]], anti-open relationship and [[File:Prud.png]] [[Prudism|Anti-Naturist]] (Mostly) Legislation, as I support their right of [[File:Indiv.png]] [[Individualism|Self-Determination]].  <br>


I fucking hate the [[File:Culturewar.png]] and both [[File:Altr.png]] {{PCB|Alt-Right|Alt-}} {{PCB|Alt-Lite|Lite}} [[File:Altl.png]] and [[File:SJW.png]] [[SJW|SJWs]] as whiny kids who need to understand the concept of [[File:Indiv.png]] [[Individualism|Individual Liberty]]. <br>
□ Serial Rape


I am generally an [[File:ArcitectReact.png]] [[Architectural Reactionarism|Architectural Reactionary]] with a preference on styles from the Renaissance to the 1800s, but I don't inherently oppose newer styles of buildings (Fuck 1950s-1990s architecture though, ugly af).
□ Mass Murder
 
□ (Maybe I'll add other in the future)
* [[File:Anti-Identi2.png]] <span style="font-size:117%">'''Colorblind Society'''</span>
 
I regard myself as [[File:Anti-Identi2.png]] Anti-Identity politics and would like to see a society where people are not judged or classified on the basis of [[File:Racenat.png]] {{PCB|Racial Nationalism|Race}}, [[File:Ethnonat.png]] {{PCB|Ethnonationalism|Ethnicity}}, [[File:Sexocracy.png]] [[Sexocracy|Sex]], [[File:Lingnat.png]] [[Linguistic Nationalism|Language]] (<s>Mostly</s>), [[File:Gay.png]] Sexual Orientation [[File:Straight.png]] or [[File:Enby.png]] Gender, but rather on their [[File:Nooc.png]] Knowledge, [[File:Merit.png]] Merits, [[File:Cultural_Nationalism.png]] {{PCB|Cultural Nationalism|Culture}} (As in, how they behave in regards to their culture) and content of their character. 
 
* [[File:Postgenderism.png|frameless]] <span style="font-size:117%">'''Post-Gender Society'''</span>
 
I believe that we should strive to attain a [[File:Postgenderism.png|frameless]] {{PCB|Postgenderism|Post-Gender}} society, where [[File:Sexocracy.png]] [[Sexocracy|Sex]] has no meaningful impact on the perception of a person and on how they should behave.
 
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''My little [[File:Conservative.png]] Conservative side'''
 
I am [[File:Modcon.png]] [[Moderate Conservatism|Moderately Conservative]] on a few issues:
 
□ '''''Open Marriages'''''
 
Open marriages are both false and a fraud, as marriage should be deep connection and trust between two individuals (Regardless of [[File:Sexocracy.png]] [[Sexocracy|Sex]], , [[File:Gay.png]] Sexual Orientation [[File:Straight.png]], [[File:Enby.png]] Gender, etc.). In addition, open marriages are damaging to eventual children, who wouldn't have fixed parental figures.
 
Open marriages shouldn't be recognised as valid marriages and should be treated as ''marriage frauds'' and ''sham marriages'' and should be accordingly punished.
 
<br>□ '''''Culture War'''''
 
I fucking hate the [[File:Culturewar.png]] Culture War and both [[File:Altr.png]] {{PCB|Alt-Right|Alt-}}{{PCB|Alt-Lite|Lite}} [[File:Altl.png]] and [[File:SJW.png]] [[SJW|SJWs]] as whiny kids who need to understand the concept of [[File:Indiv.png]] {{PHB|Individualism|Individual Liberty}}<br>□ <span style="font-size:107%">'''''Architectural Reactionarism'''''</span>
 
I am generally an [[File:ArcitectReact.png]] [[Architectural Reactionarism|Architectural Reactionary]] with a preference on styles from the Renaissance to the 1800s, but I don't inherently oppose newer styles of buildings (Fuck 1950s-1990s architecture though, ugly as fuck.
 
* <span style="font-size:117%">[[File:Lingnat.png]] '''Linguistic Nationalism'''</span>


=== [[File:Lingnat.png]] Linguistic Nationalism ===
My most nationalistic policy would be requiring all immigrants that request a citizenship to either:
My most nationalistic policy would be requiring all immigrants that request a citizenship to either:
*A - Change/translate their surnames in the state's official language
 
*B - Give them two surnames: the first one being a surname in the state's official language and the second one being their native surname
□ A - Change/translate their surnames in the state's official language
 
□ B - Give them two surnames: the first one being a surname in the state's official language and the second one being their native surname


Why [[File:Lingnat.png]] [[Linguistic Nationalism]]? [[File:Lingnat.png]] [[Linguistic Nationalism|Language]] is the only way to completely understand a given [[File:Cultural_Nationalism.png]] {{PCB|Cultural Nationalism|Culture}}; Language is the only indissoluble connection one has to one's own nation, unlike any other one, which are either [[File:Cultural_Nationalism.png]] abandonable [[File:RelNat.png]] or [[File:Racenat.png]] artificial [[File:Ethnonat.png]]; (WIP)
Why [[File:Lingnat.png]] [[Linguistic Nationalism]]? [[File:Lingnat.png]] [[Linguistic Nationalism|Language]] is the only way to completely understand a given [[File:Cultural_Nationalism.png]] {{PCB|Cultural Nationalism|Culture}}; Language is the only indissoluble connection one has to one's own nation, unlike any other one, which are either [[File:Cultural_Nationalism.png]] abandonable [[File:RelNat.png]] or [[File:Racenat.png]] artificial [[File:Ethnonat.png]]; (WIP)
Line 257: Line 349:
= Philosophy =
= Philosophy =


== Philosophical Influences ==
== ⬢ Philosophical Influences ==
'''{{Quote|quote="Enlightenment is man's emergence from his self-imposed immaturity.Immaturity is the inability to use one’s understanding without guidance from another. This immaturity is self-imposed when its cause lies not in lack of understanding, but in lack of resolve and courage to use it without guidance from another. Sapere Aude! “Have courage to use your own understanding!”--that is the motto of enlightenment."|speaker=[[File:Kant.png]] Immanuel Kant, extract from "''Answering the Question: What is Enlightenment?''"}}
{{Quote|quote="Enlightenment is man's emergence from his self-imposed immaturity. Immaturity is the inability to use one’s understanding without guidance from another. This immaturity is self-imposed when its cause lies not in lack of understanding, but in lack of resolve and courage to use it without guidance from another. Sapere Aude! “Have courage to use your own understanding!”--that is the motto of enlightenment."|speaker=[[File:Kant.png]] Immanuel Kant, extract from "''Answering the Question: What is Enlightenment?''"}}


My greatest ideological influences come from the [[File:Enlightenment.png]] {{PCB|Enlightenment Thought|Enlightenment Era}} and similar movements both preceding and succeeding it, making me a fusion of [[File:Empiricism.png]] [https://philosophyball.miraheze.org/wiki/Empiricism Empiricism] and [[File:Rational.png]] [https://philosophyball.miraheze.org/wiki/Rationalism Rationalism]. I may also define myself as a [[File:Kant.png]] {{PHB|Kantianism|Kantian}} and [[File:PostKant.png]] {{PHB|Post-Kantianism|Post-Kantian}} gnosiologically and epistemologically.
My greatest ideological influences come from the [[File:Enlightenment.png]] {{PCB|Enlightenment Thought|Enlightenment Era}} and similar movements both preceding and succeeding it. I may define myself as a [[File:Kant.png]] {{PHB|Kantianism|Kantian}} and [[File:PostKant.png]] {{PHB|Post-Kantianism|Post-Kantian}} gnosiologically and epistemologically.


I was also influenced by [[File:Romantic.png]] [https://philosophyball.miraheze.org/wiki/Romanticism Romanticism] (More particularly by the Pre-Romantics and the italian author 'Giacomo Leopardi') as I think that emotions are almost as important as rationality (it would be a 50.5% Rationality to a 49.5% Emotions) and [[File:German Idealism.png|frameless]] Fichte's 'Critical Idealism'.
I was also influenced by [[File:Romantic.png]] {{PHB|Romanticism}} (More particularly by the Pre-Romantics and the italian author 'Giacomo Leopardi') as I think that emotions are almost as important as rationality (it would be a 50.5% Rationality to a 49.5% Emotions).


My ethics partly come from [[File:Kant.png]] {{PHB|Kantianism|Kant's 'Critique of Practical Reason'}} [[File:Deontology.png]] and partly are not too dissimilar from [[File:Mill.png]] [[Millism|J.S. Mill's]] thoughts ([[File:Utility.png]] {{PHB|Utilitarianism}}
My ethics partly come from [[File:Kant.png]] {{PHB|Kantianism|Immanuel Kant's ideas}} [[File:Deontology.png]] and partly are not too dissimilar from [[File:Mill.png]] [[Millism|J.S. Mill's]] thoughts ([[File:Utility.png]] {{PHB|Utilitarianism}}
and the [[File:Civlibert.png]] {{PCB|Civic Libertarianism|Harm Principle}}).
and the [[File:Civlibert.png]] {{PCB|Civic Libertarianism|Harm Principle}}).


Line 273: Line 365:
[[File:Human.png]] [[Humanitarianism]] is the biggest part of my ideas and it is the whole engine of my political thought.
[[File:Human.png]] [[Humanitarianism]] is the biggest part of my ideas and it is the whole engine of my political thought.
   
   
[[File:Marx.png]] {{PCB|Marxism}}, [[File:CathSocial.png]] {{PCB|Catholic Theocracy|Catholic Social Teaching}} and the [[File:Mises.png]] {{PCB|Austrian School}} have had some influence on my way of thinking, but I would never identify directly with any of those movements.
[[File:Marx.png]] {{PCB|Marxism}}, [[File:CathSocial.png]] {{PCB|Catholic Theocracy|Catholic Social Teaching}}, [[File:Humanismpix.png]] {{PCB|Humanism}} and the [[File:Mises.png]] {{PCB|Austrian School}} have had some influence on my way of thinking, but I would never identify directly with any of those movements.


[[File:Pragmat.png]] [https://philosophyball.miraheze.org/wiki/Pragmatism Pragmatism] is also a big part of my thought process.
[[File:Pragmat.png]] [https://philosophyball.miraheze.org/wiki/Pragmatism Pragmatism] is also a big part of my thought process.


==== How do I define myself philosophically? ====
Personally, I find myself as mainly part of these movements:


* [[File:Empiricism.png]] [https://philosophyball.miraheze.org/wiki/Empiricism Empiricism]
 
* [[File:Idealist.png]] {{PHB|Idealism|Idealism}} (Fichtean)
□ <span style="font-size:107%">'''''How do I define myself philosophically?'''''</span>
 
Personally, I find myself as mainly influenced by and (somewhat) part of these movements and schools of thought:
 
* [[File:Empiricism.png]] {{PHB|Empiricism}}
* [[File:Indiv.png]] {{PHB|Individualism}}
* [[File:Mill.png]] {{PHB|Millism}}
* [[File:Enlightenment.png]] {{PCB|Enlightenment Thought|Enlightenment Era}}
* [[File:Kant.png]] {{PHB|Kantianism|Kantianism}}  
* [[File:Kant.png]] {{PHB|Kantianism|Kantianism}}  
* [[File:PostKant.png]] {{PHB|Post-Kantianism|Post-Kantianism}}
* [[File:PostKant.png]] {{PHB|Post-Kantianism|Post-Kantianism}}
* [[File:Enlightenment.png]] {{PCB|Enlightenment Thought|Enlightenment Era}}
* [[File:Existentialism.png]] {{PHB|Existentialism}} (Still learning though)
* [[File:Human.png]] [[Humanitarianism]]
* [[File:OptimNihil.png]] {{PHB|Optimistic Nihilism}}  
* [[File:Anti-Essentialist.png]] {{PHB|Anti-Essentialism}}
* [[File:Anti-Positivism.png|frameless]] {{PHB|Anti-Positivism}}
 
== ⬢ The Human (WIP) ==
 
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''The Fundamental Meaninglessness of Life'''</span>


== Philosophical Thought (WIP) ==
=== The Fundamental Meaninglessness of Life ===
To understand my point of view, we need to start from a single axiom:
To understand my point of view, we need to start from a single axiom:
'''Life is fundamentally [[File:Nihil.png]]''' '''meaningless and we can only make [[File:Relativism.png]] subjective meanings out of it.'''  
'''Life is fundamentally '''[[File:OptimNihil.png]] '''meaningless and we can only make [[File:Relativism.png]] subjective meanings out of it.'''
 
There is basically no interacting God, no teleological end, no divine providence, which makes [[File:Atheist.png]] {{PHB|Atheism}}, [[File:Deist.png]] {{PHB|Deism}} and [[File:Pantheism2.png]] {{PHB|Pantheism}} the only doctrines I accept
 
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''Human Action'''</span>


=== Human Action ===
Another axiom, very similar to the [[File:Mises.png]] Praxeologist one: There is no human nature but self-interest, which means that even altruism is fundamentally self-interested
Another axiom, very similar to the [[File:Mises.png]] Praxeologist one: There is no human nature but self-interest, which means that even altruism is fundamentally self-interested


=== Humans as the Measure of Everything ===
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''Humans as the Measure of Everything'''</span>
We've already said that life is [[File:Nihil.png]] {{PHB|Nihilism|Meaningless}}, but that doesn't mean that there are no truths in the universe.
TLDR; Transcendental Idealism + Personal ideas shaping how we see the world. Res Cogitans/Extensa. Physical world (Meaningless objects, meaningless everything) and Metaphysical world (Human relations, human understanding).
 
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''Rationality, Irrationality, Emotions'''</span>
 
TLDR; Neutrality of reason. Impossible neutrality in decision. Equal importance of emotion and reason. Esprit de Geometrie/de Finesse.
 
== ⬢ The State and Society (Heavy WIP) ==
 
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''Justification of the State and Taxation'''</span>* <span style="font-size:117%">'''On Liberty'''</span>
 
WIP
 
□ <span style="font-size:107%">'''''Liberty and Equality (WIP)'''''</span>
 
 
□ <span style="font-size:107%">'''''Liberty and Security (WIP)'''''</span>
{{Quote|
quote="The aim of all socialist measures, even of those which appear outwardly as coercive measures, is the development and the securing of a free personality. Their more exact examination always shows that the coercion included will raise the sum total of liberty in society, and will give more freedom over a more extended area than it takes away."<ref>[https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/bernstein/works/1899/evsoc/ch03-2.htm#c Evolutionary Socialism], Chapter 3</ref>
|speaker=[[File:Bernstein.png]] [[Liberal Socialism|Eduard Bernstein]]
}}
 
 
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''Tolerance'''</span>
 
Taking from the previous sections, we can describe tolerance.
We can already say that tolerance is fundamentally '''the defense of relativism''': it literally means to accept one's opinion regardless of your support of it; we can also sum up tolerance as Evelyn Beatrice Hall's quote 'I Disapprove of What You Say, But I Will Defend to the Death Your Right to Say It'.


We need to start by saying that no human constructs, such as order and chaos, exist outside the human (Just as in [[File:German Idealism.png|frameless]] German Idealism); however, the human world is inherently inside the human, so human concepts are inherently existing even if not necessarily universal. Thus, rationality is not inherently existing, but it exists in the human world.
As even [[File:Voltaire.png]] {{PCB|Enlightenment Thought|Voltaire}} said in his 'Treaty on Tolerance', however, tolerance needs to have some limits, and those limits are founded primarily on the intolerance of a particular group.


This also puts a hard divide between hard sciences and soft sciences: hard sciences are completely rational and can be perfectly described by mathematical relations (how hard they are to describe is unimportant) because they are governed by physical laws; soft sciences can't be completely described by rationality because they have a metaphysical plane (human relations) that is not completely governed by physical laws but rather by human emotions.
We can simply take the already universally hated Nazis as an example: their ideology is explicitly against many basic human rights and freedoms, they actively incorporate racialist and anti-egalitarian policies and support a militaristic and extremely authoritarian state. Should we accept their opinions, since their explicit objective is taking away our right to express ours? Absolutely no. We can, again, rationally get to a vague definition of tolerance: it is based around a social contract where we all decide to tolerate each other, so anyone who decides to break the contract in serious ways has no right to cry for tolerance. What is a 'Serious breach' of the contract of tolerance is, obviously, based on emotions, but we can still consider the rational and skeletal definition as a foundation.


==== Physics and Metaphysics ====
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''Egalitarianism'''</span>
Let's keep this simple:
* Physics: The physical world; how matter itself behaves. Inherently [[File:Rational.png]] Rational and  [[File:Materialism.png|frameless]] {{PHB|Materialism|Materialistic}}. The physical world is objective and has no meaning or attribute but the one of 'being', of existence.
* Metaphysics: The conscious world; how consciousness decides to behave and how it responds to stimuli (Be it human, animal, vegetal, etc.). Both [[File:Rational.png]] Rational and [[File:Irrationalism.png]] Irrational, but inherently  [[File:Idealist.png|frameless]] {{PHB|Idealism|Idealistic}}. The conscious world is subjective and it has meanings and attributes based on the experience of the consciousness.


Basically the [[File:Descartes.png]] Cartesian 'Res Cogitans' (Metaphysics) and 'Res Extensa' (Physics) or, even better, the Pascalian 'Esprit de Geometrie' (Physics) and 'Esprit de Finesse' (Metaphysics).
Humans are obviously unequal from birth, be it because of height, sex, colour of the skin, et cetera. However, it would be inhuman to consider people as inherently less than others because of unchangeable and casual characteristics.  


The physical and the metaphysical world are inherently connected because:
We can say that we should judge people 'not because of the color of their skin, but because of the content of their character', as the human has the capacity of bettering itself to the point where 'natural advantages' get outclassed by sheer 'force of will'.
*The physical world projects itself into our consciousness through our categories
*The metaphysical world is also a personal interpretation of the physical world
*The metaphysical world also acts in and through the physical world and its phenomenons


==== Ontology ====
People should thus be judged primarily through their capacities and only secondarily and minimally through their unchangeable characteristics.
Yes, the human is the measure of everything. Every object is thus the entity itself (Universal and Rational), its uses (Rational, not necessarily Universal) and how we consider it emotionally (Irrational and Subjective).


However, I view ontology as a useless branch of philosophy, as it is obvious that we have different emotions regarding different entities; thus, we can simply say that an object is simply an object, and we just define it subjectively through our emotions.
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''Metapolitics (WIP)''' </span>


In addition, I am extremely critical on the concept of 'Substance', as I believe that any object is just a synthesis of all of its parts and attributes and not inherently an object (Similarly to the ideas of Berkeley and Hegel): this is because, as I've previously said, everything but matter is inside the human mind, and thus even the concept of 'object' is but a human construct without any physical manifestation. There is therefore no substance of 'table', no substance of 'human', etc.
Ideological purity only hurts a movement in the long run. This is because pure ideology is increasingly distant to rationality and increasingly irrational and unachievable.


The only things that may resemble some sort of 'substance' are the elementary particles or the strings of the string theory, but I will not delve into this argument, as I have no profound knowledge on it.
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''The State and State Action (WIP)'''</span>


=== Rationality, Irrationality, Emotions ===
Legitimacy of state action is part of the realm of irrational thought, so there is no universal consensus of what kinds of state action can be considered legitimate or not.
We already spoke about the existence of rationality. But what is [[File:Rational.png]] Rationality?


[[File:Rational.png]] Rationality is everything that can be described as objective, so basically all of mathematics and derived disciplines, observable [[File:Empiricism.png]] Cause-Effect clauses, observable and/or measurable events, observable and/or measurable objects and truth (As in, an event described in an unbiased way).
I will defend the liberal views on the matter though.


This means that [[File:Rational.png]] Rationality is a [[File:MoralUni.png|frameless]] Universal, [[File:Radcent.png|frameless]] Neutral, [[File:Pragmat.png]] Pragmatic, [[File:Apolit.png|frameless]] Non-Ideological, Apolitical and naturally [[File:Ego.png|frameless]] Egoistic party made of cold intellect and is inherently [[File:Materialism.png|frameless]] {{PHB|Materialism|Materialistic}}.
□ The state's legitimate when it acts in order to preserve freedom and wellbeing;


Wait... what is intellect? Intellect can be described exactly as in [[File:Kant.png]] Kantian philosophy: [[File:Empiricism.png]] Categories through which we "understand" and analyse the world we perceive through our senses and through which we solve our problems.
□ Being judged by one's character and not one's body is a just principle that should be legally protected


Rationality is, however, neither the natural state of man, nor the preferable way to live, because:
□ Non-economic laws should strive to preserve freedom of thought and the possibility of relativism
*Rationality is simply the intellect and objective truth, and is thus non-ideological. This can mean that a rational outcome isn't necessarily the better one in our minds. For example, rationally,  Slavery is a preferable outcome for me, as I make the least work for the maximum earnings; however, ideologically, there are people [[File:Abolitionism.png|frameless]] who refuse slavery on the basis of [[File:Human.png|frameless]] Human Dignity, which is not rational nor existing in nature.


*Living purely by intellect is impossible, as we all are ideological in some way or another: even preferring to live 100% by intellect is having an ideological belief in [[File:Rational.png]] Rationality.
□ The harm principle is a good basis for laws


*The human mind is inherently [[File:Irrationalism.png|frameless]] Irrational and [[File:Idealist.png|frameless]] {{PHB|Idealism|Idealistic}}, as our thought process and objectives are influenced by culture, geography, genetics, events, etc., which makes it basically completely different from one person to another.
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''Against Ethnicity and Race as Concepts''' (WIP)</span>


In short, rationality is merely a universal and [[File:Materialism.png|frameless]] {{PHB|Materialism|Materialistic}} tool through which we strive for our personal, ideological and political goals, which are inherently irrational, emotive and [[File:Idealist.png|frameless]] {{PHB|Idealism|Idealistic}} as they are subjective.  
The concept of ethnicity easily loses any sense, as an italian in germany who doesn't know to be italian is completely equal to an "ethnic" german.


We should however recognise that we should try to remain grounded in rationality when making ideological decisions, as the further we get from rationality, the more irrational and unrealistic we get: this is because the physical world projects itself on the consciousness through our categories, so the metaphysical world of the consciousness is inherently connected to it.
== ⬢ Philosophy of Property ==
Thanks [[File:Autcap.png|frameless]] {{PCB|Autarchy|Robert LaFevre}}, [[File:Rousseau.png|frameless]] {{PCB|Enlightenment Thought|Jean-Jacques Rousseau}} and [[File:Nozick.png|frameless]] {{PCB|Minarchy|Robert Nozick}} for the inspiration.
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''The Origin of Private Property'''</span>


==== Emotions ====
As [[File:Autcap.png|frameless]] Robert LaFevre puts it, [[File:Property.png]] {{PCB|Propertarianism|Private Property}} is a natural right, in the sense that every man has the will to own something, which sets him apart of all the others. Private property arises not from the state, but from the human will to own property, which creates a 'social contract', where everyone has an interest in not stealing in order not to be stolen from, even if the owner is not present.
To expand on the [[File:Irrationalism.png|frameless]] Irrationality of the human mind, I believe that the famous polymath Blaise Pascal had the right idea: we have both a ''Esprit de Geometrie'' (Rationality) and a ''Esprit de Finesse'' (Emotions), and the second one can largely be [[File:Irrationalism.png|frameless]] Irrational, as we are inherently always in the search for distractions, for ''Divertissement'', in order to be happy, as [[File:Rational.png]] Rationality is not always sufficient and many times even counterproductive for our happiness. To understand the 'Res Extensa' or the 'Esprit de Geometrie', we need maths, physics, etc.; to understand the 'Res Cogitans' or the 'Esprit de Finesse', we need emotions, irrationality, relativism and what we commonly call ''heart.''<blockquote>"And Jesus answered him, saying, It is written, That man shall not live by bread alone, [...]"</blockquote>


=== Relativism and Universal Moralism ===
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''Private Property and its Defence'''</span>
After having described how rationality is [[File:MoralUni.png|frameless]] Universal, but human goals are not, we get into the problem of [[File:Relativism.png]] [[Relativism]].


First of all, we need to put the basis to relativism and justify it.
I reject the notion that private property is a purely artificial concept created ''exclusively'' by violence, either private or from the state. The best defense of private property is primarily the Social Contract previously described: since I own something and I want my ownership to be respected, I will respect the others' claims of ownership of other objects.  
We can say that:


* There are no inherent human moral imperatives, because we all have different ways to understand events and we all have different goals.
As this notion expands itself to all of society, we see that there is no violence in the continuation of ownership; if it hadn't been like this, there would be an eternal [[File:Hobbes.png|frameless]] State of Nature, where no one can trust no one else and where everyone fights for property.


* Good and bad is inherently subjective for the same reason as above.  
The cases of ownership not being respected are rarer and, in those cases, defence of private property is left to the private individual: how many times is the state useless in the case of theft from one's home? Or when a car is stolen or broken into? In these cases, the state merely restraints the thief and doesn't necessarily defend property directly, else we would live in a police state, with patrols constantly in every street.


* Rationality and objectivity exist, but again, only we can deem it good or bad for us.
We must, however, reflect on why we need to defend our property: are thieves mostly malicious, or are they created by their dire situation?


It follows that:
Poverty and inequality are certainly the mother and the father of theft, as widespread ownership of property and wealth wouldn't generate the same amount of thieves. We can say that in an anarchic society, excessively concentration of wealth and of inequality would naturally be redistributed to an equilibrium at a breaking point. However, a state prevents this, which...
* Nothing is black or white and everything is a shade of grey.


* Relativism and ideology are fundamentally opposites and it is impossible to accept both equally: complete relativism is without ideology, complete ideology is without relativism.<br>Thus follows that to make decisions, one has to abandon relativism partly.
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''The State as Defender of Injustice |'''</span> <span style="font-size:117%">'''The Ethics and Limits of Private Property'''</span>
However, pure relativism is rationally dangerous, as it has no universal moral values, which means that killing, being killed, robbing, to be robbed, etc., which are against one's self interest, are permissible. <br>
...Makes the state a protector of injustice. Such wealth concentration can happen only when a higher force protects any kind of ownership from the threat of (justified) theft from masses of poors. A state is such a type of higher force and, while it does protect distributed private property (rightly so), it also protects unjust forms of private property, such as:
We can thus rationally get to a small set of rights and laws, which we can call [[File:Clib.png|frameless]] '''Negative Rights''':
*Right to personal property
*Right to life
*Right to liberty
**Freedom of speech
**Freedom of movement
**Freedom of assembly
**(WIP)


We can say that these rights directly protect relativism from personal beliefs that curtail relativism.
□ Unimproved land


Any expansion or curtailment of these rights can be called '''Positive Rights''', and are all irrational in the sense of being subjective. Obviously, them being good or bad is completely left to the individual.
□ Natural conformations (Lakes, Mountains, Rivers, etc.)


=== On Liberty ===
□ Unextracted natural resources (Ores, Forests, etc.)
I reject whig historiography and the concept of natural progress towards a more equitable and just society, as there have been countless examples in history where a status quo that can be considered as 'good' went back (or forward) to a 'worse' state.


We can thus say that progress towards an achievement (in this case, greater liberty) is NOT a given and that liberty is but frail china that needs to be protected.
□ Property that doesn't respect the right-of-passage to unowned property


==== Liberty and Equality ====
□ Property that is not in enough quantity for the unobstructed survival of others
* Inequality is impossible to eradicate; we should still strive for a more equitable society


* Markets are fundamental for personal freedom
And other similar kinds of property.


==== Liberty and Security ====
This kind of property is unjust because it violates the [[File:JohnLocke.png|frameless]] Lockean Proviso (Which basically enunciates that [[File:Property.png]] {{PCB|Propertarianism|Private Property}} is only legitimate, though, only when it arises from work or from transaction; one cannot legitimately own something that is naturally present, unless it required some work to extract, I.E. land and natural resources are not legitimate possessions) and it doesn't respect human dignity and the right of a human to survive.
 
However, a case can be made to retain ownership of most of these kinds of unjust property.
 
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''The Necessity of Private Property'''</span>
 
The necessity of private property lies in the possibility of economic activity: if there was no ownership of unimproved land, construction of buildings can be impaired; if there was no ownership of natural resources, no one could extract them efficiently enough; if there was no ownership of extracted resources, their transformation into products would be much slower and less efficient, as anyone could take those.
 
These uses balance out the injustice of private property.
 
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''The Necessity of Wealth Redistribution'''</span>
 
While private ownership of most kinds of unjust property can be seen as necessary, it is equally necessary to maintain private property as distributed as possible (or even to make many kinds of property public), as self-ownership is much more preferable to absentee-ownership, since extreme economic inequality numbs [[File:Dem.png]] {{PCB|Democracy}} and damages [[File:Human.png]] [[Humanitarianism|Human Life]] and the [[File:Markets.png]] Economy.
 
When this is not possible, such property should be taxed and revenue should be distributed to all members of society in need through a dividend (A Negative Income Tax is my preferred method) and to all of society in general by using those taxes to fund government programs.
 
[[File:Georgist.png|frameless|24x24px]] {{PCB|Georgism}} gets the method right: most unjust private property comes from land ownership and, consequently, resource ownership, so we should apply a [[File:LVT.png]] Land Value Tax on all land and on natural resources, as neither of these have been produced by anyone and both are available only in a limited amount.
 
Expropriation should thus be a last resort, only when there are serious societal consequences that derive from the private ownership of a good or of some real estate.
 
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''Why Real Estate is not Necessarily Exploitative (And Why Private Enterprise Always Is)'''</span>
 
I justify Real Estate through a [[File:Marx.png]] {{PCB|Marxism|Marxian}} lens:
 
If we define exploitation as the retention of a part of a [[File:SyndieSam.png|frameless]] Worker's produced value, which is called Surplus Value by  [[File:Marx.png]] {{PCB|Marxism|Marxian Economics}}, then [[File:Timocracy.png|frameless]] Rent is non-exploitative as long as the total amount 'paid' does not exceed the Market Value for the rented good, as it would just correspond to gradually buying the good and/or even paying less than it would cost; once this limit is surpassed, though, any further kind of [[File:Timocracy.png|frameless]] Rent can be considered as exploitative, even more so ''if there isn't any alternative to this situations.''
 
However, this can be resolved by letting [[File:Markets.png]] Market Forces with some [[File:Regulationism.png]] {{PCB|Georgism|Regulations}} [[File:Georgist.png|frameless]] do their course or, if it isn't possible, or if leaving the market to itself would lead to excessively slow results ('In the long run, we're all dead' situation), by [[File:Statecap.png|frameless]] Intervening in the economy through the production of needed goods; basically, we should thus strive to help people and firms to own what they use and leave renting to a completely personal decision by mainly using and adapting market forces (and not by regulating and banning ownership of multiple buildings), reaching then a society where [[File:Property.png]] {{PCB|Propertarianism|Private Property}} is largely [[File:Chesterton.png]] {{PCB|Distributism|Distributed}}.


=== Tolerance ===
Taking from the previous sections, we can describe tolerance.
We can already say that tolerance is fundamentally '''the defense of relativism''': it literally means to accept one's opinion regardless of your support of it; we can also sum up tolerance as Evelyn Beatrice Hall's quote 'I Disapprove of What You Say, But I Will Defend to the Death Your Right to Say It'.


As even [[File:Voltaire.png]] {{PCB|Enlightenment Thought|Voltaire}} said in his 'Treaty on Tolerance', however, tolerance needs to have some limits, and those limits are founded primarily on the intolerance of a particular group.
In a firms' case, Surplus Value would be the cost of the machines, tools and resources used by the [[File:SyndieSam.png|frameless]] Worker and bought by the [[File:Cap.png|frameless]] Employer. This cost is, however, much lower than the one of a house, and retaining surplus value is almost always a form of exploitation by bosses; after having repaid the constant capital, which would take a smaller amount of time compared to buying a building, all workers should eventually become owners of their firm, a situation which is basically the same as in modern Worker [[File:CoopTrees.png]] Cooperatives.  


We can simply take the already universally hated Nazis as an example: their ideology is explicitly against many basic human rights and freedoms, they actively incorporate racialist and anti-egalitarian policies and support a militaristic and extremely authoritarian state. Should we accept their opinions, since their explicit objective is taking away our right to express ours? Absolutely no. We can, again, rationally get to a vague definition of tolerance: it is based around a social contract where we all decide to tolerate each other, so anyone who decides to break the contract in serious ways has no right to cry for tolerance. What is a 'Serious breach' of the contract of tolerance is, obviously, based on emotions, but we can still consider the rational and skeletal definition as a foundation.
What about shares? Shares are another form of exploitation, since there is only a monetary contribution and no labour contribution to the firm: shareholders get repaid much more than the amount of money or labour that they contribute to the firm. Only Bonds and Loans are a non-exploitative form of exclusively monetary contribution to a firm, since there is only limited profit for Bondholders and Loan-Givers.


=== Egalitarianism ===
Exploitation by [[File:NeoSlavery.png|frameless]] Wage Labour, thus, can only be resolved by working in Worker, Producer, Consumer Coops or in Non-Profits
Humans are obviously unequal from birth, be it because of height, sex, colour of the skin, et cetera. However, it would be inhuman to consider people as inherently less than others because of unchangeable and casual characteristics.


We can say that we should judge people 'not because of the color of their skin, but because of the content of their character', as the human has the capacity of bettering itself to the point where 'natural advantages' get outclassed by sheer 'force of will'.
□ '''''Why Ban Private Firms that do not Produce Profit for the Owner?'''''


People should thus be judged primarily through their capacities and only secondarily and minimally through their unchangeable characteristics.
An owner that claims no profit, other than the one that he gets should he be a constant contributor to the firm, be it in management, work or anything else, is basically the same as any other worker, and he should get no privilege over the others for the simple fact that he founded the firm at some point. The only 'privilege' he should get is recognition for his efforts in establishing the firm and a just monetary compensation for that, always corresponding to the principle of 'To each according for his own contribution' and nothing more.


=== Metapolitics ===
In addition to this, once the constant capital has been repaid to the owner of a firm, the worker owns the constant capital as much as the previous owner does. Paying the total value of something without having ownership over it can be, without a doubt, a form of exploitation.
* Ideological purity only hurts a movement in the long run. This is because pure ideology is increasingly distant to rationality and increasingly irrational and unachievable.


=== The State and State Action (WIP)===
□ '''''Then why don't we ban Non-Profits?'''''
Legitimacy of state action is part of the realm of irrational thought, so there is no universal consensus of what kinds of state action can be considered legitimate or not.


I will defend the liberal views on the matter though.
Non-Profits are a completely different form of organisation which, as the name says, does not have profit in mind for ''no one'' that partakes in its efforts, since their objective is helping others for a price as low as possible; every worker, thus, is paid for his contribution, and nothing more or less is given to them.




□ '''''What about Consumer and Producer Coops?'''''


* The state's legitimate when it acts in order to preserve freedom and wellbeing;
Justifying these two types of businesses is much more grounded on pragmatism rather than ideology: consumer coops and producer coops help both economic efficiency and consumer rights and, since it is impossible for a consumer to life off profits from their consumer or producer coop, such businesses offer better wages and benefits to their workers.
* Being judged by one's character and not one's body is a just principle that should be legally protected
* Non-economic laws should strive to preserve freedom of thought and the possibility of relativism
* The harm principle is a good basis for laws


=== Against Ethnicity and Race as Concepts ===
= Economic Beliefs =
* The concept of ethnicity easily loses any sense, as an italian in germany who doesn't know to be italian is completely equal to an "ethnic" german.


= '''Economic Beliefs''' =
== ⬢ General Overview ==
== General Overview ==
[[File:OrdoLibMarkSoc.png]] Armandonian Liberalism's economic thought is inspired by various, mostly liberal, schools of though, with the most inspiration coming from [[File:Soclib.png]] {{PCB|Social Liberalism}}, [[File:Orlib.png]] {{PCB|Ordo-Liberalism}}, [[File:Socliber.png]] {{PCB|Social Libertarianism}}, [[File:3way.png]] {{PCB|Third Way|Anti-NeoCon Third Way}}, [[File:Glib.png]] {{PCB|Green Liberalism}}, [[File:Georgist.png|frameless]] {{PCB|Georgism}}, [[File:Socdem.png]] {{PCB|Social Democracy}}, [[File:Liberalsoc.png]] {{PCB|Liberal Socialism}} and [[File:Marketsoc.png]] {{PCB|Market Socialism}}. [[File:Tito.png]] {{PCB|Titoism|Yugoslavia}} is also a big inspiration for policy (either negatively or positively).
[[File:OrdoLibMarkSoc.png]] Armandonian Liberalism's economic thought is inspired by various, mostly liberal, schools of though, with the most inspiration coming from [[File:Soclib.png]] {{PCB|Social Liberalism}}, [[File:Orlib.png]] {{PCB|Ordo-Liberalism}}, [[File:Socliber.png]] {{PCB|Social Libertarianism}}, [[File:3way.png]] {{PCB|Third Way|Anti-NeoCon Third Way}}, [[File:Glib.png]] {{PCB|Green Liberalism}}, [[File:Socdem.png]] {{PCB|Social Democracy}}, [[File:Liberalsoc.png]] {{PCB|Liberal Socialism}} and [[File:Marketsoc.png]] {{PCB|Market Socialism}}. [[File:Tito.png]] {{PCB|Titoism|Yugoslavia}} is also a big inspiration for policy.


[[File:FusionRef.png]] {{PCB|Reformism|Fusion Reformism}} towards a more [[File:SocialEconomy.png]] [[Social Economy]] and eventually [[Liberal Market Socialism]] is my main objective; if there is active resistance against the peaceful establishment of co-ops, revolution is always the plan B.
[[File:FusionRef.png]] {{PCB|Reformism|Fusion Reformism}} towards a more [[File:SocialEconomy.png]] [[Social Economy]] and eventually [[Liberal Market Socialism]] is my main objective; if there is active resistance against the peaceful establishment of co-ops, revolution is always the plan B.


== The Origin of Value (WIP) ==
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''Economic Schools'''</span>
*Labour
 
*Supply and Demand
[[File:OrdoLibMarkSoc.png]] Armandonian Liberalism is economically [[File:Radcent.png]] {{PCB|Radical Centrism|Radical Centrist}} (Leaning [[File:CLeft.png|frameless]] Center-Left ) and follows a mix of [[File:Newkeynes.png]] {{PCB|Keynesianism|New Keynesianism}}, [[File:FreiburgSchool.png]] [[Freiburg School|Freiburg Economics]], [[File:Chilib.png]] {{PCB|Chicago School|Chicagoan and New Classical Economics}} [[File:New-Neoclassical.png]], [[File:Georgist.png|frameless]] {{PCB|Georgism}}, [[File:Ricardosoc.png|frameless]] {{PCB|Ricardian Socialism|Ricardian Economics}} and, more limitedly, [[File:Austrobert.png]] {{PCB|Austrian School|Austrian Economics}} [[File:Hayek.png]], [[File:Lausanne.png|frameless]] [[Lausanne School|Lausanne Economics]], [[File:Postkeynes.png]] {{PCB|Keynesianism|Post-Keynesianism}} and [[File:Marx.png]] {{PCB|Marxism|Marxian Economics}} [[File:Neomarx.png|frameless]], with the objective of being [[File:Econprag.png]] Pragmatic in economic decision-making and to favour evidence-based policy.
== [[File:SocialEconomy.png]] Social Economy vs [[File:EconomicDemocracy.png]] Economic Democracy ==
 
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''"What are your general economic beliefs though?"'''</span>
 
To answer to that question, I would say that the [[File:FreiburgSchool.png]] [[Freiburg School|Freiburg School of Economics]] correctly defines my beliefs: an economic system where the state doesn't distort the market by excessive [[File:Regulationism.png]] {{PCB|Regulationism|Regulations}}, [[File:Protect.png]] {{PCB|Protectionism|Artificial Price Distortion}} or excessive [[File:Statecap.png]] {{PCB|State Capitalism|State Economic Intervention}}, and where an [[File:Consti.png]] {{PCB|Regulationism|"Economic Rulebook"}} is created in order to maintain healthy and just competition, foster moral economic practices and direct the market towards a particular direction. At the same time, I support many [[File:Georgist.png|frameless]] {{PCB|Georgism|Georgist}} ideas.
 
I am a strong supporter of the [[File:CoopTrees.png]] Cooperative Movement and of the concept of [[File:SocialEconomy.png]] [[Social Economy]], as I believe that workers deserve a fair wage (If not the complete value of their own work) and more decision making in firms, since they are both the source of all value and profit of the company, making jobs a social contract between workers and employers, and since it is generally known how firms, the bigger they get, the more they exploit workers.
 
In addition, workers value their welfare more than employers and managers, so they wouldn't make terrible and inhuman decisions and wouldn't oppose automation (as every worker, instead of being laid off, would just work less hours).
 
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''[[File:SocialEconomy.png]] Social Economy vs [[File:EconomicDemocracy.png]] Economic Democracy'''</span>
 
While they are similar concepts, a [[File:SocialEconomy.png]] [[Social Economy]] and an [[File:EconomicDemocracy.png]] [[Economic Democracy]] are not necessarily the same thing: an [[File:EconomicDemocracy.png]] [[Economic Democracy]] is always a [[File:SocialEconomy.png]] [[Social Economy]], but not vice versa.
While they are similar concepts, a [[File:SocialEconomy.png]] [[Social Economy]] and an [[File:EconomicDemocracy.png]] [[Economic Democracy]] are not necessarily the same thing: an [[File:EconomicDemocracy.png]] [[Economic Democracy]] is always a [[File:SocialEconomy.png]] [[Social Economy]], but not vice versa.


The fundamental difference between the two is that a [[File:SocialEconomy.png]] [[Social Economy]] just bases itself on cooperatives, mutuals, associations, foundations, social enterprises, paritarian institutions etc., while an [[File:EconomicDemocracy.png]] [[Economic Democracy]] usually adds societal control over investments and overall decision making, effectively putting the markets under the service of society and the state, in a way not too dissimilar from [[File:Marketsoc.png]] {{PCB|Market Socialism}}.
The fundamental difference between the two is that a [[File:SocialEconomy.png]] [[Social Economy]] just bases itself on cooperatives, mutuals, associations, foundations, social enterprises, paritarian institutions etc., while an [[File:EconomicDemocracy.png]] [[Economic Democracy]] usually adds societal control over investments and overall decision making, effectively putting the markets under the service of society and the state, in a way not too dissimilar to [[File:Marketsoc.png]] {{PCB|Market Socialism}}.
 
□ <span style="font-size:107%">'''''Is my ideology really a [[File:SocialEconomy.png]] Social Economy?'''''</span>


=== Is my ideology really a [[File:SocialEconomy.png]] Social Economy? ===
Short answer: I believe so.
Short answer: I believe so.


Long answer: My proposed economic system can be described as nothing more than having a [[File:Soclib.png]] {{PCB|Social Liberalism|Modern Liberal}} economic system embrace a [[File:SocialEconomy.png]] [[Social Economy]] much more closely. Economic freedom for cooperatives and small businesses and private property are still in place.  
Long answer: My proposed economic system can be described as nothing more than having a [[File:Soclib.png]] {{PCB|Social Liberalism|Modern Liberal}} economic system embrace a [[File:SocialEconomy.png]] [[Social Economy]] much more closely. Economic freedom for cooperatives and small businesses and (most) private property are still in place.
 
While it '''does''' have some kind of [[File:Liberalsoc.png]] Social Ownership of Capital (E.g. National Mutual Fund), it is not inherently subjected to the state and individuals, banks, credit unions etc. still have much freedom with investments and loans. The objective is also '''not''' state or societal control over the economy, but better economic freedom for every citizen.
 
For these reasons, I do believe to be in the realm of a [[File:SocialEconomy.png]] [[Social Economy]], rather than in an [[File:EconomicDemocracy.png]] [[Economic Democracy]].
 
== ⬢ Economic Policy ==
 
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''[[File:Econlib.png]] Economic Liberalism and [[File:World.png]] Globalism''' (WIP)
</span>
I believe that the [[File:Econlib.png]] [[Economic Liberalism|Free Market]] can be an enormous force of good and efficiency (When well-regulated, as explained further down): this is because, as we've seen countless times, they can create growth, innovation and cheaper prices much better than planned economies.


While it '''does''' have some kind of [[File:Liberalsoc.png]] Social Ownership of Capital (E.g. National Mutual Fund), it is not inherently subjected to the state and individuals, banks, credit unions etc. still have much freedom with investments and loans. The objective is also '''not''' state or societal control over the economy, but better economic freedom for every citizen.
Market economies are also self-regulating, leaving most smaller economic decisions to the costumers and the consumers and generally reaching an equilibrium by themselves (Again, there should still be government intervention, as explained further down).


State intervention is also akin to [[File:Soclib.png]] {{PCB|Social Liberalism|EU-style Liberalism}} and thus not excessive.
[[File:World.png]] {{PCB|Globalism|International cooperation}} should be fostered, as it maintains peace through trading relations, it helps countries focus only on some kinds of industries and helps directing investments all over the world.  


For these reasons, I do believe to be in the realm of a [[File:SocialEconomy.png]] [[Social Economy]], rather than in an [[File:EconomicDemocracy.png]] [[Economic Democracy]].
[[File:Protect.png]] {{PCB|Protectionism}} should be abandoned, unless there are national security motivations or there is unfair competition for lack of certain laws in other countries. Trade agreements should, thus, have clauses for better working conditions and environmental regulation.
 
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''[[File:Property.png]] Private Property'''</span>
□ '''''Economics''''' 


== General economic programme ==
TLDR; Why private property is necessary for economic stability and growth, and how exploitative wage labour gets replaced by non-exploitative rent and land development 
{{Collapse|


Phase 1:
□ <span style="font-size:107%">'''''Intellectual Property'''''</span>


*Reform Anti-Trust to encompass extremely large businesses and break them down
TLDR; Where intellectual property is legitimate, where it isn't, why it is inherently exploitative   


*Promote cooperatives and similar business models
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''[[File:Tax.png]] Taxation'''</span>


*Destroy and/or reform crony legislation
(Thanks to {{Blue Nephalem Thought}} for the direct inspiration)


*Promote and incentivise widespread property ownership
Taxation would be reformed to be much more clear and it should be calculated by using a function and (almost always) no tax brackets.
The taxes should be:


Phase 2:
□ [[File:LVT.png]] Land value tax (10%-50%, except the first home)


*Make the state explicitly favour cooperatives
□ [[File:EconProg.png]] Progressive income taxes


*Replace the stock market with the bond market
□ [[File:GreenRegulation.png]] Pigouvian and [[File:GreenTax.png]] Environmental taxes (25%-100% except for self-employed people and businesses with less than 5 people)


Phase 3:
□ [[File:Social_Meritocracy.png]] Inheritance tax (30%-45% from 1 million Euros onwards)


*Phase out Medium sized enterprises in favour of cooperatives
□ [[File:GE.png]] Gift taxes (30%-45% from 100 000 Euros onwards, unless given to a charity)


Phase 4:
□ [[File:Corp.png]] Corporate taxes (WIP)


*Phase out large sized enterprises in favour of cooperatives and cooperative federations
□ [[File:Bankocracy.png]] Financial Insurance Tax (Paid by banks to fund a National Financial Insurance Fund)


*Cooperative economy (yay!)
□ [[File:Religious.png]] Church taxes (15%-25%)  


*Widespread private property (yay!!!!)
□ [[File:RegulationMarkSoc.png]] Capital gains taxes (WIP)


}}
□ [[File:Property.png]] Property taxes (20% for Luxury Houses)


== [[File:Econlib.png]] Economic Liberalism and [[File:World.png]] Globalism ==
□ [[File:Regulationism.png]] Sales taxes (WIP)
[[File:World.png]] {{PCB|Globalism|International cooperation}} should be fostered, as it maintains peace through trading relations, it helps countries focus only on some kinds of industries and helps directing investments all over the world. [[File:Protect.png]] {{PCB|Protectionism}} should be completely abandoned, unless there are national security motivations.


== [[File:Property.png]] Private Property ==
□ [[File:Protect.png]] Tariffs (For imports from countries with sub-par working conditions, sub-par environmental laws and sub-par animal welfare)
I consider [[File:Property.png]] {{PCB|Propertarianism|Private Property}} as "The only way to ensure a good degree of independence of cooperatives from the state" and "The better way to organise property". At the same time, I believe that self-ownership is much more preferable to absentee-ownership, as extreme economic inequality numbs [[File:Dem.png]] {{PCB|Democracy}} and damages [[File:Human.png]] [[Humanitarianism|Human Life]] and the [[File:Markets.png]] Economy. We should thus strive to help people and firms to own what they use and leave renting to a completely personal decision by mainly using and adapting market forces (and not by regulating and banning ownership of multiple buildings), but also by breaking down extremely large firms when necessary.


All of this comes from a [[File:Chesterton.png]] {{PCB|Distributism|Distributist}}, [[File:Rousseau.png]] Rousseau-ist (From 'On the Origin of Inequality') and [[File:Mises.png]] {{PCB|Austrian School|Austrian}} analysis of private property.
□ [[File:Captrans.png]] AI tax (2% flat-tax for every business with more than 50 employees employing AI to fund worker retraining programmes)


===Intellectual Property===
□ [[File:World.png]] Immigrant tax (50 - 100 Euros a month for all working non-citizens to fund an Immigrant Support Fund)


== Taxation ==
These tax rates are flexible depending on the circumstances of the economy.
Taxation would be reformed to be much more clear, with only the addition of a [[File:Georgist.png]] {{PCB|Georgism|Land Value Tax}} and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pigouvian_tax various taxes on externalities]. A small tax on AI and automation use in firms will also be put in place for firms with more than 100 employees, in order to create a social dividend.


== [[File:Newkeynes.png]] State Intervention in the Economy [[File:Monet.png]] ==
⠀


* <span style="font-size:117%">'''[[File:Newkeynes.png]] State Intervention in the Economy [[File:Monet.png]]'''</span>
<tabber>
<tabber>


Economic Schools =
Regulations =
 
▣ <span style="font-size:107%">'''''[[File:Regulationism.png]] Regulations'''''</span>
[[File:Regulationism.png]] {{PCB|Regulationism|Regulations}} are a necessity to ensure a healthy economy and a healthy and just society. I am generally aligned to [[File:Cball-EU.png]] EU regulations and with [[File:Orlib.png]] {{PCB|Ordo-Liberalism|Ordo-Liberal}} and [[File:FreiburgSchool.png]] [[Freiburg School|Freiburg-Style]] regulations on this matter.
 
In general, regulations should be simple, effective and should not create excessive
[[File:Econdeflate.png]] Inefficiency,  excessive [[File:Statist.png]] [[Statism|Bureaucracy]] and [[File:Corp.png]] {{PCB|Corporatocracy|Regulatory Capture}}; their benefits should be weighted with the benefit of less strict regulation (or no regulation at all).
 
The primary objective is being [[File:Pragmat.png]] pragmatic with regulations and not excessively ideological.
 
'''Some examples of regulations I support:''' <br>
 
□ [[File:Landsoc.png]] Moderate rent increase control
 
□ [[File:SyndieSam.png]] Labour Rights
 
□□ Workplace Safety
 
□□ Work-Life balance laws
 
□ [[File:Glib.png]] Environmental Regulation


[[File:OrdoLibMarkSoc.png]] Armandonian Liberalism is economically [[File:Radcent.png]] {{PCB|Radical Centrism|Radical Centrist}} (Leaning [[File:CLeft.png|frameless]] Center-Left ) and follows a mix of [[File:Newkeynes.png]] {{PCB|Keynesianism|Modern Keynesianism}} [[File:NuKeynesPix.png|frameless]], [[File:FreiburgSchool.png]] [[Freiburg School|Freiburg Economics]], [[File:Chilib.png]] {{PCB|Chicago School|Chicagoan and Neoclassical Economics}} [[File:Neoclassical.png]] and, much more limitedly, [[File:Austrobert.png]] {{PCB|Austrian School|Austrian Economics}} [[File:Hayek.png]], with the objective of being [[File:Econprag.png]] Pragmatic in economic decision-making.
□ [[File:Welf.png]] Safety and Health Regulation


Evidence-based policy is to be favoured.
□ Consumer Protection


=== "What are your general economic beliefs though?" ===
To answer to that question, I would say that the [[File:FreiburgSchool.png]] [[Freiburg School|Freiburg School of Economics]] correctly defines my beliefs: an economic system where the state doesn't distort the market by excessive [[File:Regulationism.png]] {{PCB|Regulationism|Regulations}}, [[File:Protect.png]] {{PCB|Protectionism|Artificial Price Distortion}} or excessive [[File:Statecap.png]] {{PCB|State Capitalism|State Economic Intervention}}, and where an [[File:Consti.png]] {{PCB|Regulationism|"Economic Rulebook"}} is created in order to maintain healthy and just competition, foster moral economic practices and direct the market towards a particular direction.


I am a strong supporter of the [[File:CoopTrees.png]] Cooperative Movement and of the concept of [[File:SocialEconomy.png]] [[Social Economy]], as I believe that workers deserve a fair wage (If not the complete value of their own work) and more decision making in firms, since they are both the source of all value and profit of the company, making jobs a social contract between workers and employers, and since it is generally known how firms, the bigger they get, the more they exploit workers.
'''Some examples of regulations I would reform:''' <br>


In addition, workers value their welfare more than employers and managers, so they wouldn't make terrible and inhuman decisions and wouldn't oppose automation (as every worker, instead of being laid off, would just work less hours).
□ Zoning Laws


|-| Central Bank =
□ Occupational Licensing


A [[File:Central_bank.png]] Central Bank , independent from the central state, is to be retained/established, as it can make business cycles less severe in their effects. The Central Bank should be managed independently by [[File:Technocracy.png]] {{PCB|Technocracy|Technocrats}}.
□ Business Creation


|-| Regulations =


[[File:Regulationism.png]] {{PCB|Regulationism|Regulations}} [[File:Regulationism.png]] are a necessity to ensure a healthy economy and a healthy and just society. I am generally aligned to [[File:Cball-EU.png]] EU regulations on this matter; there are obviously regulations I would support and others I wouldn't.
'''Some examples of regulations I would remove or greatly reform and reduce:''' <br>
□ Most internet regulation


In general, regulations should be simple, effective and should prevent excessive inefficiency, [[File:Statist.png]] excessive bureaucracy and regulatory capture; their benefits should be weighted with the benefit of less strict regulation (or no regulation at all). I mainly follow the [[File:FreiburgSchool.png]] [[Freiburg School]] of economics on the matter.
□ Compulsory USB-C


The primary objective is being [[File:Pragmat.png]] pragmatic with regulations and not excessively ideological.
□ Taxi permits


'''Some examples of regulations I support:'''
□ Tech-companies regulation
*[[File:Landsoc.png]] Moderate rent increase control
*[[File:SyndieSam.png]] Labour Rights
**Workplace Safety
**Work-Life balance laws
*[[File:Glib.png]] Environmental Regulation
*[[File:Welf.png]] Safety and Health Regulation
*Consumer Protection


'''Some examples of regulations I would reform'''
□ All [[File:AntiBert.png]] Crony Regulation
*Zoning Laws
*Occupational Licensing
*Business Creation


'''Some examples of regulations I would remove or greatly reduce'''
*Most internet regulation
*Compulsory USB-C
*Taxi permits
*Tech-companies regulation
*All [[File:AntiBert.png]] Crony Regulation


|-| Anti-Trust =
▣ <span style="font-size:107%">'''''[[File:Trustbust.png]] Anti-Trust'''''</span>


Anti-Trust legislation should keep the economy fair and free from [[File:Corp.png]] {{PCB|Corporatocracy|Monopolies}}. It should be expanded to break up firms that have gotten so prevalent that they count as "Too Big to Fail" businesses and, at the same time, be reformed in order not to encompass practices that are misrepresented as monopolistic.
Anti-Trust legislation should keep the economy fair and free from [[File:Corp.png]] {{PCB|Corporatocracy|Monopolies}}. It should be expanded to break up firms that have gotten so prevalent that they count as "Too Big to Fail" businesses and, at the same time, be reformed in order not to encompass practices that are misrepresented as monopolistic.


|-| Environmentalism =
▣ <span style="font-size:107%">'''''Environmentalism'''''</span>


[[File:Envi.png]] {{PCB|Environmentalism|The environment}} should be protected using a mix of [[File:Regulationism.png]] {{PCB|Regulationism|Regulations}}, [[File:Dirigisme.png]] State Intervention and [[File:3way.png]] Negative Externality Taxation [[File:Glib.png]], all of which should balance the need to do something about environmental problems and human needs (Both social and economic).
[[File:Envi.png]] {{PCB|Environmentalism|The environment}} should be protected using a mix of [[File:Regulationism.png]] {{PCB|Regulationism|Regulations}}, [[File:Dirigisme.png]] State Intervention and [[File:3way.png]] Negative Externality Taxation [[File:Glib.png]], all of which should balance the need to do something about environmental problems and human needs (Both social and economic).
Line 552: Line 700:
The primary objective should be reaching a [[File:Ectrans.png]] Solarpunk society.
The primary objective should be reaching a [[File:Ectrans.png]] Solarpunk society.


|-| Government Services and Programs =
|-| Government Services and Programs=
 
▣ General Idea
In general, services should be rendered much more clear and efficient, in order to minimise waste of funds.
 
▣ <span style="font-size:107%">'''''[[File:Welf.png]] Welfare [[File:NIT.png]]'''''</span>


===[[File:Welf.png]] Welfare [[File:NIT.png]]===
[[File:Welf.png]] Welfare is a necessity and minimum basic services, a safety net and some wealth redistribution should be provided by the state; a progressive [[File:NIT.png]] Negative Income Tax should be something to look into, as it can potentially simplify the welfare system and the safety net by giving money to those in difficulty instead of creating many different programs, so that they can spend them on what they know they will need.
[[File:Welf.png]] Welfare is a necessity and minimum basic services, a safety net and some wealth redistribution should be provided by the state; a progressive [[File:NIT.png]] Negative Income Tax should be something to look into, as it can potentially simplify the welfare system and the safety net by giving money to those in difficulty instead of creating many different programs, so that they can spend them on what they know they will need.


=== Stimulus and Unemployment Checks ===
▣ <span style="font-size:102%">'''''Stimulus and Unemployment Checks'''''</span>
In the event of recessions or when workers get laid off, checks should be given monthly only as requests or payment directly from the government or through banks: this is because unused funds would just be 'Erased' after 8 weeks I.E. they can't be accessed by recipients anymore and would go back into the checks program.
 
<span style="font-size:90%"> In the event of recessions or when workers get laid off, checks should be given monthly only as requests or payment directly from the government or through banks: this is because unused funds would just be 'Erased' after 8 weeks I.E. they can't be accessed by recipients anymore and would go back into the checks program.


All of this would discourage saving and actually stimulate the economy.
All of this would discourage saving and actually stimulate the economy.
</span>
===[[File:Univhealth.png]] [[Universal Healthcare]]===
▣ <span style="font-size:107%">'''''[[File:Univhealth.png]] [[Universal Healthcare]]'''''</span>
 
[[File:Univhealth.png]] [[Universal Healthcare]] will be guaranteed to any and all citizens; it should not be completely free though, with smaller sums of money being paid by those who utilise the services (With a maximum of 200 Euros). Individuals unable to pay for medical expenses would still receive free care.
[[File:Univhealth.png]] [[Universal Healthcare]] will be guaranteed to any and all citizens; it should not be completely free though, with smaller sums of money being paid by those who utilise the services (With a maximum of 200 Euros). Individuals unable to pay for medical expenses would still receive free care.


This doesn't mean that private healthcare would be banned.
This doesn't mean that private healthcare would be banned (More will be explained in the next sections).
 
▣ <span style="font-size:107%">'''''[[File:CharterSchool.png]] Education'''''</span>
 
In order to provide flexibility, no teacher should be obliged to be a member of the school they work to be, but only an employee.
 
Elementary and Middle School education should both be completely state-owned, in order to provide an equal education for all pupils.
 
High School education should be mostly state-owned, however private High Schools should be possible to open, with a maximum tuition cost of 1500€ per year and the rest of the costs being paid for by
 
University education should remain as it is today; at the same time, there should be more scholarships awarded both by Universities and the State.


===[[File:CharterSchool.png]] Education (1st-12th Grade)===
▣ <span style="font-size:107%">'''''[[File:Bankocracy.png]] National Financial Insurance Fund'''''</span>
[[File:CharterSchool.png]] Education should be free, with the only required purchase for families and invididuals being school books and school supplies.


All private schools should be nationalised and new "private" schools should need government approval and funding or, alternatively, have a maximum annual tuition of 1500€.
In order to avoid a financial crisis induced by bank-runs, a [[File:Bankocracy.png]] National Financial Insurance Fund should be established and paid for by all banks through a dedicated progressive tax. This insurance fund would help failed or failing banks repay their depositors in full.


=== Electricity and Water ===
▣ <span style="font-size:107%">'''''Electricity and Water'''''</span>


▣ <span style="font-size:107%">'''''[[File:Urbanism.png]] Housing'''''</span>


=== [[File:Austrmarx.png]] Housing ===
The state should play a bigger part in building housing and organizing housing projects. This is mainly inspired by the Gemeindebauen of [[File:Austrmarx.png]] Red Vienna.
The state should play a bigger part in building housing and organizing housing projects. This is mainly inspired by the Gemeindebauen of [[File:Austrmarx.png]] Red Vienna.


Go to r/Neoliberal for my views on housing deregulation lol.
Go to r/Neoliberal for my views on housing deregulation.


|-| Economic Policy  =
|-| Economic Policy  =
Line 584: Line 747:
{{Quote|quote="The important thing for Government is not to do things which individuals are doing already, and to do them a little better or a little worse; but to do those things which at present are not done at all."|speaker=[[File:Keynes.png]] {{PCB|John M. Keynes}} }}
{{Quote|quote="The important thing for Government is not to do things which individuals are doing already, and to do them a little better or a little worse; but to do those things which at present are not done at all."|speaker=[[File:Keynes.png]] {{PCB|John M. Keynes}} }}


===[[File:Dirigisme.png]] Dirigisme and SOEs [[File:Statecap.png]]===
▣ <span style="font-size:107%">'''''[[File:Dirigisme.png]] Dirigisme and SOEs [[File:Statecap.png]]'''''</span>
 
[[File:Dirigisme.png]] Dirigist policies are, as history has shown us, a necessity to make the country prosper. As already said, protectionism should be abandoned and other methods of fostering an industry should be put in place; generally, direct investments and the creation of State Owned Enterprises (SOEs) are the best ways to do so. Incentives should be put in place only when it is necessary to do so, I.E. when regulations and dirigist policies would be excessively distruptive or difficult to enact.
[[File:Dirigisme.png]] Dirigist policies are, as history has shown us, a necessity to make the country prosper. As already said, protectionism should be abandoned and other methods of fostering an industry should be put in place; generally, direct investments and the creation of State Owned Enterprises (SOEs) are the best ways to do so. Incentives should be put in place only when it is necessary to do so, I.E. when regulations and dirigist policies would be excessively distruptive or difficult to enact.


=== Nationalisation ===
Firms deemed too fundamental for the economy can be subjected to temporary [[File:Technocracy.png]] State-control or even be [[File:Statecap.png]] Nationalised in cases of expected failure or emergency. This should be, however, mostly avoided.


===[[File:SocFiscon.png]] Austerity===
▣ <span style="font-size:107%">'''''[[File:Central_bank.png]] Central Bank'''''</span>
[[File:ModFiscon.png]] {{PCB|Fiscal Conservatism|Moderate austerity}} is to be expected under this system, transforming some SOEs into Multi-stakeholder cooperatives (Where both costumers and workers have the power of decision-making) and not privatizing them.


</tabber>
A [[File:Central_bank.png]] Central Bank , independent from the central state, is to be retained/established, as it can make business cycles less severe in their effects. The Central Bank should be managed independently by [[File:Technocracy.png]] {{PCB|Technocracy|Technocrats}}.


== Immigration ==
</tabber>⠀⠀⠀⠀
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''[[File:WPD.png]] Workplace Democracy and Worker Representation'''</span>


== Against Economic Speculation ==
□ <span style="font-size:107%">'''''[[File:LibSyndieSam.png]] Co-Determination'''''</span>


==[[File:WPD.png]] Workplace Democracy [[File:LibSyndieSam.png]]==
Low-level management should be obligatorily be elected by workers or be completely eliminated in favour of more self-management. Marchionne's "Low hierarchy factories" are also a concept that should be looked into.
Low-level management should be obligatorily be elected by workers or be completely eliminated in favour of more self-management. Marchionne's "Low hierarchy factories" are also a concept that should be looked into.


==[[File:LibSyndieSam.png]] Stances on Unionism [[File:SyndieSam.png]]==
□ <span style="font-size:107%">'''''[[File:SyndieSam.png]] Unionism'''''</span>
[[File:Synd.png]] Unions are, in principle, to be supported; however, I apply the concept of "Realist Unionism", that is basically not blindly supporting unions, as, sometimes, they have unrealistic and unjust advances towards employers.


== [[File:Bankocracy.png]] Financial Sector (Heavy WIP) ==
Unions are, in principle, to be supported; however, I apply the concept of "Realist Unionism", that is basically not blindly supporting unions, as, sometimes, they have unrealistic and unjust advances towards employers.


=== Domestic Investment Funds ===
□ [[File:Tripartism.png]]<span style="font-size:107%">''''' Tripartism'''''</span>
[[File:Tito.png]] Yugoslavia's Domestic Investment Funds


=== Cooperative Banking ===
TLDR; Seeing how well this system works in the [[File:Nordmodel.png|frameless]] {{PCB|Nordic Model|Nordic Countries}}, we should look into it
[[File:Bankocracy.png]] Banks  [[File:Mutualist.png]] Mutual Funds, Credit Unions, Cooperative Banks etc.,
 
*<span style="font-size:117%">'''[[File:GigEcon.png]] [[Gig Economy]] and'''</span> [[File:Indlibsoc.png|frameless]] <span style="font-size:117%">'''Self-Employment'''</span>
We could say that a [[File:GigEcon.png|frameless]] [[Gig Economy]] helps people have more flexibility. At the same time, this is largely abused by many firms, which use Freelancers and Self-Employed workers in order not to abide to an employment contract and exploit this kind of labour.
 
In order to solve this, [[File:SyndieSam.png|frameless]] {{PCB|Syndicalism|Trade Unions}} and a newly-formed (albeit not as powerful as in the past) [[File:Guildsoc.png|frameless]] {{PCB|Guild Socialism|Guild System}} should regulate relations between firms and [[File:GigEcon.png|frameless]] Freelancers and  [[File:PCB-Indlibsoc.png|frameless]] Self-Employed workers.
 
*<span style="font-size:117%">'''Natural Monopolies: Cooperativisation or Nationalisation?'''</span>


=== Private Banking ===
Natural monopolies (Roads, Railways, Dams)


=== Private Investments ===
<br>


==Transport Systems==
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''Transport Systems'''</span>
<tabber>
<tabber>


Line 642: Line 807:
</tabber>
</tabber>


== Urban Planning ==
* '''Urban Planning'''
<tabber>
<tabber>


Line 653: Line 818:
</tabber>
</tabber>


==Progress towards a more Social Economy ==
== ⬢ Social Economy ==
Progress towards a more [[File:SocialEconomy.png]] [[w:Social_economy|Social Economy]] should be done through [[File:Activm.png]] Activism, autonomous organisation (through internet, for example), pro-worker democracy and pro-cooperative reforms and without much direct government intervention (Basically, we should behave [[File:FreiburgSchool.png]] [[Freiburg School|Freiburg-style]]). The basic tenets are these:
Progress towards a more [[File:SocialEconomy.png]] [[w:Social_economy|Social Economy]] should be done through [[File:Activm.png]] Activism, autonomous organisation (through internet, for example), pro-worker democracy and pro-cooperative reforms and without much direct government intervention (Basically, we should behave [[File:FreiburgSchool.png]] [[Freiburg School|Freiburg-style]]). The basic tenets are these:
* [[File:Cooperative Socialism.png]] Co-operative Ownership
 
*[[File:Chesterton.png]] Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOP)
□ [[File:Cooperative Socialism.png]] Co-operative Ownership
*[[File:LibSyndieSam.png]] Board-Level Employee Representation (BLER).
 
□ [[File:Chesterton.png]] Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOP)
 
□ [[File:LibSyndieSam.png]] Board-Level Employee Representation (BLER).
 
In addition to this, laws that make establishing a cooperative, a mutual etc. should be put into place; examples are the Marcora Law and the Right to Own (More info: [https://youtu.be/yZHYiz60R5Q Unlearning Economics - Worker Democracy]).
In addition to this, laws that make establishing a cooperative, a mutual etc. should be put into place; examples are the Marcora Law and the Right to Own (More info: [https://youtu.be/yZHYiz60R5Q Unlearning Economics - Worker Democracy]).


=== Cooperative Crowdfunding ===
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''Cooperative Crowdfunding'''</span>
"Cooperative Crowdfunding" is a system where people can crowdfund a new worker or consumer cooperative through either a (cooperative) bank or a bank/state-licensed site or organisation: it would work similarly to sites like Kickstarter.
"Cooperative Crowdfunding" is a system where people can crowdfund a new worker or consumer cooperative through either a (cooperative) bank or a bank/state-licensed site or organisation: it would work similarly to sites like Kickstarter.


=== Coop-Worker Finder ===
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''Coop-Worker Finder'''</span>
"Coop-Worker Finder" would be a service where new entrepreneurs can find like-minded people to found a coop with.
"Coop-Worker Finder" would be a service where new entrepreneurs can find like-minded people to found a coop with.


=== Cooperativisation of Sectors ===
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''Healthcare: Promoting Worker and Consumer Co-ops'''</span>
 
As we've seen, the private healthcare sector in its current form is either a complete failure (Like in countries like the US) or overly expensive (Like in most EU countries). One part of this problem can surely be pointed to private hospitals private insurance companies having profit for the shareholders and the owners as their highest priority; it follows that we should promote (or even force) both Consumer Cooperatives and Worker Cooperatives in the sector.
 
Firstly, all insurance companies should be consumers' mutual funds, in order to fight the common occurrence of insurers deciding arbitrarily whether a given hospital visit was necessary or not.
 
Secondly, we should promote cooperatively-owned hospitals and clinics (Similar to the Brazilian UNIMED).
 
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''Insurance, Housing: Promoting Consumer Co-ops'''</span>
 
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''Prostitution and cooperatively-owned brothels'''
 
Prostitution should be legalised but limited to cooperatively-owned brothels, while street prostitution should be prohibited but decriminalised and pimps should remain illegal and prosecutable.
 
These limitations have these objectives:
 
□ Reduce sex slavery
 
□ Regulate prostitution
 
□ Maintain body autonomy
 
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''Founders of Coops: Risk and Reward'''</span>
TLDR; Rewarding founders of coops for taking risks
 
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''Entrepreneur as a Job | Firms and Buildings'''</span>
 
TLDR; How entrepreneurs can become coop-founders in order to stimulate economic growth
 
== ⬢ [[File:AuthSocialEconomy.png|frameless]] Forced Cooperativisation (Section in heavy rewriting) ==
 
=== ▣ Economy ===
*<span style="font-size:117%">'''Cooperativisation of Sectors'''</span>
We should individuate those sectors that can be mostly coop-driven and foster the creation of and transformation of businesses into worker and consumer cooperatives. Pharmacies, Light industry, Manufacture, Insurance, Programming, Social Media, Road transport, and many other sectors can potentially all be based around cooperatives and cooperative federations.
We should individuate those sectors that can be mostly coop-driven and foster the creation of and transformation of businesses into worker and consumer cooperatives. Pharmacies, Light industry, Manufacture, Insurance, Programming, Social Media, Road transport, and many other sectors can potentially all be based around cooperatives and cooperative federations.


=== Natural Monopolies: Cooperativisation or Nationalisation?  ===
Eventually, we should ban private business creation in such sectors and only allow for cooperative creation.
 
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''Ban on Firm Inheritance'''</span>


=== Healthcare: Promoting Worker and Consumer Co-ops ===
Firm inheritance should be banned and the firm should go directly to workers, in order to eventually phase out all private businesses.


=== Insurance, Banks, Housing: Promoting Consumer Co-ops ===
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''Trade Unions | Employee Firm Ownership Plans'''</span>


=== Prostitution and cooperatively-owned brothels ===
In order to foster the Right to Own, Trade Unions


== Cooperative-specific regulations ==
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''Ban on Private Insurance'''</span>


===Status of Worker Cooperatives===
TLDR; Mutual insurance
[[File:Cooperative_Socialism.png]] Worker Cooperatives would be allowed to have up to 20% of workers as non-members, in order to ensure an easier hiring and training process. Membership would remain completely voluntary, with each worker deciding between being a simple employee with none of the benefits of membership, or pay for the membership (This process would be organised by each co-op independently).


Each non-member employee of a cooperative has either the right to some kind of [[File:LibSyndieSam.png]] Board-Level Employee Representation or to a reduced value of its vote between 0.3 and 0.8 (E.g. In firm X, a non-member employee can vote, but its vote will have a value of 0.6 instead of 1); this last possibility will be decided by the co-op.
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''Cooperativisation of Capital Intensive Sectors'''</span>


===Status of Consumer Cooperatives===
TLDR; idek
All Consumer Cooperatives would either become multi-stakeholder/worker-consumer cooperatives, after a vote by both employees and members, or have obligatory co-determination for workers once they pass 60 employees.
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''Status of Non-Profits'''</span>
Non-profit organisations will not be subjected to the same laws as for-profit businesses: private ownership will be possible and they will be subjected to pretty much the same regulation as today, as the objective of this kind of business is, as the name says, not to give a profit to owners or workers, but to give a cheaper and humane service
 
*<span style="font-size:117%">'''[[File:Bankocracy.png]] Financial Sector (Heavy WIP)'''</span>
□ <span style="font-size:107%">'''''Domestic Investment Funds'''''</span>
 
[[File:Tito.png]] Yugoslavia's Domestic Investment Funds
 
□ <span style="font-size:107%">'''''Private Banking'''''</span>
 
 
□ <span style="font-size:107%">'''''Cooperative Banking'''''</span>
 
[[File:Bankocracy.png]] Banks  [[File:Mutualist.png]] Mutual Funds, Credit Unions, Cooperative Banks etc.,  
 
□ <span style="font-size:107%">'''''Private Investments'''''</span>


== [[File:AuthSocialEconomy.png|frameless]] Forced Cooperativisation of Businesses (WIP) ==
TLDR; Bond markets, stock ownership as exploitation, why non-exploitative stock ownership is basically a bond market, why bonds are non-exploitative ('Repaying' machinery and resources to who bought the bond, as the funds come from him)
Eventually, most sectors will become mostly co-op driven, and all sectors of the economy will be forcibly cooperativized. This is what would happen:


=== Cooperativisation of Non-Capital Intensive Businesses ===
=== ▣ Politics ===
All private businesses with more than 60 employees would be cooperativised; those with 20 to 60 employees would have employees elect a [[File:LibSyndieSam.png]] Employee Representative that would work closely with the employer and/or the administration; finally, those with less than 20 employees would keep doing business as before.


Every business which passes 20-25 employees will, from then on, become a cooperative, with financial compensation in form of a monthly bond (With the duration and the quantity of money set by a court) for the original owner.
== ⬢ Cooperative-specific regulations (Section in heavy rewriting) ==


====Forced Cooperativisation: Is there financial compensation?====
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''Worker Cooperatives'''</span>
As businesses with more than 60 employees would become cooperatives, employees of the business will financially compensate the owner(s) and/or the shareholders totally (in form of a monthly bond, with the duration and the quantity of money set by a court) and get 100% control of their business.


There is however a limit to the financial compensation: (TLDR: Shareholders and Owners of larger businesses will receive fewer compensation compared to smaller ones; I will make a chart in the future)
[[File:CoopTrees.png]] Worker Cooperatives would be allowed to have up to 1/5 of workers as non-members (The calculation would be: Number of Members ÷ 5 = Maximum number of Non-Member employees, always rounded up), in order to ensure an easier hiring and training process. Membership would remain completely voluntary, with each worker deciding between being a simple employee with none of the benefits of membership, or pay for the membership (This process would be organised by each co-op independently).


=== Status of Non-Profits ===
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''Consumer Cooperatives'''</span>
Non-profit organisations will not be subjected to the same laws as for-profit businesses: private ownership will be possible and they will be subjected to pretty much the same regulation as today.
All Consumer Cooperatives would either become multi-stakeholder/worker-consumer cooperatives, after a vote by both employees and members, or have obligatory co-determination for workers once they pass 60 employees.


=== Status of Internet-based Businesses ===
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''Cooperative Brothels'''</span>
Cooperative Brothels will just be considered as collaborating self-employed people who share the same space. Profits will be assigned to the individual worker and will not be shared through equity.


=== Status of the [[File:GigEcon.png]] [[Gig Economy]] ===
= Focus on some Concepts =


=== Status of the [[File:Chesterton.png]] Petty Bourgeoisie ===
== ⬢ Private Property (WIP) ==
The [[File:Chesterton.png]] Petty Bourgeoisie is considered as having the same hardships as the [[File:SyndieSam.png]] Workers and as being a secondary target of exploitation by bigger firms. Small businesses should thus be allowed to exist


=== Status of Capital Intensive Industries ===
* <span style="font-size:117%">'''Why Private Property is not Inherently Exploitative (Personal Article)'''</span>
 
Write to me on Discord to get the first draft of the document!


= '''Reading List''' =
= '''Reading List''' =
==Already Read==
<span style="font-size:117%">Already Read</span>
*[[File:Mises.png]] Ludwig von Mises - Economic Policy
*[[File:Mises.png]] Ludwig von Mises - Economic Policy
* [[File:CathSocial.png]] Pope Leo XIII - Rerum Novarum
* [[File:CathSocial.png]] Pope Leo XIII - Rerum Novarum
Line 719: Line 935:
* [[File:Voltaire.png]] Voltaire - A Treatise on Tolerance
* [[File:Voltaire.png]] Voltaire - A Treatise on Tolerance
* [[File:Rousseau.png]] Jean-Jacques Rousseau - On the Origin of Inequality
* [[File:Rousseau.png]] Jean-Jacques Rousseau - On the Origin of Inequality
* [[File:Cooperative_Socialism.png]] David I. Backer - Illyrian economics
* [[File:Strasser.png]] Gregor and Otto Strasser - The Manifesto of the Black Front
* [[File:Kant.png]] Immanuel Kant - Perpetual Peace
* [[File:Autcap.png|frameless]] Robert LaFevre - The Philosophy of Ownership
* [[File:Clib.png]] Thomas Paine - Agrarian Justice
* [[File:Niccolo Machiavelli.png]] Niccolò Machiavelli - Il Principe (Studied in school)
* Ludvik Vaculik - [https://www.pwf.cz/rubriky/projects/1968/ludvik-vaculik-two-thousand-words_849.html 2000 Words]


==Reading It ==
<span style="font-size:117%">Reading It</span>
 
*[[File:Councom.png|frameless]] Group of International Communists - Fundamental
Principles of Communist Production and Distribution


*[[File:Mises.png]] Ludwig von Mises - Human Action (Pretty much abandoned)
*[[File:Hayek.png|frameless]] F.A. Hayek - The Constitution of Liberty
*[[File:Councom.png|frameless]] Group of International Communists - Fundamental Principles of Communist Production and Distribution
*[[File:Bernstein.png]] Eduard Bernstein - Evolutionary Socialism
*[[File:Bernstein.png]] Eduard Bernstein - Evolutionary Socialism
*[[File:Enlightenment.png]] Cesare Beccaria - On Crimes and Punishment
*[[File:Enlightenment.png]] Cesare Beccaria - On Crimes and Punishment
==Planning to Read==
 
*[[File:Rousseau.png]] Jean-Jacques Rousseau - The Social Contract
*[[File:Mill.png]] John Stuart Mill - On Liberty
*[[File:Mill.png]] John Stuart Mill - On Liberty
<span style="font-size:117%">Planning to Read</span>
* [[File:Hayek.png|frameless]] F.A. Hayek - The Constitution of Liberty
* [[File:Hayek.png|frameless]] F.A. Hayek - Road to Serfdom
* [[File:Hayek.png|frameless]] F.A. Hayek - Monetary Nationalism
* [[File:Hayek.png|frameless]] F.A. Hayek - The Denationalisation of Money
* [[File:Kant.png]] Immanuel Kant - Critique of Practical Reason
* [[File:Kant.png]] Immanuel Kant - Critique of Judgement
* [[File:Kant.png]] Immanuel Kant - Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals
* [[File:Kant.png]] Immanuel Kant - Metaphysics of Morals
* [[File:Kant.png]] Immanuel Kant - The Conflict of the Faculties
* [[File:Rousseau.png]] Jean-Jacques Rousseau - Reveries of the Solitary Walker
*[[File:Pareto.png]] Vilfredo Pareto - The Mind and Society
*[[File:DeSoto.png]] Jesus Huerta de Soto - The Theory of Dynamic Efficiency
*[[File:GeoAust.png]] Fred Foldvary - The Business Cycle: A Geo-Austrian synthesis
*[[File:Mill.png]] John Stuart Mill - Utilitarianism
*[[File:Mill.png]] John Stuart Mill - Considerations on Representative Government
*[[File:Mill.png]] John Stuart Mill - The Subjection of Women
*[[File:Mill.png]] John Stuart Mill - Principles of Political Economy
*[[File:Mill.png]] John Stuart Mill - Principles of Political Economy
*[[File:Rousseau.png]] Jean-Jacques Rousseau - The Social Contract
 
*[[File:JohnLocke.png|frameless]] John Locke - Two Treaties on Government
*[[File:JohnLocke.png|frameless]] John Locke - Two Treaties on Government
*[[File:Hobbes.png|frameless]] Thomas Hobbes - Leviathan
*[[File:Hobbes.png|frameless]] Thomas Hobbes - Behemoth


*[[File:Clib.png]] Henry David Thoreau - Civil Disobedience
*[[File:Clib.png]] Henry David Thoreau - Civil Disobedience


*[[File:Clib.png]] Henry David Thoreau - Walden; or, Life in the Woods  
*[[File:Clib.png]] Henry David Thoreau - Walden; or, Life in the Woods  
*[[File:GeoClib.png|frameless]] Henry George - Science of Political Economy  
*[[File:GeoClib.png|frameless]] Henry George - Science of Political Economy  
*[[File:GeoClib.png|frameless]] Henry George - Protection or Free Trade


*[[File:Marx.png]] Karl Marx - Das Kapital
*[[File:Marx.png]] Karl Marx - Das Kapital
*[[File:Nozick.png|frameless]] Robert Nozick - Anarchy, State and Utopia


*Marco Bentivogli, Diodato Pirone - Fabbrica Futuro
*Marco Bentivogli, Diodato Pirone - Fabbrica Futuro


*[[File:Cooperative Socialism.png|frameless]] MacPherson - One Path to Cooperative Studies  
*[[File:CoopTrees.png|frameless]] MacPherson - One Path to Cooperative Studies  


*[[File:Clib.png|frameless]] Adam Smith - The Wealth of Nations
*[[File:AdamSmith.png|frameless]] Adam Smith - The Wealth of Nations
*[[File:AdamSmith.png|frameless]] Adam Smith - The Theory of Moral Sentiments
*[[File:Burke.png|frameless]] Edmund Burke - (Something in general)
*[[File:DavidHume.png|frameless]] David Hume - (Something in general)
*[[File:AlexisdeTocqueville.png|frameless]] Alexis de Tocqueville - Democracy in America
*[[File:AlexisdeTocqueville.png|frameless]] Alexis de Tocqueville - The Old Regime and the Revolution


*[[File:Ricardosoc.png|frameless]] David Ricardo - On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation
*[[File:Ricardosoc.png|frameless]] David Ricardo - On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation
Line 763: Line 1,022:


= '''Relations''' =
= '''Relations''' =
<tabber>
Real and plausible ideologies=
(The ideologies of PCBA are here because they have in-depth real-world theory or praxis surrounding them and can plausibly be created IRL)


=== Friends ===
== Real and plausible ideologies ==
<span style="font-size:117%">'''Friends'''</span>
*[[File:Mill.png]] {{PB|Millism}} - One of the most based philosophers and economists in history
*[[File:Mill.png]] {{PB|Millism}} - One of the most based philosophers and economists in history
*[[file:LibMarketsoc.png]] [[Liberal Market Socialism]] - Basically my economic system
*[[file:LibMarketsoc.png]] [[Liberal Market Socialism]] - Basically my economic system
Line 781: Line 1,038:
*[[File:PCB-Neoliberal-icon.png]] {{PCB|Neoliberalism}} - r/Neoliberal is a nice place
*[[File:PCB-Neoliberal-icon.png]] {{PCB|Neoliberalism}} - r/Neoliberal is a nice place
*[[File:DistributismIcon.png]] {{PCB|Distributism}} - The only third position I will accept
*[[File:DistributismIcon.png]] {{PCB|Distributism}} - The only third position I will accept
*[[File:Socliber.png]] {{PCB|Social Libertarianism}} - The only good (And not stupid) libertarian, but dirigisme is useful, really
*[[File:Socliber.png]] {{PCB|Social Libertarianism}} - The only good (And not stupid) libertarian
*[[File:PCB-Regulationism.png]] {{PCB|Regulationism}} [[File:RegulationMarkSoc.png]] - Useful if not taken too far.
*[[File:PCB-Regulationism.png]] {{PCB|Regulationism}} [[File:RegulationMarkSoc.png]] - Useful if not taken too far.
*[[File:Synd.png]] {{PCB|Syndicalism}} - I agree with you in principle, but I will also support employers' unions when they are right, remember.
*[[File:Synd.png]] {{PCB|Syndicalism}} - I agree with you in principle, but I will also support employers' unions when they are right, remember.
Line 788: Line 1,045:
*[[File:3way.png]] {{PCB|Third Way}} - To redistribute wealth you have to create it first.
*[[File:3way.png]] {{PCB|Third Way}} - To redistribute wealth you have to create it first.
*[[File:PCB-Marketsoc.png]] {{PCB|Market Socialism}} - It's nice discussing with market socialists. They are not that ideological.
*[[File:PCB-Marketsoc.png]] {{PCB|Market Socialism}} - It's nice discussing with market socialists. They are not that ideological.
*[[File:Postlib.png]] [[Post-Liberalism]] - I could be described as a post-liberal for my support for a [[File:SocialEconomy.png]] [[Social Economy]].
<span style="font-size:117%">'''Likeable'''</span>
*[[File:Libconserv3.png]] {{PCB|Liberal Conservatism}} - Generally likeable, but you got to actually redistribute wealth for it to trickle down. At least you're not [[File:PCB-ConLib.png]] {{PCB|Conservative Liberalism}}.
*[[File:Hayek.png]] {{PCB|Hayekism|F.A. Hayek}} - I shouldn't like you, but I feel so attracted to your ideas for some reason.
*[[File:Hayek.png]] {{PCB|Hayekism|F.A. Hayek}} - I shouldn't like you, but I feel so attracted to your ideas for some reason.
=== "65% good, 35% bad" gang ===
*[[File:Libconserv3.png]] {{PCB|Liberal Conservatism}} - Generally likeable, but you got to actually redistribute wealth for it to trickle down. At least you're not [[File:PCB-ConLib.png]] {{PCB|Conservative Liberalism}}.
*[[File:Onenatcon.png]] {{PCB|One-Nation Conservatism}} - Best conservative, but we do have our economic disagreements from time to time <s> MOTHERFUCKER WHY DID YOU LEAVE THE EU </s>.
*[[File:Onenatcon.png]] {{PCB|One-Nation Conservatism}} - Best conservative, but we do have our economic disagreements from time to time <s> MOTHERFUCKER WHY DID YOU LEAVE THE EU </s>.
*[[File:MuscLib.png]] {{PCB|One-Nation Conservatism|Muscular Liberalism}} - DEFEND CULTURALLY LIBERAL VALUES RAHHHHHH (But stop being islamophobic please).
*[[File:MuscLib.png]] {{PCB|One-Nation Conservatism|Muscular Liberalism}} - DEFEND CULTURALLY LIBERAL VALUES RAHHHHHH (But stop being islamophobic please).
Line 798: Line 1,053:
*[[File:Tito.png]] {{PCB|Titoism}} - Based laws on foreign investments, but you should have accepted the free market more.
*[[File:Tito.png]] {{PCB|Titoism}} - Based laws on foreign investments, but you should have accepted the free market more.
*[[File:Councom.png]] {{PCB|Council Communism}} - Most based form of communism, would live under it if I had to decide which kind of communism to establish. I do have my reservations against the economic planning (It is inherently anti-individualistic) however.
*[[File:Councom.png]] {{PCB|Council Communism}} - Most based form of communism, would live under it if I had to decide which kind of communism to establish. I do have my reservations against the economic planning (It is inherently anti-individualistic) however.
 
<span style="font-size:117%">'''Frenemies'''</span>
=== Frenemies ===
*[[File:PostLibertarianism.png]] [[Post-Libertarianism]] - Has some interesting takes, but is too laissez-faire.
*[[File:PostLibertarianism.png]] [[Post-Libertarianism]] - Has some interesting takes, but is too laissez-faire.
*[[File:Demsocstar.png]] {{PCB|Democratic Socialism}} - Some of you are more akin to my ideas and [[File:Liberalsoc.png]] {{PCB|Liberal Socialism}}, others to regular [[File:PCB-Marketsoc.png]] {{PCB|Market Socialism}}, but why are SO MANY of your followers [[File:Statecap.png]] {{PCB|State Capitalism|State Capitalists}}!? Cringe
*[[File:Demsocstar.png]] {{PCB|Democratic Socialism}} - Some of you are more akin to my ideas and [[File:Liberalsoc.png]] {{PCB|Liberal Socialism}}, others to regular [[File:PCB-Marketsoc.png]] {{PCB|Market Socialism}}, but why are SO MANY of your followers [[File:Statecap.png]] {{PCB|State Capitalism|State Capitalists}}!? Cringe
*[[File:PCB-Nalib.png]] {{PCB|National Liberalism}} - A bit of nationalism is necessary to keep us united (If you don't think that liberalism IS the best system ever, how will it ever survive?), but you get too conservative and even protectionist at times.
*[[File:PCB-Nalib.png]] {{PCB|National Liberalism}} - A bit of nationalism is necessary to keep us united (If you don't think that liberalism IS the best system ever, how will it ever survive?), but you get too conservative and even protectionist at times.
*[[File:Mutalist.png]] {{PCB|Mutualism}} - Mixed bag, I will certainly keep that National Mutual Fund you theorised though. One way to socially own money.
*[[File:Mutalist.png]] {{PCB|Mutualism}} - Mixed bag, I will certainly keep that National Mutual Fund you theorised though. One way to socially own money.
*[[File:Austrobert.png]] {{PCB|Austrian School}} - I must admit that you were a big influence on me on the philosophical side of things, and I may apply your principles here and there, but laissez-faire was a failure. Full stop.
*[[File:Austrobert.png]] {{PCB|Austrian School}} - Has some good ideas and a good business cycle analysis, I may apply your principles here and there, but laissez-faire was a failure. Full stop.
*[[File:Libertarian.png]] {{PCB|Libertarianism}} - Eh. Liberty is obviously good, but you have more of an emphasis on being egoist than on being free with others harmoniously.
*[[File:Libertarian.png]] {{PCB|Libertarianism}} - Eh. Liberty is obviously good, but you have more of an emphasis on being egoist than on being free with others harmoniously.
*[[File:PCB-Corptism.png]] {{PCB|Corporatism}} - Class collaboration is more based than laissez-faire, but you're too statist.
*[[File:PCB-Corptism.png]] {{PCB|Corporatism}} - Class collaboration is more based than laissez-faire, but you're too statist.
*[[File:Soc-h.png]] {{PCB|Socialism}} - Yes, we're gonna get to you, but only BY AUTOMATION.
*[[File:Soc-h.png]] {{PCB|Socialism}} - Yes, we're gonna get to you, but only BY AUTOMATION.
*[[File:PCB-Cap.png]] {{PCB|Capitalism}} - VERY mixed bag. [[file:LibMarketsoc.png]] [[Liberal Market Socialism]]does have many elements from you and a good boss can be better than a cooperative, I must admit it. But history shows us how exploitative you are and I think that, in the long run, it would be better to phase you out into a [[File:SocialEconomy.png]] [[Social Economy]].
*[[File:PCB-Cap.png]] {{PCB|Capitalism}} - VERY mixed bag. I have many elements from you and a good boss can be better than a cooperative, I must admit it. But history shows us how exploitative you are and I think that, in the long run, it would be better to phase you out into a much more [[File:SocialEconomy.png]] [[Social Economy]].
<span style="font-size:117%">'''Unlikeable'''</span>


=== Enemies ===
* [[File:Protect.png]] {{PCB|Protectionism}} - Free trade fosters cooperation, peace and helps every country with focusing only on what they do well. Protection makes prices higher and doesn't help international relations at all. We should still apply you when there is an emergency situation though, or to defend us from unethically produced goods from other countries.
*[[File:Protect.png]] {{PCB|Protectionism}} - Never worked, will never work. Free trade fosters cooperation, peace and helps every country with focusing only on what they do well.
 
<span style="font-size:117%">'''Enemies'''</span>
*[[File:PCB-Commie.png]] {{PCB|Communism|Communists}} and [[File:Statesoc.png]] {{PCB|State Socialism}} - Unlike socialism, you two are completely utopic and devolve constantly in dictatorships or back to capitalism.
*[[File:PCB-Commie.png]] {{PCB|Communism|Communists}} and [[File:Statesoc.png]] {{PCB|State Socialism}} - Unlike socialism, you two are completely utopic and devolve constantly in dictatorships or back to capitalism.
*[[File:PCB-Awaj.png]] {{PCB|Anarchy|Anarchists}} - Utopic, unrealistic, etc.
*[[File:PCB-Awaj.png]] {{PCB|Anarchy|Anarchists}} - Utopic, unrealistic, etc.
Line 823: Line 1,079:




 
== Self-Inserts ==
|-| Self-Inserts=
 
Judging your ideology, not you :D
Judging your ideology, not you :D


=== S-Tier Lads ===
<span style="font-size:117%">'''S-Tier Lads'''</span>
 
*{{Template:NameEvolutionarySocialism}} - You're fucking EPIC. I may get many ideas from you.
*{{Template:NameEvolutionarySocialism}} - You're fucking EPIC. I may get many ideas from you.


Line 848: Line 1,101:
*{{SocMor}} - You are the closest we can get to neo-distributism lol. A very nice and level-headed ideology (Especially economically) and one of the best class-collaborators here
*{{SocMor}} - You are the closest we can get to neo-distributism lol. A very nice and level-headed ideology (Especially economically) and one of the best class-collaborators here


=== A-Tier Friends ===
*[[File:VEnlight.png]] [[Ultra-Enlightenment]] - You are one of my favourite ideologies on here and I love the totality of your beliefs, especially the philosophical ones.
 
*{{GoobLab}} - Again, one of the best class collaborators, plus you've become even more similar to me. You should just embrace cooperatives totally at this point though.
<span style="font-size:117%">'''A-Tier Friends'''</span>
*[[File:Uzarashvilism.png]] [[Uzarashvilism]] - Very strange cultural beliefs, but other than that, very based economics, not unlike to mine
 
*{{Gbnl}} - MY MAN. You are pretty cool tbh, hope that our (Pretty dire, to be honest) differences don't distract us from the cooperative movement.
*{{Gbnl}} - MY MAN. You are pretty cool tbh, hope that our (Pretty dire, to be honest) differences don't distract us from the cooperative movement.


*{{Heredism}} - GANG! You are very... particular with your beliefs, but nonetheless CO-OP UNITY!
*{{Heredism}} - Based mutualism, but I doubt that it would work in the long run.


*{{ETS}} - Ok man, I gotta say that you are a bit too much of a statist and collectivist in my opinion, mostly on the basis of syndicate control of the economy and of cultural policy, however I don't really have any strong opposition to your beliefs. Your democratic system is interesting. Overall a nice ideology.
*{{ETS}} - Ok man, I gotta say that you are a bit too much of a statist and collectivist in my opinion, mostly on the basis of syndicate control of the economy and of cultural policy, however I don't really have any strong opposition to your beliefs. Your democratic system is interesting. Overall a nice ideology.
Line 869: Line 1,127:


*[[File:OwfBall.png]] [[Owfism]] - Pretty much a regular [[File:Soclib.png]] {{PCB|Social Liberalism|Social Liberal}} tbh. Pretty good in my opinion, just needs to be a little more focused on [[File:Cooperative_Socialism.png]] cooperatives and reject a lot of that support for [[File:Corp.png]] {{PCB|Corporatocracy|Big Business}}.
*[[File:OwfBall.png]] [[Owfism]] - Pretty much a regular [[File:Soclib.png]] {{PCB|Social Liberalism|Social Liberal}} tbh. Pretty good in my opinion, just needs to be a little more focused on [[File:Cooperative_Socialism.png]] cooperatives and reject a lot of that support for [[File:Corp.png]] {{PCB|Corporatocracy|Big Business}}.
*


=== "75% good, 25% bad" gang ===
*{{HEW thought}} - National Syndicalism is economically based, but socially? I don't really like conservatism that much. You're pretty moderate though, so still based ;)
<span style="font-size:117%">'''Likeable Gang'''</span>
*[[File:AriFut.png]] [[Aristocratic Futurism]] [[File:AriFut2.png]] -  Now - your ideology is really thought-provoking and you raise good concerns against the status quo of liberalism and democracy, but I think that you put a little too much trust in unelected officials and in a society divided in classes, even if they're meritocratic. May also get some ideas from you though.
*[[File:AriFut.png]] [[Aristocratic Futurism]] [[File:AriFut2.png]] -  Now - your ideology is really thought-provoking and you raise good concerns against the status quo of liberalism and democracy, but I think that you put a little too much trust in unelected officials and in a society divided in classes, even if they're meritocratic. May also get some ideas from you though.
*{{HEW thought}} - National Syndicalism is economically based, but socially? Sorry man, I don't really like conservatism that much.


*{{Vistulism}} - A tad bit too statist for my liking plus protectionism is shit, however we have similar ideals and love for cooperatives!
*{{Vistulism}} - A tad bit too statist for my liking plus protectionism is shit, however we have similar ideals and love for cooperatives!


*[[File:Vamp.png]] {{Greenlink|Tiberius Thought}} - Too statist for my liking bro, but you seem to know what you are talking about. Based economics.  
*[[File:Vamp.png]] {{Greenlink|Tiberius Thought}} - Too statist for my liking bro, but you seem to know what you are talking about. Based economics.  
==Frenemies==


*[[File:EgoFutureStrasserism-Alt.png]] [[User:Hein's thought|Ego Future Strasserism]] - Very based economics, less based strasserist simbology
<span style="font-size:117%">'''Frenemies'''</span>
*[[File:CounMarx.png]] [[Council Marxism]] - A much better version of Council Communism. Still, where are the markets?
*[[File:CounMarx.png]] [[Council Marxism]] - A much better version of Council Communism. Still, where are the markets?
**[[File:CounMarx.png]] See the latest addition to my page.
**[[File:CounMarx.png]] See the latest addition to my page.
Line 887: Line 1,146:




=== "35% good, 65% bad" gang ===
<span style="font-size:117%">'''"35% good, 65% bad" Gang'''</span>
*[[File:GlorCommunism.png]] [[Glorified Communism]] - Your analysis is... very interesting. I fundamentally agree with the Solar Economy part. However, I reject violence and insurrection and I have my doubts on anarchy and minarchy.
*[[File:GlorCommunism.png]] [[Glorified Communism]] - Your analysis is... very interesting. I fundamentally agree with the Solar Economy part. However, I reject violence and insurrection and I have my doubts on anarchy and minarchy.


*[[File:Jefsynd.png]] [[Jefbol Thought]] - Council communism is a mixed bag. Automation will surely lead to it, but for the time being, it just restricts the freedom that the markets give us.
*[[File:Jefsynd.png]] [[Jefbol Thought]] - Council communism is a mixed bag. Automation will surely lead to it, but for the time being, it just restricts the freedom that the markets give us.
 
<span style="font-size:117%">'''Enemies'''</span>
==Enemies==
*{{Ayafantoho}} - You're down here simply because I am grading beliefs (I mean, you're anarcho-nihilism on crack boi), but we should bash our own skulls together some day
*{{Ayafantoho}} - You're down here simply because I am grading beliefs (I mean, you're anarcho-nihilism on crack boi), but we should bash our own skulls together some day


Line 901: Line 1,159:
*[[File:Neokira2.png]] [[Meowxism]] - Marxist-Leninist, Planned Economy Supporter, Collectivist, Anti-Nationalist, Eurosceptic, Anti-Liberal, ... I cannot imagine a worst ideology and a worse system to live into tbh.
*[[File:Neokira2.png]] [[Meowxism]] - Marxist-Leninist, Planned Economy Supporter, Collectivist, Anti-Nationalist, Eurosceptic, Anti-Liberal, ... I cannot imagine a worst ideology and a worse system to live into tbh.


|-| Hysteria=
*[[File: Hysteriaball.png]]  [[Hysteria thought]] - A very strange lad, but economically tame (which I still don't support)
 
*[[File: Hysteriaball.png]]  [[Hysteria thought]] - M̶̡̨̡̢̨̯̦̦̱͚̗̳̗͎͕̯͎͓̬̟͎̠̩̝̫͕̝̮͓̫̹̥͚̈̊̌̈̾̇̽̊̒̿̉̈͒̌͌͛́̄̎̄̉̿̊͘͜͠͝Y̸̡̨̛͈̹͇̠̮̣̲͉̝̬̭͈̺͍̣̑̄̇̊͊̿ͅ ̸̨̧̡̹̖͚̝̹̜̬̝̘̟̱̼̙͎̹͍̝͈͎̫̙̙̗̩̰̭̖̬̜̫̿̈͌̔̈́͊͂́̐͋̐̄̄̍̈́̌̈́̋̇͒́͒͂́̄̔͜͝ͅL̶̨̧̢̹͔̭̣͙͙͉̯̖̜͓̝̞͗̋̀̽̄͆̍̏̆̀̽̈̎̐̾̒̋̆̎̂͐̀͗͗̂͋̐̉̊͘̕͘͜I̷̫̜͖̩̤͈͓̹̦̙̐̀̍̀̄̌̐́̑̆̆̏̽̆̕͝͝͝ͅM̸̨̡̱͈͎̘͔̳͕̙̯̭̗͈̠͕̖͈͙̜̪̭̦̮̲̔́̈͒̀̿̈́̓̒̍̅͑̊̏̀̋̆͒̐̿̚͘͘͜͜͜͝I̶̮̘͆̅̍̄̀̄̀͒̎̄̑̉́̔̿̂͌̈́̅̀͌͊̎͐̔͒͋͛͗̄̓͠͝T̸̡̘̱̦̪̤̭̱̙͙̯̝̦͕͈͇̭̦̤̲̯̮̭̻̫̰̹͇͉̘̥͎̯̰̞̻͓͂̑́͂̍͑̊̈́̀̾̈̿̇̀̏́͆̅̋̽͆̂̀͐͗̓̽̐͒̊̿̈̈́̑͌̔̕͠͝Ê̶͚̝̩̭̗͉̲͖͋̀̃̉̈́͒̈́͝͝D̷̨̨̡̩̥̹̰̣͈̖̬̰̯͇̣͖̤̜͔͍̞͕̪̖̪͎̠̙̺̝̳̭̯͔̙͊́͛̐̀́̍̌̋̈́̈́͒̀͋̇͑̿̅̈́̃͌͆̃̉̋̚͜͝͝ ̶̨̢̧̧̛̛̼̣̫̹͎̥̘͚̬̫͕̺͖͖͕̫̪̱̺̼̫̰̖̐͋̔̎̀̊͑̐̀́̏̈̓͗͋̈͒͊͆̂̕͝͝ͅM̷̢͓̱͖̿͋͋̐̑̆̿̀͗͑̅͐̄͋̀̚͘͠Ĩ̵̖͓͓̺̗̍̿͊̉́̀̈́͒͘ͅN̸̡̨̨̧̲͓̹̝͔̰͍͙̰̱̰̻̪̜͎̭͒͂͑̽͂́̾̀̎Ḋ̶̨̡̢̦͚̺̬̘̮͉̝̱̩̤̦͈̞̥̬̺͙̹͖̳̜̞̻͈͍͓̬͕͕̭̈ͅ ̵̡̢̧̛̞̙̣̥̦̺̖͍͖͈͓̳̦͉͇͈̺̤̳͍͖͕̟͔̻͙̲̻͙̹̙͂̃͒̓͑̾̒́͒̑̓̏̉͘̚̚͜͝͝C̸̡̟͎͚̺͎̼͇̺̪͙̳͎͍̖͚̬̼͉̘̗̗͗͑̆̐̀̑̓͑͐̏̂̽̔͑̀̾̿̈́͂̈́̾́̈́̍̾̔̏͂̀́͊̈́̈́͐͘̚̕̚͜͝͠͠͠Ą̷̡̛̛̛̼̱͍̈́͂͂̋̂̅̆̂̓̈̇̓̄̔̇̊̈́̀̍͗͌̓͛̃́̈́̽͋̚̚͘̕͝Ṋ̶̼͉̺͎̬̖͖̬͔̉̃̊͌̅̍͊͛̅̃̾͠N̸̮̰̈ͅỌ̷̢̡͈̲̰̬͖͕̫̫̫͉̝͉̖̘͖͓̻̞̰̬̗̟̹̯͂͌̀̐͛̿̾́̍̃̀͑̋́̿͑͗̄̾̈̉͐̇͋̎͘̚͜͝T̶̨̨̨̨̡̛͍̟̩̰͎̗̘͍̺͉̰̻͎̥̺̳͓̻̺̮͉̳̣̪̣̥̠͔̰̎̑͊̇͂͑̈́̊̓̈́͊̿̀͑̎͂͗̄̊̅̉̎̾̈́̈́͌̓̓̄̏͊̎̈́̎͘̚̚̕͜͠͠ͅͅ ̴̼̥͎̘̯̤̘͕̯̖͓̰͋̃̅̃̾̎͑̋͌͊͌͂̽̌͋̿͌̀͒̏̑͑͑̈́̕͝͠ͅÇ̸̨̲̹̮̟̖̝̥̮̘̼̗̗̼̏̈̈́͑́̔̑͐́͗̎̄̒̍̏̈́̒̒̃̉͛̈͊̓̀͛͆̀͑̕͘̕͝ͅO̶̡̘̦̮͕̱̣̳̻̻̗̣̤̥̼̜̮̭̥̦̿̓̉͊̀̾̽̔͌̈́̃̍̉̿̚͝Ṁ̷̢̡͓̦͍͍͖̳̮̹̗̳̖̮̺͖͕̩̞̺̥̫̙̯͍͓͇̹̪̗͎͔̯̅̀͂ͅP̷̢̢̟̯̳̯̥̙̲̬̠̝͈͖̬͙̲͉͉̗͔̤̫̼͓͖̝͓̀̀͑͆̽̍̈́͐̿͆͊̃̾͜͝Ř̶͇̫̞̫͕̪̺̣̹̭̻̣͖̥̬̩͕̝͉͈̤͎̜̦̠͚̭̥̺̙̩̟̙͔̣̌̽̔̆́͐͌͗́̐͐̑̇́̇́͐͒́̄̉̿̾̓͗̔͌͛̈́̔̀̉̕͜͝͠͝ͅĘ̶̡̡̥͍̘͖͕̮̭̣͖̜̻̟͚̩͓͚̺̺̻̘̮̗̣̥͈̜̫͓̮̹̭̻̍̾̍͋͛̊̾͒͊̃͗̑̌̿̑̎̓̔̓̊̏͒̅͛́̚̚̚͘̚͝H̴̨̢̨̡̛͚͕̱̙̭̙̻͔̬̥̪̺̥̱͙̘̻͚̘̳͑̃̐̎̋̈́͛̈͊̌̏͊͆̾̈́̓̕Ȩ̸̨̧̛̛̤̼͇̭̭̮͉͍͍̟̦̤̝̱̳̠̣̰͉̤̼̓͐̉́̔͒́̑͌̒͒̊̃̍͌͊̋̊͐̏̌̈́̄͗̋̀̓̋̐̕͘̚̕͘͜͝N̸̨̨̛̦̥̬̟̗̝͔͓͈̟̖͖̒́̌̈́̅̿̇͗̋͌̋̃̋̌̍̿̿ͅͅD̴̡̨̢̞̜̖̫̰̺̮̪̱̹̝̥̪͇͒̇̈́̀̈́͂̆͜͠͠ ̶̧̛̛̜͍̮͖̹̬͖̗̪̯͍̼͎͔̪̙͙̺͕̹̖͇̖̱̱̱̤͎̙̪͓̣̻̮̓̓͋̽̿͋̒͐̓̎̐̿͗̒̈́͋̓̊̔́̉̒̎̾̓̆̂̄̈́͒̂͋̒̓̑̚͘̚͜͜͠͠ͅͅŞ̴͇̠̤͙̭̫̬͎̬̖̖̥̰̼̼̘͍̠̝̜̬͍͉͔̭̪̥̭͚̠̐̄͛́̏̈́̏̍Ȗ̶̢̪͈̳̹̤̮̱̲̠̤̮̲̮̳̰̮̆ͅÇ̴̠̖͎̮̟̗̙̭̬͈̗͓̝̹̣̞̱͓̘͈̦̺̼̘̻̠̯̰̐̐͒̍̇̾͆̿̒̔͆̇̅͊͂̄̈́̋̏̋͐̒͋̀͑̊͛͐͑̽̉͗͗͒͋̐̚͠ͅH̵̛̜͔̝̰̯͚̞͕̬̹̰͖̟͙̲̩͚̲̦̩̖̯͓̩͆́͆͑͗̾̉̈́̍̍͌͂̄̒̉̓̔̀̔̊̍̕̕ͅ ̸̮̪̼̣͓̳̻̬̼̖̠̞̰̲̦̪̥̓͐̋͂͛̄́͐̈́͂̌̋̒̐̒̀́̊͋̆̎̏̀̓͂́̎͌̇̀̏̊͐͆̋̋̕͝ͅI̷̗̭͕̳͖̝̩̙̙̟̩̻̖̟̖̭̮͎͙̟̘͈̹͈̪̥̎̏͒̉̊̔̅̀̅̋͐̍͆̾̀̀̈́̀́͐́̊̽̂̎͋͘̚͜͜͝D̸̨͍̬͍̮̥͈̩̦̞̞̭̙̠̭̳̼̪̙̝̝̺̎̄̈́͆̉͗̔̀̅́͋͂͗̍̋̓̄́͌͆͋̉̑̄̍̓͒̌̂̏̊͗͗͗͘̕̕͘͠͠͠͠E̵̡̛̛̙̠̙̖̥͎̲͈̤̹̳̻̟̦̝̹̥͖̟̹͈͚̟̼͕̥̲͔̘͓͊̅̎́̽̿̋͌̇́͑̒̐̉͂̄̑̔̓͂̑̚͠͠Ơ̶̡̧͙͚͖͕̜̞̙͇̺̦̪̻̳͈̥͔͙̗̭͓̼̗̯̙͚͙͔̥̖̝̥̽̀̒͋͜͝ͅL̷̢̡̨̛̮̳̠͕͇̘̼̣̻̫͔̮̣͕̫̼̼͎͖͓̞̤͕̦͓̱̮͆̀͛̈́̑͌̑͑̊̋̾̈́̽͐̚Ơ̵̰̫̜̟͍̠̣̠̗̺̲͎̻͔̟̰͍̼̬̬̫̈̌̆̓̀́̏̊̅̇̇͌̎̀̇̄̿͒͛̐͌̒́̕͝͠Ǵ̵̛͕̩̪͙̺̯̫̮̖͓͕̟͔̠̼̱̎̿̍̂͛̈́̋̒̚̕̚͜͠͝Y̴̧̨̡̡̡̝̻͖̯̝͖̝̻̤̳̘̫̠̮̙̘͈̻͂͂̌̄͋͑͐̾͂͜͜͠ ̶̩̱͇̺͎̘̯̩̣̥͍̫̫̼͚̂̇̑̿́̓̐̾Ą̴͍̪͇̣͙͓̲̗̹̯͓̦͈̱̻̝̳̞̻̖̊̌A̷̧̛̯̯̰̲̪̰͈̱̗͖̝̻̯̮͚̻̾͑̈̐́̃͂̒͂̅͆̄͐̈̄̏̈́̔̈́̽̑̏̎̒͆̔̽̚͜͜͝͠͠A̷̫̱͎͖͙͍̠̗̰̩̙͕̝͔̲̎̀̈́́̂̔̏̓̈́͗̎͆̂͆́̆͛̌͒̉̕͠͝ͅẠ̶̡̰͇̙̪̬͓̠̺̌͌̆̄͆̔̂͋̿͐͆̓͊̿͐̕̕̕͜͝͝Ą̴̧̧͓͓̱͇̺̲̞͙͓̱͓̮̩̼͔͎̱̞̼̜͋̀̅̅̓̄̊̈́̄́̑͆̀̈́̒̓͌̓́͌̄̓͐̾́̈͛̚͝À̷̧̨̧̺̱̟̭̣̱̲͍̺̰̳͓̳̮̦̜͖̹͔͚͎̺̺̟̰͗̾̔͜A̷̡̡̠̬̮̣̼̙̻̥̫̩͙̮̪̳̗̺͕̾̏̓̎̐̍̏̒̀͐͒̀͊̄̄̃͛͂̈́̓́͋͌̓̿͘͝͝͝Ą̴̡̧̢̨̡̨̧̡̥̫̝͖̣̱͖͔͈̺̭̰̯̩̩̹͇͔̬̣̥͉̱̖̹̣͕̯̙̍͑̌̀̀̀̐̔̎̈́͆̋͒̈̀̎̇͑̅̽̽͗͘̚̕͝͝͝͝A̴̢̨̨͉̥̘̺͖͎̱̦̻̲̫̲͖͕̝̭̦̲͗̆̓͋͒͊͂͗̕A̸̤͆̀͊̈̍͋̆̅̏́̀͒̔̓̋͊̈́̄͒̽̉̂̔̍̚͘͝͠͝Ą̷̢̢̛͕̫̻͎͙͎̙͖̜̝̲̮͖̮̗̣̯͉͍̭͍̹̻́̆͆̏̊̆̓̌͐̀̒̀͌̈̏̌̑̓̉̔́̽͐̔͘͜͝͝ͅA̸̧̮̣͍͉̬̩̠̖͚̻̣̲͙͍̹͈͎̪͋̃̽̏̀͒̓̓̍̿̃͂̑̒́͒̄͗̇̔̈́̏̅̚̕͜͠͠ͅA̵̡͔̺̥̠͙̙̲̯̜̯̻͖͕̤̮̱̱̱̤̦̠̹͉̜̝͙̪͔̥̩͉̗̋͂̈́̾̀̐̓̀̉̍̅̓̈̑̀́̒͑̒͊͊̀̍̉̋͂͆̒̕͜͝ͅA̸̛͔̰͉͎͒͛̌̃̅̿̐͒͗̆͛͗̔̋̈́̕ͅͅÄ̵̧̧̼̺̦͖̖͚̼̲̻͕̭͚̮͖̯̖͙͙̬̥̰́̽̃̒̀̾̇́̑̿̈̓͜ͅȀ̵̡̢̼̖̣͓̘̝̺̜̮͎̹̠̥͇̯̪͔̜̞̹͙̜̓̂͌̀̃͛͐̔̊̉̔͐̈́́̕͜͜͝͝Ä̴̢̡̧̡̡̜̦͎̮͇̮̜͙̬͎̥͈̫̤͕̮͍̥̣̝̯͔̹̞̃̉̏͑̀͋̓͂̋͒̊̃͆̓͛͜͜͠A̶̡̡̳̞͖̝̲͔͑̀͌̈̀̋̌̈̋̈̈́͊̓̿͒̓͆̑́̎̀̕̕͜͜͠͝ͅĄ̵̡̛̛̰̭̳̰̘̝̪̳̙͕̰͓̲̰͙̟͉̾͗̍͗́̽̒͐͆́͗́͗͗͛͑̉͒̈̐́̍̂̒̋̎̕̚͝͝͝͝͠Ă̶̢̛̹̦͎͈̩̙̲͕̱̜̬̼̫͔̯̮̺̘̙͍̗̓̊͂̿̓͊́́̐̔̈́̊̒̎́̐̍̀́͗͂̈͛̌̾̌͒͋͌̽̏̕̕̕͜͠͝A̷̡̧̢̻̭͈̜̺̼̖̗̦̞̻̠̭͍͓͔̻͍̤̭̜͙̯͉̪͔̙͇̖̱͉͖̜̘͛̑͑̋̈́̐͒̍͒̽͛̆̓͜͜͜͜͝Å̸̦̥̣̰̤͓͚̰̬̤̺̫̗͑̆͐̋̒̋͋̓̍̓̌̆̍̓̓̾͂̍͑͐̂̇̏̈́̇͒͘̕̕͜͝͝͝A̸̢̛̩͙̽͗̓̋̉̋͆͒͗̔̏̍͆̈́̃͂̀̓̃͋͐̿͒͑͌̒̓͑̕̕͘͝͝͝Ą̵̡̡͈̼̦͔͈͚̝͇͔̫̪̭͓̭̼͉̟͍̭̼̗͚̝̇̿̈́̽̀̈̃̑͛͊̍͊̋̿̋́͆͌͒̉́͋͌̚͝͝͝ͅÁ̶̡̛̤͕̳͍̬̺̯̻͓̠̙̱̰͎̯̲̱̱̘̪̟̦͖͖̪͈̦̻̅͆́͛̽̈͛̀̂̔̽͒̓̌̍̑͆̾͒̾̈͒̚͘̚͜͜A̴̢̡̝̯̭͙̬͈̪̹͔̰̽̀́̊́͐͋̈́̑̔͐̓̌̿̌̈̾̆̐͒̊̋͊̅̆͊͌̓̒̕̕͝͠A̵̛͚͇̯̠͓̼̣̲̭͗̌͌̎̄͆̑̅͊̈́͋̀̃̎̈͆͆̊͋̽̓͒̽̄̄̽̐̋̓̀̾̈̇̍̕̕͠͝͠Ą̵̢̨̝̘̟̮͖͖̹̣͓͍̻͎̯͇͚̠̮̱̪̪̘͔͚̫̽̋̇͑̏̇̆̀͋̃͛̌͛̓̔̔̄̇́̈́͑̓́̄̓͘̕͝ͅͅÀ̵̡̛͚̪̬̺̘̥̠͉͔͎̹̼̂͋̃̔̑͑̀̌̓̄̒͗̀̃̿̃̈́͒͊́̈́̋̐̄̈̎͑̉͑͂̈́͌̅͑̕͝A̷̡̲͔̲̝͈͈̲̔̿͑͆̀͊̈́̿͋̀̚͝Ą̷̢̨̡͇͕̮̱̝͙̬̖̣̟̯̹͉̯̾̈́̾̀͛̉̓̓̉̅͐͗̈́̑̉̀͒̋̃͆͊́͗̅̍̽̃͒̒̀̏̕̚̕͘͜ͅA̴̧̮̪̞̹̳̺̱͖̻͎͔̣̝̯̙̖̤͉̭̼̺̞̝͎̔̀͑̅̊̓̿̆̂̽̏̓̐̓͑̚͝͝͠ͅA̴̡̨̧̧̳̤͚̳̞͇̼̞̦̥̩͎̼͎̺̬͚͓̪̰̤̖͔͎͓̮͈͋ͅĄ̸̨̜̠̠͍͓̮̫͍̹̙͚̗̪̦̳̫͚̬͍͎̩̺͍̳̙̲̜͌̂̅̎̈̐̊̽̒̈́̓̉̀̚͜͜À̶̧̡̢̨̝͓̝̥̭̥͎̖̦̰̻̹͖̞̹̹͓̻̭̺̱̜̯͂Ả̷̢̧̨̳̠̜̱͙̱̪̓̐̎̔̍́͊͐̓̇̋̒̿̇́̈́̄̆̑̊͂̽͝͝A̸̧͕̳̭̤̣̰͎̜͓̲̜̭̿͗Ą̵̨̨͙̼͎̣̼̼̙͔͚̫̦̫̘̪̠͈̳̫̻̰̤̬̮̬̗͔̾̿̾̇̇̄̒̆̉̔̀̐͊̓̓̄̓̏͌̐̈̀̏͌͆̀̍͐̏́̊̒̔̚̕͜͜͜͝A̵̧̧̧̛̛̲͚͖̝̫̠̗̪̞̭̱̘̖̺̼͎͍͙͒̓̽̂͐̑́̽̒͒́͒́͂̂͗̃͊̅͒͑̐͂̏͂͋́̄̋̄̅͆͐͌̏͛̽̚͝ͅǍ̴͔̖͎̥̘̤̤̯̩̤̃́̈̎́͆̒̆̉̈́̓́͆̅͐̾͒̆̒̈́̈́̈̉̃̏̈͐̾̕͘̕͝Ą̸̢̡̨͓͖̪͎̣̺͈͖̪̥̟̙͈͎̖͙̼̮̣͕͔̖͉͚̹͇̖̜̘̱̻̄̍͊̔͊͆̐̆̑̿̎̈͑̌̐͒̽̽̈́͜͝A̷̡̡̨̡̨̛̖͉̰̩̙͍͓̬̰̰̖͚̘̥͎̖͙̭͈̩̻͍̪̺͔͓̯͎̣̩̹̭̟̗̤̺̓̔̓̔̾̍͋͋̊̉̔̍̿́̒́͒͒̀̈́̆̉̈́̓͘͘͠͝A̸̧̛͔̬̳̞̦̹̬̖̟̬̤̜̝̭͚͓̬͔͕͎̘̦̯̭͒̋̽̽͗͌͂̾̉̍̾̽̇̅̆̇̾̀̈́̋́̆̈̽̽̀͋̓̂͗̈̓̉̚̕͝͝Ã̸̧̪̬̺͓̩̲̬̞̹̲͔̦͔̗̳͎̼̼̲͓͔̬̻̱̭͆̎̓̌̈̃͋͋̎͂́̋̋͊̄̌̉̀̾̂̊̀͝͝Ä̸̡̨̛̳͖̯̠͖̳͎͇̠̲͎̗̺̳̖̻͔͔̺͎͈͎͙͍́̿̃͋Ą̷̢̢͕͔̹̣͓̖̜͍͓̱͚͚͇͈̤̠͓̙̮̩͚̤̯̰̳̮̝͍̙̯̭̭͈̳̱̖͇̤̈́͂̈͑̀̍̽̌̋̿̒̈́͗͒͗́̿́̔̒̀͗̆̓́̌͛͊̃̆͊́̐̈́̑̕̚͠͠͠ͅA̴̛̦̫̜̖̰̯̫̽̈́́̄͆̅̿͌̂͒̔̂̾̈́̋̿̓̎̾̉̚̕̚̚͜͝͝͝A̵̧̢̧̛̛̯̳͚̫͙̖̘̜̼̼̣̠̟͌̉́͂́̔͂̂̔͐͗̐̓͒̇̈͂̐̀̏́͛̿̂̉̈͗̽̀̔͊͒̔̀̿̌͌͘͝͝A̸̧̛̛̟̳̻̣͕̙̫̫̺̺̤͙͚͉̘̠̥̱̩̞̖̠̲̘̘͈̤̖̮̥̣̜̩̭̲̝̺̒̈́͆͆̋͆̌͐̽̐̈́͐́̈́̀̎͆̽̎̂͊͝͠͠͝ͅA̷̢̢̰̠̻͖̭̫͓̤̝͔͉͔̟̝̠͉͕̹̯͖̭̖̳̻̙͓̹̩̣̦̝͉͇̘̯̹̫̘͚̺̽̌͑͌͋͝͝Ã̸̧̧̡͈̥͇̤̤͔̰͔͊̍͆̀̃́͊͒͆͛̆͊̈́̽͛́̎̕͜ͅẠ̴̧̡̯̲̫̰͚̮̻̫̤͍͙̭͚̹̬͇͔̦͍̟̬̙͂̾̓̑͜Ã̵̡̡̙̻̙͍̬̉͆̚Å̸̡̢̨̡̡͎͎͖̬͉̪͈̬̬̣͚̺̮͉̞̲̣̯͇̙̪͎͍̹̲̐̑͒̀̆̏̆̅͐͊̋̎̒͒͊́̍̄̌̋̒́̿͋̓́͂́̿͂͋́̀̕͘͘̚͜͜͝͝͠͝A̸̛̠̹̯̥͐͑̉̈́̒̈̆̿̈̑̐̔̈̒̃̆̎̇͝͝A̵̩̝̿̐̂̃̆̔̋̊̈́͗̈́̈̿͂͋̒͛̈́̉̿̄̓͂̓̉̈́́͝͝A̵̡̦͓̦͓̗̦̳̺̋̈́̾̍͐͐̈͆̽̋̾͜͠͝A̸͖̦͚̬͒͛̃̊̒͒͊̈̉̇̾́̄̿̿͑̇́͝͝͠͠Ą̸̡̢̡̢̢̡̻̖̪͓̣͙̝̼̞͓̟̤͎̼̲̖̯̞̤͕͈͇̦̪̖͍̻̯͖̳̘̟̉̅̂͑̄̍́̉̾͒͊̎͛͌͋́́̿̃̓̄͒̉̕̕͜͝͝͠ͅA̴̼͗̉̀́Å̶̝͍͚̮̝̦̬͒͐̊͌͠͝A̶̗̩̜̖̱͔͑̾̎̏́̇̔́͆̈́̊͌Ȃ̴͔̫̣̠̲̺̙̬̲̻̙͕͕̺̟̭̜̮̝̣̪̻̳̱̞̦̞̯͑̈́͜ͅA̴̢̡̳͖͇͈̯̩̽̉̉̂́͗̈́̈̉̉́̅̍̔͆͊̇̿̾͋̎͗͂̿̓̚̚͜͝͝ͅͅA̸̟͉̮̠͈̳̺̘̳̣̩̝͕̰̞̩͍̘͓̩̜̦̝̰̗͕͇̙̱̹̼̪͍̽͂̆̅͗̈́̑̔͊̏̃̾͑̄͂̒̇̋̄̋̑̇͗̎͊̆͂̓͒͂̑̚͘̚̚͜͜͠͠͠͠Ǎ̴̱̞̙̻͇̩̞̬͙̪̼̗͎̗̈́̅͌̔̈́̑̿̐̐̂͒̈́̊̆̅̊̾̾̋͐͆̂͆̆̀̉̎́̅̕̕̚͜͝ͅA̷̢͈͖̫̠̹̳̮̽͋̈́́̎̃̈́̚ͅA̷̧̧̗̩͉͙̞̲͈̦̼̱̫̗̺̫͙͓̼̪̝͋̓̒̐̋̀̔͗̈́̓̾̒̎͛͊̓̏̿͂̈́̎̀̾̀̈́̆̌̃̍͐̓͒͘͘͠͠͝A̸̛̝͓̰̗̓͐̽̾̔͊̋́̐͒̀̓͆̌͋̽̀̚̕Ā̶̡̛̛͕͕̞̰̠̺͖͖̰̻̖̱̣̥̭̺̗͕̺̣͔͉̥͉͓̳̟̟̠̞͈̦̯̱̝͖͚͊̐̃͊̉̈́̄̂̒̓̅̓͑̎̃̂̽̿̌́͊̆̊̌͛̉̓͑̄̅̇͜͝͝͝A̷̢̡̡̛̦̟̮̦̮͔̭̗̪̘̬̹̻̘͍̳̦̹͆̇̉̓̄͑̃̌̐̏̉̉͂͐̈́̅̚Ã̶̡̨̛̟̝̻̤͉̙͈͕̝̞̞͉̦͖̯̦͍̟̮̲̮̦̦̼̬̔̒̄̉̀͊͋̃̉́̽͊͐̄͗̓͌̾̌̉̀̿̍̿̅̍̕͘͝͠A̵̛͇͚͖͓̝̹̘̥̻̮̻̗͖͎̙̻̰̭͈͉̒̄̅̉͑̒̇̿́͊͘̚̚̕͝͝A̶̧̨͎̘͇͕͕̜̬̹͔̖̘͓͍̹͊̇͆̆̚A̶̞͈̻͒̓̈́̈́̉̅̍͋̌̿͋̓͌͗̔́̔͊̾́̔̄̾͗̒͒̈́̆̀̅̋͑̒̚̚̕͠͝͝͝͝Ą̵̢̡̛̥̬̖͓̝̩̺̱̠̥̮̰̪̞̬̼͍͚͙̩͕̲͕̭̟͔̹͔̲͒́̄̈́͆̏̽̉̽̏́̈́̐̑͊̓̏̉̃̎̏̎̈́͐̍̑̍̍͆̔̑̆̈̽͘͜͝͠͝Ä̷̢̡̡̢̧͉̙̻͙̤̩͔̤͎͖̩͓̦̪͕̞̪̹̼͔̩̥͔̱́̍͋̽̈́͗̓̌̈́͆̈́͗̇̽͆̊͆̔͊̂̀̇́̓̿̏̕͘̚͠͝A̵̧͇̙̙̞̘̽̇̎͊͐̂́̈̐̈͝͠Ą̷̛̗͇͕̺̤̲̬͍̫̣͕͇͓̳̜͙̣̯̹̝̠͓̬̘̩͗̓͑͆̀̒̔̅̆̓͒͒͊͋̍̍́̓͊̒̎̎͆͋̿̚̕͘̚̕͘͝͠͝͝͝͠͠͝͝͝ͅÄ̷̧̬̘̻̤̺̲͚̟͖̞̦́̃̉̈̑̓̀̔̈́͊̿̒͠͝͝Å̴̢͇̗̱̲͙̪̪̻̹̥̙̹̍͊͒̑ͅA̵̡̡̡̙̝̜͎̻̜̤̲̣͇̝̱͈̭̦̖͖̩͎̤̯͍͖̘͉̙̟̼̓̔̽̽͊̋́̍͂̋́̋̈́́̀̎̈̃͑̈́̆̿͌̍̚̚͠͠͝͠͝͝A̷̢̨̡͍͎̜͎͙̣͎̭͎͍̟̯̱̱̰̼̰̝̣̤̯̟̪͕̫͚͎͎̣̲͙̫̳͇̓̾̄̈́͆͌̑̕Ą̷̭̻͓͖̩͙̙̠̱͈͖̬͔̬̭̪̮͔͕̺͖̖̜͖̥̬͉͚̹̳̗͖͔̰͈͋A̶̠̫̙̬͆͊̈́̅̽Ą̶̼̱̟̼͍͖͈̯̲̤̬̱̪̻̼̰̦̊̈́̃͘͜͠Å̶̲̮̜̗͎̳͈͓͉̣͉͕͉͍̲̭̬̱̹̙̻̞̞̫̃̓̒͗͂́̌͒̊̐̀̓̍̔͆̾̃̒̈͆̊̀̒̍̓̔̾͜͝͠ͅĄ̴̨̢̖͈̗̼̘̖͙̻͉̩͕̪̼̺̺̝̗̟̮̗͎̦̿̐̊̒̒̀͒͑̄̑̔͒̈́̅̾̑͌͑͑̇͋͐̈́̏͛̕͜͠͝͠À̴̢̧̧̢̙̥̙̱͉̘͕̙̰͎̩͇̳̭͎̘͍̣͓͖̤͎̯̲̬̬̠̤̃̏̈̈́̓̅́̌̽̇̈́͂́͌́̑͆̇̄̆͑̊̓̄̀̀̾̋̊͜͝͝͝͠A̷̡̧̡̛̛̞͙̥̹̳͚͔̹̮̙̱͈̗͓̿̽̐̾͌́̿̍̈́͋͆̒̄̓́̎͆̉̈́̓̄̓̐͆̈̀͆̉̕̚͘͝͠͝Ą̵̨̢̧̡̘̘̜͕̱̪̱͖͕͇̲͍̩̫̮͍̹̻͍̗̊̎̒͊͂̔̍̈́͑͆̉̈̍̎͛͛͋̒̃̈́͑̓́͝͠͠͝ͅͅA̸̡̧̡̬̥͓͔̘̭̖͉̙͈̱͕̪̱̮͔̻̗̲̱͈̟̰̠̅͜A̷̰͉̭͍͓̅̒̐͆̃͆͋̑̄̌̎̔͌̋͝͝Ą̴̨̛̛̞̩͍̻̲̬̰͍͕͓̞̪͙̙̪̼͚̝̻͕͉̠͈̹͉͎̠̱̙̦̭̹͍͍͇̠̟͆́͛͒̏̃̉͛̽̉͗̅̾̊͛̈́̌̈́̽̊͒̍̽̚̕͝͝͝͝͝Å̷̡̧̡̰̭͔̪̭̩̪̭̰̪̥͕̱̗͉͇̠̼̝͉̞̞̩̞̻̣̻̮̣͖̮̗̱̤̮̤̩͙̥̈́̒̄͛́̎̇̄́͒͆̈́̓̐͂̀̿͘̚͘͝͠͝͝A̸͖̣͙̠͍̥̖̙̮̤̍̄̈͝Ạ̴̻̙̎̇̄͗̀͝͝͝A̷̢̢̞̞͚̥͚̼͔̪̳͉̟͕̰̳̘̱͕̬̱̝̭͎̹͇͉̱̦̻̻̦͙̙̫̫̭̠͍̽̉̀̔̓̓͐̓̍̋͑̍̽͌̅̈́̐̄̂̉͊͒̓̈́́͆͛̕͘Ầ̴̧̤̳̲̗̝̙͋̒̍̌͋̊͛͋͌̍̐̇̉̓̽͋͐̍͐͛͌́͋̽͛̀̍̈͐̕͠͝͠͝͝Ǎ̵̡̨͈̺̙̜̮͇͙̹̯̭͉̦̦̻͛̅̂̊̉̎̐̄̾̄͗̂͊̔̋̾̈́̅̾͗̉͊͋̑͐̈́̄̍̊͆̇͋̒͘͝͝͝A̴̧̨̱̯̻͖̝̣̦̜̦̼̼̘̬͚̠̝͉̱̫͑̄̔̈́̉͗̒̌̑̕͝ͅA̷̛̦̥̲̙̝̪͔̝̹̗̫̋̀͛̀̆̑̋̎̀̈́̆̔̿͗͂̈́̔̔̌͋͋̎̚͘͘͝Ä̶̢͍͕͍̰͎̘͙̖̥̱́̋͆̐̓͋͝Ǎ̸̡̛̖̟̼̦̣̟̟̮̞̪̞̃̊̏̌͋̋̅̍͒̾̊̏́̔͒̚͠͝͝͝A̷͕̙͇̤͇̍͌̎̈̆̿͑̾́̒̀͆̐͑̊̎̇͠͝͠͝A̷̧͚̰̰̹̫͍͍͖̖̗̳̩̞̺͉͈̮̥͎̮͛̍́̂͘͜Ă̸̧̧̢̛̻̘̣̤̠̦̻̪̞̻̩͆̈́̅̌̇̀̾̓̐̉̏͑̃̔̆̑̈́̕A̴̼̣̞̤̝̫͍̠̯̎̍̍͛̏̈́̏̀̍͒̿̄̊́̐͗̽̕͝ͅA̵̢̡̢̢̟͍̳͖̥͉̟͍̣̪̗̺͓̯͚͔͍̞͖̳̬͇̝͍͌̅̇͒ͅ


</tabber>
</tabber>
Line 917: Line 1,173:


==Add List==
==Add List==
*{{MSZ}} - Add me
=== Archived ===
{{Collapse|
*[[File: Hysteriaball.png]]  [[ Hysteria thought]] - add me <3
*[[File: Hysteriaball.png]]  [[ Hysteria thought]] - add me <3
*{{Ayafantoho}} - add me as enemy cus why not
*{{Ayafantoho}} - add me as enemy cus why not
Line 948: Line 1,207:
*{{ETS}} - I lost faction experience
*{{ETS}} - I lost faction experience
*{{SocMor}} - Please add me back.
*{{SocMor}} - Please add me back.
*[[file:Rigby.png]] [[Rigby Thought]] - Update
*[[File:Uzarashvilism.png]][[Uzarashvilism]] - Oi there, based Liberal bruv, add me?
*{{GoobLab}} - It's Goober again, I became even more based, add me.
}}
=== New ones ===
*{{Meadowsin's Basilisk}} - Just read your page, and I wanna see where you put me,, add. :3
*[[File:Niiloism.png]][[Niiloism]] - Add me?
*[[File:Niiloism.png]][[Niiloism]] - Add me?
*[[file:Rigby.png]] [[Rigby Thought]] - Update
*{{JustaWorker}} - Add me?
*[[File:Champi thought.png]] [[Pensamiento de Champi]] - add me pliz :)
*{{IMileism}} - Add me.


==Navigation==
==Navigation==
Line 958: Line 1,226:
ArmandoByHEW2.png|Second Version by {{HEW}}! (The hat and the flag were added by me)
ArmandoByHEW2.png|Second Version by {{HEW}}! (The hat and the flag were added by me)
ArmandoByCurly.png|Second version by [[Curly Wurly]]!
ArmandoByCurly.png|Second version by [[Curly Wurly]]!
Conflict.png|Second Version by {{Dr. Occo}}!
ArmandoAndTheKing.png|Monarchist me and normal me
YSKYSNArmando.png|You Should KYS, NOW! by {{HEW}}!
</gallery>
</gallery>
{{Market Socialists}}
{{Market Socialists}}
{{Lib}}


{{#css:
{{#css:

Latest revision as of 08:44, 14 March 2024


Self Insert
"People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism

This page is meant to represent GeneraleArmando's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission.




"Men are no more dependent beings that need protection from a hierarchical and paternalistic system; they are independent beings capable of guiding themselves and can approach others as equals."



Armandonian Liberalism is user GeneraleArmando's self-insert ideology that mixes various beliefs from the center and left wings of politics, mainly from Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Liberalism (and all its variants), Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Social Democracy, Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Market Socialism and, more limitedly, some variants of Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Right-Libertarianism Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination and Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Left-Libertarianism.

Ideology Template

Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Armandonian Liberalism Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination

Politics

I believe in a Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Semi-Direct Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Liberal Democratic Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Federative Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Republic with a strong Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Constitution (In order to protect Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Civil Liberties from Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Dictatorship of the Majority) and a strong emphasis on Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Experts making sensible policies based on the will of the elected politicians and, thus, of the people.

I support replacing all Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Senates with a 'Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination House of Experts Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination', where actual experts, nominated by the Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination President or the Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Monarch Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination, also vote on laws.

In principle, I have nothing against Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Ceremonial Monarchies, and I would even support a Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Constitutional Monarchy where the monarch has either Reserve Powers comparable to those of a Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Parliamentarian Republic, or executive power and the duty to nominate capable ministers.

The Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination State is both a necessity and a benefit for society, even though I do have my reservations against excessive Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Economic Regulations, excessive Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination State Intervention and most forms of state-mandated Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Culture.

I am extremely Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Anti-Authoritarian and I critique Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Military Conscription and Compulsive Military Service, Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Government Surveillance, Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Imperialism, Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination State Capitalism and Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Excessive Interventionism as Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Authoritarian Actions and Government Overreach.

I overall personally support Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Fusion Reformism in the form of both Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Social Economy Activism (Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Co-operative Ownership, Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOP), Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Board-Level Employee Representation (BLER)) and of Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Ordoliberal-adiacent economics. In the event of an Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Authoritarian Government I do however support both Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Peaceful and Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Violent means to attain Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Liberty once again.

Diplomatically, I am a strong Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Pro-Europeanist that would like closer European integration, but not to the level of a Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Federation. I also support close Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination International Cooperation as a mean of peace rather than Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Military Interventionism. However, I still recognize how military intervention can potentially be better in some situations (E.g. against ISIS or in genocidal countries).

I define myself as an Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Anti-Zionist, since I, in principle, refuse any legitimacy of the state of Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Israel; however, I also believe that the current situation has gone too far to delete Israel from the map without creating unnecessary suffering, so I propose either a two-state solution with Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Israel mostly going back to 1947 borders (With obvious adjustments for modern times based on the 1967 borders) and abandoning illegal settlements in Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Cisgiordania, or a Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination one-state solution where religion is completely banned from state legislation (Other than respecting freedom of religion and religious festivals) and total equality between all ethnic groups is upheld.

Culture and Society

I define myself as a Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Radical Liberal, as I have a strong commitment to Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Civil Liberties, Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Freedom Of and From Religion, Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Anti-Clericalism, Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Liberal Egalitarianism, Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Cultural Liberalism, primacy of the Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Individual, Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Individualist Feminism and supporting Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Government Programs that make it possible for everyone to put their rights and liberty into practice (Support programmes for the homeless, for abandoned LGBT teens, economic safety nets, ...). I also support a File:PragmatProg.png Pragmatic and Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Moderate form of File:PROG.png Progressivism in society, without forcing it on people 9 times out of 10 (As it has generally the opposite effect).

As part of my Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Anti-Clerical and Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Laicistic policies, I believe that religious authorities should not partecipate in political life and that the state should have an Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Atheistic or Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Deistic approach to life, without devolving into Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination a priori Repression of religion.

  • Nation

I deem Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Citizenship and Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Language as the two main factors of nationality, with Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Culture playing only a smaller part overall. Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Patriotism is a necessity in my opinion, as it just means "Love for one's own country and cultural characteristics" and not Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination "Belief in one's own supremacy on the basis of country and nation".

  • Immigration

I am supportive of immigration; however, I also understand that Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Interculturalism is necessary to preserve the Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Civil Liberties from Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Conservative Immigrants that want to change their host country to a less Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Free one. I am thus critical, at times, of Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Multiculturalism, especially in regards of Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Religions. I support the 'Ius Culturae' rather than the 'Ius Soli' and I am against the 'Ius Sanguinis' past the parents.

I think we should crackdown on Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Illegal immigration and accept less refugees overall (still helping them and treating them humanely), but at the same time, we should simplify the process for legal immigration, as today it is excessively slow and cumbersome.

  • Crimes and Punishments

□ Restorative or Retributive Justice?

"Tough on crime, tough on causes of crime"

File:TonyBlair2.png Sir Tony Blair

I believe that justice should be fundamentally retributive (but not cruel and not excessive) and restoration should be seen as an important part of justice, but not it's first and foremost objective.

At the same time, we should still work towards resolving the causes of crime (Poverty, corruption, discrimination, lack of education, bad parenting, ...) through government programmes.

□ Expulsion of Criminal Immigrants

□ Self-Defence

□ Death Penalty

I disdain death penalty in all cases but these ones:

□ Serial Rape

□ Mass Murder

□ (Maybe I'll add other in the future)

I regard myself as File:Anti-Identi2.png Anti-Identity politics and would like to see a society where people are not judged or classified on the basis of Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Race, Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Ethnicity, Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Sex, Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Language (Mostly), Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Sexual Orientation Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination or Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Gender, but rather on their Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Knowledge, Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Merits, Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Culture (As in, how they behave in regards to their culture) and content of their character.

I believe that we should strive to attain a Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Post-Gender society, where Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Sex has no meaningful impact on the perception of a person and on how they should behave.

I am Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Moderately Conservative on a few issues:

□ Open Marriages

Open marriages are both false and a fraud, as marriage should be deep connection and trust between two individuals (Regardless of Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Sex, , Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Sexual Orientation Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination, Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Gender, etc.). In addition, open marriages are damaging to eventual children, who wouldn't have fixed parental figures.

Open marriages shouldn't be recognised as valid marriages and should be treated as marriage frauds and sham marriages and should be accordingly punished.


□ Culture War

I fucking hate the Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Culture War and both Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Alt-Lite Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination and Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination SJWs as whiny kids who need to understand the concept of Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Individual Liberty
□ Architectural Reactionarism

I am generally an Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Architectural Reactionary with a preference on styles from the Renaissance to the 1800s, but I don't inherently oppose newer styles of buildings (Fuck 1950s-1990s architecture though, ugly as fuck.

My most nationalistic policy would be requiring all immigrants that request a citizenship to either:

□ A - Change/translate their surnames in the state's official language

□ B - Give them two surnames: the first one being a surname in the state's official language and the second one being their native surname

Why Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Linguistic Nationalism? Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Language is the only way to completely understand a given Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Culture; Language is the only indissoluble connection one has to one's own nation, unlike any other one, which are either Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination abandonable Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination or Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination artificial Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination; (WIP)

Philosophy

⬢ Philosophical Influences

"Enlightenment is man's emergence from his self-imposed immaturity. Immaturity is the inability to use one’s understanding without guidance from another. This immaturity is self-imposed when its cause lies not in lack of understanding, but in lack of resolve and courage to use it without guidance from another. Sapere Aude! “Have courage to use your own understanding!”--that is the motto of enlightenment."

Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Immanuel Kant, extract from "Answering the Question: What is Enlightenment?"


My greatest ideological influences come from the Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Enlightenment Era and similar movements both preceding and succeeding it. I may define myself as a Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Kantian and Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Post-Kantian gnosiologically and epistemologically.

I was also influenced by Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Romanticism (More particularly by the Pre-Romantics and the italian author 'Giacomo Leopardi') as I think that emotions are almost as important as rationality (it would be a 50.5% Rationality to a 49.5% Emotions).

My ethics partly come from Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Immanuel Kant's ideas Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination and partly are not too dissimilar from Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination J.S. Mill's thoughts (Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Utilitarianism and the Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Harm Principle).

I believe in the extreme importance of Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Relativism, Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Post-Modernism, Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Post-Structuralism and Positive Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Nihilism: this is because I think it is impossible for every human to have the exact same thought process, as life shapes us and our way of thinking.

All of this makes me an Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Anti-Positivist.

Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Humanitarianism is the biggest part of my ideas and it is the whole engine of my political thought.

Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Marxism, Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Catholic Social Teaching, Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Humanism and the Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Austrian School have had some influence on my way of thinking, but I would never identify directly with any of those movements.

Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Pragmatism is also a big part of my thought process.


□ How do I define myself philosophically?

Personally, I find myself as mainly influenced by and (somewhat) part of these movements and schools of thought:

⬢ The Human (WIP)

  • The Fundamental Meaninglessness of Life

To understand my point of view, we need to start from a single axiom: Life is fundamentally Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination meaningless and we can only make Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination subjective meanings out of it.

There is basically no interacting God, no teleological end, no divine providence, which makes Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Atheism, Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Deism and File:Pantheism2.png Pantheism the only doctrines I accept

  • Human Action

Another axiom, very similar to the Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Praxeologist one: There is no human nature but self-interest, which means that even altruism is fundamentally self-interested

  • Humans as the Measure of Everything

TLDR; Transcendental Idealism + Personal ideas shaping how we see the world. Res Cogitans/Extensa. Physical world (Meaningless objects, meaningless everything) and Metaphysical world (Human relations, human understanding).

  • Rationality, Irrationality, Emotions

TLDR; Neutrality of reason. Impossible neutrality in decision. Equal importance of emotion and reason. Esprit de Geometrie/de Finesse.

⬢ The State and Society (Heavy WIP)

  • Justification of the State and Taxation* On Liberty

WIP

□ Liberty and Equality (WIP)


□ Liberty and Security (WIP)

"The aim of all socialist measures, even of those which appear outwardly as coercive measures, is the development and the securing of a free personality. Their more exact examination always shows that the coercion included will raise the sum total of liberty in society, and will give more freedom over a more extended area than it takes away."[1]



  • Tolerance

Taking from the previous sections, we can describe tolerance. We can already say that tolerance is fundamentally the defense of relativism: it literally means to accept one's opinion regardless of your support of it; we can also sum up tolerance as Evelyn Beatrice Hall's quote 'I Disapprove of What You Say, But I Will Defend to the Death Your Right to Say It'.

As even Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Voltaire said in his 'Treaty on Tolerance', however, tolerance needs to have some limits, and those limits are founded primarily on the intolerance of a particular group.

We can simply take the already universally hated Nazis as an example: their ideology is explicitly against many basic human rights and freedoms, they actively incorporate racialist and anti-egalitarian policies and support a militaristic and extremely authoritarian state. Should we accept their opinions, since their explicit objective is taking away our right to express ours? Absolutely no. We can, again, rationally get to a vague definition of tolerance: it is based around a social contract where we all decide to tolerate each other, so anyone who decides to break the contract in serious ways has no right to cry for tolerance. What is a 'Serious breach' of the contract of tolerance is, obviously, based on emotions, but we can still consider the rational and skeletal definition as a foundation.

  • Egalitarianism

Humans are obviously unequal from birth, be it because of height, sex, colour of the skin, et cetera. However, it would be inhuman to consider people as inherently less than others because of unchangeable and casual characteristics.

We can say that we should judge people 'not because of the color of their skin, but because of the content of their character', as the human has the capacity of bettering itself to the point where 'natural advantages' get outclassed by sheer 'force of will'.

People should thus be judged primarily through their capacities and only secondarily and minimally through their unchangeable characteristics.

  • Metapolitics (WIP)

Ideological purity only hurts a movement in the long run. This is because pure ideology is increasingly distant to rationality and increasingly irrational and unachievable.

  • The State and State Action (WIP)

Legitimacy of state action is part of the realm of irrational thought, so there is no universal consensus of what kinds of state action can be considered legitimate or not.

I will defend the liberal views on the matter though.

□ The state's legitimate when it acts in order to preserve freedom and wellbeing;

□ Being judged by one's character and not one's body is a just principle that should be legally protected

□ Non-economic laws should strive to preserve freedom of thought and the possibility of relativism

□ The harm principle is a good basis for laws

  • Against Ethnicity and Race as Concepts (WIP)

The concept of ethnicity easily loses any sense, as an italian in germany who doesn't know to be italian is completely equal to an "ethnic" german.

⬢ Philosophy of Property

Thanks Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Robert LaFevre, Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Robert Nozick for the inspiration.

  • The Origin of Private Property

As Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Robert LaFevre puts it, Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Private Property is a natural right, in the sense that every man has the will to own something, which sets him apart of all the others. Private property arises not from the state, but from the human will to own property, which creates a 'social contract', where everyone has an interest in not stealing in order not to be stolen from, even if the owner is not present.

  • Private Property and its Defence

I reject the notion that private property is a purely artificial concept created exclusively by violence, either private or from the state. The best defense of private property is primarily the Social Contract previously described: since I own something and I want my ownership to be respected, I will respect the others' claims of ownership of other objects.

As this notion expands itself to all of society, we see that there is no violence in the continuation of ownership; if it hadn't been like this, there would be an eternal Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination State of Nature, where no one can trust no one else and where everyone fights for property.

The cases of ownership not being respected are rarer and, in those cases, defence of private property is left to the private individual: how many times is the state useless in the case of theft from one's home? Or when a car is stolen or broken into? In these cases, the state merely restraints the thief and doesn't necessarily defend property directly, else we would live in a police state, with patrols constantly in every street.

We must, however, reflect on why we need to defend our property: are thieves mostly malicious, or are they created by their dire situation?

Poverty and inequality are certainly the mother and the father of theft, as widespread ownership of property and wealth wouldn't generate the same amount of thieves. We can say that in an anarchic society, excessively concentration of wealth and of inequality would naturally be redistributed to an equilibrium at a breaking point. However, a state prevents this, which...

  • The State as Defender of Injustice | The Ethics and Limits of Private Property

...Makes the state a protector of injustice. Such wealth concentration can happen only when a higher force protects any kind of ownership from the threat of (justified) theft from masses of poors. A state is such a type of higher force and, while it does protect distributed private property (rightly so), it also protects unjust forms of private property, such as:

□ Unimproved land

□ Natural conformations (Lakes, Mountains, Rivers, etc.)

□ Unextracted natural resources (Ores, Forests, etc.)

□ Property that doesn't respect the right-of-passage to unowned property

□ Property that is not in enough quantity for the unobstructed survival of others

And other similar kinds of property.

This kind of property is unjust because it violates the Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Lockean Proviso (Which basically enunciates that Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Private Property is only legitimate, though, only when it arises from work or from transaction; one cannot legitimately own something that is naturally present, unless it required some work to extract, I.E. land and natural resources are not legitimate possessions) and it doesn't respect human dignity and the right of a human to survive.

However, a case can be made to retain ownership of most of these kinds of unjust property.

  • The Necessity of Private Property

The necessity of private property lies in the possibility of economic activity: if there was no ownership of unimproved land, construction of buildings can be impaired; if there was no ownership of natural resources, no one could extract them efficiently enough; if there was no ownership of extracted resources, their transformation into products would be much slower and less efficient, as anyone could take those.

These uses balance out the injustice of private property.

  • The Necessity of Wealth Redistribution

While private ownership of most kinds of unjust property can be seen as necessary, it is equally necessary to maintain private property as distributed as possible (or even to make many kinds of property public), as self-ownership is much more preferable to absentee-ownership, since extreme economic inequality numbs Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Democracy and damages Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Human Life and the Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Economy.

When this is not possible, such property should be taxed and revenue should be distributed to all members of society in need through a dividend (A Negative Income Tax is my preferred method) and to all of society in general by using those taxes to fund government programs.

Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Georgism gets the method right: most unjust private property comes from land ownership and, consequently, resource ownership, so we should apply a Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Land Value Tax on all land and on natural resources, as neither of these have been produced by anyone and both are available only in a limited amount.

Expropriation should thus be a last resort, only when there are serious societal consequences that derive from the private ownership of a good or of some real estate.

  • Why Real Estate is not Necessarily Exploitative (And Why Private Enterprise Always Is)

I justify Real Estate through a Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Marxian lens:

If we define exploitation as the retention of a part of a Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Worker's produced value, which is called Surplus Value by Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Marxian Economics, then Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Rent is non-exploitative as long as the total amount 'paid' does not exceed the Market Value for the rented good, as it would just correspond to gradually buying the good and/or even paying less than it would cost; once this limit is surpassed, though, any further kind of Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Rent can be considered as exploitative, even more so if there isn't any alternative to this situations.

However, this can be resolved by letting Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Market Forces with some Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Regulations Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination do their course or, if it isn't possible, or if leaving the market to itself would lead to excessively slow results ('In the long run, we're all dead' situation), by Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Intervening in the economy through the production of needed goods; basically, we should thus strive to help people and firms to own what they use and leave renting to a completely personal decision by mainly using and adapting market forces (and not by regulating and banning ownership of multiple buildings), reaching then a society where Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Private Property is largely Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Distributed.


In a firms' case, Surplus Value would be the cost of the machines, tools and resources used by the Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Worker and bought by the Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Employer. This cost is, however, much lower than the one of a house, and retaining surplus value is almost always a form of exploitation by bosses; after having repaid the constant capital, which would take a smaller amount of time compared to buying a building, all workers should eventually become owners of their firm, a situation which is basically the same as in modern Worker Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Cooperatives.

What about shares? Shares are another form of exploitation, since there is only a monetary contribution and no labour contribution to the firm: shareholders get repaid much more than the amount of money or labour that they contribute to the firm. Only Bonds and Loans are a non-exploitative form of exclusively monetary contribution to a firm, since there is only limited profit for Bondholders and Loan-Givers.

Exploitation by Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Wage Labour, thus, can only be resolved by working in Worker, Producer, Consumer Coops or in Non-Profits

□ Why Ban Private Firms that do not Produce Profit for the Owner?

An owner that claims no profit, other than the one that he gets should he be a constant contributor to the firm, be it in management, work or anything else, is basically the same as any other worker, and he should get no privilege over the others for the simple fact that he founded the firm at some point. The only 'privilege' he should get is recognition for his efforts in establishing the firm and a just monetary compensation for that, always corresponding to the principle of 'To each according for his own contribution' and nothing more.

In addition to this, once the constant capital has been repaid to the owner of a firm, the worker owns the constant capital as much as the previous owner does. Paying the total value of something without having ownership over it can be, without a doubt, a form of exploitation.

□ Then why don't we ban Non-Profits?

Non-Profits are a completely different form of organisation which, as the name says, does not have profit in mind for no one that partakes in its efforts, since their objective is helping others for a price as low as possible; every worker, thus, is paid for his contribution, and nothing more or less is given to them.


□ What about Consumer and Producer Coops?

Justifying these two types of businesses is much more grounded on pragmatism rather than ideology: consumer coops and producer coops help both economic efficiency and consumer rights and, since it is impossible for a consumer to life off profits from their consumer or producer coop, such businesses offer better wages and benefits to their workers.

Economic Beliefs

⬢ General Overview

Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Armandonian Liberalism's economic thought is inspired by various, mostly liberal, schools of though, with the most inspiration coming from Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Social Liberalism, Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Ordo-Liberalism, Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Social Libertarianism, Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Anti-NeoCon Third Way, Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Green Liberalism, Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Georgism, Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Social Democracy, Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Liberal Socialism and Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Market Socialism. Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Yugoslavia is also a big inspiration for policy (either negatively or positively).

Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Fusion Reformism towards a more Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Social Economy and eventually Liberal Market Socialism is my main objective; if there is active resistance against the peaceful establishment of co-ops, revolution is always the plan B.

  • Economic Schools

Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Armandonian Liberalism is economically Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Radical Centrist (Leaning Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Center-Left ) and follows a mix of Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination New Keynesianism, Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Freiburg Economics, Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Chicagoan and New Classical Economics Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination, Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Georgism, Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Ricardian Economics and, more limitedly, Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Austrian Economics Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination, File:Lausanne.png Lausanne Economics, Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Post-Keynesianism and Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Marxian Economics Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination, with the objective of being Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Pragmatic in economic decision-making and to favour evidence-based policy.

  • "What are your general economic beliefs though?"

To answer to that question, I would say that the Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Freiburg School of Economics correctly defines my beliefs: an economic system where the state doesn't distort the market by excessive Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Regulations, Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Artificial Price Distortion or excessive Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination State Economic Intervention, and where an Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination "Economic Rulebook" is created in order to maintain healthy and just competition, foster moral economic practices and direct the market towards a particular direction. At the same time, I support many Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Georgist ideas.

I am a strong supporter of the Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Cooperative Movement and of the concept of Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Social Economy, as I believe that workers deserve a fair wage (If not the complete value of their own work) and more decision making in firms, since they are both the source of all value and profit of the company, making jobs a social contract between workers and employers, and since it is generally known how firms, the bigger they get, the more they exploit workers.

In addition, workers value their welfare more than employers and managers, so they wouldn't make terrible and inhuman decisions and wouldn't oppose automation (as every worker, instead of being laid off, would just work less hours).

While they are similar concepts, a Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Social Economy and an Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Economic Democracy are not necessarily the same thing: an Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Economic Democracy is always a Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Social Economy, but not vice versa.

The fundamental difference between the two is that a Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Social Economy just bases itself on cooperatives, mutuals, associations, foundations, social enterprises, paritarian institutions etc., while an Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Economic Democracy usually adds societal control over investments and overall decision making, effectively putting the markets under the service of society and the state, in a way not too dissimilar to Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Market Socialism.

□ Is my ideology really a Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Social Economy?

Short answer: I believe so.

Long answer: My proposed economic system can be described as nothing more than having a Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Modern Liberal economic system embrace a Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Social Economy much more closely. Economic freedom for cooperatives and small businesses and (most) private property are still in place.

While it does have some kind of Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Social Ownership of Capital (E.g. National Mutual Fund), it is not inherently subjected to the state and individuals, banks, credit unions etc. still have much freedom with investments and loans. The objective is also not state or societal control over the economy, but better economic freedom for every citizen.

For these reasons, I do believe to be in the realm of a Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Social Economy, rather than in an Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Economic Democracy.

⬢ Economic Policy

I believe that the Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Free Market can be an enormous force of good and efficiency (When well-regulated, as explained further down): this is because, as we've seen countless times, they can create growth, innovation and cheaper prices much better than planned economies.

Market economies are also self-regulating, leaving most smaller economic decisions to the costumers and the consumers and generally reaching an equilibrium by themselves (Again, there should still be government intervention, as explained further down).

Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination International cooperation should be fostered, as it maintains peace through trading relations, it helps countries focus only on some kinds of industries and helps directing investments all over the world.

Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Protectionism should be abandoned, unless there are national security motivations or there is unfair competition for lack of certain laws in other countries. Trade agreements should, thus, have clauses for better working conditions and environmental regulation.

□ Economics

TLDR; Why private property is necessary for economic stability and growth, and how exploitative wage labour gets replaced by non-exploitative rent and land development

□ Intellectual Property

TLDR; Where intellectual property is legitimate, where it isn't, why it is inherently exploitative

(Thanks to Template:Blue Nephalem Thought for the direct inspiration)

Taxation would be reformed to be much more clear and it should be calculated by using a function and (almost always) no tax brackets. The taxes should be:

□ Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Land value tax (10%-50%, except the first home)

□ Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Progressive income taxes

□ Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Pigouvian and Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Environmental taxes (25%-100% except for self-employed people and businesses with less than 5 people)

□ Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Inheritance tax (30%-45% from 1 million Euros onwards)

□ Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Gift taxes (30%-45% from 100 000 Euros onwards, unless given to a charity)

□ Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Corporate taxes (WIP)

□ Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Financial Insurance Tax (Paid by banks to fund a National Financial Insurance Fund)

□ Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Church taxes (15%-25%)

□ Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Capital gains taxes (WIP)

□ Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Property taxes (20% for Luxury Houses)

□ Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Sales taxes (WIP)

□ Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Tariffs (For imports from countries with sub-par working conditions, sub-par environmental laws and sub-par animal welfare)

□ Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination AI tax (2% flat-tax for every business with more than 50 employees employing AI to fund worker retraining programmes)

□ Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Immigrant tax (50 - 100 Euros a month for all working non-citizens to fund an Immigrant Support Fund)

These tax rates are flexible depending on the circumstances of the economy.

⠀

▣ Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Regulations

Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Regulations are a necessity to ensure a healthy economy and a healthy and just society. I am generally aligned to Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination EU regulations and with Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Ordo-Liberal and Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Freiburg-Style regulations on this matter.

In general, regulations should be simple, effective and should not create excessive File:Econdeflate.png Inefficiency, excessive Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Bureaucracy and Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Regulatory Capture; their benefits should be weighted with the benefit of less strict regulation (or no regulation at all).

The primary objective is being Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination pragmatic with regulations and not excessively ideological.

Some examples of regulations I support:

□ Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Moderate rent increase control

□ Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Labour Rights

□□ Workplace Safety

□□ Work-Life balance laws

□ Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Environmental Regulation

□ Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Safety and Health Regulation

□ Consumer Protection


Some examples of regulations I would reform:

□ Zoning Laws

□ Occupational Licensing

□ Business Creation


Some examples of regulations I would remove or greatly reform and reduce:
□ Most internet regulation

□ Compulsory USB-C

□ Taxi permits

□ Tech-companies regulation

□ All File:AntiBert.png Crony Regulation


▣ Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Anti-Trust

Anti-Trust legislation should keep the economy fair and free from Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Monopolies. It should be expanded to break up firms that have gotten so prevalent that they count as "Too Big to Fail" businesses and, at the same time, be reformed in order not to encompass practices that are misrepresented as monopolistic.

▣ Environmentalism

Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination The environment should be protected using a mix of Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Regulations, Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination State Intervention and Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Negative Externality Taxation Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination, all of which should balance the need to do something about environmental problems and human needs (Both social and economic).

The primary objective should be reaching a Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Solarpunk society.

▣ General Idea

In general, services should be rendered much more clear and efficient, in order to minimise waste of funds.

▣ Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Welfare Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination

Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Welfare is a necessity and minimum basic services, a safety net and some wealth redistribution should be provided by the state; a progressive Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Negative Income Tax should be something to look into, as it can potentially simplify the welfare system and the safety net by giving money to those in difficulty instead of creating many different programs, so that they can spend them on what they know they will need.

▣ Stimulus and Unemployment Checks

In the event of recessions or when workers get laid off, checks should be given monthly only as requests or payment directly from the government or through banks: this is because unused funds would just be 'Erased' after 8 weeks I.E. they can't be accessed by recipients anymore and would go back into the checks program.

All of this would discourage saving and actually stimulate the economy. ▣ Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Universal Healthcare

Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Universal Healthcare will be guaranteed to any and all citizens; it should not be completely free though, with smaller sums of money being paid by those who utilise the services (With a maximum of 200 Euros). Individuals unable to pay for medical expenses would still receive free care.

This doesn't mean that private healthcare would be banned (More will be explained in the next sections).

▣ Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Education

In order to provide flexibility, no teacher should be obliged to be a member of the school they work to be, but only an employee.

Elementary and Middle School education should both be completely state-owned, in order to provide an equal education for all pupils.

High School education should be mostly state-owned, however private High Schools should be possible to open, with a maximum tuition cost of 1500€ per year and the rest of the costs being paid for by

University education should remain as it is today; at the same time, there should be more scholarships awarded both by Universities and the State.

▣ Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination National Financial Insurance Fund

In order to avoid a financial crisis induced by bank-runs, a Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination National Financial Insurance Fund should be established and paid for by all banks through a dedicated progressive tax. This insurance fund would help failed or failing banks repay their depositors in full.

▣ Electricity and Water

▣ Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Housing

The state should play a bigger part in building housing and organizing housing projects. This is mainly inspired by the Gemeindebauen of Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Red Vienna.

Go to r/Neoliberal for my views on housing deregulation.

"The important thing for Government is not to do things which individuals are doing already, and to do them a little better or a little worse; but to do those things which at present are not done at all."


▣ Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Dirigisme and SOEs Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination

Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Dirigist policies are, as history has shown us, a necessity to make the country prosper. As already said, protectionism should be abandoned and other methods of fostering an industry should be put in place; generally, direct investments and the creation of State Owned Enterprises (SOEs) are the best ways to do so. Incentives should be put in place only when it is necessary to do so, I.E. when regulations and dirigist policies would be excessively distruptive or difficult to enact.


▣ Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Central Bank

A Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Central Bank , independent from the central state, is to be retained/established, as it can make business cycles less severe in their effects. The Central Bank should be managed independently by Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Technocrats.

⠀⠀⠀⠀

□ Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Co-Determination

Low-level management should be obligatorily be elected by workers or be completely eliminated in favour of more self-management. Marchionne's "Low hierarchy factories" are also a concept that should be looked into.

□ Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Unionism

Unions are, in principle, to be supported; however, I apply the concept of "Realist Unionism", that is basically not blindly supporting unions, as, sometimes, they have unrealistic and unjust advances towards employers.

□ Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Tripartism

TLDR; Seeing how well this system works in the Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Nordic Countries, we should look into it

We could say that a File:GigEcon.png Gig Economy helps people have more flexibility. At the same time, this is largely abused by many firms, which use Freelancers and Self-Employed workers in order not to abide to an employment contract and exploit this kind of labour.

In order to solve this, Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Trade Unions and a newly-formed (albeit not as powerful as in the past) Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Guild System should regulate relations between firms and File:GigEcon.png Freelancers and File:PCB-Indlibsoc.png Self-Employed workers.

  • Natural Monopolies: Cooperativisation or Nationalisation?

Natural monopolies (Roads, Railways, Dams)


  • Transport Systems

Biking infrastructure should be constructed all over the place, to foster the use of bikes and scooter and reduce the volume of cars used.

The Taxi sector should be mostly deregulated, in order to foster self-employed taxi drivers and more competition. Motorbike-taxis and bus-taxis should also be allowed to exist.

  • Urban Planning

⬢ Social Economy

Progress towards a more Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Social Economy should be done through Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Activism, autonomous organisation (through internet, for example), pro-worker democracy and pro-cooperative reforms and without much direct government intervention (Basically, we should behave Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Freiburg-style). The basic tenets are these:

□ Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Co-operative Ownership

□ Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Employee Stock Ownership Plans (ESOP)

□ Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Board-Level Employee Representation (BLER).

In addition to this, laws that make establishing a cooperative, a mutual etc. should be put into place; examples are the Marcora Law and the Right to Own (More info: Unlearning Economics - Worker Democracy).

  • Cooperative Crowdfunding

"Cooperative Crowdfunding" is a system where people can crowdfund a new worker or consumer cooperative through either a (cooperative) bank or a bank/state-licensed site or organisation: it would work similarly to sites like Kickstarter.

  • Coop-Worker Finder

"Coop-Worker Finder" would be a service where new entrepreneurs can find like-minded people to found a coop with.

  • Healthcare: Promoting Worker and Consumer Co-ops

As we've seen, the private healthcare sector in its current form is either a complete failure (Like in countries like the US) or overly expensive (Like in most EU countries). One part of this problem can surely be pointed to private hospitals private insurance companies having profit for the shareholders and the owners as their highest priority; it follows that we should promote (or even force) both Consumer Cooperatives and Worker Cooperatives in the sector.

Firstly, all insurance companies should be consumers' mutual funds, in order to fight the common occurrence of insurers deciding arbitrarily whether a given hospital visit was necessary or not.

Secondly, we should promote cooperatively-owned hospitals and clinics (Similar to the Brazilian UNIMED).

  • Insurance, Housing: Promoting Consumer Co-ops
  • Prostitution and cooperatively-owned brothels

Prostitution should be legalised but limited to cooperatively-owned brothels, while street prostitution should be prohibited but decriminalised and pimps should remain illegal and prosecutable.

These limitations have these objectives:

□ Reduce sex slavery

□ Regulate prostitution

□ Maintain body autonomy

  • Founders of Coops: Risk and Reward

TLDR; Rewarding founders of coops for taking risks

  • Entrepreneur as a Job | Firms and Buildings

TLDR; How entrepreneurs can become coop-founders in order to stimulate economic growth

⬢ Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Forced Cooperativisation (Section in heavy rewriting)

▣ Economy

  • Cooperativisation of Sectors

We should individuate those sectors that can be mostly coop-driven and foster the creation of and transformation of businesses into worker and consumer cooperatives. Pharmacies, Light industry, Manufacture, Insurance, Programming, Social Media, Road transport, and many other sectors can potentially all be based around cooperatives and cooperative federations.

Eventually, we should ban private business creation in such sectors and only allow for cooperative creation.

  • Ban on Firm Inheritance

Firm inheritance should be banned and the firm should go directly to workers, in order to eventually phase out all private businesses.

  • Trade Unions | Employee Firm Ownership Plans

In order to foster the Right to Own, Trade Unions

  • Ban on Private Insurance

TLDR; Mutual insurance

  • Cooperativisation of Capital Intensive Sectors

TLDR; idek

  • Status of Non-Profits

Non-profit organisations will not be subjected to the same laws as for-profit businesses: private ownership will be possible and they will be subjected to pretty much the same regulation as today, as the objective of this kind of business is, as the name says, not to give a profit to owners or workers, but to give a cheaper and humane service

□ Domestic Investment Funds

Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Yugoslavia's Domestic Investment Funds

□ Private Banking


□ Cooperative Banking

Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Banks Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Mutual Funds, Credit Unions, Cooperative Banks etc.,

□ Private Investments

TLDR; Bond markets, stock ownership as exploitation, why non-exploitative stock ownership is basically a bond market, why bonds are non-exploitative ('Repaying' machinery and resources to who bought the bond, as the funds come from him)

▣ Politics

⬢ Cooperative-specific regulations (Section in heavy rewriting)

  • Worker Cooperatives

Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Worker Cooperatives would be allowed to have up to 1/5 of workers as non-members (The calculation would be: Number of Members ÷ 5 = Maximum number of Non-Member employees, always rounded up), in order to ensure an easier hiring and training process. Membership would remain completely voluntary, with each worker deciding between being a simple employee with none of the benefits of membership, or pay for the membership (This process would be organised by each co-op independently).

  • Consumer Cooperatives

All Consumer Cooperatives would either become multi-stakeholder/worker-consumer cooperatives, after a vote by both employees and members, or have obligatory co-determination for workers once they pass 60 employees.

  • Cooperative Brothels

Cooperative Brothels will just be considered as collaborating self-employed people who share the same space. Profits will be assigned to the individual worker and will not be shared through equity.

Focus on some Concepts

⬢ Private Property (WIP)

  • Why Private Property is not Inherently Exploitative (Personal Article)

Write to me on Discord to get the first draft of the document!

Reading List

Already Read

Reading It

Principles of Communist Production and Distribution

Planning to Read

  • Marco Bentivogli, Diodato Pirone - Fabbrica Futuro

Relations

Real and plausible ideologies

Friends

Likeable

Frenemies

Unlikeable

  • Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination Protectionism - Free trade fosters cooperation, peace and helps every country with focusing only on what they do well. Protection makes prices higher and doesn't help international relations at all. We should still apply you when there is an emergency situation though, or to defend us from unethically produced goods from other countries.

Enemies


Self-Inserts

Judging your ideology, not you :D

S-Tier Lads

  • Template:SocMor - You are the closest we can get to neo-distributism lol. A very nice and level-headed ideology (Especially economically) and one of the best class-collaborators here
  • Template:GoobLab - Again, one of the best class collaborators, plus you've become even more similar to me. You should just embrace cooperatives totally at this point though.

A-Tier Friends

  • Template:ETS - Ok man, I gotta say that you are a bit too much of a statist and collectivist in my opinion, mostly on the basis of syndicate control of the economy and of cultural policy, however I don't really have any strong opposition to your beliefs. Your democratic system is interesting. Overall a nice ideology.

Another contentious point is the role of co-ops; while you don't support eventually mandating them, you still recognize their utility.

P.S. PETIT BOURGEOISIE GANG

  • Template:Panth - idk about that economic coordination and corporatism, I prefer dirigisme, but otherwise pretty nice economics. Just get a little bit more democratic though.

Likeable Gang

Frenemies


"35% good, 65% bad" Gang

Enemies

  • Template:Ayafantoho - You're down here simply because I am grading beliefs (I mean, you're anarcho-nihilism on crack boi), but we should bash our own skulls together some day

</tabber>

Comments


Add List

Archived

New ones

Navigation

Gallery

Template:Market Socialists


  1. ↑ Evolutionary Socialism, Chapter 3
Retrieved from "https://pcbwiki.net/index.php?title=Armandonian_Liberalism&oldid=490171"

Recent changes

  • MarketLiberal Thought
    MarketLiberal • 02:27
  • MarketLiberal Thought
    MarketLiberal • 02:25
  • Itapism
    Itapi • Yesterday at 23:46
  • Itapism
    Itapi • Yesterday at 23:45