| Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
====[[File:Schizocom.png]] Spontaneity==== | ====[[File:Schizocom.png]] Spontaneity==== | ||
1. Communism is not an [[File:Utsoc.png]] ideal or a utopia to be chased after, not a [[File: | 1. Communism is not an [[File:Utsoc.png]] ideal or a utopia to be chased after, not a [[File:Statesoc.png]] system to be established, [[File:ML.png]] some abstract goal for an ideal society to be modeled after through the iron fists of state apparatuses. It does not merely exist in [[File:Post-an.png]] autonomous zones, in [[File:Egocom.png]] individual lifestyles, in [[File:Statesoc.png]] government initiatives. Rather, [[File:Commie.png]] is the movement to abolish [[File:Cap.png]] the current state of things, it is [[File:Inscom.png]] an active process. It actively seeks to abolish [[File:Classism.png]] class, [[File:Cap.png]] wage labor, [[File:AV-Market.png]] the commodity, [[File:Statist.png]] states, [[File:Sexism icon.png]] gender, [[File:Nation.png]] nationhood, etc. The [[File:Erga.png]] proletariat is a [[File:Meta-Anarchism.png]] war machine against [[File:MetaCap.png]] Capital, it is the class which is capable of abolishing these current capitalist relations, of killing real life [[File:MetaCap.png]] gods and [[File:Plutocrat.png]] demons. | ||
2. (WIP) | 2. (WIP) | ||
Revision as of 01:19, 10 December 2023
 |
Self Insert "People can really believe anything these days!" - Ismism This page is meant to represent Jefbol's political views. Please do not make any major edits without their permission. |
Post-Jefbolism is an "ideology".
Essentially, this is my attempt to combine 
post-structuralist and 
schizoanalytic study of 
signs and 
psychology with 
a dehegelized Marxism. The core of my beliefs is my opinion that as 
communism is the movement to abolish the current state of things, the movement to 
destratify desire and 
power from 
class and from 
state apparatuses, communism can only be achieved through 
active struggle, this being influenced by the 
Situationists and their 
"revolution of everyday life". In accordance with this, I am in support of the 
generalized self-management of the everyday through the fludity of the council, which through this transcends the 
proletarian condition. I am influenced primarily in my writings by 
Baruch Spinoza, 
Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels 
, 
Friedrich Nietzsche, 
Antonie Pannekoek, 
Wilhelm Reich, 
Jacques Lacan, Paul Mattick, 
Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari 
, 
Guy Debord, and 
Antonio Negri.
Icons for if you want to add me: (/
//
)
Beliefs
Spontaneity
1. Communism is not an 
ideal or a utopia to be chased after, not a 
system to be established, 
some abstract goal for an ideal society to be modeled after through the iron fists of state apparatuses. It does not merely exist in 
autonomous zones, in 
individual lifestyles, in government initiatives. Rather, is the movement to abolish 
the current state of things, it is an active process. It actively seeks to abolish class, wage labor, 
the commodity, states, 
gender, 
nationhood, etc. The 
proletariat is a war machine against 
Capital, it is the class which is capable of abolishing these current capitalist relations, of killing real life gods and 
demons.
2. (WIP)
Capital as God
The Social Factory
Symbolic Exchange
The Integration of the Proletarian
The Death of the Program
Living Communism
The Self-Management of Everyday Life
The Strategy of Refusal
Relations
Add an alias to this page if you want to get added
Messtarded Tier
Messardism (
) - 🫡
Gemerald
Glorified Communism (
) - Very cool guy with very cool beliefs, perhaps the closest to me in terms of philosophical and political matches.
Kimno Thought (
) - Fellow left communist and Nietzschean, though I would criticize your support for the party-form(?).- Venatrixism () - My student! Very much like the above, but very much so still a baby communist. Also you are very systematic and I think a bit too workerist, something which inadvertently goes against your supposed Marxism.
Gem
Dust
Nurulisme (
) - I really do not know how to feel about this. On one hand, I agree heavily with your Marxism (even if limited), post-structuralism, emphasis on the council-form, your view of Capital not as just abstract money accumulation but a living god, etc. However, I notice a few very bad flaws of yours. First and most obvious is your nationalism, specifically your view of the nation (“civilization” as you call it) as the manifestation of the will/of existence, something which you borrow from Dugin. I also dislike your emphasis on the party-form and the vanguard quite expectedly. But the thing I want to focus on is your rejection of higher phase communism. You state that “One could organize an economy based on a system of need and gifts but we live in a far more complicated world with many such inter-connected nodes in very far-reaching places that necessitate some form of mass scale coordination and which requires mediums for execution (money, social book-keeping, divisions of labour, or more broadly, an input-output system). This is where i got disillusioned by communism and turned to it's moderate form of socialism where the living organism of civilization whilst still living is not contained by an autocratic command structure.” And yet this is something Marx and the GIK both noticed, how can we calculate demand/need (need in the context of communism, just like how you pointed out with the market, does not necessarily depend on a differentiation between “need” and “want”) without some level of book-keeping or without an input-output system? Communism does not see the social book-keeping system, mass coordination, or the input-output feedbacks as a basis for economics destroyed, rather it is its universalization, because without it communism and “each according to his ability to reach according to his needs” would just be a utopian fantasy. With your rejection of higher-phase communism, I see your overall views descending into just another petit bourgeois critique of capitalism. Overall, I don’t know how to feel about this.
Neo-StockMarketCrash Thought (
) - Fellow Deleuzian and Nietzschean, but god damn am I disappointed looking through this. Firstly, I dislike your mutualism, because although you proclaim yourself to be against capitalism, what you don't see is that markets and their existence necessitate capital accumulation, the survival of the commodity-form, of wages, etc. And your nationalism sticks out like a sore thumb, contradicting everything else you believe (yes, even Proudhonianism and Sorelianism).
Coal
Proletariat builderism (
) - I despise the Christianity, the Platonism, and Natural Law nonsense, otherwise quite hard to follow along due to the contradictory and confusing influences.
Alstūdism (
) - Very cool as a person, but this blind petit bourgeois romanticism that you and the rest of the fascists hold dear is indeed vile, with it encouraging the self-desiring of his or hers' own repression by the abstract ideal of the "nation" and by such an ideal's militaristic fury.
Meowxism (
) - Incredibly contradictory beliefs, and you've shown yourself to not understand anything about Deleuzian or post-structuralist theory, let alone your own movement's theory. Fine person, however.
BERNHEism (
) - What saves you from being in brimstone is how honestly you present your political and economic views, for you seek only efficiency and stability no matter what for capitalism, your politics stripped of any democratic illusions of rights and the people's power, something that I very much so can respect. You're also a very good friend of mine, so there's that.
Pantheonism (
) - Here it is, the petit bourgeois socialist who wishes to relieve society of the dangers of big capital so the small capital of the petit bourgeoisie can hang on for just a short while, a reactionary at heart who seeks to entrench the tyranny of the guilds of small producers like what was in medieval times, all for the sake of some vague anti-capitalism.
Brimstone
Brazilian Liberalism (
) - Pathetic and delusional priest of capitalism, nothing much to say.
Tedcruzfan Thought (
) - Libra, you're unfunny and retarded, and this is the greatest showcase of this.
Post-Post-Post-Post-Incomprehensible Tier
Voidvill Rajandeep (
) - I'm sorry but what the actual fuck is thi-
- - Blud doesn't even recognize one of his students 💀
- I don't know what you expect from a demented old man as myself.
- - What do you understand or comprehend at least of my thought?
- - The actual concepts on there I get, I just don’t get how they all fit together into one.
- - I thought I had finally made something sensible/understandable, but eh, thanks for giving me a writing style that works and frees the insides even if it is not really essays
Comments
Distributist Reactionarism - Add me
Baxism - Add me.- Voidvill Rajandeep - Add me oh great ultra-leftist
- Venatrixism - add me plz
Vistulism - Hello Jefbol, add me please if you wouldn't mind.- Brazilian Liberalism - Add
- Kimno Thought - Add me armchair man. I'll update you when I actually make my page
- Tedcruzfan Thought - Add me
- Proletariat builderism please add me
- Meowxism - add? i upd'd my ideology a bit lol
Agricoetism - Add me :3- BERNHEism - Add me, Mr. Best Nemesis
Meadowsin's Basilisk - Add me? :)
Caatinguism 
- holy shit its Jeff Bezos, add me
