Voidvill Rajandeep

Voidvill Rajandeep is an ideology of a guy who is 13yo and just being a contrarian and having fun, his views of absurdism come from exurb1a, generally I am very much a fan of school life, much better than pcb life in my opinion and will just wander this thing I have until death. He offers no solutions and only skepticism, mostly due to his extreme influences like Srnicek and some others, despite this may seem that he falls for a depressive outlook he carries on joyfully

Voidvill Rajandeep
"On the topic of my LARPiness, I would say, eh, I am an armchair theorist, but I do believe in my thought, I see value in it, I just want to live my life, I am armchair because I don't know how to see the bigger picture, as argued by Srnicek, thus ig I have embraced defeatism, I'll waddle like an idiot enjoy my ramblings"
Ideological Influences
Influenced by	Jonas Ceika Thought Contrarianism Biomechanicalism Soulism
Character Information
Likes	Progress Existential Negation Hypocrisy Music
Dislikes	Norms
Song	Haunted Clock

Personality

If you wanna understand my comedy interact with me on reddit watch Caddicarus, guy is hilarious

Reading List

Theory I have Written

• Temporary Autonomous Zones and the Eternal Leviathan Systems: Two Sides (2023)
• Rantomism (2023-)
  • File:Pessman.png Liberalism and Pessimism (2023)
  • Communizomes (2023)
  • Singularity? (2023)
• Incompetent Writings: Session 1 (2023)
• My Maning Festingo (2023)
• Void; An Argument Against “Existence” (2023)
• Bloody Fly (2023)
• Deadly Built Freedom (2023)

Theory I Plan To Write

• Removal of a Dream: In The Name of Consistency!

Theory I Am Reading

Nick Srnicek, Alex Williams, Alex Andrews, Armen Avanessian, Diann Bauer, Ray Brassier, Benjamin Bratton, Harry Cleaver, Nathan Coombs, Michael Ferrer, Mark Fisher, Sam Forsythe, Dominic Fox, Lucca Fraser, Craig Gent, Jeremy Gilbert, Fabio Gironi, Jairus Grove, Doug Henwood, Aggie Hirst, Amy Ireland, Joshua Johnson, Robin Mackay, Suhail Malik, Keir Milburn, Reza Negarestani, Matteo Pasquinelli, Patricia Reed, Rory Rowan, Michal Rozworski, Mohammed Salemy, Robbie Shilliam, Ben Singleton, Keith Tilford, James Trafford, Deneb Kozikoski Valereto, and Pete Wolfendale

• File:Postcapitalism.png Inventing the Future: Postcapitalism and a World Without Work

Theory I Plan To Read

Dana Simmons

• Waste Not, Want Not: Excrement and Economy in Nineteenth-Century France

Oswald Mosely

• Fascism: 100 Questions Asked and Answered

Albert Camus

• The Myth of Sisyphus

Bobby Whittenberg-James

• Economic Nihilism

Dr. Bones

• Egoist-Communism: What It Is and What It Isn't
• The "Stirner Wasn't A Capitalist You Fucking Idiot" Cheat Sheet

For Ourselves: Council for Generalized Self-Management

• The Right To Be Greedy: Theses On The Practical Necessity Of Demanding Everything

D. Z. Rowan

• A Brief Description Of Egoist Communism
• Why Collapse Won’t Save Us
• Ultra Left International

Evan Jack

• A Farewell To Post-Left Anarchy

Friedrich Engels

• File:EoA.png On Authority

Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx

• The Communist Manifesto

Fredy Perlman

• Reproduction Of Daily Life

Amy Ireland

• The Poememenon: Form as Occult Technology

Theory I Have Read

Nyx Land

• Hello From the Wired (2023)

Ian Wright

• Venture Communism versus Venture Capitalism (2023)
• File:PostCraft.png What is abstract labour, and who does the abstracting? (2023)

Mencius Moldbug

• A formalist manifesto (2023)
• The case against democracy: ten red pills (2023)
• Why do atheists believe in religion? (2023)
• A new theory of constitutional cynicism ✩ (2023)

Margaret Killjoy

• Take What You Need And Compost The Rest: an introduction to post-civilized theory (2023)

File:PunFel.png PunishedFelix

• The Queer Machine - Critique of Nyx Land ✩ (2023)

Karl Marx

• Capital Volume One (2023)

File:PostHumPhil.png Thomas Moynihan

• Responsibility and Existential Risk (2023)

smartistone

• Ads are everything, not AI (2023)
• File:AtAuthority.png The appeal to authority: when it works and doesn't (2023)
• The Myth of Wealthy Boomers (why they are not much ‘better off’ compared to later generations) (2023)
• Why Influence/Reach is Better than Power, Wealth, or Social Status (2023)

Fumiko Kaneko

• Because I Wanted To (2023)

Alfredo Bonanno

• Armed Joy (2023)

Misery

• The Dark Truths of Enlightenment ✩ (2023)

Spek

• Metamodern Corporate Devices (2023)

Amadeo Bordiga

• The human species and the Earth's crust (2023)

Theory The Thought Half-Assed

Anonymous

• Desert (2023)

Monsieur Dupont

• Nihilist Communism (2023)

Jack Donnovan

• The Way of Men (2023)

File:BB.png Bob Black

• The Abolition of Work (2023)

Suggestions

Put sections for specific authors (unless it is already there) and add there books here is an example

Guy

• Book

User Test

Economic

• Dirigisme (+20)
• Keynesian School (+13)
• Marxism (+19)
• Industrial Orchestra (+20)
• Service Economy (+6)
• Localized Economy (+2)
• Evolutionary Economics (+7)
• Corporatism (+3)
• Monopolized Free-Market (-20)
• Distributism (+1)
• Feudalism (0)
• Guild-oriented Economics (-3)
• Regulated (+20)
• Planned (+9)
• Neocameralism (-1)
• Patchwork (0)
• Georgist (+11)
• Gift Economy (+2)
• Self-Sufficency (+3)
• Social Market Economy (-12)
• Transitionary Economics (-18)
• Immediatism (+19)
• State Capitalism (-6)
• Protectionism (+20)
• Environmentalism (+20)
• Market-oriented Economics (+2)
• Mixed Economy (+2)
• Third Position (+7)

Cultural

• Ultraprogressive (+20)
• Futuristic (+12)
• Progressive (+14)
• Reformist (+3)
• Middle (-2)
• Conservative (-14)
• Traditionalist (-14)
• Nationalist (-16)
• Reactionary (-20)
• File:Transformism.png Transformist (+2)

Social

• File:Fromm.png Frommian Society-Building (+20)
• Progressivism (+18)
• Unchained (+20)
• Cynicism (+20)
• Conservatism (-20)
• File:Transformism.png Transformism (+7)

Diplomatic

• Neorealism (+20)
• Imperialism (-20)
• Chauvinism (-20)
• Nationalism (-7)

Organization

• Netocracy (-3)
• Aristocracy (-19)
• Organic Centralism (+12)
• Councilism (+7)
• Autocracy (+4)
• Oligarchy (+13)
• Tricameralism (+20)

Ecological

• Voluntary Suicide (+20)
• Radicalism (+20)
• Biomechanicalism (+20)
• Protective (+14)
• Skeptical (-19)
• Artifism (+9)

Genetic

• Biological Anarchy (+20)
• Eugenics (-20)
• Morphological Freedom (+20)
• Biofuturism (+8)

Results

• Brazilian Liberalism - -8
• Borker - (-4) Evil usertest, painful
• FargothGares - (-13) what does any of this mean dawg
• - (68) I left out two sections because I have no idea what to even make with them. You should probably work on this.

File:Ideology Disintegrationism.png Paradox, that is what we are

Section 1: Why Structure?

"Why can't I just eat my waffle?"

Barack Obama, 1961-

Now from what this thought owns of post-structuralism on the idea of structure is this: let's say you are learning a language, your teacher, points to a tree and says "x", now does this mean tree inherently means "x", oh god I am awful at remembering what Jonas Ceika said when he explained it, but from what I sorta remember is that "x" defines itself from what is isn't, a tree is a tree because it is not a chair, but why care for differences? Specialty is not everything, but why use language? If it is only to create structures to perpetuate themselves for some bloody reason. Look at this thought, look at this wire it was copied by Jefbol, is this different? No. I tried to be different, got rejected. Irony. Wibble wobble a cross the room of unoriginality to feel dull and smile, what you did was not special, but it was this thought, isn't that great? To have that moment where that thought goes: OH MA FOOKIN GOD ME DID THAT. Mockery; simply the ruining of the special reveals the void more and more to us, we mock, which voidizes this world, the acknowledgement that the fun is but blodges of paint, nothing else, and being fine

Section 2: Belong Nowhere

"Let us sink such differences as nationality, religion, politics, and set our eyes eternally and forever toward the rising star of the industrial republic of labor; remembering that we have left the old behind and have set our faces toward the future. There is no power on earth that can stop men and women who are determined to be free at all hazards. There is no power on earth so great as the power of intellect. It moves the world and it moves the earth..."

Lucy Parsons, 1851-1942

Well you have been birthed, congrats this thought guesses, well this thought never asked does that matter? The thought was not asked whether or not they wanted to be birthed so well... you are here.... In this situation, get on the stage now boy! You may be confused that is a problem, we will fix it, the director will, the director will give you enough, cause you fell onto his land. Do what he says. Well, how bout this: piss off why? I never asked to be here, so... like? Why do I need to be proud why do I need to accpet your wants can't I just sit alone on a pipe myself

Section 3: Negation

"The author enters into his own death, writing begins."

Roland Barthes, 1915-1980

I will start this off by saying this; negation is standing up, and staring uncomfortably. Pick your nose, itch your balls aggressively as the snot get stuck inside your clothes, you may notice your ball hair is on the snot or is the hair from your nose? Who knows, in a sense negation is like chaos, but less careful, going into the fiery mouth of the situation through committing philosophical rebellion of Camus, chaos in itself is stumbling stupidly, coughing aggressively like a dog, and making everything mediocre in it's self-centered egoism, chaos does not care for beauty it destroys, that is what it is sposed to do is it not?

Proletarian Beyond Class Racism

Section 1: Proletariat is Disunited, Confused, and Self-Destructive Unit

"Communism knows no monster. ... Should abuse occur, the perpetrator would not be ostracized by his fellow human beings. They would not reject the social violator in order to reassure themselves of their humanity by comparing themselves to a non-human human, to a monster. They would be able to recognize what they have in common with him, and to realize that they could have done what he did. And this, we believe, is a much better way of reducing abuse to its lowest possible minimum than any search for normality."

Gilles Duave, 1947-

Is a team united? Common values, would that lead to unity? I'd say no. To me, a team is a group of people with things in common, who hate most of there members except for a small few, unity is an unrealistic concept, people do not love everyone in there socially-built identity, why else are there manospherian "women" and feminist "women"? Efficency is built of inefficency, the perpetual hatred of eachother builds that efficency

Section 2: We Made This

"The scariest monsters are human beings and what we will do to each other."

Jared Harris, 1961-

A problem with team self-hatred is the creation of differences, now this is fine, diversity ruins the pathetic ideal of unity, slight bursts of freedom however, it can create divisions, now divisions create new groups, new groups destroys cosmopolitan post-masculinity, in there rejections of the (metaphorical) expansion of men. A conservative states to take responsibility, our responsibility in my view, embrace the self-division to destroy unity and teamify it, let the semi-cosmic horror of this fall into our hands like sand and than let the sand come back up and down again and again

Section 3: Care for the Hateful

Now, sure, we have one culture in here, than someone comes with a different culture? Is this perverting what it is to have a nation? A shared culture, and there is someone existing in that, nation, who's... well... an other.... we are sposed to have something in common with each other and there is an other? Well, you are already in the nation so you are one of us now.

Donovan be like:

"A man is not merely a man but a man among men, in a world of men. Being good atbeing a man has more to do with a man’s ability to succeed with men and within groupsof men than it does with a man’s relationship to any woman or any group of women.When someone tells a man to be a man, they are telling him to be more like other men,more like the majority of men, and ideally more like the men whom other men hold inhigh regard."

Jack Donovan, 1974-

Man is when man with man, man than man man walked with man, danced with man, man man the man than the man the man man there man group man rizzed man, sandwich consumption between man than man walked to man he man no like female no no man is man with man first man than man

Self-Bullshit; Confusing "Traditionalist Realism"

Section 1: The Real as this Tool for Confusion

"To be able to function in late capitalism without being a psychological wreck, it is necessary to accept the insane as standard."

Mark Fisher, 1968-2017

Gonna talk about capitalist realism, no I'm not gonna say traditions are like capital where they have etched themselves inside thoughts' even if that to an extent is the case, now what I am going to talk about Mark Fishers use of Lacan's real to escape and accelerate capitalism to confusion, creating new futures out of said confusion this can be applied to tradition, dive down into it and belittle it through deterritorializing real , the deterritorialization in a sense would be a sorta final deterritorialization, without a major reterritorialization, there can be more a small reterritorialization, but this shall be after the mass deterritorialization, only after than can tradition return, with a broken awareness, tradition, simply after this be snobbish and escapist of it's own abstraction, freed from that, and now it will simply be dull and acknowlgable of it's bullshit

Section 2: I Know I am a Fool, the Paradox of Self-Bullshit

"I certainly contradict myself a lot — that's what makes me a philosopher."

Anthony Bax, ?-

Bullshit, what we acknowledge ourselves to be, bullshit, we embrace it gracefully, the spit falls repeatedly down from us. May we be godly in this action, pathetic. God what sits inside this. Self-bullshit is absurdist, sees the dumbness and just wanders, in inconsistent cynicism and altruism

The Technological Imaginarium

I generally believe in expanding the conciousness into multiple different realities, inspired by Children of Dusk literally discord fiction by the way wants to create an imaginarium, basically, the concept is, you create worlds fully from your imagination with little programmed restrictions, of course the citizens can choose whether or not it is public or private. Why yes... I do acknowledge this will never come

Meta-Artifism

Section 1: Criticism of Nature

"Wouldn't it be better for humanity, in general, to push beyond nature when the opportunity arises? Why not rise above nature instead of playing by its rules?"

BERNHE, 2004-

Nature, an idealized something, a state, that isn't now, that isn't modern or post-modern, but primitive. Relying on nature for evolution is like relying on the state to an anarchist or someone self-sufficent, why? Why not rely on the self? It is always the human that defines nature, this shows humans can do something, thus this doing can be unraveled more and more, the doing is the creation of more nature, in an Artifist sense above nature, or beyond it. We have the innovation, creativity, and general Faustianism to go forward into the swamp and piss ourselves, to eat skulls and muck found in the toilet sewers. Mate, look at me, it's past my bedtime, thus I am beyond my bedtime, I have escaped the limits of bedtime and onto awakening, the morning has arisen, and I am ready to meet all the faces, and vomit for the first time, it is euphoric, the vomit, the want to spew, the want to watch every detail drip down quickly like a disappointment of a sperm and just cough and fuck.

Section 2: Evolution is not improvement

"While transgender people represent one front being opened against bioconservativism, biological anarchy is our all-encompassing battleplan. What it is? The abolition of all limits on biological modification. The freeing of possibility from the chains of 'ethics' and 'rationality'. The liberation of women from womenhood, and man from manhood. The destruction of man on a biological level, and the creation of posthumanity past paltry cybernetic implants. This is biopunk. This is H.R Giger's biomechanism. Machine and Flesh become one, while they produce ever stranger forms, ever more beautiful symphonies, ever more beating, pulsating neo-organs, ever more futures, and ever more delights."

Noel Marxgrave, ?-

Dear corpse come down, the dear cough medicine wanders, the cough has the admire of the corpse but none of the power, a corpse can cause so much... so much happiness, so much sadness, so much, apathy. The cough, tries, and tries, the struggle. biological anarchy sees the genetic responsibility and like a little shit leaves that responsibility for itself to explore

Section 3: The Cough as Thassaria

"No...no...he was corrupted by me"

Hysteria, ?-

Thassaria, something, a concept, that word, it belchs post-post-post-post-modernist and hyper-Deleuzian views, it also shows pessimism from what I understand from Hysteria is this:

"Thassaria or Thassaria Hypothesis represents macroextension global relativity theory of logic by Jean Da Faldier. According to the doctrine, she is nothing more than rational astilla, powerful and timeless comfort system. It is distinguished by the "shadow of ideas", abstract but at the same time free in interpretation and somehow reproduced in our world through a prism. This distinguishes it from other more fundamental features of ideology because by definition they cannot be realized even so."

Thus it is something emotional a belief system made as a coping machinery to make someone feel better, an delusional embrace of failure, the cough does not know this, as they are differently titled, they are the cough, not Thassaria, different, тнє янιzσмαтι¢ ¢ση¢єρтιση σƒ тнє ηєє∂ тσ ¢яєαтє "яєαℓ" ∂郃єяєη¢є ƒяσм уσυ, ι.є. "ι αм ησт α мαℓє" вє¢αυѕє ι нανє α ναgιηα ¢συℓ∂ тυяη ιηтσ "ι αм ησт мαℓє" вє¢αυѕє ι ∂σ "χ" αη∂ ƒєєℓ "χ", t꙲h꙲i꙲s꙲ s꙲h꙲o꙲w꙲s꙲ t꙲h꙲e꙲ e꙲x꙲p꙲a꙲n꙲s꙲i꙲o꙲n꙲ o꙲f꙲ d꙲i꙲f꙲f꙲e꙲r꙲e꙲n꙲c꙲e꙲ a꙲s꙲ a꙲r꙲g꙲u꙲e꙲d꙲ b꙲y꙲ r꙲h꙲i꙲z꙲o꙲m꙲a꙲t꙲i꙲c꙲ i꙲d꙲e꙲a꙲l꙲s꙲, 𝙩⃥𝙝⃥𝙚⃥ 𝙣⃥𝙚⃥𝙚⃥𝙙⃥ 𝙛⃥𝙤⃥𝙧⃥ 𝙨⃥𝙥⃥𝙚⃥𝙘⃥𝙞⃥𝙖⃥𝙡⃥𝙣⃥𝙚⃥𝙨⃥𝙨⃥ 𝙩⃥𝙤⃥ 𝙛⃥𝙞⃥𝙩⃥ 𝙩⃥𝙝⃥𝙚⃥ 𝙧⃥𝙤⃥𝙤⃥𝙢⃥, ᚴᛜᏌᏒ ᛜƂJᛊᛈᛠᛨ𝓯ᛨᛈᚣᛠᛨᛜᚺ ᚣᚺD ᚣᚳᛨᛊᚺᚣᛠᛨᛜᚺ ᛨᛢ 𝓯ᛨᚺᛊ, ᚴᛜᏌ ᛗᚣᛕᛊ ᛠꖾᛊ ᛗᛜᛢᛠ Ꮜᛠᛨᚳᛨᛠᚴ ᚣᚺD ᛠꖾᏌᛢ ᛠꖾᛊ ᛠᏒᛊᚣᛠᛗᛊᚺᛠ ƂᏌᛨᚳDᛢ ᛠꖾᛊ ᛢᚴᛢᛠᛊᛗ Ꮤᛊ Ꮤᛨᚳᚳ Ꮜᛢᛊ ᛠᛜ ᛢᏌᛈᛈᛊᛊD ᚣᛢ ᚣ ᎶᏒᛜᏌᚹ ᏌᚺDᛊᏒ "Ꮜᚺᛨᛠᚴ", 𝖞ℴ𝖚 𝖘ℯ𝖊𝓂 𝓈𝖆𝒹 𝒽𝖊𝓇𝖊 𝖑ℯ𝖙 𝖚𝓈 𝓇𝖊𝓅𝖊𝒶𝖙 𝖙𝒽𝖊 𝖙𝒽𝖎𝓃𝖌𝓈 𝓉𝖍𝒶𝖙 𝖍𝒶𝖛ℯ "𝖕𝓇𝖔𝓋𝖊𝓃" 𝖙ℴ "𝖜ℴ𝖗𝓀", 𝓌𝖊 𝖘𝒽𝖆𝓁𝖑 𝖓ℴ𝖙 𝖍𝒶𝖛ℯ 𝓇𝖊𝓂𝖆𝓉𝖈𝒽𝖊𝓈, 𝖙𝒽𝖊 𝖘𝓉𝖗ℴ𝖓ℊ 𝒸𝖆𝓃'𝓉 𝒷𝖊 𝖕𝓇𝖔𝓋𝖊𝓃 𝓉𝖔 𝖇ℯ 𝓌𝖊𝒶𝖐 𝖎𝓃 𝒶 "𝖗ℯ𝖒𝒶𝖙𝒸𝖍", 𝖙𝒽𝖊𝓇𝖊 𝖜𝒾𝖑𝓁 𝒷𝖊 𝖒𝓊𝖑𝓉𝖎𝓅𝖑ℯ 𝓈𝖕𝓁𝖚𝓉𝖙ℯ𝖗𝓈 𝒻𝖔𝓇 𝓇𝖊𝓂𝖆𝓉𝖈𝒽𝖊𝓈, 𝘤⃒̅𝘰⃒̅𝘳⃒̅𝘱⃒̅𝘴⃒̅𝘦⃒̅ 𝘤⃒̅𝘰⃒̅𝘮⃒̅𝘦⃒̅,⃒̅ 𝘨⃒̅𝘳⃒̅𝘰⃒̅𝘶⃒̅𝘱⃒̅,⃒̅ 𝘨⃒̅𝘳⃒̅𝘰⃒̅𝘶⃒̅𝘱⃒̅𝘸⃒̅𝘢⃒̅𝘯⃒̅𝘥⃒̅𝘦⃒̅𝘳⃒̅,⃒̅ 𝘴⃒̅𝘦⃒̅𝘭⃒̅𝘧⃒̅-⃒̅𝘣⃒̅𝘢⃒̅𝘵⃒̅𝘵⃒̅𝘭⃒̅𝘦⃒̅,⃒̅ 𝘮⃒̅𝘢⃒̅𝘯⃒̅-⃒̅𝘫⃒̅𝘪⃒̅𝘨⃒̅𝘨⃒̅𝘭⃒̅𝘦⃒̅. O҉k҉a҉y҉?҉ t҉h҉i҉s҉ i҉s҉ w҉h҉a҉t҉ i҉s҉ d҉e҉e҉m҉e҉d҉ o҉k҉a҉y҉?҉ I҉n҉ "҉l҉a҉n҉d҉"҉

File:AntiIdea.png Rambles Against Life

Section 1: Against Existence

When we are "getting a life" it is an ideal, what is thought of as a "life" is reality

Section 2: Another Suicide

Since life is but an idea, a conservative idea of what we do, we must leave lives and embrace suicide when it comes to reality, not to blind ourselves, but to have fun. To walk what we have, and than fall when we do

Thought Garble

• Cyberdelic Egoism (File:CelebEcon.png) - I love your thought, just embrace the dullity of our absurd existence, biofuturism is but spudges on a canvas nothing else, and that can put a smile on your face can't it? Embrace the dull struggle is a hard thing to embrace but it is fine
• Brazilian Liberalism () - Good to see that you seem nicer debatable tho now sure you have eugenics is not a tolerable view, you should embrace morphological freedom and biological anarchy that is just a suggestion, capitalism is a commoditizing and exploitative system but other than that, your fine
• Distributist Reactionarism () - Y̷̩̦̩̩̱͐̓ó̸̡̱̰͎͕̪͐ū̴̢̡͎̥͕͕̪̰̬̄̍̚̕̕ ̶̧̨̛͉͚̼̻̯̞͈̈́̉̌̇̓͗͆̕͝s̵̨̬͕̩̮̹̠̪̠͈̲̤͉̣͒̓h̶̺̙͈̐͗͋̔͂͘a̷̬̙̣̠͉̾͒̈́̔l̴̨̠̝̪̦̥͉̙̮̘̪̣̑ͅḻ̷̨̨̫̫͙͇̤̫̰̺̃͊̉̀̈́͂̾̒̈̎̓̄̕ ̶̧̯̳͔̗̐̋̽̇̎͊͆͒̇̕͝b̴̧̯̘͙̼͈̣̮̼̈́͊̐̊̓̄̍̾̓͠ͅe̴̡̠̖̮̹̣͑̊̅̐̈́̍̂̾̌͆͘ͅ ̴̨̣̙͕̰̦̯̺̜̜̏͌̓̐̎̏̔̅̋̊í̶̛̛̦̣̜͕̳̯͕͚̲̺͚̪̤̔̐̓̎̈̋͘̚̕n̷̲̬̞͚̦̉̄̌̉͛̇̍̇͂̉́̽̔̕t̵̨̨̛̻̰͍̮̙̠̘̱̮̠͉ͅi̵̧̗̪̲͚͉̠͎͍̗͗̈̎͛̒̑́͌̈̒̅͋̋́͊͜m̵̨̢͚̹͚̜͖̔̔̏̌̔̕̕͝ỉ̶̩̞̼͖̯̹̳̖̪̝̱̳͉̉̊ḑ̸̧͔͓̘͇̼͒̓͋̉̋̋̓̄͑͐̑̇̋͂ä̴̧̠̘́̑̒̽̅̎͋̒̚̚͝ṫ̶̢̢̹͎͉͓̳̫̬̻̤͚͉̜͌̆̔́̋̆̒̔̾̀̔͘͝ͅe̴̡͙͖̰̍̌͜d̴̝͓̿̌͒̎͝ ̶̝͚̙̝̺̣̹͍̿̏̋̒̈́̐b̷̧̧̥͙̩̭̖̙͔̟͇̀͐͗͒̀͒̎̐̚͝ͅŷ̷̢̻̦͈̹͈̜̝̦̓ ̷̛̺̳̋͑̀͆̕t̸̪͕̉̋̓͗̽̌̔h̵̛͕̝͇̹͖͊̒͌͋̄̀͋̔͋̋̕̕̕ǐ̸̢̤̙̖̖͍̥̬̼̼̲̳͙̉̈́̈́̊̎̂̐̚s̸̢̛̩̭͖̘͇͙͓̹̳͎̳̫̗̼͂͒̌̊͝͝ ̶̗̫̘͎̼̼̼̫̋̒̽͒̏̽͐̾͗́̋͐̚͝p̶̺̖͕͉͈̄̍̏͌͘͠ḯ̶̲̺̱̯̯̠͚͉̰͙͔̳͓̈́̔̒̈̐͗̑͋̏̈̄ë̶͚̖́̈́͂͐̄̀̂̈́̾c̴̛̟̳̹̺̖̜͕̤̳̑̌ͅͅe̴̘͓̮̗̳̱̫̣̥͇͔̠͙̍̓̿̄̂͌̀̍͐́͝ ̸̞̦̝̣̉̈́̾̔̑̾̓͂͛̒̚͝͝ơ̸̢̨̯̳̟̞̜̱̝͕̲̞̮̍͊͒̃̍̌͑͌͘̕f̸̼͇̽̄̓͗̽͒̾̇̀̽̇̑͘͝ ̵̖̟̟̊͗͝w̵̡̩̦͖̬̖̩̦̟̬̰̤̺̆̔̑̑̎̇͑͒̇͐͘ǐ̷̝̈̕r̷͍̟̯͙̠̪͎̉̕ȩ̶͎̞̞̘̹̫̲̺̻̖͉̍̊̊̀̄̍̽̃̚ͅ Economics hit hard, other than that your just ideologically intolerable or mid
• Hoodism () - I have to blabber on the toleranezation of your thought, while the thought may negate concept of "500 year road to communism", due to communizer influences. It is tolerable and autotolerated to have another "le epin ultroid"
• Neo-Anthony Bax Thought () - Your ultranationalism is great, border control is cringish, but thanks to you, I have come back to a bit of nationalism, and lighted an interest in the conservative revolution and folk socialism, thank you thought
•  MugiKotobuki8814ism () - Listen thought, just because the thought changes the wires formatting and page makeup, the long af tabber shit was an attempt to make it long af, blud have you seen your main influences?! Too needlessly long bro. But it could be thought that the short make the long in some sense, like how the inefficencies of armchair theorists create efficencies for the Biscuit. I'll properly explain my "shopper" things on the changes, the name changes is just my vibes when I get tired probably of a certain title, the change of formatting is this arborescent will to create a new page formatting, I copied Nesanel because I thought it would be a good an easier way of explaining my thought instead of the paragraphs which fell into "uncultured" wackiness to others, now, I changed because I was tired, of it, so I copied Modular's sections, fuck even copied Calculust's infobox, the thousands of icons I added onto was a "pseudo-trollish" attempt of making it really long never thought I'd be seen as a shopper, to an extent it was, I went out searching for things that fitted my ideal vision, and got it, my arm stretched out, and shoplifted that shit legally. I copied Jefbol because his way of essays(?) writing hit hard, and well, while my are small and tiny compared to them, they're my attempt, maybe I am rhizoming it probably not, sure they're disorganized. Onto your thought, intolerable, you were forced into this existence so why should I be proud of something I was on during that birth, state-mandated courtship is laughable, gonna put this is again since, well, you are a racial Darwinist. Maybe the "white" "race" is just "naturally" incompetent to the point they lead to there own "genocide" and "replacement" and thus nature has had enough with the great "white" "man" and with time comes a new "successor" that would now be the "black" "man" in a sense, nature has choosen them to be the heir of the superiority, in a weird sense nature is some malevolent force that lets millions of races die in the name of adaptation and selection
• Nurulisme () - Fellow post-Marxist, not at all sold on gnosticism, monolectical materialism from what I have read so far hits hard, great job, you influenced me on production-centered ontology, give the thought (yourself) a pat on the back. The thought never autotolerated unironically viewing capital as a Lovecraftian god, esoteric Marxism is goofy, great ideology bro thumbs up
• Neo-Majapahitism () - Mid, women policy really great
• Amism () - A respectable Ismist, but god? Why do you always have to go back to reactionarism?
• Dokevism () - Futurism is auto-non-toleraable, embrace the dull, economics, why? Why stay onto capitalism? Also liberalism is disagreeable atleast to me
  • - Well, Capitalism defends Private Property and makes people work with a Purpose, But i prefer a Capitalism more Welfarist
    • - Capitalism commodizes people into mere profit objectives, also, why send money to one individual and not the state? It would benefit the state making it more efficent and give it more free time to spend on initiatives
      • - in my case, i dont see people as mere Profit Objectives, i see them as Humans, Living Beings that deserve love and welfare, also, what if the State uses the Money on useless things or even use the money for own interests?
• Artelordism () - Sure your moderate, but your good, altho I feel democracy should be extended to every one no matter what, space travel is but frontierism with a "human" mask, I am glad you like economic AI planning
•  BERNHEism () - Wow, you really are neo-eugenics strongest warrior. Impressive. Despite us being economically different, you being capitalist and me, a communist, I will always sympathize with your views, good automation policy, I agree with you on the useless, pharma policy looks even tho I have not fully read it, power policy good, travel is really good now embrace state-owned brothels legal is based, information is cringe, I do not at all agree on the need to privatize, but, shockingly, I understand it, maybe it's my past capitalism that makes me sympathetic, the old days when I was still allowed on the site but goddammit you are great, a restrained dictatorship is an alright run in my book, drug policy good, capital punishment, Tabula Rasa looks good. Diplomacy is where I hate, racial views hit hard, technology hits hard, besides the eugenics, post-BERNHEism is very good, russophobia is retarded, your life story is the saddest thing I read R.I.P. asexual rizzard L
• Pantheonism () - Stop simping for imperialists, you can beat it eh, embrace post-Marxism ig guilds, are mid and sorta elitist, embrace industrial unions or a post-industrial form of that as I purpose.
• Post-Jefbolism () - Ah, another one of my infleunces armchair Marxism-Leninism-racism is what infleunced me cheers me to know ye have abandoned metamodernism, be happy ye made me like the ultra-left, although I am pretty certain Kaskin probably did that before you but eh. Ye seem based, spontaneity seems to offer something, Ultra-left post-Marxism sounds goofy, but that's probably a ghost of my past on the ultra-left Very well read, there, I pleased your ego, now go fuck the cranial body. Honestly I was saddened when you became an autonomist, but who cares. I'll read about Camatte later. Fs in the chat for the party, and Ws for spontaneity
• Proletariat Builderism () - Finally you used a capital letter at the end of the title! Cardinal ethics hit hard, everyelse is hit or miss
• Hysteria thought () - Link all the theory you've read, I can't find it! You truly are a post-post-post-post-modernist but for reals, you give of the vibes your a 30-year-old intellectual congrats you've got my admire your hyper-Deleuzianism is admirable, cannot wait for more of your thought
• Agricoetism () - Sorry for the wait L + ratio + no 5 balls now, what do I think, ultimately, mid, I think you should embrace independent industrial unionism and become based nazbol incomprehensible? Fine. LARP? PFFFTTTT, such a dismissal of a word, mate I just want to write my beliefs in a pseud way, and sometimes silly
• Necro-Anarchism () - Communitarian Thassaria aside, you are less shit than I thought, your not really economically right, as market anarchism is a leftist ideology inherently, glad you returned to democracy the majority are strong and must subjugate the minority aka the weak also would you say you are an alternate modernist, cultural views to conservative but good. Your slave morality, is so blatant, Jonas Ceika owned your theorists' asses. Ironic because your a sadomasochist, and in the video, Berserk shows the masochistic of morals, and well, your violence, well, if you attack someone who does not want in the name of your morals, because they well... broke it, that is not very voluntary. Another thing is you... honestly failed at self-improvement, you tried for a couple days and... than turned all wankery, also, if there is an essence for things being happy like, I'm happy when my sooong is on me like, but what if I don't like the song anymore? Is the essence.... just... not static, animism is something idk or care maybe
  • - Their immorality is their volunteering to be attacked
    • - blud your just admitting your not at all a voluntarist
• Meowxism () - I'll say this again, beauty is a temporary thing it's struggling and fighting (fighting), just to keep itself alive (keep itself alive), I must keep biggering, I'm figgering on biggering, Though biggering is triggering more biggering, I won't stop biggering, I'm figgering on biggering, And biggering is triggering more biggering. With the customers all buying, And the money multiplying, And the PR people lying, And the lawyers all denying, Who cares if some things are dying? I don't wanna hear your crying! This is all so gratifying!!!! dullness is like capitalist realism, it consumes ofc capitalism is an economic system thus it is escapable, one-party statism is awful and restrictive on freedom the Stalin gyat was to much for bro
• Rigby Thought () - Blud.... you used to be based makes sense you are a KK alt homoconservatism to homophobia? PFFTTTT

Quotes From me

"While browsing Polcompball Anarchy Wiki saw a comment by user Orwellisthebest; "you seem to hate everything and you realize that almost everything is a weak moralist social construct to keep us in chains.Why don't you embrace it,join the 'spectacle' and if you try,you'll be able to control the others. I see our situation as Camus advocated-I accept the apsurdity of the world and I try to make the point of its existance and our purpose in it,while you commit a 'philosophical' suicide-you don't embrace it and wish to make sense of it by trying to destroy it in a sort of a post-nihilist way.Add me" this has left an impact on how I view the absurd, not only is it now a metaphysical embrace, but an everything embrace."

"Racism only breeds a culture of shit comedy and tap water"