×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 2,438 articles on Polcompball Wiki. Type your article name above or click on one of the titles below and start writing!



Polcompball Wiki
Polcompball Wiki
2,438Articles
  Recent changes
in:
Pages using Tabber parser tag, Self-Insert, Ideologies

National-Communitarian Theory

Revision as of 12:09, 9 April 2024 by Nebeler (talk | contribs)
Self Insert
"People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism

This page is meant to represent Nebeler's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission.

Work in Progress
"I'll be done any day now!" - Still-Being-Drawnism

This page is not done yet and may still contain inaccurate information or miss important details.


National-Communitarian Theory is an economically far-left, culturally variable, and syncretic ideology which posits the well-being of the national community as being paramount (the nation being defined as a people united by common culture). It is thus Nationalist, but opposes Ultranationalism on count of it being detrimental to common good, instead favouring Internationalism.

Beliefs

On Democracy

Democracy is merely a system of smoke and mirrors which serves the interests of the bourgeois class. It is not the most capable or intelligent who are elected, rather those who are most able to mislead the crowd. Even in a 'real' democracy, the majority often makes choices which are not in their best interest. The truth is that most people are simply not educated enough to make important decisions.

On Capitalism

Since the growth of capital is driven by the profit motive, it is bound to prioritise the continued accumulation of wealth over all else. It will continue to expand to the detriment of all which stands in its way — the rights of the individual, the good of the community, the health of natural ecosystems, cultures and nations — anything which cannot be commodified or exploited to further its advance.

On Nation and Culture

The nation is by definition people united by a common identity, which is formed out of a shared culture, language, heritage, tradition, et al. Individuals within a nation are therefore also united by common interests, and it is natural that they seek to organise themselves on that basis.
A-culture¹ acts as a medium of unconscious communication which informs one's reasoning and interpretation of phenomena. It forms a basis for symbolic understanding, providing a unique set of values and relations which is subtle but permeates all interaction.
Commonality is essential for mutual trust. Two individuals which are brought up with different cultures will have different values. One cannot truly grasp how the other thinks, nor how he operates. They cannot understand each other on that fundamental frequency for which shared culture is required.

On Law and Violence

Anarchists are correct in their understanding of the state as a monopoly on use of force, which it uses to make its rules into law and affirm its own legitimacy. Or, as Max Stirner put it: “The state calls its own violence law, but that of the individual, crime”. The mistake they make, however, is to assume that violence is unnecessary and wrong — therefore the state is an evil that should be dismantled. Quite the opposite! It is precisely because law and hierarchy is essential for the existence of civil, harmonious society that violence is necessary (and morally neutral).²

On Eugenics

Eugenics is, by definition, a set of practices (which become policy when enacted by the state) with the aim of improving the quality of a population's genetic profile. Contrary to how it is often taught, eugenics does not mean castrating minorities and poor people. At base, it would be enacted by selectively limiting the reproductive rights of individuals who have a risk of transmitting problematic conditions and disorders to their offspring.
In fact, most countries do eugenics to a limited degree! Incest is illegal not because of moral stigma, but because consanguine relationships have a significantly greater chance of yielding disordered offspring — who, as a consequence of their parents' immorality, are forced to live a life of unnecessary suffering. In fact, the demonstrably disastrous consequences of inbreeding is likely the reason why the taboo against incest (especially between parent and child, and between full-blooded siblings) is universal among cultures — it is natural law.
Prohibiting incest is, in fact, eugenics. The mistake a very niche minority make is believing that eugenics is inherently immoral, and — since laws against incest fall into the realm of eugenics — the prohibition of incest is also wrong. Instead:²

  1. since incest is bad, prohibiting it is right.
  2. since prohibiting incest is right and prohibiting incest falls within the realm of eugenics, there are things in the realm of eugenics which are right.
  3. since there are things in the realm of eugenics which are right, eugenics is not wrong.

On Expression

  • People are rarely evil; rather, they may have a perspective which is difficult to understand.
  • People are rarely dishonest about their convictions; rather, they are inconsistent in their beliefs. “When someone tells you who they are, believe them.”

Notes

1 : 'A-culture' refers to organic and anthropogenic cultures which are carried through vectors of experience, practice, belief, environment and genealogy. It is used to differentiate human ethnic/national/religious cultures with the wider notion of 'culture' (which also includes culture of establishments and mass media).
2 : 'Contraversion' is what I have chosen to dub this approach in logical reasoning, which involves undoing bad assumptions to reverse a mistaken conclusion. I have taken the liberty of giving it this name since I haven't seen any evidence that there already exists a term for it. As an example,

  • P ^ R → ¬Q

would be the contraversion of:

  • Q ^ R → ¬P

Quotes

“The cult of the Leader, the cult of personality, not a divine but a human personality, is an even worse social narcotic that we shall define as the cocaine of the proletariat.”

Amadeo Bordiga, The Guignol in History


“... the principal role of conservatism in modern politics is to be humiliated. That is what a perpetual loyal opposition, or court jester, is for.”

Nick Land, The Dark Enlightenment


“The supreme function of statesmanship is to provide against preventable evils. In seeking to do so, it encounters obstacles which are deeply rooted in human nature. One is that by the very order of things such evils are not demonstrable until they have occurred: at each stage in their onset there is room for doubt and for dispute whether they be real or imaginary. By the same token, they attract little attention in comparison with current troubles, which are both indisputable and pressing: whence the besetting temptation of all politics to concern itself with the immediate present at the expense of the future.”

Enoch Powell, 'Rivers of Blood' speech


“A society in which critical thinking is a crime against the state has lost its ability to create and is slated to survive only by spending the intellectual and technological capital created by previous generations.”

Lennart Meri


Relationships

Much like

  • Socialism - Mann der Arbeit, aufgewacht!
  • Titoism - Maybe it was not wise to try and integrate all of the Yugoslav nations together considering that the enmity between them and their desire for independence was strong enough to cause such atrocious conflict. But you did will to resist against Stalin.
  • Left-Wing Nationalism - Finally, a socialist who recognises the importance of the nation!
  • Internationalism - International solidarity between the peoples of the whole world!
  • Cultural Nationalism - More than anything else, it is culture which unites a nation!
  • Paetelism - Uh, based? please don't hate the French, even if Versailles was unfair...
  • Cybercommunism - Based... CYBERSYN was pretty cool.
  • Eco-Socialism - Preserving natural beauty is our collective responsibility.

Like

  • Marxism - Very correct analyses. You were a bit harsh on that Lassalle guy.
  • Market Socialism - Let's face it, centrally planned economies don't work.
  • Left Communism - I am not as keen on orthodoxy as you are and I know we disagree on the national question, but you are authentically Marxist at least, unlike Stalinists and the New Left.
  • Kemalism - You were great. I wish you would come back to fix Turkey.
  • Nationalism - A very mixed bag. Of course nations should exist, but it shouldn't mean bloodshed and hatred.
  • Ethnopluralism - Preserving the demographic composition of all nations is good, but you are sometimes a bit aggressive.

Mixed feelings

  • Authoritarianism - Authority is necessary for efficient direction, but people also want freedom and privacy.
  • Anti-Authoritarianism - Your concerns are understandable, but you shouldn't fear power.
  • Democracy - Letting the uneducated majority make the important decisions? Not a fan.
  • Democratic Socialism - Socialism will not come through the ballot box, Kautsky.
  • Liberal Socialism - Liberal. Rest in peace Mikhail Gorbachev, you did what you could
  • State Socialism - I concede that the state is necessary, but you look a bit too much like that other guy!
  • Leninism - I understand the need for revolutionary violence, but the Red Terror was absolutely barbaric!
  • Trotskyism - Glad you recognise how bad Stalin was. I'm not convinced that you would've done significantly better.
  • National Conservatism - Glad you favour the nation, but you have to realise that capital doesn't.
  • Paternalistic Conservatism - At least you're willing to care for your people.
  • Civic Nationalism - Nationality is more than just a certificate. You can't assimilate everything and everyone like the Borg.
  • Identitarianism - I don't like your chauvinist tendencies. Also, Europe is not a single nation, stop trying to make it one.
  • Ethnic Nationalism - Of course, ethnicity and culture overlap a lot... but you, too, need to learn to love a little.
  • Ethnic Welfare - Well, you might become necessary... but I'm uncomfortable with the idea of having to discriminate...
  • Indigenism - I support the rights of native peoples, but you are often a massive hypocrite.
  • Occult Post-Humanism - Valuable ideas in the current epoch, though your misanthropic tendencies makes me uncomfortable.
  • Landian Accelerationism - Another banger Mr Land.

Dislike

  • Capitalism - Exploitative and inhuman. *notices ur markets* owo what's this??
  • Conservatism - You are a pussy and you stand for absolutely nothing.
  • Libertarianism - You are right about the need for liberty, but you are too individualist. You must realise that those who 'just want to be left alone' can very easily be overwhelmed and destroyed by any organised multiplicity who is determined to take.
  • Hoppeanism - Well, you are right to be critical of democracy. Read Bordiga.
  • Anarchism - Naïve and idealist. Why do you support independence movements while condemning nationalism? Hypocrite.
  • Anarcho-Communism - Not much better.
  • Posadism - Hard to hate a lunatic, but nuclear armageddon? Really?
  • Dissident Right - Rightoid chauvinist. I guess you did force me to broaden my horizons...
  • Pan-Nationalism - Let people have their independence, pal.

Much dislike

Like

  •  Baxism - I am personally sceptical of revolutionary violence, but you seem alright.
  • Shellshocked Communism - I can sympathise with you, and though your formulations carry that poetic vagueness which is characteristic of post-structuralists, they still convey an idea — which I interpret as a dream of a biomechanical world, of horizontality and freedom from alienation. Though maybe I am wrong.
    • - You are very right.
    • (Re-evaluation) Serene, organic. Though our convictions are different, I'm fond of your ideas.
  •  Romantic Egoism - Don't know what else to say. Despite disliking individualism, I like your style and consistency.
  • Psychedelic Liberationism - You seem alright. Read Bordiga, Stalinist (/hj)
    • - Stalinist?!
  • Sundog - I haven't studied some of these concepts you talk about, but your ideas seem quite interesting and you seem like well-read individual. Influenced by Italian left-communism, therefore great and authentic.
  • Ziółkowskiizm - Maybe a bit too aggressively in your anti-Western sentiment, but based in pretty much every other respect. I don't think interventionism is very good for international and diplomatic stability, but that's something I'm willing to overlook.
  • Lankajori Thought - Not a fan of libertarianism, but i'll support Irish nationalism any day of the week. Up the 'RA!

Mixed feelings

  • Alstūdism - I'm really not a fan of fascism, but at least you're more of an ethnopluralist and universal nationalist rather than just a chauvinist — though I'd still object to your revanchism, on the count of it being unworkable (especially for Norway) and likely to backfire. Overall one of the more tolerable fascists I've come across, and at least you're a socialist like Mussolini.
  •  Neocarlism - Weird, but I guess I've seen worse.
  • Distributist Reactionaryism - Distributism is okay, but I wish you were economically socialist instead of just being a corporatist (fascist). And what is culture without the nation?
  • BetterCallSneedism - I don't like fascism and I don't like pan-nationalism... though I certainly would support a revival of Celtic culture.

Neutral

  • Venatrixism - Cool reading list, I recommend CCRU and N1x.
    • Venatrixism - I have read n1x, not a big fan.also better analysis of me plz 😔
      • - Well, I'm not sure how you'd consider yourself a communist while also being post-left and a stirnerite, but I guess you're okay.
        • Venatrixism - not really that hard to be a communist and a stirnerite and post-leftist? Don’t know what you’re pulling at here. Literally one of the first generally accepted ones to be a post-leftist, Tiqqun was communist.
          • - ok
  • Brazilian Liberalism - Liberal, but would probably heal the country a bit.
  • Rocksism - I'm critical of anarchism, but your ideas seem coherent and well-thought-out.
  • Schumacherianism (////) - Disagree with individualism and anarcho-capitalism, but your ideas are fairly well-developed and unique enough that I can respect it.
  • Patrick Thought - Not a fan of monarchism, but you're not too bad.

Dislike

  • Dankeism - Too liberal, too progressive. My advice is that you should read a few books by authors with a variety of different opinions, so as to explore many perspectives. Seek to understand them.
    • - I shouldn't read anything, because reading doesn't influence, I may read millions of books by [enter political author], but I will never change with that, in reality, no one influences anyone, everyone has their different opinions, even if they read all the books of Marx, Lenin or whoever nothing will change. I am on a journey of self-discovery discovering my political thoughts hidden in my mind, I influence myself, everyone does. And I repeat, if I read other authors, nothing will change
  • Imperial Socialism - Have you even actually read Lenin? Also, "pay rool [sic] taxes so that the government can pay for Social Security and insurance"? You sound more like a social democrat than a communist. Please read theory, a bit of Marx at least.
  • Nuriskianism - The Fourth Political Theory is cringe, I'm not adding that to my reading list. How exactly are you influenced by both multiculturalism AND ethnopluralism??? At least you don't seem to be an anti-Western chauvinist like Dugin. Overall, very strange.
  • Volker41ism - I'm really not a fan of fascism and nazism, sorry. Also, please stop denying Axis war crimes, for Christ's sake. It's very easy to just dismiss anything that you don't like as being part of a conspiracy theory, but this isn't a fairy tale where morality is black and white.

Much dislike

  • Theoanarchism - "I fear no man. But that thing... it scares me." - The Heavy
  • N.Brioism - Contrarianism is retarded. You're neither funny nor cool, grow up.
  • N.Cortexism - ...You're actually the same person, aren't you? Coal regardless.

Much like

  • Josip Broz Tito - The only one who could hold Yugoslavia together... wish you were still here.
  • Lee Kuan Yew - Single-handedly made Singapore into the developed country it is today!
  • Bernie Sanders - You are a reformist, a liberal and a progressive, but somehow I still appreciate your authenticity and dedication.
  • Mikhail Gorbachev - The one who refused to employ the cruel methods of his predecessors. If only it hadn't been for the hard-liners...

Like

Mixed feelings

  • Richard Nixon - People judge you too harshly... but not when it comes to Cambodia.
  • Vladimir Lenin - I try to sympathise, but when I think about the Cheka...
  • Leon Trotsky - And you, you executed so many people!
  • Muammar Gaddafi - You were great, but you lost your touch...
  • n1x - You write well, though with you it's hard to tell where sincerity ends and irony begins. You also have a good sense of humour, but I can't really say I support your misandry, even when it's part of an esoteric belief system.
  • Ted Kaczynski - Your analysis about the technological society is very relevant, though your methods are far from ideal.

Dislike

  • Angela Merkel - Ruined Germany! Easily the second-worst chancellor the country has ever had.
  • Tony Blair - Made Britain a worse place. Why did you support the invasion of Iraq?
  • Sadiq Khan - If you want to spread lies about British history, then why on Earth are you the mayor of London?
  • Emmanuel Macron - Immature neoliberal LARPer who never should've been elected.
  • Donald Trump - Incompetent moron.
  • Joe Biden - Brain-dead moron.
  • Justin Trudeau - Cool Hitler costume. Where'd you get it, the Hitler store?
  • Boris Yeltsin - Incompetent drunkard.
  • Vladimir Putin - Chauvinist warmonger!
  • Erdoğan - Warmongering chauvinist bastard. How dare you promote ethnic nepotism in Europe? If you want Turks to further their own interests, then they will have to do it in Turkey, and nowhere else!
  • Malcolm X - Your racialism was really distasteful, but at least you improved in the later years.

Much dislike

Much like

Like

Singapore

Neutral

United States

South Africa

  • Democratic Alliance - Well, you're probably better than the ANC — and certainly better than the EFF.

Mixed feelings

United States

  • Victorian Socialists - You're supposed to be Trotskyists, but liberal IdPol pervades your program. Read Bordiga.

Australia

France

Dislike

United States

United Kingdom

  • Sinn Féin - More immigration won't make Ireland more Irish, you f#$%ing idiots.

Australia

France

Germany

  • SPD - Auf, auf zum Kampf, zum Kampf!
  • AfD - Supports NATO and Israel. Still the lesser evil, but only if you can actually reduce immigration.

South Africa

Much dislike

United States

United Kingdom

Australia

France

  • Renaissance - Robespierre, please send the revolutionary insurrection to kill this guy.

Germany

  • Die Grünen - Anti-German regressive idiots who spread anti-Nuclear propaganda and lies.

South Africa

International

  • NATO - Nazi Aggressor Terrorist Organisation, more like!
  • WEF - I HATE THE DICTATORSHIP OF THE CLERKS I HATE THE DICTATORSHIP OF THE CLERKS I HATE

How to draw

Flag of National-Communitarian Theory
Color Name HEX RGB
Red #bd0000 189, 0, 0
Blue #003a84 0, 58, 132
White #ffffff 255, 255, 255
  1. Draw a ball.
  2. Fill it with red.
  3. Fill the bottom one-fifth portion with blue.
  4. Add a white circle of wheat grains, centred relative to the red section.
  5. Add a white hammer, placed vertically in the centre of the circle of wheat grains.

Theory

Have read

Reading

On my bookshelf

To read


Retrieved from "https://pcbwiki.net/index.php?title=National-Communitarian_Theory&oldid=495527"

Recent changes

  • Moxogenism
    Moxogeni • 41 minutes ago
  • Moxogenism
    Moxogeni • 52 minutes ago
  • Revolutionary Frisianism
    TIIKKETMASTER • 55 minutes ago
  • Calmism
    Communism9867 • 1 hour ago